Industry Questionnaire.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- N00024-24-R-2227 - P-TSVRON Draft Solicitation
- Solicitation number
- N00024-24-R-2227
About this file
This document is an Industry Questionnaire related to a draft solicitation for the procurement and conversion of two existing Offshore Supply Vessels (OSVs) into Pacific Training Support Vessels (P-TSV) for the U.S. Navy.
The Navy is requesting industry feedback on several key areas, including: the impact of a proposed 15-year age cap on vessel availability and cost; the ability to provide vessels with optional capabilities; the impact of awarding optional contract line items after contract award; and an alternate approach to the construction and outfitting of C5I and accommodation spaces. The Navy is also seeking feedback on the certification status of the proposed dry dock facility and any perceived risks related to required software upgrades for the vessel's propulsion, navigation, and dynamic positioning systems. Additionally, the Navy requests information on whether the proposed vessels meet the damage stability requirements of the 2008 IMO Code of Safety for Special Purpose Ships.
This is a pre-solicitation notice, and the Navy is not currently accepting proposals. The Government intends to use the industry feedback to inform the final solicitation, which will be posted on SAM.gov. Inquiries should be directed to the points of contact provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| J-12 Technical Data Package Status List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT J-2 DRLs 26MAR2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| DRAFT J-6 P-TSV Maintenance SOWv1.docx | DOCX document | |
| DRAFT J-10 Preservation Instructions v1.docx | DOCX document | |
| DRAFT J-1 P-TSV Specification 3_28_24.docx | DOCX document | |
| N0002424R2227_Draft RFP_1APR2024_SAM Posting.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Company Name | ||||
| Company Website URL | ||||
| Contact Information (Name, Phone Number, and Email Address) | ||||
| Small or Large Business | ||||
| No. | Questions for Industry | Response | Reference | Additional Comments |
| 1 | The Navy would like to bring to the attention of Contractors that a 15 year age cap is being proposed for the pre-conversion vessels. In return, many of the required capabilities identified in prior RFIs are now optional (see following four questions in relation) | |||
| The Navy requests feedback on the impact to vessel availability and cost | ||||
| The Navy requests feedback on the optional capabilities such as the ability to provide a vessel incorporating none, some, or all options. | ||||
| The Navy requests feedback on the ability/impact of awarding optional CLINs after contract award. | ||||
| The Navy requests feedback on an alternate options approach consisting of the following CLINs in lieu of current ITEM 1006 and 1007: |
| 1006, Construction of C5I and Accommodation Spaces – Contractor shall construct and install any additional deckhouse required to provide for new Radio Room, Training Operations Center, Hospital Room, and Accommodations Spaces to provide total berthing for a full complement of 18 crew and 10 embarked trainers. Rough plumbing, electrical, HVAC, and other support services shall be provided for the deckhouse. | |||
| 1007, Outfitting of C5I and Accommodation Spaces – Contractor shall procure and install all decking, joiner work, final support services installation, and outfitting for new Radio Room, Training Operations Center, Hospital Room, and Accommodations Spaces. | |||
| 2 | The Navy requests that the Contractor provide feedback as to whether the dry dock to be used is currently or previously certified IAW MIL-STD-1652, Safety Certification for Drydock Facilities and Building Ways for U.S. Navy Ships and the ability to obtain certification. | ||
| 3 | The Navy requests the Contractor feedback on their perceived risk of software upgrades being required for vessel propulsion, navigation, and DPS systems to meet current ABS and Regulatory requirements. | ||
| 4 | The Navy requests feedback as to whether proposed vessels meet the damage stability requirements of 2008 IMO Code of Safety for Special Purpose Ships. | ||
| Industry Recommendation, Question, and/or Concern | Draft Specification Reference | Additional Comments |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .