1.17 OPPD 26-R-3101 CNAF N8.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N0024426R3101
About this file
This is an Offeror's Past Performance Data questionnaire form for solicitation N00244-26-R-3101, Aviation Fleet Transition Support, issued by NAVSUP FLC San Diego. The form requests completion and return by the solicitation closing date to Christine Jordan at NAVSUP FLC San Diego. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance on previous contracts to assess the probability of successful accomplishment of work required by the Government in relation to contract award.
The form collects information across four primary evaluation categories: Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements (including customer satisfaction, rework instances, and innovative work applications); Quality/Timeliness (performance schedule compliance and submission timeliness); Quality/Contractor Responsiveness (response to customer concerns, problem resolution, and cost control); and Additional Observations/Information (contractor strengths and weaknesses, overall satisfaction with the award decision, and identification of similar contracted efforts). Respondents are requested to provide detailed explanations for any deficiencies, cost variations, and corrective actions taken. The form includes fields for both the offeror's company information and the completing organization's contact details, with instructions that the questionnaire should not be returned to the contractor who originated the request. This is a template document that does not address specific products or services required under the solicitation itself.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00244-26-R-3101 Aviation Fleet Transition Support
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Christine Jordan, Code 240 Phone: (619) 556-6121 Email: christine.jordan@navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .