AMENDMENT_0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide an amendment to the draw ings/specifications. (See Attached Documents)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Jul-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40085-15-R-0310

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Jun-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Jul-2015

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

MARINE CORPS IPT

9324 VIRGINIA AVE

NORFOLK VA 23511

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40085-15-R-0310

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

(End of Summary of Changes)

AMENDMENT TO

APPENDIX C

FINAL REPORT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES

SOIL SAMPLING FOR PROPOSED WET POND

FOR

P-193 WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPLACEMENT

JULY 2015

THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

REPORT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES

Soil Sampling for Proposed Wet Pond P193 Water Treatment Plant

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina

Prepared for C. Allan Bamforth, Jr.

Engineer-Surveyor, Ltd.

2207 Hampton Boulevard

Attention: Ms. Anna Lee Bamforth, P.E., L.S., LEED AP

Prepared by

H. Nelson Adcock, Jr., P.E. and Karen I. Kruebbe, REM age 1

Southern Professional Center I 2712 Southern Boulevard, Suite 101 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452

(757) 463-3200 Fax (757) 463-3080 germail@geronline.com

June 11, 2015

June 11, 2015

C. Allan Bamforth, Jr.

Engineer-Surveyor, Ltd.

2207 Hampton Boulevard Norfolk, VA 23517

Attention: Ms. Anna Lee Bamforth, P.E., L.S., LEED AP

Subject: Environmental Sampling Consulting Services P193 Water Treatment Plant - Proposed Wet Pond Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina A/E Contract No. N40085-10-D-5304

GER 130-6715

GeoEnvironmental Resources, Inc. is pleased to present this Environmental Sampling report for the subject property. These services were performed in general accordance with proposal P15-130-6220, dated 19 May 2015 as authorized by Anna Lee Bamforth, of C. Allan Bamforth, Jr.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve as your consultant on this project and trust that you will contact us at your convenience with any questions you may have concerning this report or the project in general.

Sincerely, GeoEnvironmental Resources, Inc.

Karen I. Kruebbe, R.E.M.

Project Geologist

H. Nelson Adcock, Jr., P.E.

President

2712 Southern Boulevard, Suite 101, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 (757) 463-3200 Fax (757) 463-3080

Section 5 Photographs

Section 4 Sampling Plan

Section 3 Analytical Results

Section 2 Drawings

Section 1 Report

Executive Summary

The table below provides a summary of our Environmental Investigation for the site.

Site Description: The site is comprised of a 20,000 SF WTP and an ozone generation building at MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina. The project will include construction of a new 21,000 SF WTP, followed by demolition of the existing WTP. The new WTP also includes the construction of a new wet pond.

Site Location: P193 Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Replacement project is located at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point, North Carolina. The existing facility consists of an existing water treatment plant (building 4356) and an existing ozone generation building (building 4357).

Environmental Investigation Summary

Conclusions The purpose of the environmental investigation was to evaluate lead in the surface soils expected to be disturbed during the construction of the new WTP wet pond. Based on the results of the sampling and analysis, although there are concentrations of lead present in the surface soils the lead concentrations are below regulatory thresholds and do not classify the soils as hazardous materials.

Based on the findings of the investigation, we do not recommend any additional environmental investigation of the wet pond area at this time. It is recommended, however, that any soils being removed as part of construction be tested for lawful disposal before being removed from the site.

BACKGROUND

The proposed project will prepare a stand alone construction package to be used to solicit bids for replacement of the existing Water Treatment Plant (WTP) at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Cherry Point.

The key elements of this project include the following:

Replacement of the existing water treat-ment plant with a new membrane filtration water treatment plant, Conversion of the existing ozone genera-tion building to a vehicle storage garage, Demolition of the existing water treatment plant; and

Construction of a new wet pond.

Potential subsurface environmental issues associ-ated with the wet pond construction include:

1. New WTP Building Wet Pond: The proposed new wet pond limits appear to be within the limits of the existing skeet range. The soils in this area will need to be characterized for disposal.

SITE OVERVIEW

The proposed new wet pond site is located SE of the existing facility. The site is located in both wooded and cleared portions of the property (see Figure 1, Drawing 1).

SAMPLING PLAN

A sampling plan was prepared and submitted to the MCAS Cherry Point Environmental Affairs Department, Mr.

Stan C. Kegley, Environmental Chemist and Project Coordinator on 18 May 2015. We received approval of the sampling plan from Mr. Jeffrey K. Christopher, Supervisory Environmental Engineer Restoration and Recycling Division Environmental Affairs Department MCAS Cherry Point on 19 May 2015. The approved sampling plan included minor locational changes to the proposed sample locations is attached.

FIELD INVESTIGATION

The proposed wet pond excavation limits were located by C. Allan Bamforth, Jr. Engineer-Surveyor, Ltd. We collected surface soil samples at five locations within the proposed wet pond excavation limits on 28 May 2015.

The soil samples were collected from the upper 6-inches of soil at each location using a stainless stel hand auger.

Sample locations P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 were located in a forested portion of the property (see Drawing 2). Prior to collecting the soil samples, loose forest debris was removed from the sample locations as required. Prior to each sampling evolution the stainless steel hand auger was cleaned/deconned using an Alconox solution and rinsed with distilled water. Soil samples were collected from the upper 6-inches of soil using a stainless steel hand auger. The soil samples were visually inspected for evidence of skeet range fragments and debris and placed in clean laboratory provided containers.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

As a measure of quality assurance (QA), soil sample P4 was split into two separate samples. The QA sample was labeled P6.

P193 Water Treatment Plant - Wet Pond GER Project #120-6715 Page 1

Figure 1 - Site Location Map

2712 Southern Boulevard, Suite 101, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 (757) 463-3200 Fax (757) 463-3080

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

All soil samples were placed in clean, laboratory provided containers, sealed with Teflon lined lids, preserved on ice and forwarded to Test America for analysis using chain-of-custody controls. All soil samples were analyzed for:

„ Total Lead - Soil samples were analyzed for total lead using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 method 6010.

„ Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) - Soil samples were analyzed for TCLP lead using EPA SW-846 method 6010.

SOIL SAMPLE RESULTS

Tables 1 provides soil sample analysis results for samples P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6. Section 3 provides complete laboratory results.

mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram or parts per million; mg/L = milligrams per liter; ND = Not detected above laboratory reporting limit; J - result is less than reporting limit (RL), greater than method detection limit (MDL), concentration is approximate.

0.100.0100.0258.10.241.2Soil Sample P6 <0.0100.0100.0253.50.211.0Soil Sample P5 0.0310.0100.0258.60.221.1Soil Sample P4 2.30.0100.0256.60.241.2Soil Sample P3 2.80.0100.025760.231.2Soil Sample P2

0.011 J0.0100.0255.40.231.2Soil Sample P1

ResultMDLRLResultMDLRLSample Identification

TCLP Lead (mg/L)Total Lead (mg/Kg) Table 1. Soil Sample Results

DISCUSSION

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for lead concentrations in bare soil in play areas for children is 400 mg/Kg. The surface soil samples collected within the wet pond excavation limits were determined to range from 3.5 mg/Kg to 76 mg/Kg. These total lead concentrations are well below the EPA’s threshold of 400 mg/Kg and should not present a personnel exposure or disposal issue.

The United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 40 CFR §261.24 identifies the Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic for lead as 5 mg/L. The surface soil samples collected within the wet pond excavation limits were determined to have TCLP results ranging from <0.010 mg/L to 2.8 mg/L. These TCLP lead concentrations are below the EPA’s threshold of 5 mg/L and do not classify the soils as hazardous waste.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of the environmental investigation was to evaluate lead concentrations in the surface soils within the limits of the proposed WTP wet pond excavation. Based on the results of the sampling and analysis of soil samples the total lead concentrations and the TCLP concentrations do not exceed a regulatory threshold.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings of the investigation, we do not recommend any additional environmental investigation of the wet pond excavation limits at this time. It is recommended, however, that any soils being removed as part of construction be tested for lawful disposal before being removed from the site. Coordinate all soil removal activities with MCAS Environmental Affairs Department.

P193 Water Treatment Plant - Wet Pond GER Project #120-6715 Page 2

GER

SECTION 2

Drawings

SECTION 3

Analytical Results

ANALYTICAL REPORT

TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.

TestAmerica Pensacola 3355 McLemore Drive Pensacola, FL 32514 Tel: (850)474-1001

TestAmerica Job ID: 400-106288-1 Client Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

For:

GeoEnvironmental Resources Inc GER 2712 Southern Blvd Suite 101 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452

Attn: Mr. H. Nelson Adcock, Jr.

Authorized for release by:

6/9/2015 3:11:46 PM

Mark Swafford, Project Manager I (850)474-1001 mark.swafford@testamericainc.com

The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page.

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm http://www.testamericainc.com mailto:mark.swafford@testamericainc.com

Table of Contents

Client: GeoEnvironmental Resources Inc GER Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

TestAmerica Job ID: 400-106288-1

Cover Page

Table of Contents

Definitions

Detection Summary

Sample Summary

Client Sample Results

QC Sample Results

QC Association

Chronicle

Certification Summary

Method Summary

Chain of Custody

Receipt Checklists

Definitions/Glossary TestAmerica Job ID: 400-106288-1Client: GeoEnvironmental Resources Inc GER

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Qualifiers

Metals

Qualifier Description

J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

Qualifier

General Chemistry

Qualifier Description

F3 Duplicate RPD exceeds the control limit

Qualifier

Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CFL Contains Free Liquid

CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Pensacola

Detection Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Client Sample ID: P1 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-1

☼Lead

RL

1.2 mg/Kg

MDL

0.23

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA15.4 6010C

Lead 0.025 mg/L0.010 TCLP10.011 J 6010C

Client Sample ID: P2 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-2

☼Lead

RL

1.2 mg/Kg

MDL

0.23

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA176 6010C

Lead 0.025 mg/L0.010 TCLP12.8 6010C

Client Sample ID: P3 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-3

☼Lead

RL

1.2 mg/Kg

MDL

0.24

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA16.6 6010C

Lead 0.025 mg/L0.010 TCLP12.3 6010C

Client Sample ID: P4 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-4

☼Lead

RL

1.1 mg/Kg

MDL

0.22

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA18.6 6010C

Lead 0.025 mg/L0.010 TCLP10.031 6010C

Client Sample ID: P5 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-5

☼Lead

RL

1.0 mg/Kg

MDL

0.21

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA13.5 6010C

Client Sample ID: P6 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-6

☼Lead

RL

1.2 mg/Kg

MDL

0.24

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA18.1 6010C

Lead 0.025 mg/L0.010 TCLP10.10 6010C

TestAmerica Pensacola

This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.

Sample Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

400-106288-1 P1 Solid 05/28/15 09:08 05/29/15 09:08

400-106288-2 P2 Solid 05/28/15 09:31 05/29/15 09:08

400-106288-3 P3 Solid 05/28/15 09:48 05/29/15 09:08

400-106288-4 P4 Solid 05/28/15 10:02 05/29/15 09:08

400-106288-5 P5 Solid 05/28/15 10:16 05/29/15 09:08

400-106288-6 P6 Solid 05/28/15 10:02 05/29/15 09:08

TestAmerica Pensacola

Client Sample Results

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-1Client Sample ID: P1 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:08

Percent Solids: 85.9Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 5.4 1.2 0.23 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:04 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead 0.011 J 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 14:39 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 14 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-2Client Sample ID: P2 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:31

Percent Solids: 81.9Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 76 1.2 0.23 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:08 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead 2.8 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:06 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 18 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-3Client Sample ID: P3 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:48

Percent Solids: 75.4Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 6.6 1.2 0.24 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:11 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead 2.3 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:10 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 25 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-4Client Sample ID: P4 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:02

Percent Solids: 89.6Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 8.6 1.1 0.22 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:15 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead 0.031 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:13 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 10 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-5Client Sample ID: P5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:16

Percent Solids: 92.7Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 3.5 1.0 0.21 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:18 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead <0.010 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:17 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 7.3 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-6Client Sample ID: P6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:02

Percent Solids: 80.2Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

RL MDL

Lead 8.1 1.2 0.24 mg/Kg ☼ 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 19:21 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP) - TCLP

RL MDL

Lead 0.10 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:20 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

General Chemistry

RL MDL

Percent Moisture 20 0.10 0.10 % 06/02/15 08:34 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

TestAmerica Pensacola

QC Sample Results

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Method: 6010C - Metals (ICP)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 400-259292/1-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 259796 Prep Batch: 259292

RL MDL

Lead <0.20 1.0 0.20 mg/Kg 06/01/15 13:14 06/03/15 17:39 1

MB MB

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-259292/2-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 259796 Prep Batch: 259292

Lead 99.1 104 mg/Kg 105 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 400-106286-F-19-E MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 259796 Prep Batch: 259292

Lead 7.3 93.9 105 mg/Kg 104 75 - 125

Analyte

MS MS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 400-106286-F-19-F MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 259796 Prep Batch: 259292

Lead 7.3 97.5 109 mg/Kg 105 75 - 125 4 20

Analyte

MSD MSD

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-260153/11-A Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 260385 Prep Batch: 260153

Lead 5.00 5.13 mg/L 103 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 400-259895/1-C Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP Analysis Batch: 260385 Prep Batch: 260153

RL MDL

Lead <0.010 0.025 0.010 mg/L 06/06/15 10:40 06/08/15 15:24 1

LB LB

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier

Client Sample ID: P1Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-1 MS Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP Analysis Batch: 260385 Prep Batch: 260153

Lead 0.011 J 5.00 5.11 mg/L 102 75 - 125

Analyte

MS MS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: P1Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-1 MSD Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP Analysis Batch: 260385 Prep Batch: 260153

Lead 0.011 J 5.00 5.01 mg/L 100 75 - 125 2 20

Analyte

MSD MSD

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Pensacola

QC Sample Results

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Method: Moisture - Percent Moisture

Client Sample ID: DuplicateLab Sample ID: 400-106297-A-1 DU Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 259428

Percent Moisture 42 33 F3 % 22 10

Analyte

DU DU

DUnitResult Qualifier

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Pensacola

QC Association Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Metals

Prep Batch: 259292

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 3050B400-106286-F-19-E MS Matrix Spike Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106286-F-19-F MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-1 P1 Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-2 P2 Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-3 P3 Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-4 P4 Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-5 P5 Total/NA

Solid 3050B400-106288-6 P6 Total/NA

Solid 3050BLCS 400-259292/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 3050BMB 400-259292/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Analysis Batch: 259796

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 6010C 259292400-106286-F-19-E MS Matrix Spike Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106286-F-19-F MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-1 P1 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-2 P2 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-3 P3 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-4 P4 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-5 P5 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292400-106288-6 P6 Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292LCS 400-259292/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 6010C 259292MB 400-259292/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Leach Batch: 259895

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 1311400-106288-1 P1 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-1 MS P1 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-1 MSD P1 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-2 P2 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-3 P3 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-4 P4 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-5 P5 TCLP

Solid 1311400-106288-6 P6 TCLP

Solid 1311LB 400-259895/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Prep Batch: 260153

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-1 P1 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-1 MS P1 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-1 MSD P1 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-2 P2 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-3 P3 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-4 P4 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-5 P5 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895400-106288-6 P6 TCLP

Solid 3010A 259895LB 400-259895/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Solid 3010ALCS 400-260153/11-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

TestAmerica Pensacola

QC Association Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Metals (Continued)

Analysis Batch: 260385

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-1 P1 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-1 MS P1 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-1 MSD P1 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-2 P2 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-3 P3 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-4 P4 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-5 P5 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153400-106288-6 P6 TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153LB 400-259895/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Solid 6010C 260153LCS 400-260153/11-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

General Chemistry

Analysis Batch: 259428

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid Moisture400-106288-1 P1 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106288-2 P2 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106288-3 P3 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106288-4 P4 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106288-5 P5 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106288-6 P6 Total/NA

Solid Moisture400-106297-A-1 DU Duplicate Total/NA

TestAmerica Pensacola

Lab Chronicle Client: GeoEnvironmental Resources Inc GER TestAmerica Job ID: 400-106288-1 Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Client Sample ID: P1 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-1 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:08

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 14:39 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:04 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: P2 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-2 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:31

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 15:06 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:08 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: P3 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-3 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 09:48

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 15:10 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:11 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: P4 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-4 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:02

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 15:13 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:15 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

TestAmerica Pensacola

Lab Chronicle

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Client Sample ID: P5 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-5 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:16

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 15:17 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:18 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

Client Sample ID: P6 Lab Sample ID: 400-106288-6 Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 05/28/15 10:02

Date Received: 05/29/15 09:08

Leach 1311 06/04/15 14:52 DAS259895 TAL PEN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3010A 260153 06/06/15 10:40 DN1 TAL PENTCLP

Analysis 6010C 1 260385 06/08/15 15:20 SLM TAL PENTCLP

Prep 3050B 259292 06/01/15 13:14 KWN TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis 6010C 1 259796 06/03/15 19:21 JMH TAL PENTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 259428 06/02/15 08:34 LEC TAL PENTotal/NA

Laboratory References:

TAL PEN = TestAmerica Pensacola, 3355 McLemore Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514, TEL (850)474-1001

TestAmerica Pensacola

Certification Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Laboratory: TestAmerica Pensacola Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each certification below.

Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date

North Carolina (WW/SW) 3144State Program 12-31-15

Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte

The following analytes are included in this report, but certification is not offered by the governing authority:

Moisture Solid Percent Moisture

TestAmerica Pensacola

Method Summary

Project/Site: MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol

SW8466010C Metals (ICP) TAL PEN

EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL PEN

Protocol References:

EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency

SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.

Laboratory References:

TAL PEN = TestAmerica Pensacola, 3355 McLemore Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514, TEL (850)474-1001

TestAmerica Pensacola

Login Sample Receipt Checklist

Client: GeoEnvironmental Resources Inc GER Job Number: 400-106288-1

Login Number: 106288

Question Answer Comment

Creator: Crawford, Lauren E

List Source: TestAmerica Pensacola

List Number: 1

N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey meter.

TrueThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.

N/ASample custody seals, if present, are intact.

TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or tampered with.

TrueSamples were received on ice.

TrueCooler Temperature is acceptable.

TrueCooler Temperature is recorded. 3.7°C IR-6

TrueCOC is present.

TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.

TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.

TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?

TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.

TrueSamples are received within Holding Time.

TrueSample containers have legible labels.

TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.

TrueSample collection date/times are provided.

TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.

TrueSample bottles are completely filled.

TrueSample Preservation Verified.

TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested MS/MSDs

N/AContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is <6mm (1/4").

TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.

TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.

N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.

TestAmerica Pensacola

SECTION 4

Sampling Plan hna Typewritten Text

REVISED AND APPROVED SAMPLE LOCATIONS, 19 MAY 2015

hna Typewritten Text hna Typewritten Text hna Typewritten Text hna Typewritten Text

May 18, 2015

Environmental Affairs Department Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC 28533-0013

Attention: Mr. Stan C. Kegley, Environmental Chemist; Project Coordinator

Subject: Environmental Services - Soil Sampling Plan P193 Water Treatment Plant Replacement Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, North Carolina

GER 130-6715

GeoEnvironmental Resources, Inc. has prepared a soil sampling plan for the Water Treatment Plant Replacement Wet Pond. The plan is described below.

SOIL SAMPLING PLAN

WATER TREATMENT PLAN REPLACEMENT

MCAS CHERRY POINT, NC

BACKGROUND

The Water Treatment Plant Replacement project includes the construction of a new wet pond. A portion of the wet pond is located within the adjacent skeet and trap range limits. The primary concerns with construction within the boundary of the skeet and trap range is the potential presence of munitions components (i.e. Lead). Under the Military Munitions Rule, expended range munitions are exempt from regulation as hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provided the munitions components remain on the range and are not collected, treated, or disposed.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

A total of five (5) soil samples will be collected from the wet pond area as shown on drawing #1 attached. The soil samples will be collected by an Environmental Professional (EP) familiar with environmental sampling protocols. The soil samples will be collected from the upper 6 inches of surface soil. The soil samples will be collected using clean stainless steel sampling tools as required. Sampling equipment will be decontaminated using Alconox and rinsed with distilled water, as required between sampling events.

All soil samples will be placed in clean, laboratory provided containers, sealed with Teflon lined lids, preserved on ice and forwarded to a laboratory for analysis using chain-of-custody controls. Each soil sample will be analyzed for the following:

„ Total Lead - Soil samples will be analyzed for total lead using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 method 6010.

„ Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) - Soil samples will be analyzed for TCLP lead using EPA SW-846 method 6010.

QUALITY ASSURANCE

One of the five (5) soil samples will be split into two samples for quality assurance purposes. The two samples will be analyzed for the same constituents as the samples described above. The samples will be identified so as not to indicate to the laboratory they are split samples.

REPORT

A written report will be prepared for the soil sampling event. The report will include a discussion of findings observed on site, soil sampling information, analytical results, a discussion of the analytical results and a sample location plan. We will also include any recommendations for additional work if required. The report will be prepared by an EP and reviewed by registered professional.

Philip T. Rogan, P.G. H. Nelson Adcock, Jr.

Environmental Project Manager President

Attachments) A. Drawing #1 - Soil Sample Location Plan

Copy to: Anna Lee Bamforth

SECTION 5

Project:

Number:

Water Treatment Plant Replacement MCAS Cherry Point, NC

Project #120-6715

Photo 1: East facing view of the wooded area where the new WTP wet pond will be located.

Photo Sheet 1

AMENDMENT TO

APPENDIX E

PERMIT APPROVALS

P-193 WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPLACEMENT AND RAW

WATER WELLS AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

JULY 2015

TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF

PLANS AND SPECS

P-193 WATER TREATMENT PLANT

DRAFT NPDES PERMIT

MODIFICATION NO. NC0003816

TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF

PLANS AND SPECS

FOR

P-193 RAW WATER WELLS AND

TRANSMISSION MAINS

APPROVED PLAN REVISION FOR

STORMWATER PERMIT

FOR

EROSION AND SEDIMENT

CONTROL PERMIT APPROVAL

(REVISED) FOR

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, NC WTP Replacement 483052CHERRYPT

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 1

SECTION 22 11 23.00 10X

SUBMERSIBLE PUMP

07/07

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA (ASA)

ASA S2.19 (1999; R 2004) Mechanical Vibration - Balance

Quality Requirements of Rigid Rotors, Part 1:

Determination of Permissible Residual Unbalance, Including Marine Applications

AMERICAN BEARING MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (ABMA)

ABMA 11 (1990; R 2008) Load Ratings and Fatigue Life for Roller Bearings

ABMA 9 (1990; ERTA 2012; S 2013) Load Ratings and

Fatigue Life for Ball Bearings

AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)

AWWA C200 (2012) Steel Water Pipe - 6 In. (150 mm) and

Larger

AWWA C203 (2008) Coal-Tar Protective Coatings and

Linings for Steel Water Pipelines - Enamel and Tape - Hot-Applied

AWWA C207 (2013) Standard for Steel Pipe Flanges for

Waterworks Service-Sizes 100 mm through 3600 mm 4 in. through 144 in.

AWWA C208 (2012) Standard for Dimensions for Fabricated

Steel Water Pipe Fittings

AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)

AWS D1.1/D1.1M (2012; Errata 2011) Structural Welding Code -

Steel

ASME INTERNATIONAL (ASME)

ASME B46.1 (2009) Surface Texture, Surface Roughness, Waviness and Lay

ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 2

ASTM A108 (2007) Standard Specification for Steel Bar, Carbon and Alloy, Cold-Finished

ASTM A167 (1999; R 2009) Standard Specification for

Stainless and Heat-Resisting Chromium-Nickel Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip

ASTM A176 (1999; R 2009) Standard Specification for

Stainless and Heat-Resisting Chromium Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip

ASTM A242/A242M (2013) Standard Specification for High-

Strength Low-Alloy Structural Steel

ASTM A27/A27M (2010) Standard Specification for Steel

Castings, Carbon, for General Application

ASTM A276 (2010) Standard Specification for Stainless

Steel Bars and Shapes

ASTM A297/A297M (2010) Standard Specification for Steel

Castings, Iron-Chromium and Iron-Chromium- Nickel, Heat Resistant, for General Application

ASTM A312/A312M (2013) Standard Specification for Seamless, Welded, and Heavily Cold Worked Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipes

ASTM A36/A36M (2012) Standard Specification for Carbon

Structural Steel

ASTM A48/A48M (2003; R 2012) Standard Specification for

Gray Iron Castings

ASTM A516/A516M (2010) Standard Specification for Pressure

Vessel Plates, Carbon Steel, for Moderate-and Lower-Temperature Service

ASTM A576 (1990b; R 2012) Standard Specification for

Steel Bars, Carbon, Hot-Wrought, Special Quality

ASTM A668/A668M (2013) Standard Specification for Steel

Forgings, Carbon and Alloy, for General Industrial Use

ASTM B148 (1997; R 2009) Standard Specification for

Aluminum-Bronze Sand Castings

ASTM B584 (2013) Standard Specification for Copper

Alloy Sand Castings for General Applications

ASTM D2000 (2012) Standard Classification System for

Rubber Products in Automotive Applications

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 3

ASTM F1476 (2007; R 2013) Standard Specification for Performance of Gasketed Mechanical Couplings for Use in Piping Applications

HYDRAULIC INSTITUTE (HI)

HI 1.3 (2013) Rotodynamic (Centrifugal) Pump

Applications

HI 9.1-9.5 (2000) Pumps - General Guidelines for Types, Applications, Definitions, Sound Measurements and Documentation

HI 11.6 (2012) Rotodynamic Submersible Pumps

HI 14.6 (2011) Rotodynamic Pumps for Hydraulic

Performance Acceptance Tests

ISA - INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AUTOMATION (ISA)

ISA RP2.1 (1978) Manometer Tables

NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA)

NEMA MG 1 (2011; Errata 2012) Motors and Generators

NEMA WC 70 (2009) Power Cable Rated 2000 V or Less for the Distribution of Electrical Energy--S95-

NEMA WC 72 (1999; R 2004) Standard for Continuity of

Coating Testing for Electrical Conductors

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)

UFC 3-310-04 (2013) Seismic Design for Buildings

1.2 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

1.2.1 General Project Requirements

Design, furnish, and install complete submersible pumping systems as shown.

