N4008024R2396 Amendment 0004.pdf

N4008024R2396

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please see SF30 Continuation Page

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jul-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008024R2396

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-May-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jul-2024

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1) Extend the proposal due date to Wednesday 31 July 2024, time remains unchanged.

2) Respond to pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs)

3) PPIs due date is NOT extended with the proposal due date extension.

Qs

. REFERENCE

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Posted on

Amend No.

Pa ge Section

Par a.

of

Factor 2.

Corporate Experience

(2) (i) a)

Puyenpa Construction LLC is a Native American (Tribally Owned) SBA 8(a) and HUBZone Certified company. I am writing to inquire about Notice ID N4008024R2396. Our team has extensive experience in new construction, demolition, repair, alteration, and renovation of HVAC equipment, systems, and infrastructure. We believe this opportunity aligns perfectly with our capabilities and expertise. However, I have a concern regarding one of the past performance requirements specified in the notice. It states that "at least one (1) project must have a final construction cost of at least $15,000,000 or greater." While we are close, this requirement would unfortunately disqualify us and other 8(a) small businesses like ours. I am reaching out to inquire if there has been any consideration given to lowering the dollar amount associated with this requirement. This adjustment would enable capable companies like ours to participate in this project.

Bid per RFP. 0004

2 General With the Roof Top Units coils getting changed out, please confirm if a water balance pre‐ read is required.

No, Bid per RFP. 0004

3 4 01 14 00 1.3.

Please clarify "noisey work" to be performed outside of normal hours. Would demolition be considered noisey?

Any work producing noise which will disturb the occupants of the building during normal hours.

Demolition may be considered noisy work depending on the activity and location (i.e.

mechanical room vs.

laboratory/classroom)

4 4 01 14 00 1.3.

Is GC responsible for moving furniture? Will laboratory furniture remain in place?

Bid Per RFP. Refer to architectural sheet notes: TEMPORARILY

RELOCATE OR PROTECT IN PLACE

FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT AS

REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND

NEW WORK ACTIVITIES.

Will furnture / ceiling mounted fixtures need to be unprotected daily?

No, Bid per RFP. 0004

6 4 01 14 00 1.3.

Daily clean mentions work being performed at night. Please confirm normal working hours.

Bid per RFP‐Please Refer to Spec section 01 14 00 sub section 1.3.2‐ 1.3.5

7 5 01 50 00 3.2.

Will GC have to pay for temporary utilities? No, Bid per RFP. 0004

8 2 21 13 13 1.2 Please confirm Sprinkler R & R is a part of this

RFP.

Bid per RFP ‐ Please refer to architectural sheet notes:

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TO

REMAIN SPRINKLERS. CUT AWAY

ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE

AROUND SPRINKLERS. PROVIDE

NEW TY3231 QUICK RESPONSE

RECESSED PENDENT SPRINKLERS

TO MATCH EXISTING SPRINKLERS

IN AREAS WHERE THE REMOVAL

OF SPRINKLERS IS NECESSARY TO

FACILITATE MECHANICAL

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT.

REMOVED PIPING MAY BE REUSED

IF IN GOOD WORKING

CONDITION. REMOVED

SPRINKLERS MUST NOT BE

REUSED. COORDINATE WORK

BETWEEN DISCIPLINES

9 21 13 13 Please provide drawings showing sprinkler work

Bid per RFP ‐ Please refer to architectural sheet notes:

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TO

REMAIN SPRINKLERS. CUT AWAY

ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE

AROUND SPRINKLERS. PROVIDE

NEW TY3231 QUICK RESPONSE

RECESSED PENDENT SPRINKLERS

TO MATCH EXISTING SPRINKLERS

IN AREAS WHERE THE REMOVAL

OF SPRINKLERS IS NECESSARY TO

FACILITATE MECHANICAL

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT.

REMOVED PIPING MAY BE REUSED

IF IN GOOD WORKING

CONDITION. REMOVED

SPRINKLERS MUST NOT BE

REUSED. COORDINATE WORK

BETWEEN DISCIPLINES

10 Fire Alarm Please confirm if FA is existing and if so, is it to remain & be protected?

Bid per RFP. Please refer to architectural sheet notes: FIRE

ALARM DETECTION AND

NOTIFICATION DEVICES TO

REMAIN. REINSTALL DEVICES

WITHIN THE SAME LOCATION

WHERE CEILING TILES ARE

REPLACED

11 Fire Alarm Please provide FA Vendor for the system. Invicta Global LLC. 0004

12 Security Please confirm if there are any security devices located in the ceiling.

Confirmed. Please refer to architectural sheet notes: CEILING

MOUNTED EQUIPMENT

INCLUDING, LIGHTING, SPEAKERS,

ETC. MUST REMAIN SUSPENDED

AND PROTECTED IN PLACE IN

AREAS OF WORK SHOWN ON THE

REFLECTED CEILING PLAN.

