Attachment 9 - NSA Questionnaire for ECPs.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00039-19-R-1000
About this file
This document contains an engineering change proposal questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The engineering change proposal questionnaire includes 13 questions for a program manager concerning an engineering change to an end cryptographic unit. It requests information on the evaluator supporting the change, whether the evaluator has concurred on answers, if the product is certified, and details of the proposed change.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Naval Information Warfare Systems Command to award multiple indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts for production, systems engineering and integration, and retrofitting of various Multifunctional Information Distribution System Joint Tactical Radio System terminal configurations. The contract requires manufacturing and delivering terminals including CMN-4, TTNT and F-22 configurations as well as providing associated spare parts and retrofitting services. It also requires providing technical support for systems engineering and integration services.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Questionnaire for Engineer Change Proposals (ECP).
(U) NSA certification manager: before submitting this ECP Questionnaire, please consult with your evaluator!
(U) Request response by program manager concerning End Cryptographic Unit (ECU)
Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). Any affirmative response needs to include sufficient detail to describe impact.
Nomenclature (e.g. RT-1925(C)/U):
ECP Document ID:
PRISM Requirement Number [NSA completes]:
1. (U/FOUO) Who is the NSA evaluator supporting this ECP [NSA completes]?
2. (U/FOUO) Has the evaluator concurred on the answers to this questionnaire [NSA completes]?
3. (U/FOUO) Is the product already certified?
4. (U/FOUO) Is this change only updating the documentation? Or does it involve a change to the design?
5. (U/FOUO) If this is an update to the documentation, is this ECP due to the alternative parts, or error in the documentation?
6. (U/FOUO) Is this change in the security critical circuitry or software (that circuitry or software implementing the UIC or IASRD requirements)?
7. (U/FOUO) Does this change affect processing within the Information Assurance functions?
8. (U/FOUO) Does this change affect a specific vulnerability countermeasure?
9. (U/FOUO) Does this change introduce new functionality to the device?
10. (U/FOUO) Has this change been evaluated and appropriate regression SVT been successfully accomplished? If not, why was it not needed? (If you didn’t have an I73 evaluator involved in the decision, give details why you believe this is not needed.).
11. (U/FOUO) Has the change been functionally tested to ensure it is working as intended either in development of the change or on the production line? (IBVT/SPA)
12. (U/FOUO) Does the PM feel this change is appropriately covered by the old certificate, or is a new one needed [NSA completes]?
13. (U/FOUO) Has the CACMB database been updated or submitted as necessary [NSA completes]?
Include this completed form with the ECP documentation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .