ATT12_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Survey.docx

Competition Sensitive – For Official Use Only

ATTACHMENT 12 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE/SURVEY

SPAWAR CONTRACTS

4301 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO, CA 92110-3127

FAX TO:

AGENCY:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

This office is currently in the process of awarding a competitive contract for logistics, integration, engineering, procurement, fabrication, assembly, test, inspection, zone integration, and installation of integrated C4I capabilities aboard new construction (NEWCON) aircraft carrier and large deck amphibious ships, to include Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) ships. [CONTRACTOR NAME] has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding [CONTRACTOR’S NAME] record of past performance under Contract No. [CONTRACT NO.]. Specifically, we are looking for past performance information regarding the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service - Conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of good workmanship, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence;

b.) Schedule - Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction, completed on time, including wrap-up and contract administration, no liquidated damages assessed;

c.) Cost Control - Within budget, current accurate and complete billings, actual cost/rates reflect closely to negotiated cost/rates, cost efficiency measures, adequate budgetary internal controls;

d.) Management - Effectiveness of management, to include effective management of subcontractors; professionalism of correspondence and communications internally and externally; responsiveness to contract requirements; reasonable/cooperative behavior; prompt notification of urgent issues/problems; presentation of flexible, proactive, and effective Contractor-recommended solutions; and e.) Utilization of Small Business - Timeliness and accuracy of required subcontract reports; compliance with statutory and negotiated small business participation goals; effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

In order for our team to complete its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached survey form and email it, and any other pertinent information, within five (5) working days to edwin.davenport@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned contractor.

Best Regards,

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print) Code Phone

Please read the statements below, indicating your relative level of agreement in the box provided:

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY GOOD

SATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

UNSATISFACTORY

a.) QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(1) The contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(2) The contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

(3) The contractor furnished updated project schedules on a timely basis.

c.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Excellent” or “Not Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the NARRATIVE EXPLANATION page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY (CONTINUED)

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY GOOD

SATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

UNSATISFACTORY

d.) MANAGEMENT:

(1) The contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

e.) UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS:

(1) The contractor completed and submitted required subcontract reports accurately and in a timely manner.

(2) The contractor met statutory and negotiated small business participation goals.

(3) The contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

NOTE: For statements indicating “Excellent” or “Not Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation on the NARRATIVE EXPLANATION page.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY (CONTINUED)

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:________________________

NARRATIVE EXPLANATION:

N00039-17-R-0043 Attachment 12 image1.wmf oleObject1.bin