13 Security If so, are they to remain & be protected? 0004

14 General Is any protection to be removed on a daily basis?

No, Bid per RFP. 0004

15 General Will ceilings need to be reinstalled daily? No, Bid per RFP. 0004

16 11

Factor 2 Constructio n Experience

The RFP states, The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR 125.11. The Prime Offeror may submit experience where the prime offeror served as part of a joint venture or served as a first‐tier subcontractor under Factor 2, Construction Experience. Will the government consider accepting subcontractor experience of an exclusive team partner (including teaming agreement and authorization to utilize past experience and obtain reference)?

Bid per RFP. 0004

17 14

Factor 3 – Manageme nt Approach

The RFP requires the Factor 3 Management Approach narrative to be completed within five (5) pages however the information requested will be limited and restricted due to the page requirements. The narrative requires offerors to describe our approach to the management of multiple concurrent projects and the management of design build and design bid build projects. Addressing these detailed management systems require, at a minimum, the description of the processes and this will be difficult to include all facets of these systems within the page limitation. The five (5) page narrative also includes the Narrative Work Plan addressing all major elements of work, project risks and mitigations for the Demonstration Project.

This is major factor and component to this program response and limiting this section to only five (5) pages will greatly diminish the ability of offerors to respond thoroughly to this request within such a tight page count.

May the government consider expanding the Factor 3 Management Approach narrative page limit to ten (10) pages?

Bid per RFP. 0004

09 51 00

The drawings are calling for a replacement of the existing ACT. Please provide the specifications for the existing ceiling tiles? Armstrong Fine Fissure 1755 white 0004

19 09 51 00 Please clarify the ceiling height in various locations

Generally 9ft in classrooms and laboratories

20 13 4

1. We want to be clear the government will evaluate up to five total PPQ’s and project experience sheets, inclusive of all subcontractors and any Joint Venture? Or, is each entity within the proposed solution required to submit 3‐5 PPQ’s and Project experience sheets independently?

Bid per RFP. Past Performance Experience should be submitted for each Project under Factor 2, Experience. The intent is to have one Past Performance evaluation document for the contracted team for the corresponding project.

21 At ta ch m en t B

On past performance projects where the design / build contractor acted as both the engineer of record and the installing mechanical contractor, can these projects be submitted for both the construction past performance and design past performance sections? Thus one past performance project could qualify for QTY 1 contruction past performance project and QTY 1 design past performance project. Yes. 0004

N/ A N/A N/A

For the seed project, please clarify if the work can be executed during normal business hours.

Bid per RFP‐Please refer to Spec section 01 14 00 section 1.3.2‐

1.3.5 0004 of

Factor 2, Corporate Experience, Section A ‐ Constructio n Experience ‐ "Note:

The Governme nt will not consider any project submitted for Factor 2 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, Please confirm that the government will consider a project submitted for Factor 2 if it was performed by the offeror's subcontractor as long as a teaming agreement is also submitted which demonstrates the necessary level of meaningful involvment described in Factor 1.

Bid per RFP ‐ The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR

125.11. The Prime Offeror may

submit experience where the prime offeror served as part of a joint venture or served as a first‐ tier subcontractor under Factor 2, Construction Experience. 0004 teaming agreement, or letter of commitme nt demonstrat ing the necessary level of meaningful involvemen t described in Factor 1.

of

Factor 2, Corporate Experience, Section A ‐ Constructio n Experience ‐ "The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontrac tor to demonstrat e constructio n experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR 125.11.

The Prime Offeror may submit experience where the prime offeror served as part of a joint venture or served as a first‐tier subcontrac

If the answer to my question above (013) is yes, please confirm that the statement below in the solicitation will be removed ‐"The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR 125.11." Bid per RFP. 0004 tor under Factor 2, Constructio n Experience.

Ge ne ral

If existing systems are found deficient, will this be a change order for corrections since they are not called out on the drawings? How can we quantify the cost of such repair?

Bid per RFP.

Can we use subscontractors experience and PPQ in the technical requirement?

Bid per RFP ‐ The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR

125.11. The Prime Offeror may

submit experience where the prime offeror served as part of a joint venture or served as a first‐ tier subcontractor under Factor 2, Construction Experience. 0004

(End of Summary of Changes)