Attachment 24 - Past_Perf_Questionnaire_Survey.docx

Naval Information Warfare Systems Command

LINDSAY NICKEL, CODE 2.4 NAVWAR CONTRACTS

4301 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-3127

AGENCY: PHONE: EMAIL:

REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

This office is currently in the process of awarding competitive contract(s) for MIDS JTRS Production & Sustainment. Contracts will include the following: MIDS JTRS terminal production, to include CMN-4, F-22 and TTNT variant terminals. MIDS JTRS terminal repair and retrofit of MIDS JTRS Core, CMN-4 and TTNT terminal configurations. MIDS JTRS Systems Engineering & Integration (SE&I) activities in support of the MIDS JTRS terminal variants (Block Cycles and Engineering Releases) All activities required to support various Service/platform capabilities such as Link 16 Enhanced Throughput, Frequency Remapping, Crypto Modernization, emerging technologies, CMN-4, F-22 and TTNT.

[CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Schedule c.) Cost Control d.) Management e.) Utilization of Small Business

In order for our team to complete its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, within five (5) working days to lindsay.nickel@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned contractor.

Best Regards, Lindsay Nickel Procuring Contracting Officer SPAWAR 2.4

TEL: (619) 524-5618

Competition Sensitive – For Official Use Only

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print) Code Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY GOOD

SATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

UNSATISFACTORY

a.) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(1) The contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(2) The contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

(3) The contractor furnished updated project schedules on a timely basis.

c.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Excellent” or “Not Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the NARRATIVE EXPLANATION page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY (CONTINUED)

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY GOOD

SATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

UNSATISFACTORY

d.) MANAGEMENT:

(1) The contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

e.) UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS:

(1) The contractor completed and submitted required subcontract reports accurately and in a timely manner.

(2) The contractor met statutory and negotiated small business participation goals.

(3) The contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Excellent” or “Not Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the NARRATIVE EXPLANATION page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY (CONTINUED)

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION: