Attachment_1-_SOW_dtd_21_Aug_14.docx

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR THE

FMU-139D/B Bomb Fuze

21 August 2014

Contract No: N00019-14-R-0025 table of Contents

3.1.2 Integrated Master Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………..4

3.1.3 Integrated Master Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………………..4

3.1.4 Program Reviews and Meetings………………...……………………………………………………………………4

3.1.4.1 Post Award Conference…………………………………………………….……………………………………….…………………….…5

3.1.4.2 Program Management Reviews…………………………………………………………………………..………………………………….5

3.1.4.3 Technical Interchange Meetings…………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….. 6

3.1.5 Subcontract Management……….……………………………………………………………………………………6

3.1.6 Systems Engineering 6

3.1.6.1 Risk Management………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………….6

3.1.8.1 Counerfeit Parts and Material…………………………………..……………………………………………...……………….7

3.1.8.2 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages…………….……………………………………………….……7

3.1.13.1 Safety Assessment……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…………….9

3.1.14 Reliability 9

3.1.14.1 Fuze Reliability Prediction.......……….……………………………………………………………………………………..…..……… .9

3.1.14.2 Detonation Transfer Reliability.....…………….………………………………………………………………………………………….9 3.1.15 Failure Reporting Analysis & Corrective Action System 9

3.1.15.1 Failure Reporting……………………….....………………………………………………………………………………….………

3.1.15.2 Failure Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...…10

3.1.15.3 Corrective Action………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…10

3.1.18.1 Confirguration Management….....…………….…………………………..……………………………………….……………………11

3.1.18.2 Engineering Change Proposals.....………….………………………………………………………………………....…..………...….11

3.1.18.3 Notice of Revisions.....………… .……………………………………………………………………………………………….……

3.1.18.4 Request for Deviations…………………………………………………………………………………………...…………………….….12

3.2.1.1 Qualification Testing……….…..…………………………………………………………..………………………………………...….…13

3.2.1.2 First Article Test. 13

3.2.1.3 Systems Engineering Technical Reviews………………………………………………………………………………………….…...…13

3.2.1.4 Safety Review Boards…………………….………………………………………………………………………………………….…....…13

ii

SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the tasks to fulfill contract requirements and objectives for the FMU-139D/B Bomb Fuze program.

Applicable Documents Department of Defense Specifications

Department of Defense Standards and Handbooks

Government Documents

NAVAIRINST 5000.21

NAVAIR Risk Management Policy

Commercial Standards

Requirements

1.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3.1.1 Reports and Tracking

The Contractor shall submit a progress report in accordance with Exhibit B (B001) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.2 Integrated Master Plan

The Contractor shall maintain an Integrated Master Plan (IMP) that contains milestones and events, key tasks for each milestone and event, accomplishment criteria for each task, and an event-oriented timeline that ties directly to the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). The IMP shall contain all major events needed for successful, timely accomplishment of the program. The Contractor shall use the IMP and IMS to integrate all milestones (i.e., all actions required for the Contractor and Government activities) and major subcontractor and supplier schedules. The Contractor shall provide the IMP in accordance with Exhibit B (B002) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.3 Integrated Master Schedule

The Contractor shall maintain an IMS that accurately reflects and projects program milestones and activities. The Contractor shall provide the IMS in accordance with Exhibit B (Item B003) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.4 Program Reviews and Meetings

The Contractor and its major subcontractors (defined as any subcontract in excess of $100,000; any subcontract for explosive components; any subcontract for fuze initiators and accessories; and any other subcontracts as mutually agreed to by the Government and Contractor) shall conduct program meetings to review program and schedule status, current areas of risk, and current technical and performance status.

The Contractor shall coordinate, host, co-chair, and participate in program conferences, reviews, and meetings, including:

Post Award Conference;

Semi-Annual Program Management Reviews (PMRs);

Weekly Teleconferences;

Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs);

Other meetings, as required;

Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs).

· The Contractor shall host a Systems Requirements Review-2 (SRR-2)/Systems Functional Review (SFR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR), Critical Design Review (CDR), and Production Readiness Review (PRR)/Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). All design reviews shall be held at the Contractor’s facility and at subcontractor’s facilities (as required) in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.2.1.3.

The Contractor shall prepare and distribute meeting agendas in accordance with Exhibit B (Item B004) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall also prepare and distribute conference minutes documenting attendees, significant actions, action items, and Contractor and Government presentation material in accordance with Exhibit B (Item B005) CDRL, DD Form 1423. Action Items shall be tracked until closure.

3.1.4.1 Post-Award Conference

The Contractor shall host at its facility a Government-chaired Post Award Conference within 30 days of contract award. The purpose of the Post-Award Conference is to ensure both the Government and Contractor achieve a clear and mutual understanding of all contract requirements. The Government will establish and distribute the agenda and minutes.

3.1.4.2 Program Management Reviews

The Contractor shall host at its facility, or a location that is mutually agreed upon with the Government, semi-annual Program Management Reviews (PMRs). The Contractor shall conduct PMRs that review the program schedule, areas of risk, and current technical performance, and shall provide a forum for discussing issues that impact the FMU-139D/B fuze program. Additionally, PMRs shall provide visibility into the conduct and consequence of the Contractor’s and major subcontractor’s efforts and performance including any technical or schedule performance problem areas and recommended actions. Action items will be identified and tracked through closure, and shall be submitted with the minutes.

3.1.4.3 Technical Interchange Meetings

The Contractor shall support Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs) with the Government. TIMs shall keep the Government apprised of program progress and review status toward achievement of schedule milestones, risk, and technical performance requirements.

3.1.5 Subcontract Management

The Contractor shall ensure the requirements of this contract are consistently applied to all subcontracts. The Contractor shall maintain its program to assure effective control over the quality of all products, processes, and services procured from subcontractors. The Contractor shall conduct periodic reviews of its subcontractors to determine their continued capability to control the quality of materials or services specified in the contract. The Contractor shall also ensure all quality and manufacturing requirements are included in all subcontracts.

3.1.6 Systems Engineering

The Contractor shall maintain Systems Engineering practices to ensure all aspects of the product life cycle and use are appropriately considered. The Contractor shall perform the necessary tasks to ensure PMA201-12-001, PMA201-13-004, and other contract requirements are met and that the finished product is capable of achieving mission success. The Contractor shall maintain a requirements traceability database in IBM Rational Dynamic Object Oriented Requirements System (DOORS), or equivalent software. Initial requirements traceability data are provided in Attachment 3. Subject requirements traceability information shall be made available to the Government for review, as well as be provided in support of Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs) or other meetings, as required.

3.1.6.1 Risk Management

The Contractor shall develop a Risk Management Plan (RMP), maintain a risk register, and convene routine joint USG-Contractor Risk Management Board (RMB) meetings in accordance with NAVAIRINST 5000.21, NAVAIR Risk Management Policy. The Contractor shall maintain its FMU-139D/B integrated risk management system to mitigate risks that could negatively impact FMU-139D/B program technical, cost, and schedule performance. Status of active risk areas shall be reported at program meetings and reviews. RMP and Risk Management Status Reports shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit A (A001 and A002) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.6.2 Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver a Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A003) CDRL, DD Form 1423. All failure modes due to safety and reliability risks, their local / system effects, and associated detection methods shall be identified. The FMECA may be performed using MIL-STD-1629 as guidance. All single point failures that can lead to early burst shall be identified and, if possible, mitigations shall be identified and implemented.

3.1.7 Quality Assurance Engineering

The Contractor shall maintain a Quality Assurance (QA) program that meets the requirements of SAE International Aerospace Standard AS9100C Quality System. All of the QA requirements of this contract shall flow down to all tiers of subcontracts to ensure that subcontractor supplies conform to the requirements of this contract. The Contractor shall submit a Quality Assurance Plan in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A004) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor should use Manufacturing and Quality Program, MIL-HDBK-896 as guidance.

3.1.8 Parts Control

3.1.8.1 Counterfeit Parts and Material

The Contractor shall establish and maintain counterfeit parts avoidance policies and practices to ensure that only genuine, new, and unused material, components, and parts are obtained from the original manufacturers, their authorized suppliers, or from suppliers who obtain such parts and materiel exclusively from the original manufacturer or their authorized suppliers for incorporation into delivered product. The Contractor shall ensure that subcontractors, suppliers, and distributors have demonstrated counterfeit avoidance policies and practices. The identification of any suspected or confirmed counterfeit items shall be immediately reported to the Government. SAE AS5553, Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition may be used as guidance.

3.1.8.2 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages The Contractor shall develop and provide a program plan to address Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A005) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall also develop and maintain a Bill of Materials (BOM) centered on minimizing the impact of component obsolescence and technical obsolescence to the FMU-139D/B program, including items using special materials or unique processes. The Contractor shall manage obsolescence and DMSMS over the entire period of the contract. All costs for redesign, qualification, and testing efforts shall be borne by the Contractor. This obsolescence management responsibility includes an ongoing review and identification of actual and potential obsolescence issues, including, but not limited to, obsolescence of components, assemblies, subassemblies, piece parts, and material. The Contractor shall continually investigate parts availability, interchangeability, and substitutability; and identify necessary parts replacement, vendor interfaces, engineering efforts, testing requirements, internal drawing changes, etc. The Contractor shall provide the Government with obsolescence status briefs as part of the periodic program reviews.

3.1.9 Gaging

The Contractor shall develop drawings and calibration procedures for all gaging equipment. The Contractor shall submit the drawing and calibration procedures for gaging equipment associated with all critical, major, and minor characteristics to the Government in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A006) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Government will approve all gaging equipment used to verify critical, major, or minor characteristics. The Contractor shall calibrate all gaging necessary for production of the FMU-139D/B Electronic Bomb Fuze and accessories in accordance with internal calibration procedures. The Contractor shall ensure that all gaging equipment calibration is sustained throughout the performance of this contract.

3.1.10 Test Equipment

The Contractor shall develop drawings and calibration procedures for all test equipment. The Contractor shall submit the drawing and calibration procedures for test equipment associated with all the testing of critical, major, and minor characteristics to the Government in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A006) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Government will certify all test equipment used to test critical, major, or minor characteristics. The Contractor shall calibrate all test equipment necessary for production of the FMU-139D/B Electronic Bomb Fuze and accessories in accordance with internal calibration procedures. The Contractor shall ensure that all test equipment calibration is sustained throughout the performance of this contract.

3.1.11 Government Testing

The Contractor shall provide technical support, such as providing technical documentation/data and answering technical questions, for Government test events required to obtain flight clearances for the FMU-139D/B fuze. These test events may include captive carriage, weapon separation, and carrier suitability flight testing.

3.1.12 Lot Acceptance Testing

The Contractor shall prepare a Lot Acceptance Test (LAT) Plan in accordance with PMA201-12-001 and Exhibit A (Item A007) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall submit the LAT Plan in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A007) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall perform LAT in accordance with the LAT Plan. The Contractor shall provide a LAT report upon completion of LAT for each deliverable lot in accordance with Exhibit A (A008) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.13 System Safety Program

The Contractor shall develop and maintain its FMU-139D/B System Safety program in accordance with Department of Defense Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882, to ensure the safety requirements of PMA201-12-001 and PMA201-13-004 are satisfied and safety is maintained throughout the manufacturing, handling, storage, and transportation of fuzes.

3.1.13.1 Safety Assessment

The Contractor shall perform a safety assessment in accordance with MIL-STD-882 prior to each design review and following qualification testing. The Contractor shall also submit a Safety Assessment Report in accordance with Exhibit A (A009) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.14 Reliability

3.1.14.1 Fuze Reliability Prediction

The Contractor shall generate and maintain a fuze reliability prediction model that includes, at a minimum, all active and passive electronic components (including printed wiring boards, soldering, and interconnects), all electro-explosive components, and all explosive components. MIL-HDBK-217 should be used as guidance. The reliability prediction shall be based on either parts count or actual derated operating conditions. The Contractor shall submit a Fuze Reliability Prediction Report in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00A) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.14.2 Detonation Transfer Reliability

The Contractor shall include Detonation Transfer Reliability in the fuze reliability prediction model. Determination of the explosive train reliability and detonation transfer probability may be determined by the methods in Statistical Methods for Evaluation of Fuze Explosive Train Safety and Reliability, NAVORD 2101 and an Expanded Varicomp Method for Determining Detonation Transfer Probabilities, NWC TP 5789. The reliability prediction model should use the values and methods delineated by MIL-HDBK-217.

3.1.15 Failure Reporting Analysis & Corrective Action System

The Contractor shall maintain its closed loop Failure and Fault Reporting, Analysis and Corrective Action System (FRACAS) in support of the FMU-139D/B fuze program. The Contractor shall provide visibility and traceability of all reported failures (including manufacturing and production, qualification testing, First Article Test (FAT), or LAT) from discovery to closeout. For the purposes of the FMU-139D/B program, a “failure” is defined as the fuze, or any subassembly, component or accessory thereof, failing to perform per the requirements of PMA201-12-001 and PMA201-13-004, regardless of the terminology that may be used by Contractors, such as, but not limited to, “anomalies,” “glitches,” “hiccups,” or “no test”.

3.1.15.1 Failure Reporting

The Contractor shall notify the Government Program Office (PMA-201) via email within 24 hours after a failure occurs (including during qualification testing, FAT, or LAT.)

3.1.15.2 Failure Analysis

The Contractor shall perform failure analysis on ALL failures (including qualification testing, FAT, or LAT) to the level required to determine the cause of failure, define the failure mechanism, and develop corrective actions to eliminate or minimize their recurrence. The Contractor shall maintain records of failure analyses, including causes and effects. Failure Analysis and Corrective Action Reports (FACARs) shall be prepared for all failures occurring during qualification testing, FAT, or LAT in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00B) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.15.3 Corrective Actions

The Contractor shall develop and implement corrective actions to eliminate or minimize recurrence of failure mechanisms and their effects. Corrective actions for all qualification testing, FAT, or LAT failures shall meet the following criteria:

1. Confirmed as an effective corrective action either through analyses or by testing;

Scheduled for incorporation into production equipment via Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) when corrective action results in an update to the technical data package;

Established and maintained in a database recording all reworked hardware (if rework is required); and Approved by the Government.

3.1.16 Explosives Control

The Contractor shall maintain a program to track and control explosives material and electro-explosive devices within the FMU-139D/B program. An Ammunition Data Card shall be provided with each fuze deliverable lot in accordance with Exhibit G (G001) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.17 Software Support

The Contractor shall develop a software development and test plan appropriate for the software effort to be performed on the FMU139D/B program and provide the plan to the Government in accordance with Exhibit A (A007) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall provide technical support during Government aircraft and weapon software development and integration efforts. Examples of technical support include providing technical documentation/data and answering technical questions that arise during software development/integration efforts for the FMU-139D/B fuze. The Contractor shall maintain configuration control of software and firmware products. Verification and validation of all software products shall be conducted for all delivered products and changes and documented in a Software Test Report, in accordance with Exhibit A (A008) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.18 Configuration Management

3.1.18.1 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall maintain its Configuration Management (CM) system to ensure proper product identification, documentation and traceability, baselines, change management (tracking, reporting, and implementation accountability), interface management, and maintenance of the Contractor’s Technical Data Package (TDP). Contractor should use Military Handbook Configuration Management Guidance, MIL-HDBK-61A, as guidance.

The CM system shall satisfy the following requirements:

1. Maintain hardware and software baseline requirements as reflected by PMA201-12-001 and PMA201-13-004. This baseline shall include hardware drawings and software programs and code that represent the delivered end items. The Contractor shall maintain its design configuration baseline by updating formal documentation (e.g., specifications, drawings, and documents) that describes the as-built configuration of the FMU-139D/B in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00C) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

Verify system requirements have been incorporated and implemented into the evolving (detailed) baseline.

Include a change control system to identify, evaluate, disposition, and implement proposed hardware and software changes to the established baseline.

Provide for periodic audits, including subcontractors, to ensure the overall requirements and objectives of the program are being accomplished and satisfied.

3.1.18.2 Engineering Change Proposals

Upon formal closure of the PCA, all changes (ECPs and deviations) to fuze hardware configuration require Government approval or concurrence in the classification of the change. The Contractor shall prepare ECPs and submit in accordance with Exhibit G (G002) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall perform a safety impact assessment and submit it in conjunction with each ECP in accordance with Exhibits A and G (A009 and G002) CDRLs, DD Form 1423.

3.1.18.3 Notice of Revisions

Notice of Revisions shall be submitted concurrently with ECP submittals in accordance with Exhibit G (Item G003) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.18.4 Request for Deviations

The Contractor shall prepare Requests for Deviation (RFDs) for departures from the performance specification, TDP, or other contract requirement. Each RFD shall identify the specific requirement affected by the RFD, the temporary condition to be approved, and long-term mitigation plan for returning to the functional and product baseline. The Contractor shall submit RFDs in accordance with Exhibit G (G004) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

The Contractor shall perform a safety impact assessment for all Major/Critical deviations and submit in conjunction with each RFD in accordance with Exhibit G (A009 and G004) CDRLs, DD Form 1423.

3.1.19 Shipping, Storage, Packing and Marking

The Contractor shall design and test internal packaging material to be used in conjunction with M548 containers to meet the requirements of PMA201-12-001, paragraphs, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 4.3.8 and 5. Upon successful testing, the Contractor shall submit the applicable test report(s) in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A008) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

Packaging shall be designed so that FMU-139D/B fuzes remain safe and operable throughout the fuze life cycle, as defined by PMA201-12-001, paragraphs 3.6 and 3.7. There shall be three FMU-139D/B fuze packaging configurations: 1) FMU-139D/B Fuze System, as defined by PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.1; 2) FMU-139D/B Fuze, as defined by PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.2; and 3) FMU-139D/B Accessory Kit, as defined by PMA201-12-001, paragraph B.5. Packaging drawings shall be provided to the Government for review and approval in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00C) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.20 Source Data

The Contractor shall provide source data to support Government efforts, such as technical manual updates, flight clearances, training plan updates, and other documentation updates, as required in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00D) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.1.21 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program

The Contractor shall participate in the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP).

Formal response in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00E) CDRL, DD Form 1423, to GIDEP alerts shall be provided to the Government when they affect the FMU-139D/B Program.

3.2 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

3.2.1 First Article Test and Qualification (CLIN 0001)

The Contractor shall perform all non-recurring engineering efforts required in support of the FMU-139D/B program from contract award through completion and approval of all SETRs, Qualification Test, First Article Test (FAT) and Safety Review Boards.

3.2.1.1 Qualification Testing

The Contractor shall develop a Qualification Test Plan that meets the requirements of PMA201-12-001 and submit the test plan to the Government in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A007) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall conduct qualification testing in accordance with the Qualification Test Plan. The Contractor shall provide a Qualification Test Report in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A008) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

The Contractor shall perform a root cause analysis in accordance with SOW paragraph 3.1.15 and develop a corrective action and implementation plan for any qualification sample that fails.

3.2.1.2 First Article Test

The Contractor shall develop a FAT Plan that meets the requirements of PMA201-12-001 and submit the plan in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A007) CDRL, DD Form 1423. The Contractor shall complete the following SETR events prior to commencing FAT: Systems Readiness Review 2 (SRR-2)/Systems Functional Review (SFR), Preliminary Design Review (PDR), and Critical Design Review (CDR). The Contractor shall conduct FAT in accordance with PMA201-12-001, FAR Clause 52.209-3, “FIRST ARTICLE APPROVAL – CONTRACTOR TESTING (SEP 1989) – ALT 1 (JAN 1997)”, the Government-approved FAT Plan and the requirements of this SOW. The FAT report shall be submitted in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A008) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

3.2.1.3 Systems Engineering Technical Reviews

The Contractor shall conduct Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs), as identified in SOW paragraph 3.1.4, throughout the program to review the status of program elements including systems engineering, software development, production, system test (including test preparation, execution, and test reviews), risk, material, configuration management and control, and Integrated Logistics Support (ILS). Each review shall be conducted and tailored in accordance with the Systems Engineering Technical Review Process, NAVAIRINST 4355.19D. The Contractor shall provide the support required to adequately prepare for and conduct all required SETRs, including tracking all resulting action items to closure.

3.2.1.4 Safety Review Boards

The Contractor shall obtain approval of its design from the Weapon System Explosives Safety Review Board (WSESRB), Software System Safety Technical Review Panel (SSSTRP), Joint Services Software Safety Authority Technical Review Panel (JS-SSA-TRP), Non-Nuclear Munitions Safety Board (NNMSB), and the Fuze Initiator System Technical Review Panel (FISTRP). PMA201-12-001, paragraph 4.0, and PMA201-13-004, paragraph 5.0, detail the Verification Requirements that will be reviewed by the Safety Boards in conjunction with the approval of the design.

3.2.2 Test and Trainer Fuzes (CLINs 0002, 0003, 0104-0404, 0105-0405, 0106-0406, 0107-0407) The Contractor shall deliver FMU-139D/B Live Test Fuzes (CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0104-0404), Inert FMU-139D/B(D-1) Test Fuzes (CLIN 0003 and CLIN 0105-0405), FMU-139D/B(D-2) Trainer Fuzes (CLIN 0106-0406), FMU-139D/B(D-5) Cut-away Fuzes (CLIN 0107-0407), and accessories in accordance with PMA201-12-001, PMA201-13-004, and other contract requirements. The Contractor shall provide the part number and drawings for all test and trainer fuze configurations for Government concurrence prior to manufacture, in accordance with Exhibit A (Item A00C) CDRL, DD Form 1423.

(CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0104-0404) The Contractor shall provide fully functional, flight-worthy FMU-139D/B Live Test Fuze and accessories. The FMU-139D/B Test Fuze and accessories shall have the same external dimensions, external connections, and similar weight (±10%) to an operational FMU-139D/B in accordance with PMA201-12-001. The FMU-139D/B Live Test Fuze and accessories configuration shall be as outlined in PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.1.

(CLIN 0003 and CLIN 0105-0405) The Contractor shall provide fully functional, flight-worthy FMU-139D/B (D-1) Inert Test Fuze and accessories. The FMU-139D/B Inert Test Fuze and accessories shall have the same external dimensions, external connections, and similar weight (±10%) to an operational FMU-139D/B in accordance with PMA201-12-001. The FMU-139D/B (D-1) Test Fuze and accessories configuration shall be as outlined in PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.1.

(CLIN 0106-0406) The FMU-139D/B (D-2) Load Crew Training Fuze shall be of the same diameter and shape of the parent FMU-139D/B fuze. It shall have a capability of duplicating every action required during the loading of the parent FMU-139D/B. Internal hardware shall not be necessary, except as may be required for checkout. The weight shall be within 10% and the center of gravity shall be within 2% of the parent FMU-139D/B.

(CLIN 0107-0407) The FMU-139D/B (D-5) Cut-away Fuze shall be of the same diameter and shape of the parent FMU-139D/B Fuze. It shall be assembled with simulated explosive components and sectioned to provide visual observation of the internal structures/components.

3.2.3 Fuze and Accessories (CLINs 0101-0401, 0102-0402, 0103-0403) (CLIN 0101-0401) The FMU-139D/B Fuze System shall be delivered in accordance with the requirements of PMA201-12-001, PMA201-13-004, this SOW, and other contractual requirements, with the exception noted below. The configuration is defined in PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.1.

The fuze shall be produced to the requirements of General Specification for Ammunition, MIL-A-2550B with the following exception:

1. Positional and Other Geometrical Tolerances – Paragraph 3.10. – Use ASME Y14.5 in lieu of referenced USASI Y14.5.

(CLIN 0102-0402) The FMU-139D/B Fuze shall be delivered in accordance with the requirements of PMA201-12-001, PMA201-13-004, this SOW, and other contractual requirements, with the exception noted below. The configuration is defined in PMA201-12-001, paragraph 5.2.

The fuze shall be produced to the requirements of General Specification for Ammunition, MIL-A-2550B with the following exception:

a. Positional and Other Geometrical Tolerances – Paragraph 3.10. – Use ASME Y14.5 in lieu of referenced USASI Y14.5.

(CLIN 0103-0403) The FMU-139D/B Fuze Accessory Kit shall be delivered in accordance with the requirements of PMA201-12-001, PMA201-13-004, this SOW, and other contractual requirements, with the exception noted below. The configuration is defined in PMA201-12-001, paragraph B.5.

The fuze shall be produced to the requirements of General Specification for Ammunition, MIL-A-2550B with the following exception:

a. Positional and Other Geometrical Tolerances – Paragraph 3.10. – Use ASME Y14.5 in lieu of referenced USASI Y14.5.

Table1: Applicable CDRLs and Associated Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) Referenced in This SOW