QA2_N4008422R0041_10142022.pdf

CUI//FEDCON [when filled in] Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 3.104 [when filled]

Pre‐Bid/Proposal Inquiry Form

Page Section Para.

1 10/11/2022 SF1442 13.

ADDITIO

NAL

SOLICITA

TION

REQUIRE

MENTS

B The bid guarantee is required for this solicitation. We believe that we need to offer the bid guarantee on the Phase 2 proposal, but not on Phase 1. Does it correct?

ビッドボンドが必要となっていますが、こ

れはフェーズ２で必要ということでよろし

いですか？

Yes. Bid guarantee is a part of Price Proposal which shall be submitted for Phase II of this solicitation. Please refer to page 13 of SF1442.

QA1

2 10/12/2022 RFP

page.

K.

PREPROP

OSAL

CONFERE

NCE

AND SITE

Are you going to conduct the pre‐proposal conference on the phone?

電話での入札前会議はありますか？

There will be no pre‐proposal conference for Phase I of the solicitation. Site visit / pre‐proposal conference is anticipated to be conducted during Phase II.

QA1

3 10/13/2022 RFP

page. 4

C.

DESCRIP

TION

OF SEED

PROJECT

When are we available to obtain the specifications and drawings for the seed project?

シードプロジェクトの仕様書等はいつ頃手

に入りますか？

The specification and drawings for the seed project will be made available when Phase II solicitation is issued.

QA1

4 10/14/2022 RFP

page. 4

B.

DESCRIP

TION

OF

ACQUISI

TION

This new MACC project is quite a bigger scale than usual. Are you also planning to issue a MINI MACC project near future? Or does this MACC project combine the current MINI MACC and BIG MACC as a next‐generation version?

今回のMACC案件は規模が大きいように思い

ますが、今後MINI

MACCも発行されますか？それともこのMAC

C案件が既存のMINI MACCやBIG

MACCの次世代版になるのでしょうか？

Plans for a new MINI‐MACC are not known at this time.

QA1

SOLICITATION N40084‐22‐R‐0041 INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) DESIGN_BUILD (DB)/DESIGN‐BID‐BUILD (DBB) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR

MCAS IWAKUNI OPERATIONAL AREA, JAPAN

REFERENCEQuestion No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received Posted on Amend No.

Pre‐Bid/Proposal Inquiry Form

Page Section Para.

REFERENCEQuestion No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received Posted on Amend No.

QA1

Factor 1 ‐ Technical Approach

(1) is to define that the lines of authority between the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract.

However, (2) is to provide signed copies of the agreements between the offeror and the entities included in offeror’s organizational chart.

As for this section, do we have to discribe all of our potential subcontractors' name in the Organization Chart other than AE firm?

If so, do we have to provide all of our potential subcontractors' TA (Teaming Agreement) other than AE firm?

We assume that Factor 1 will consist of a few pages; one for the Organization Chart and the others for TA of DOR and LOC of DOR. In this case, TA & LOC do not include the Organization Cahrt page count, we believe.

3. (a) (1) (a)

(1) & (2)

S1710/12/2022

The Organizational Chart shall include the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract.

If claiming the experience of an entity (e.g., subcontractor) under Factor 2, you must include the entity (e.g., subcontractor) name in the organizational chart. Signed copies of the agreements for these entities must be provided.

Submission for Factor 1 will consist of:

One (1) page for the Organizational Chart, which includes brief description of the role and responsibility of each entity identified in the organizational chart.

AND

Signed copies of Agreements (JV, Partnership, Teaming, Approved Mentor Protege) and Letter of Committment (LOC) for all entities listed in the organizational chart.

There are no page limits for the Agreements or LOCs.

Pre‐Bid/Proposal Inquiry Form

Page Section Para.

REFERENCEQuestion No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received Posted on Amend No.

6 10/14/2022 18 S

3. (a) (2) (a)

(2)

Factor 2 – Experience This section stated that the best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP.

As for design experience, within 5 years design completion is too short for the Offerors due to same AE firm project. Similar solicitations N40084‐21‐R‐0069 and N40084‐22‐R‐0077 MACC project were stated within 7 years.

Can the Government extend within 5 years to within 7 years same as these two?

No.

Please follow the recency requirement for design experience at page 20 of SF1442.

7 10/14/2022 18 S

3. (a) (2) (a)

(2)

Factor 2 – Experience Unless the Offerors can submit same AE firm experience, do we have to submit all of the potential to design AE firms’ TAs and LOCs?

Submit a signed copy of teaming agreement (TA), or letter of commitment (LOC) for AE firms whose projects are submitted to demonstrate Design Experience.

Please refer to the Instructions to Offerors on page 16, as well as page 21 of SF1442.