17-R-3514_Attachment_P_-_Past_Performance.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SSV West Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N32205-17-R-3514
About this file
Attachment P - Past Performance
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE DATA SHEET
1. Complete Name of Reference (Government agency, commercial firm, or other organization)
2. Complete Address of Reference
3. Contract Number or other control number
4. Date of contract
5. Date work was begun
6. Date work was completed
7. Contract type, initial contract price, estimated cost and fee, or target cost and profit or fee
8. Final amount invoiced or amount invoiced to date
9a. Reference/Technical point of contact (name, title, address, telephone no. and email address)
9b. Reference/Contracting point of contact (name, title, address, telephone no. and email address)
10. Location of work (country, state or province, county, city)
11. Current status of contract (choose one):
[ ] Ongoing [ ] Complete [ ] Terminated for Convenience [ ] Terminated for Default [ ] Other (explain)
12. Provide a summary description of contract work. Describe the scope and complexity of work, its relevancy to the efforts to be performed under this solicitation and a description of any problems encountered and your corrective actions. Additional details, to include past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience and subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement can be attached to this form, but shall not exceed two (2) pages in length.
13a. Did this contract require a Small Business Subcontracting Plan pursuant to FAR 52.219-9? Yes __, No__.
13b. If “Yes” to 13a, have you regularly submitted your reports in the Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS) in a timely manner? Yes __, No__.
If no, why not?
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FROM: FACSIMILE:
TO: PHONE:
INFORMATION REQUEST
Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:
a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Schedule c.) Business Relations d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors) e.) Utilization of Small Business
In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, to Mr. Franklin Carley Orvin at franklin.orvin@navy.mil and Mr. Christopher Meconnahey at chris.meconnahey@navy.mil Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.
| Thank you, |
| Franklin Carley Orvin |
| Contracting Officer |
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.)Schedule: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.
d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.
e) Utilization of Small Business: Provides for maximum participation of small businesses in the award of subcontracts consistent with efficient contract performance.
3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .