2.12_Amend_0001_Attachment_1_OPPD.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BERTHING AND MESSING BARGE OPERATIONAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0024419R0012
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for berthing and messing barge operational maintenance services. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by previous customers and returned by the solicitation closing date of May 7, 2019. It requests information about a contractor's performance on prior contracts in areas like quality, timeliness, and responsiveness. The related federal contract opportunity is a 100% 8(a) small disadvantaged set-aside issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Supply Systems Command. The cost plus fixed fee contract will provide organizational-level maintenance, repairs, service call repairs, and operational support for five years for the Commander, Pacific Fleet Berthing and Messing Barge Program in locations including San Diego, California; Bremerton, Washington; Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; Yokosuka, Japan; and Sasebo, Japan.
2.12_Amend_0001_Attachment_1_OPPD.docx
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12_N00244-19-R-0012-AMEND_0005.pdf | ||
| 2.12_N00244-19-R-0012-AMEND_0004.pdf | ||
| 2.12_N00244-19-R-0012-AMEND_0003.pdf | ||
| 2.12_N00244-19-R-0012-AMEND_0002.pdf | ||
| 2.12_N00244-19-R-0012-AMEND_0001.pdf | ||
| 2.12_Amend_0001_Attachment_2_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N00244-19-R-0012.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_OPPD.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_Cost_Proposal_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_3_DD_Form_254.pdf | ||
| N0024419R0012_SYNOPSIS.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00244-19-R-0012
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
| NAVSUP FLC San Diego | NAVSUP FLC San Diego | |
| Attn: Kimberly Rieder, Code 250 | Attn: Lucas Aiu, Code 212 | |
| Phone: (619) 556-5239 | Phone: (619) 556-6937 | |
| Email: kimberly.rieder@navy.mil | Email: lucas.k.aiu@navy.mil |
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .