Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This Amendment is issued to provide the requirements for Phase II Technical/Price Proposals under this solicitation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 28-Feb-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40085-14-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-Nov-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

28-Feb-2014

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

PWD MAINE - FEAD PORTSMOUTH

PORTSMOUTH NAVAL SHIPYARD

BLDG 59

PORTSMOUTH NH 03801-2032

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40085-14-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 10-Dec-2013 02:00 PM to 01-Apr-2014 02:00 PM.

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0001 PHASE II

This Amendment is to provide the proposal submission requirements for PHASE II of Solicitation N40085-14-R-0004, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Construction Contract for Public Works Department Maine.

Only the Offeror’s who were successful in Phase I of this solicitation will have an opportunity to continue to Phase II of the solicitation.

The Basis for Award with Evaluation Factors for Phase II and instructions for proposal submittal are inserted below.

PHASE II PROPOSALS ARE DUE BY 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, 1 APRIL 2014.

The Seed Project is NOSC Whole Center Repairs, Plainville, CT. The specifications and drawings for the Seed Project are included with this amendment. There will not be a site visit conducted for this project. The deadline for submission of Requests for Information (RFIs) is 2:00 P. M., 24 March 2014.

THE MAGNITUDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION IS BETWEEN $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

PROPOSAL DELIVERY INFORMATION: REFER TO SOLICITATION, INSTRUCTIONS TO

OFFERORS

BASIS FOR AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS PHASE II

BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all non-cost/price evaluation factors when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

B. ADJECTIVAL RATINGS/DESCRIPTIONS

1. The technical rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal.

a. A combined technical/risk evaluation considering risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings shall be used. The technical risk evaluation shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in the following table. Adjectival ratings and rating descriptions will be used to assign an overall rating to each technical proposal and to assign a rating for each technical factor and subfactor other than past performance. Use upper case letter ratings for major technical factors as well as the overall rating. Use lower case letter ratings for technical subfactors. The addition of plus (+) or minus (-) to an adjective rating is not allowed.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Rating Description

Outstanding (O)

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good (G)

Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable (A)

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal (M)

Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable (U)

Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies.

Proposal is unawardable.

2. Definitions: The following definitions are provided to assist evaluators in the evaluation of each non-cost/price factor.

a. Strength: An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

b. Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

c. Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

d. Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

EVALUATION FACTORS

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors and subfactors set forth below. This will be a 2 Phase Evaluation process in accordance with FAR

36.3. Factors 1-4 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 5 and Price will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the government will consider Factors 2-5 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is that technical factors are equal to each other and when combined are equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance). The combined non-cost/price factors are approximately equal to price.

Phase II Technical Factors:

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

Price

Factor 5 Technical Solution Offeror shall submit one(1), marked “Original”, and three (3) copies, each in a separate three-ring binder with following characteristics:

• 8 ½ x 11 format

• 12 point font

• Limited to 50 pages – page count excludes cover page and tabs. PAGES THAT

EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATION SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

• A cover page with Contract Number, Contract Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

Technical Solution Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project and contract that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

For the overall contract, describe the A/Es involvement in the construction phase and the Construction Contractor’s involvement in the design phase. Describe how the design/build team will function as a whole and what benefits the proposed team will bring to the success of this contract. Describe how quality control will be integrated into your proposed teaming approach during the DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION for the contract.

For the overall contract, describe the Offeror’s project management plan for delivering simultaneous projects within budget and time constraints, and outline management approach and staffing resources available to the offeror to support the design and construction of the contracts. Only for the purpose of project management plan narrative, the Offeror shall assume that at least two relevant design-build projects located at different sites within the PWD Maine Area of Responsibility are awarded to the Offeror at the same time and that the projects have the same project schedule.

For the seed project, provide a description of the technical solutions as they relate to the project requirements that demonstrate full understanding of the scope of the construction required for this project. The narrative shall include but not be limited to:

- A draft schedule of events including relevant milestones

- A description of the proposed construction sequence and phasing.

Note: If the draft schedule or sequencing/phasing do not comply with the solicitation requirements, they will be deemed unacceptable and will impact the rating for this factor and potentially affect the offeror’s overall rating.

The narrative shall not exceed six double-sided pages (or 12 single-sided pages). Up to three conceptual drawings may be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e. floor plan, exterior elevation, and site plan).

Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

PRICE

Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Price shall be submitted on the Price Schedule included in the solicitation. Offeror shall submit one marked “Original”, and one copy each in a separate package with the following characteristics:

• 8- ½ x 11 format

• 12 point font

• A cover page with Contract Number, Contract Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

• Completed SF 1442, including the Pricing Schedule (ATTACHMENT A)

• Proof of Central Contractor registry (CCR) and ORCA registration.

Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Solicitation Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

Attachments to Amendment 0001:

A – PRICING SCHEDULE

B – SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEED PROJECT

C – DRAWINGS FOR SEED PROJECT

D – DAVIS BACON WAGE DETERMINATION FOR SEED PROJECT

(End of Summary of Changes)