N00024-19-R-4442_BQ__2_21MAY2019.pdf

DATE OF REQUEST: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 HULLS/TITLE: Hawaii MAC IDIQ

SOLICITATION NO: N00024-19-R-4442

NAVSEA POCs:

Martha Bello Zachary Tucker

NAVSEA POC E-MAIL:

Martha.Bello@navy.mil Zachary.M.Tucker@navy.mil

NAVSEA POC #:

Martha Bello: 202-781-3864 Zachary Tucker: 202-781-4234

# Question Area Para # Date Received Contractor Question Government Response

22 Solicitation Section C, Para. 1.2, Page No. 19 22-Apr-19

Paragraph 1.2 states that " . . . the successful offeror must be a ship repair company with facilities within the HRMC local travel area (island of Oahu) and possess or have access via teaming arrangement (in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6) to the minimum shop facility requirements on the island of Oahu with the capability to perform the following efforts:"

Please define the use of the words "within the HRMC local travel area (island of Oahu)."

Also, further define the maximum distance that an offeror would be considered "within the HRMC local travel area."

Within the HRMC local travel area is defined as the island of Oahu.

23 Solicitation

Section C:

Para 1.2 and 1.4.4, Page

No. 20

22-Apr-19

Para. 1.2 states, "Due to U.S. Navy or other customer commitments and schedules, a significant number of task orders may be issued as emergent requirements. The contractor may be required to respond to more than one requirement (simultaneous task orders for more than one vessel)." Par. 1.4.4 states, "Commence shipboard work within twenty four (24) hours of discovery and original notification to the contractor." In order for Contractor to evaluate manning resources to support "significant number of task orders as emergent requirements" and to secure manning resources in 24 hours to commence work, please clarify what is meant by the word "significant."

There is no way to predict how many ships will need emergent maintenance. We had an average of 7 Emergent availablities per Fiscal Year based on the past Fiscal Years

(FY16-18).

24 Solicitation:

Section C

SOW Para.

10. Page No.

22-Apr-19

Paragraph 10.0 states, "Government Furnished Material (GFM) cited in the DO RFPs will be delivered or made available to be picked up as identified in each DO, unless other location(s) is/are specified in the contract. The successful offeror is to contact the NSA Project Manager to coordinate obtaining

GFM." Will the successful offeror under a DO be allowed to store GFM at its own facility off Pearl Harbor Naval Base? If yes, what would be the minimum requirements needed to be allowed to store such material? If not, will the Government provide a facility to store the GFM?

The Government has no issues with the Contractor storing GFM offbase provided the custody turnover is properly documented beforehand and their facility is compliant with material storage requirements pertinent to that equipment. No, the Government will not define how much space they need. No, the Government will not provide a space to store the GFM after it is turned over.

Solicitation:

Section M

Volume II, Factor 4.

Page No. 106 22-Apr-19

Section M (page 106) Past Performance Evaluation. How will the government evaluate “Business Relations” and “Management of Key Personnel”?

Please clarify.

Assessment of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances. These past performance assessment elements are annotated in the PPQs and CPARs.

Section C;

Statement of Work

(SOW)

SOW Para.

16.0 and

18.0, Attachment S-

4.

Attachment S- 4 QASP. Page

No. 26

22-Apr-19 Pursuant to paragraphs 16.0 and 18.0 and Attachment S-4, for every incorrect / late CAR, CFR, etc., that is issued by the Gov’t, which creates contractor inefficiencies & delays, will the QASP value be deducted?

In accordance with Enclosure 1 to Attachment S-4 QASP, there are penalties described that will be deducted as incorrect/late actions occur.

27 Solicitation

Attachment S-

4 QASP;

Assessment #2 for

Milestones

22-Apr-19 QASP penalty #2 is associated with Milestone reporting. In column (C) subparagraph 2.b)i), it references a "rejected IPS," which is covered under QASP Penalty #1 subparagraph 1.b)i). Please revise Attachment S-4 by deleting the subparagraph 2.b)i) that incorrectly applies the IPS subparagraph 1.b)i).

Column (C) subparagraph 2.b)i) refers to milestones which must meet the Performance / Acceptable Quality Level Requirement in Column (B).

Column (C) subparagraph 1.b)i) refers to schedule and asscoiated reports per NAVSEA 009-60 which must meet the Performance / Acceptable Quality Level Requirement in

Column (B).

Both items are applicable and remain.

Pre-Proposal Information (PPI)

The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation.

QUESTION #/ DETAILS QUESTION/ ANSWER

28 Solicitation Factor 2 -

Management Capabilities

23-Apr-19

5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT

Factor 2: Management Capabilities: In response to Factor 2, Offerors shall provide:

The Offeror’s Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA). Offerors that hold an MSRA do not need to submit any further information in response to this factor.

If the Offeror holds an ABR and is only submitting a proposal for the Lot 2 requirements, is there a need to submit any further information in response to this factor?

If an offeror does not hold an MSRA, the offeror shall address the requirements in Section L of the RFP, Factor 2: paragraph 2.

29 CDRL A005 22-Apr-19 Please explain why this information is needed to determine the awardee for a firm, fixed-price MAC IDIQ contract and subsequent awarded Delivery

Orders for which title to all contractor-furnished equipment remains with the contractor. If the information is necessary to assess a contractor’s ability to perform the work by having the necessary equipment, please confirm that the pricing data in the PO can be redacted.

CDRL's refer to information delivered to the Government by the contractor, after the contract is awarded. Please refer to the requirements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-

01, specifically pargraph 3.4.4.2

30 CDRL A007 Block 16 22-Apr-19 Block 16 makes reference to (BLKS 4/12/13) IAW SI 009-07, PARA 3.7.10 SUBMIT WRITTEN OPERATING PROCEDURES/INSTRUCTION TO SHIP’S FORCE ON EACH TYPE OF FIREFIGHTING SYSTEM. Navy Stand Item FY20 does not have a 009-07 Para 3.7.10. Please delete this reference 009-07 or confirm that

Navy Standard Item FY20 reference should be 009-08 Para 3.14.1.1.

Yes, FY20 009-08 para 3.14 (and subparagraphs) is the correct reference.

31 CDRL C002

Block 9 & 16, Exhibit C 22-Apr-19 Please confirm that Block 9 was intentionally left blank and no Distribution Statement is required to be noted in Block 16.

Yes, this was intentional. CDRL C002 requires COTS manuals to be used as-is or with supplementation to support COTS equipment used by DOD as specified in the DID.

Since no supplementation or specific distribution is needed for this contract, they can be delivered 'as-is' by the contractor.

BQ #2