N00024-21-R-4456_A0004.pdf

SOUTHWEST REGIONAL MAINTENANCE CENTER

CODE 400 3755 BRINSER STREET, STE 1

SAN DIEGO CA 92136-5205

N0002420FR62044

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of Amendment A0004 is to: (1) Issue Errata No. 4 for the USS RUSSELL; (2) Provide responses to Bidder Question Nos. 32 - 43; (3) Delete Section B, Note G, in its entirety; (4) Update Section I (FAR 52.211-11); and (5) Update Section M - Basis for Aw ard.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Nov-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002421R4456

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Oct-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Nov-2020

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE N55236

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been deleted:

Section B, Note G has been deleted in its entirety.

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

52.211-11 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--SUPPLIES, SERVICES, OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to deliver the supplies or perform the services within the time specified in this contract, the Contractor shall, in place of actual damages, pay to the Government liquidated damages, as described in the table below, per calendar day of delay.

For large businesses, the sum of liquidated damages, across all milestones in the table below, shall not exceed 10% of the awarded price of the Availability, including all Base and Option Items.

For small businesses, the sub of liquidated damages, across all milestones in the table below, shall not exceed the 5% of the awarded price of each availability, including all Base and Option Items.

USS RUSSELL FY21 SRA

Milestones

Location Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

CONTRACT COMPLETE -

Mission Ready Vessel Redelivered to Fleet*

All Locations $159,937 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

USS SOMERSET FY21 SRA

Milestones

Location Liquidated Damage incurred per Day

Maximum Liquidated Damage associated with each Milestone

CONTRACT COMPLETE -

Mission Ready Vessel Redelivered to Fleet*

All Locations $330,726 Up to total maximum liquidated damage

(b) If the Government terminates this contract in whole or in part under the Default--Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause, the Contractor is liable for liquidated damages accruing until the Government reasonably obtains delivery or performance of similar supplies or services. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

(c) The Contractor will not be charged with liquidated damages when the delay in delivery or performance is beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor as defined in the Default--Fixed-Price Supply and Service clause in this contract.

(End of clause)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

I. GENERAL

A. The Government intends to award two separate Firm Fixed-Price contracts: one contract for the completion of the USS SOMERSET (LPD 25) FY21 SRA and one contract for the USS RUSSELL (DDG 59) FY21 SRA to the Offerors whose proposals, together, represent the best value to the Government.

B. Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Should the Government establish a competitive range and enter discussions for either the USS SOMERSET or USS RUSSELL evaluation and source selection, the scope of that determination and discussions will be limited to either the USS SOMERSET or USS RUSSELL only, unless discussions are necessary for both.

C. Offerors are advised that the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of each proposal.

II. BASIS OF AWARD

A. The Government will restrict the awards of the USS SOMERSET and the USS RUSSELL such that both availabilities shall not be awarded to the same Offeror. The Government will award the USS SOMERSET and the USS RUSSELL to the technically acceptable and responsible proposals from two different Offerors that together represent the combined, lowest total evaluated price to the Government, based upon an assessment of Cost/Price Factor and Non-Price Factor 1: Eligibility. A contract may be awarded to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR 9.104, whose proposal conforms to the RFP’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and represents the best value to the Government.

B. For the USS SOMERSET and USS RUSSELL

a. The best value basis for award will be based on the following evaluation factors:

Non-Price Factor

a) Factor 1: Eligibility Factor

Cost/Price Factor

a) Factor 2: Price

b. Ratings will be applied to each factor as follows: Non-Price Factor 1 will be rated as either

‘acceptable’ or ‘unacceptable.’ A separate Factor 1 rating will be applied for each USS SOMERSET and USS RUSSELL.

C. The Government will initially only evaluate the Offeror with the lowest priced proposal submitted in response to each availability. However, if a single Offeror submits the lowest priced proposal for each availability, the Government will then review the next lowest priced proposal from a second Offeror, which together represent the combined, lowest total evaluated price to the Government. The Government will only evaluate the two (2) lowest Offerors, which together represent the combined, lowest total evaluated price to the Government. Following price evaluation, the Government will then make a determination as to whether the lowest priced Offerors meet the minimum technical requirements. If the lowest priced Offerors are determined to be technically acceptable, no competing proposals will be reviewed. In addition, if the Government determines discussions are necessary, the Government will complete a technical evaluation of all Offerors and establish a competitive range. The SSA will base the source selection decision on an assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

III. EVALUATION FACTOR DESCRIPTIONS

USS SOMERSET and USS RUSSELL

A. Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

The objective of this factor is to:

1. Assess whether the Offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA) or has demonstrated equivalency as outlined in Section L, subsections V.B.1 and V.D.1 for Factor 1.

2. Assess whether the Offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the vessel, in accordance with Section L.

B. Factor 2 - Price

1. The Government will assess price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404 to determine reasonableness of proposed pricing based on the information contained in the availability’s Pricing Workbook. The Government will not conduct a price realism analysis on any aspect of an Offeror’s price proposal. Although award will be made based on an Offeror’s total price, a price proposal that is found unreasonable and/or unbalanced may be rejected. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated.

2. Total Evaluated Price for each availability shall be calculated by adding:

a) The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total price of all work items),

b) The price of all option CLINs,

c) Contractor’s Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rates as applied to all

Growth Reservation CLINS (Base and Option) and New Work,

d) Contractor’s daily extension rate as applied to the number of additional days pier side requiring availability extension listed in Attachment J-4 (USS RUSSELL) and Attachment J-14 (USS SOMERSET), and

e) As applicable, the value of the inter-port differentials (as identified in Section L of this solicitation)

3. Evaluated price for Extension Day Rates and Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rates & Material Burden Rates (as applied to Growth Reservation CLINs and New Work) shall be calculated in the following manner:

a) Growth Reservation CLINs (Base and Option)

(1) Multiply the proposed fully burdened ship repair labor rate by the number of hours associated with (1) each Growth Reservation CLIN and (2) New Work allocation to yield the labor hour price.

(2) Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with (1) each Growth Reservation CLIN and (2) New Work allocation to yield the burdened material price for that CLIN.

(3) Add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each Growth Reservation CLIN and New Work allocation. (Note, the offeror’s Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate as applied to New Work allocation will be included in the Total Evaluated Price for evaluation purposes only. This figure will not be incorporated into the contract at the time of award; however, the offeror’s Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate will be utilized for pricing of New Work arising during contract execution.)

b) Extension Day Price

(1) Multiply the proposed daily rate by the number of days associated with that rate to yield the evaluated price for the pier-side extension. Offerors are advised that the number of extension days used to calculate the Extension Day Price are for evaluation purposes only.

4. Subcontracting Plan: (For large businesses only.) The Government will assess the plan for:

a) Compliance with FAR clause 19.704; subcontracting goals identified in Section L, V.A.4.b; and

FAR 52.219-9 to include all subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d).

b) Adequate rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than the goals identified in Section L, V

A.4.b.

5. Inter-port Differential

a) The inter-port differential chart in Section L provides the values to be included in all Offerors’ price proposals to determine the Offeror’s Total Evaluated Price.

IV. EVALUATION FACTOR RATINGS

The ratings will be based on what is contained in or referenced in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources. The adjectival ratings described below are guides; a proposal need not have all aspects of the rating description to be rated accordingly. The ratings are set as follows:

A. Non-Price Factor 1: USS SOMERSET and USS RUSSELL

1. For Factor 1 for each ship, the rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factor 1 for that ship meets or does not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any inconsistencies in Offerors’ proposals. The ratings for Factor 1 are as follows:

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

B. Definitions:

1. Best Value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. See FAR 2.101.

2. Competitive Range - See FAR 15.306(c).

3. Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the Offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

4. Clarifications are limited exchanges, between the Government and Offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated.

5. Deficiency is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

(End of Summary of Changes)