QUESTIONS ANSWERS N00253-20-R-00050002.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ADC MK2
- Solicitation number
- N0025320R0005
About this file
This document provides questions and answers regarding solicitation N0025320R0005 for the ADC MK2 program. The solicitation requires supply and production of the ADC MK2 device for the United States Navy fleet through at least fiscal year 2026. Key details include a $100,000 other direct cost ceiling for the five-year period, clarification that table L-2 refers to production unit subclin options AC through AN totaling an estimated $36 million, and confirmation of the revised proposal due date of December 30, 2020. Engineering services will be further defined by technical instructions.
The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command for sustainment of minimum inventory levels for the ADC MK2 program. Questions cover cost data reporting requirements, wage determinations dependent on the offeror's location, and clarification of attachment references. Proposed changes to the statement of work were also addressed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS N00253-20-R-0005-0002
(03 DEC 2020)
Q1.
CLIN 0003 - ODC - Is the $100,000 dollar ceiling apply to all five years combined, or $100,000 per year?
A.1 Other direct costs (ODC) Ceiling is $100K for the full five years.
Q.2 On page 89 of RFP, Table L-2 states that the dollar ceiling (inclusive of fee) for SUBCLIN AB “MK2 Production Units” is $36m. Attachment 9 identifies SUBCLIN AB as ADC MK2 MOD7 First Article. Can the government please provide clarification?
On the page 22 of the MOD, Table L-2 still has the same reference.
A.2 Table L-2 should identify SLINs AC through AN for the production units. The $36M is an overall estimated total for all of those SLINs combined.
Q.3 Can you please provide Exhibits A & B for the CDRLs?
A.3 Exhibit A is the ELIN tables (first tab of the Cost Summary Table which has been uploaded Attachment 9); CDRLs are Exhibits B & C. All CDRLs have been uploaded as individual documents (A001, A002 etc.); all pertinent documents have already been uploaded to beta.Sam.gov
Q.4 Can you please provide Attachment 10 for the Wage Determination?
A.4 Wage Determinations are dependent upon the location of the successful Offeror and will be added upon award. Vendors can determine the wage determination for their location by visiting beta.sam.gov and “Searching Wage Determinations”. For the purposes of the search, the Government will be designating this as Service Contract Act (SCA).
Q.5 On the mod, page 22, tab 2 still says Section J attachment 10. Should this be Attachment 9 per Q and A response?
A.5 Yes, this is updated to Attachment 9.
Q.6 On Amendment 0001, the required response date/time has changed from 07-Dec-2020 01:00 PM to 21-Dec-2020 01:00 PM. This is in conflict with previously answered question 21 which identified the proposal date to Dec. 30, 2020. Due to a lengthy quoting cycle and corporate reviews of the proposal, a 45 day extension from the original response date is desired. If this is not possible, can the Government please confirm the questions and answers correctly stated the revised due date of Dec. 30, 2020, and can a modification please be issued to that effect.
A.6 Yes, block 9 is now updated to reflect the Dec 30th date.
Q.7 Can the Government please provide the DD-1423 forms for CDRL A024 and A016?
A.7 References were incorrect in SOW; updated SOW is now uploaded. CDRLs in question have already been uploaded as A003, which covers both requirements. DD 1423s will be updated appropriately at award.
Q.8 Please provide revised Attachment 9
A.8 Verbiage updated to allow the Offeror to come up with their own format to submit separately from Attachment 9.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .