BAMS_Q&A.pdf
PDF 5 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Buoyancy Assist Modules
- Solicitation number
- N3225319R0023
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amend_6_Q&A.pdf | ||
| 997-28-001.pdf | ||
| Amend_4_Q&A.pdf | ||
| 612-11-001.pdf | ||
| N3225319R0023_Amend_1.pdf | ||
| Environmental_Guide_for_Ktr_on_Ship_Projects.pdf | ||
| BAMS_HRMC-HM&E-19-0008_Package.pdf | ||
| OSHContractor_MOA__final_6sept2017.doc | DOC document | |
| Reference_Information_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| N3225319R0023.pdf | ||
| BAMS_HRMC-HM&E-19-0008_Package.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1.) Regarding Work Item 123-16-001. Paragraph 1.3.3.9 calls out for a WT 12 x 58# T. This would normally be a half section of a WF 24 x 116# beam. Unfortunately, the beam that size is made as a WF
24 x 117# which would make the split T at WT 12 x 58.5#. Will that size T be acceptable?
Answer: WF 24 x 117# is acceptable.
2.) Regarding WI 623-11-001 paragraph 3.1. The specifications call for 122 new rungs for each
BAM. There are a total of 18 tanks for both BAMs and seven (7) rungs per tank or a total 126. Which is the correct number of rungs needed for this Work Item?
Answer: 126.
3.) Will there be an opportunity for a ship check?
Answer: There will not be a ship check for this solicitation.
4.) Please confirm that the specifications reflect a grand total of 3475 ultrasonic readings for the entire project.
Answer: Yes, there is a grand total of 3475 ultrasonic readings.
File details come from the government source that posted it.