N00024-18-R-4404-0009.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-18-R-4404
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N0002418R4404
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0009
1. Section I – Revise 52.233-1 to 52.233-1Alt 1.
2. Section J – Update J-1 and J-2 to incorporate Errata 11 and Addendum 2.
3. Section J – Update the J-4, Pricing Workbook
4. Section J – Update the J-3, Execution Milestones PERL
5. Section L – Revise the due date to reflect Amendment 0008 Section A to Fri 13 April.
6. Section L – Revise the RFP delivery location from DC to San Diego.
7. Section L – Update dates in “Vessel modification and transit plan” section
SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
The following have been added by reference:
52.233-1 Alt I
The following have been deleted:
52.233-1
52.233-1 Alt I
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
The following have been modified:
DOCUMENTS/EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) form a part of this solicitation:
| No. | Document | ||
| Attachment S-1 | Technical Capabilities Data Sheet | ||
| Attachment S-2 | Past Performance Questionnaire | ||
| Attachment S-3 | Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form | ||
| Attachment S-4 | Past Performance References | ||
| Attachment S-5 | Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet |
The following document(s), exhibit(s), and other attachment(s) also form a part of this solicitation and will form a part of the contract resulting from this solicitation:
| No. | Document | ||
| Attachment J-1 | Specification Package No. [TPPC-LHD6-SWRMC18-CN01] (Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4, Errata 5, Errata 6, Errata 7, Errata 8, Errata 9, Errata 10, Errata 11, Addendum 1, Addendum 2) | ||
| Attachment J-2 | Work Item Plans, Drawings, and Other References (Errata 1, Errata 2, Errata 3, Errata 4, Errata 5, Errata 6, Errata 7, Errata 8, Errata 9, Errata 10, Errata 11, Addendum 1, Addendum 2) | ||
| Attachment J-3 | Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Amendment 0009) | ||
| Attachment J-4 | Pricing Workbook (Amendment 0009) | ||
| Attachment J-5 | Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan | ||
| Attachment J-6 | Subcontracting Plan (to be incorporated upon award) |
Exhibit A Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) A001-A003; A005-A009; A011; A012; A014 (Does not include A004, A0010, or A0013) Exhibit B Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) B001-B009 Exhibit C Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) (DD Form 1423) C001-C002
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract for the FY18 Docking Phased Maintenance Availability (DPMA) for USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6). The Government anticipates awarding a single contract through a best value source selection process. The Government expects the best value to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price and will thus use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2
ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Steve Galer, Contracting Officer, and Ivy Hosokawa, Contract Specialist, at steven.galer@navy.mil and ivy.e.hosokawa@navy.mil. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror requests for information (RFIs) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 22 March 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. RFIs should reference a solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form (Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.
Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making a single award on or around 8 June 2018. Offerors must provide a period of 120 calendar days from the proposal due date for Government acceptance of the offer (Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).
2.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS
Proposal Due Date: All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 13 April 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, San Diego. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.
Proposal Submission:
Proposals shall be sent to:
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND
Southwest Regional Maintenance Center Attn: Deborah Redondo C-420 3755 Brinser Street, Suite 1 San Diego, CA 92136 In care of Steven Galer, Naval Sea Systems Command
Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO CODE 420”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.
Offerors shall submit:
| Volume |
| Title |
| Number of Paper Originals (See Note 1) |
| Number of Paper Copies |
| Number of CDs (See Notes 2 &3) |
| I |
| Price Proposal |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| II |
| Technical Proposal |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
Note (delete this): The number of paper coppies shall be verified with SSEB Chair. Goal is to minimize the number of copies.
Note 1: Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, originals should be separately wrapped inside the container, and clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.
Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure that the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses. The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.
Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in Microsoft Office Suite 2007 or Adobe Acrobat. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. In cases where the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal conflict, the hard copy shall take precedence. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious. No fields shall be password protected. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.
3.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
Ship Checks: Offerors, including significant subcontractors, may inspect the USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6), between 8 December and 22 December 2017 at Commander, Fleet Activities Sasebo, Japan. (Please note: These dates are subject to last minute change). To schedule a ship check, offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Steve Galer and Ivy Hosokawa at steven.galer@navy.mil and ivy.e.hosokawa@navy.mil, respectively. Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Ship Repair Facility- SASEBO and the ship’s Commanding Officer. Contractors conducting SWRMC related work efforts must visit SWRMC security website for latest forms and instructions at http://www.swrmc.navy.mil/visitors.html
Specifications and associated reference documentation: The Government will provide, upon request, CD/DVDs including Attachment J-1 Work Items and Work Item References not already in the possession of the offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, or available through the following websites:
https://jedmics.net/ https://webjed.nnsy.navy.mil/ https://psjed.psns.navy.mil/
Offerors or subcontractors may request a CD/DVD by contacting Ivy Hosokawa at ivy.e.hosokawa@navy.mil
Alteration of Solicitation: Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.
Proposal Information: Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, offerors are advised that statements such as: “the offeror understands”, “the offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors are encouraged to provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.
Amendments: The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.
Teaming Arrangements: Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique Commercial and Government Entity code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.
4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT
To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. Proposals which do not follow this direction may be rejected as non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.
Hard Copy Proposals: All pages shall be double-sided on 8.5 x 11 inch paper with a one-inch margin. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum font size of 12-point. Each side of the page will count as one “page”. Any type contained on graphics pages will not be smaller than 10-point font. Any pages that may be revised as a result of discussions (if required) shall contain revision numbers and date of the proposal revision submission. Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section 5.0 where required.
Page Limits:
· The cover letter is limited to three (3) pages
· Non-price proposals shall be limited to five (5) pages for the Technical Capabilities Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) for Factor 2 – Technical Capabilities
· There are no other page limitations
5.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT
VOLUME I
a. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:
b. Cover Letter,
c. Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,
d. Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),
e. Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),
f. Completed Section B carrying forward information from Attachment J-4, and
g. Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates ( Attachment J-4)
Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:
· Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,
· CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor,
· Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications, and
· Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).
In addition to the above, the following information is requested to be provided in the cover letter:
· Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more
· For any WI with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in Attachment J-4, provide an explanation as to why. In addition to, if applicable:
· For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.
· For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.
Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the offeror shall submit the completed SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for ALL CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.
Subcontracting Plan: A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.
Completed Section B and Attachment J-4 : Offerors must propose on all contract line items (CLINs), complete the clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)” in Section B, complete the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.
The contractor must submit prices for the Pricing Workbook Spreadsheet containing Work Item Pricing and Labor & Material Burden Rates (Attachment J-4) in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Labor & Material Burden Rates must match the rates provided in the Section B clause entitled “SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED)”. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B clause rates shall govern.
For Attachment J-4, offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields.
The RFP specified 531,452 labor hours and $4,200,000 included for material in the Labor & Material Burden Rate worksheet contained in Attachment J-4 are for evaluation purposes only. The proposed labor and material burden rates included in Attachment J-4 and inserted in Section B, Note A paragraph (7) shall be the fixed rates used for negotiating growth and new work during the entire availability regardless of how many labor hours and material dollars are negotiated and procured.
An Interport Differential shall be proposed for offerors that do not plan to perform the proposed work at the USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6) homeport in San Diego, CA. If applicable, include the value for the inter-port differential as follows:
| Location* |
| Differential |
| Portland, OR |
| $14,398,416 |
| San Francisco, CA |
| $32,753,865 |
*Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above inter-port differential table shall submit a bidder’s question requesting an inter-port differential be calculated for the location of the offeror’s proposed place of performance for the USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6) FY18 DPMA.
A Government Provided Pier Differential shall be proposed for offerors that are relying on the Government to supply the required pier space. If applicable, include the value for the Government provided pier differential as follows:
| Location** |
| Differential |
| San Diego, CA |
| $4,542,941 |
**Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above Government provided pier differential table shall submit a bidder’s question requesting a Government provided pier differential be calculated for the location of the offeror’s proposed Government provided pier space for the USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6) FY18 DPMA.
VOLUME II
Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of four factors, Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor, Factor 2 – Technical Capabilities, Factor 3 - Past Performance, and Factor 4 – Resource Capacity as follows:
Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor: Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:
· Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) with the top portion filled out
· A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the LHD 6 and a dry-dock capable of docking the LHD 6 at time of contract award. Evidence must be provided to prove the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock in performance of this contract.
· Co-signed Master Ship Repair Agreement or proof of MSRA Equivalency to demonstrate capability
· As applicable, a vessel modification and transit plan that allows the vessel to reach the offerors facility, given specific Navy provided constraints described below
MSRA Equivalency (Applicable to Non-MSRA holders only): Offerors that do not hold an MSRA must submit MSRA equivalency documentation to demonstrate sufficient organization and facilities capabilities. (Specific documentation requirements provided upon inspection request).
To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71 Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection. All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1300, local time, Washington DC on 30 January 2018. Requests shall be sent to Steve Galer and Ivy Hosokawa at steven.galer@navy.mil and ivy.e.hosokawa@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of offeror eligibility. All inspections will be completed by a representative from Commander, Navy Regional Maintenance Center (CNRMC). All offerors requesting equivalency inspections will receive a copy of the final inspection report prior to the date of contract award. The on-site inspection will supplement documentation provided with the offeror’s proposal.
The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey or to require other evidence of technical, production, managerial, financial, and similar abilities to perform prior to the award of any proposed contracts; regardless of whether the offeror has an existing MSRA. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.
Vessel modification and transit plan (Applicable to out-of-homeport only): Offerors outside the vessel’s San Diego, CA homeport should submit, if applicable, the following information outlined below under Option CLIN 0033. The intent of the information is to permit out of port offerors to provide a vessel modification and transit plan that allows the vessel to reach the offerors facility, given specific Navy provided constraints.
If necessary to allow transit to the offerors facility, offerors may modify the vessel. The Navy has identified the following constraints applicable to vessel modification that must all be satisfied:
| 1. | The only portion of the vessel that Offerors may propose to alter to support arrival to or departure from the offeror’s facility is the vessel’s Foremast and Mainmast, as described in: |
| a. | NAVSEA Drawing 801-6926386,USS Bonhomme Richard LHD 6 General Booklet of Drawings |
| b. | NAVSEA Drawing 171-6856849, Foremast 06 level and above FR 73 to FR 75 MDL 5 |
| c. | NAVSEA drawings 171-6208146, Main mast 07 level and above FR 85 to FR 89 MDL 5 |
| 2. | Proposed vessel modifications may not disturb the following systems: |
| a. | SPQ 9B Radar Antenna |
| b. | Enhanced Position Location Reporting System (EPLRS) |
| c. | Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) System |
3. The LHD6 vessel shall be available for transit and to execute a maintenance window of opportunity to complete Offeror proposed vessel modifications no earlier than 15 October 2018.
4. The LHD6 DPMA CNO Availability shall commence no earlier than 5 November 2018.
5. Offerors may not commence any work on Communications, Damage Control, Engineering, Navigation, and Seamanship systems that undermines the vessel’s ability to safely get or remain underway prior to 5 November 2018. The minimum equipment redlines are listed in enclosure (1) of COMNAVSURFPAC/COMNAVSURFLANT INSTRUCTION 3504.1B.