1.2.2 Pumping Unit Description

In general, each submersible process pumping unit includes a pump/motor, base mounted, discharge elbow, lifting chain, guide rail cable, and controls. In general, each sump pump includes integral pump/motor/base assembly and controls (where indicated). Each pump shall be of the submersible nonclog or vortex impeller.

1.2.3 General Design Requirements

a. The pump shall meet head, capacity, speed, efficiency, pump sump design, range of operation, cavitation, and vibration requirements as specified.

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 4

b. The pump shall, as a minimum, meet the applicable design, materials, and manufacture requirements of applicable Hydraulic Institute Standards and these specifications.

c. The pumping unit design and performance shall have been demonstrated by previous successful operation of pumps of the required type and of equal design complexity by the manufacturer.

d. The pump shall have a continuously rising head characteristic with decreasing capacity over the required range of operation specified.

The pump shall not have an unstable operating characteristic over the required range of operation.

e. The pump shall meet all requirements for net positive suction head required (NPSHR).

f. Associated pumping equipment including, but not limited to, electrical controls and instrumentation, shall be suitable for outdoor operation.

1.2.4 Operating Conditions

a. The pump shall be designed for continuous operation under submerged or partially submerged conditions, and intermittent operation when totally dry without damage to pump or motor.

b. The pump manufacturer shall establish and state in the operating manual the procedures for starting and stopping the pumps, including setting of valves or any sequential operations.

1.2.5 Performance Requirements

a. The pump shall be capable of operating without instability over the required range of head.

1.2.6 Capacities

a. Refer to pump data sheet supplements at the end of this section.

1.3 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;

submittals not having a "G" designation are for Contractor Quality Control approval. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-02 Shop Drawings

Detail Drawings

SD-03 Product Data

Materials Equipment Motor Data Packaged Control Panel Spare Parts Installation Instruction Manual

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 5

Factory Tests Pump Field Tests

SD-06 Test Reports

Field Test Report

SD-10 Operation and Maintenance Data

Operating and Maintenance Instructions

Submit in accordance with Section 01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA and Section 01 78 24.00 20 FACILITY ELECTRONIC OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE SUPPORT INFORMATION (eOMSI).

1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE

1.4.1 Pump Supplier Qualifications

The pump manufacturer shall have overall responsibility to supply the complete pumping unit that meets the requirements of this specification.

Thus, during start-up, installation, and performance evaluation, the pump manufacturer is the sole responsible party.

1.4.2 Detail Drawings and Product Data

Furnish the following:

a. Outline drawings of the pump showing dimensions and weight of the pump/motor.

b. Drawings showing details and dimensions of pump mounting design and layout including any embedded items.

c. Cross-sectional drawings of the pump, showing each component, and major or complicated sections of the pump in detail. On each drawing indicate an itemized list of components showing type, grade, class of material used, and make and model of the standard component used.

Include detail and assembly drawings of entire pumping unit assembly.

d. Performance data curves showing head, capacity, horsepower demand, bhp, NPSHR, and pump efficiency over entire operating range of pump, from shutoff to maximum capacity. Indicate separately head, capacity, horsepower demand, overall efficiency, and minimum submergence required at guarantee point.

e. Motor characteristic curves or tabulated data (test or calculated) should indicate the speed, power factor, efficiency, current, and kilowatt input, all plotted or tabulated against percent load.

1.5 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

The pump will be inspected for damage or other distress when received at the project site. Store the pump and associated equipment indoors as recommended by the pump manufacturer, protected from construction or weather hazards at the project site. The pump and equipment shall have adequate short-term storage in a covered, dry, and ventilated location prior to

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 6 installation. The manufacturer's instructions shall be followed for extended storage. Proper equipment for handling the pump shall be supplied and shall be considered as special tools if not completely standard. Follow the manufacturers recommendations for handling of the pump.

