Attachment 5_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_N0016719R0012.doc

N00167-19-R-0012 N00167-19-R-0012

Attachment 6 Recent and Relevant Past Performance Questionnaire

1. Past Performance Assessment. The Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD) is soliciting competitive offers from contractors for the purpose of awarding contract(s) on behalf of the Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division Detachment Norfolk, Combatant Craft Division’s (NSWCCDDN). NSWCCDDN is soliciting competitive offers for Watercraft Industrial Support covering all phases of watercraft total life cycle industrial support to include construction, proof of design, model development and realization, fabrication, modernization, quick response capability, repair, overhaul quality assurance and testing.

It is requested that you complete and submit this questionnaire via e-mail to the following individuals no later than the closing date and time specified in Block 9 of the solicitation:

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD)

Attn: Carolyn O. Johnson-Lawrence, Contracting Officer (Code 0223)

2600 Tarawa Court, Bldg. 1602, Room 109

Virginia Beach, VA 23459

Telephone: 757-492-4139

Email: Carolyn.johnson@navy.mil Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division (NSWCCD)

Attn: Cindi Newcomb, Contract Specialist (Code 0223)

2600 Tarawa Court, Bldg. 1602, Room 109

Virginia Beach, VA 23459

Telephone: 757-492-4143 Email: cynthia.newcomb@navy.mil

RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE ABOVE CONTRACTING POINT OF CONTACT.

*NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE ALL PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT BY THE PROPOSAL SUBMISSION CLOSING DATE AND TIME.

If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information. If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer or the Contract Specialist at the above e-mail addresses.

2. Contract Information. Please complete the following:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Dollar Amount at Award:

Dollar Amount at Completion (or Current Dollar Amount, if not Completed):

Contract Type: Fixed-Price; Labor Hour or Time and Material; Cost-Reimbursement (CPFF, CPAF, CPIF, etc.)

Describe the Products or Services:

3. Contract Relevancy. For comparison with the size and scope of Solicitation N00167-18-R-3001, please provide the following information pertaining to the contract identified in Section 2 above:

(a)

Size: $______ per year in contract services.

(b) Scope: Check all that apply:

______ Program Management Support

______ Planning Support

______ Business and Financial Management Support

______ Acquisition and Contract Management Support

______ Technical Management Support

______ Test and Evaluation Management Support

______ General Logistics Management Support

______ Production Management Support

______ Engineering Support

______ Other Support (please describe: _________________________)

4. Performance Assessment Values.

5 – Outstanding. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

4 – Excellent. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements, to the Government’s benefit. Contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

3 – Good. Performance meets contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

2 – Satisfactory. Performance barely meets some contractual requirements. Contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

1 – Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet some or most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

0 – Not Applicable. Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

5. Assessment Elements. Please select/circle the appropriate performance assessment value for each item on the questionnaire and provide supporting narrative.

a. Cost Control. Rate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost (including reporting and analyzing variances) and ability to deliver at the agreed-to cost/price. Provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes).

Comments:

b. Schedule. Rate the contractor’s ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

Comments:

c. Mission Requirements. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your mission requirements.

Comments:

d. Quality. Rate the contractor’s ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality. Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards.)

Comments:

e. Socioeconomic Goals. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Businesses (SB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB), Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB), HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI).

Comments:

f. Subcontract Management. Rate the contractor’s ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include the ability to timely award and manage subcontracts.

Comments:

g. Business Relations. Rate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, quality of problem resolution, corrective action plans, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, and its ability to submit accurate invoices in a timely manner.

Comments:

h. Management of Key Personnel. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing—when necessary—key personnel.

Comments:

i. Recommendation. To what extent would you recommend this contractor for additional contracts? Rate on the following scale: 5 = Yes, definitely; 4 = Yes, likely; 3 = Maybe, 2 = No, not likely; 1 = No, not ever; 0 = N/A.

Comments:

6. Other References. If you are aware of any other Point of Contact (POC) who is familiar with the contractor’s performance under this contract, please identify.

Name, Phone, and E-mail Address:

7. Assessor Information. Please provide the following information about yourself:

Name:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

E-mail Address:

Thank you for your assistance.

PAGE

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104