6. Subject to the approval of ship’s force, Offerors may obtain paint samples, set up temporary services, commence pre-operational tests, and complete inspections to prepare to complete work on the equipment listed in enclosure (1) of COMNAVSURFPAC/COMNAVSURFLANT INSTRUCTION 3504.1B prior 5 November 2018 so long as the offerors efforts in no way disable the systems in question.
| 7. | After the completion of the LHD6 DPMA work package SSP #TPPC-LHD6-SWRMC18-CN01, the vessel shall be available to execute a window of opportunity until no later than 12 June 2020. The following must be complete no later than 12 June 2020 |
| a. | Vessel Transit back to San Diego Naval Station |
| b. | Reconstitution of the Mast |
| c. | Post reconstitution Sea Trials (assumed to be no less than 10 days in duration) |
The Navy has identified the following constraints and stipulations applicable to the transit of the vessel that must all be satisfied:
| 1. | The ship can ballast and/or de-ballast while in transit provided ballasting and/or de-ballasting operations do not affect the safety of the ship and minimum navigational safety margins are maintained |
| 2. | Maximum allowable ballast depth shall be no greater than 30 feet. |
| 3. | Minimum allowable ballast depth shall be no less than 24 feet. |
| 4. | Minimum water clearance below the vessel’s keel at mean low water shall be no less than 5 feet. |
| 5. | Minimum air clearance above the vessel’s remaining mast at mean high water shall be no less than 5 feet. |
In demonstrating, please provide the following information:
· Work Item(s), written in accordance with Joint Fleet Maintenance Manual (JFMM) Volume VII, Chapter 4, Appendix E, describing proposed mast alterations. Work Item(s) must conform to the constraints listed above.
· Provide drawings or sketches showing modification to the mast for transit plan using the following references:
a. NAVSEA Drawing 801-6926386,USS Bonhomme Richard LHD 6 General Booklet of Drawings,
b. NAVSEA Drawing 171-6856849, Foremast 06 level and above FR 73 to FR 75 MDL 5
c. NAVSEA drawings 171-6208146, Main mast 07 level and above FR 85 to FR 89 MDL 5
· Transit Plan, describing the suggested navigational path, ballasting operations and any other stipulations to transit the vessel to the offerors facility. Transit Plan must demonstrate conformance to the constraints listed above and provide documentation proving the compliance to local, state, and federal requirements associated with transit.
There is no page limit associated with this documentation.
Factor 2 - Technical Capabilities: Offerors shall complete the Technical Capabilities Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), provided with this solicitation for a previous availability or equivalent project performed by the offeror. Offerors may not exceed a total of five (5) pages between the data sheet and the narrative.
The Contractor shall provide this documentation for contracts/projects demonstrating relevant experience as a Prime contractor. The Government is looking for experience in executing projects of same or similar type and complexity of work as required by this solicitation. For purposes of this solicitation, the Government considers an offeror’s Technical Capability relating to the following types of projects/contracts to be relevant:
a. Performance as a prime contractor of a ship repair availability similar in complexity and magnitude as the proposed USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6) FY18 DPMA, including approximately six (6) months production duration and 100,000 man-days in magnitude, using the same or similar personnel, processes and equipment the offeror is proposing to use to meet the solicitation requirements, to be relevant.
OR
b. Performance as a prime contractor of the construction of a ship of similar size and complexity and composition as a LHD-1 Wasp-class ship or a comparable naval vessel of similar type and complexity using the same or similar personnel, processes, and equipment the offeror is proposing to use to meet the solicitation requirements.
The project shall have been completed or be substantially complete within the past three (3) years. The project provided must be considered relevant based on its own features rather than demonstrating relevant experience as a combination of projects. Offerors are advised that the Technical Capability Factor is "prime contractor" specific. Newly formed joint ventures may propose projects by the separate members of the joint venture as prime contractors. An offeror may not use the Technical Capabilities of an affiliated "prime contractor" to meet the Technical Capability Factor requirements.
Factor 3 – Past Performance: The Government requires relevant performance information on all Offerors based on the past and present efforts provided by the Offeror and data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance as a prime contractor. In the investigation of an Offeror’s past performance, the Government reserves the right to contact former customers and Government agencies and other private and public sources of information.
Offerors with recent and relevant past performance shall submit information concerning contracts which offerors consider relevant in demonstrating their ability to perform the proposed effort. Offerors shall identify portions of the contracts that are relevant. Offerors are requested to provide information up to five (5) previous contracts where the effort is recent and relevant to the effort required by this solicitation.
· “Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. If the offeror has not completed up to five (5) contracts within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation, information on recent and relevant subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted.
· “Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements as set forth in this solicitation.
· Scope: Experience in the areas defined in the Solicitation Section C Statement of Work.
· Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.
· Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation. For complexity, not only will the tasks performed by the offeror be considered, but also the offeror’s ability to coordinate tasks (e.g., concurrent performance requirements).
Offerors shall provide a detailed explanation demonstrating the similarity of the contracts to the requirements of this solicitation; a detailed description of the work performed for the contract. Offerors are responsible for the accuracy of all data provided.
An offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the Government to consider.
The Offeror’s proposal shall identify the customer point of contact and which of the listed contacts that each questionnaire was sent to be completed. This will let the Contracting Officer know whether all questionnaires from all of the Offeror’s references were received.
Regarding Past performance information that is documented as a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) and available in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), the offeror may list it in Past Performance References, Attachment S-4. Attachment S-4 shall be used to identify the source of Past Performance information ( e.g., CPARs, PPQs). For Past Performance information that does not have a current CPAR associated with it, the offeror may submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), Attachment S-2 to its customer to complete. Each proposal shall include no more than a total of five (5) PPQs, one per contract identified. The offeror will complete Part A of the Questionnaire. Separately, the offeror shall provide the entire Past Performance Questionnaire, with Part A completed, to each customer for them to complete Parts B and C. Customer evaluation will not be included as part of the page count in this volume submitted by the offeror. The offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation.
E-mail to:
Steve Galer, Procuring Contract Officer, steven.galer@navy.mil and
Ivy Hosokawa, Contract Specialist, ivy.e.hosokawa@navy.mil
Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.
In addition, the offeror shall provide for all Past Performance References included in Attachment S-4, a short description of the work performed and why the offeror considers it relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. Government may validate past performance information with the source regardless of whether it is provided under a CPAR reference or a PPQ.
All offerors (including small business offerors) are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. In addition, large businesses are requested to address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part 52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. Attachments to these narratives, including any eSRS information, is not included in the page limits.
Factor 4 – Resource Capacity: Offerors shall provide Integrated Production Schedule (IPS) documentation for the USS BONHOMME RICHARD (LHD 6) FY18 DPMA inclusive of the “Initial IPS” elements of NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60 as well as the Manpower Curves (Total) and the Manpower Curves (Trades) associated with the 009-60 “Schedule of Record”. Offerors shall provide the documentation in accordance with format requirements of FY18 (CH-1) NAVSEA Standard Item 009-60. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required by FY18 (CH-1) 009-60 and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the Work Package. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Navy Intermediate-Level schedules.
Manpower Curves (Total) and Manpower Curves (Trade) – In addition to the requirements of 009-60, the offerors shall provide Total and Trade Manpower Curves including the following information:
· The total and trade manpower resources currently employed by the offeror and expected to be employed by the offeror during the Availability period of performance.
· The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability period of performance.
· The total and trade manpower resources required to complete work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other expected requirements during the Availability period of performance.
Offerors shall provide a narrative affirming that the offeror has the manpower resources, by craft/trade/supervisor/support, available to complete the requirements of the availability, accounting for manpower resource required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract and manpower resources required to complete outstanding proposals and any other expected requirements during the Availability period. Should the offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources, the offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and period of performance for each subcontract requirement.
There is no page limit associated with this documentation.
(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it.