1.6 EXTRA MATERIALS

1.6.1 Spare Parts

Submit spare parts data for each different item of material and equipment specified, after approval of the detail drawings. Include in the data a complete list of parts and supplies, with current unit prices and source of supply, and a list of the parts recommended by the manufacturer to be replaced after 1 and 5 year(s) of service.

1.6.2 Special Tools

A complete set of special tools which may be necessary for the adjustment, operation, maintenance, and disassembly of all equipment shall be furnished.

Special tools are considered to be those tools which because of their limited use are not normally available, but which are necessary for particular equipment. Tools shall be high-grade, smooth, forged, alloy, tool steel. Special tools shall be delivered at the same time as the equipment to which they pertain. Properly store and safeguard such special tools until completion of the work, at which time they shall be delivered to the Contracting Officer.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1 GENERAL

Provide pumps with duty conditions as outlined in the pump data sheet supplements at the end of this Section.

2.2 MATERIALS

Submit a list designating materials to be used for each pump part along with the submittal of the drawings. If deviation from specified materials is desired, submit complete specifications for the proposed deviating materials after award of the contract.

a. The pumps shall be designed and manufactured by a firm that is regularly engaged in the manufacture of the type of pump described in these specifications.

b. Identify the pumping unit by means of a separate nameplate permanently affixed in a conspicuous location. The plate shall bear the manufacturer's name, model designation, serial number, if applicable, and other pertinent information such as horsepower, speed, capacity, type, and direction of rotation. The plate shall be made of Type 316 stainless steel with 1/4-inch raised or depressed lettering and a contrasting background.

c. The pumping unit shall be equipped with suitably located instruction plates, including any warnings and cautions, describing any special and important procedures to be followed in starting, operating, and

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 7 servicing the equipment. Plates shall be made of corrosion-resistant metal with raised or depressed lettering and a contrasting background.

2.3 SUBMERSIBLE PROCESS PUMPS

This section part is applicable to the following submersible Pumps

a. Backwash Water Pump 1, 10BWW-PMP22001.

b. Backwash Water Pump 2, 10BWW-PMP22002.

c. Backwash Water Pump 3, 10BWW-PMP22003.

d. Clarifier Decant Pump 1, 70BWW-PMP24001.

e. Clarifier Decant Pump 2, 70BWW-PMP24002.

f. Clarifier Waste Pump 1, 70CW-PMP22001.

g. Clarifier Waste Pump 2, 70CW-PMP22002.

h. Clarifier Waste Pump 3, 70CW-PMP22003.

2.3.1 General

The major pump components shall be of materials as described in the pump data sheet supplements at the end of this Section. All the exposed nuts and bolts shall be stainless steel. All mating surfaces where watertight sealing is required, shall be machined and fitted with nitrile rubber O-rings. The fitting shall be such that the sealing is accomplished by metal-metal contact between machined surfaces which results in controlled compression of the O-rings. Sealing compounds, grease, or secondary devices are not acceptable.

2.3.2 Pump Lifting Handle and Lifting Lugs

The lifting handle shall be designed to bear the entire weight of the pumping unit at a conservative factor of safety. Lifting lugs shall be provided where the weight of the separate part requires a lug.

2.3.3 Pump and Motor Bearing Arrangement

The pump and motor bearings shall be the standard design of the manufacturer for the pump supplied under this specification. The type and number shall be of proven design as used in previous operating units supplied by the manufacturer. The bearings shall be of the grease lubricated and sealed type. The bearings shall have a minimum B-10 bearing life of 50,000 hr.

Each bearing shall be of the correct design to resist the radial and thrust loads applied. Enough bearings shall be provided to ensure the pump rotating elements are supported so that the possibility of excessive vibration is eliminated. Ball and roller bearings life and load ratings shall conform to ABMA 9 and ABMA 11.

2.3.4 Lubricant Housing

Section 22 11 23.00 10X Page 8

Provide an oil housing with oil, as recommended by the pump manufacturer, to lubricate the shaft sealing system and to dissipate the heat generated by the motor and bearings.

2.3.5 Impeller

The impeller design and manufacture shall be the manufacturer's standard.

The impeller surface shall be smooth, without holes and fabrication offsets.

The attachments to shaft shall be with keys or other fasteners which are to be made of stainless steel. The attachment should be of sturdy construction designed to not loosen, but be easily removed for maintenance. The impeller construction may be cast or fabricated.