Annex_K_-_Evaluation_Final_Report_Template_outline.pdf

PDF 41 KB Posted

Attached to
Independent Evaluation Services - Namibia Tourism Activities Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
MCC-16-RFQ-0204
Issued by
Millennium Challenge Corporation

About this file

Annex K

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Independent Evaluation Services - Namibia Tourism Activities, newest first.
File Type Posted
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0004_(Signed).pdf PDF
M E_Plan_-_version_of_7-1-14_(approved)_(final).pdf PDF
ITT_-_completed_Q20_(July-Sept_2014)_(2015_01_09)_final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0003.pdf PDF
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0002.pdf PDF
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0001.pdf PDF
Annex_I_-_Data_Collection_Plan.pdf PDF
Annex_N_-_Medical_Accomodation_Procedures.pdf PDF
FBO_Synopsis_-_MCC-16-RFQ-0204_-_Independent_Evaluation_Services_-_Namibia_Tourism.pdf PDF
Annex_H_-_MCC_Evaluation_Management_and_Review_Process_DRAFT.pdf PDF
Annex_D_-_Economic_Model_for_Tourism_Marketing_Activity.pdf PDF
Annex_F_-_Evaluation_Services_Travel_SOW_Template.pdf PDF
Annex_A_-_Toursim_Project_Description.pdf PDF
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_-_Independent_Evaluation_Services_(Namibia_Tourism).pdf PDF
Annex_M_-_Evaluator_Progress_Report_ _Work_Plan.pdf PDF
Annex_C_-_Economic_Model_for_ENP_Activity.pdf PDF
Annex_L_-_MCC_Data_Documentation_and_Anonymization_Requirements.pdf PDF
Annex_B_-_Tourism_Program_Logic.pdf PDF
Annex_P_-_Travel_Form_-_DS-4086A.pdf PDF
Annex_Q_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Annex_J_-__MCC_Informed_Consent_Statement_Draft.pdf PDF
Annex_G_-_Evaluation_Design_Report_Outline_Template.pdf PDF
Annex_O_-_Travel_Form_-_DS-4086.pdf PDF
Annex_E_-_Project_Evaluability_Assessment_draft.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MCC Independent Evaluation Final Report Outline Template

i. List of Acronyms

ii. Table of Contents

iii. Executive Summary1

a. Overview of Compact and intervention(s) evaluated

b. Evaluation type, questions, methodology

c. Implementation summary

d. Findings

e. Next steps/future analysis

1 The Executive Summary should be written for a general audience and should provide a complete summary of the evaluation. Keep in mind that many people only read the Executive Summary.

1. Introduction

2. Overview of the Compact and the intervention(s) evaluated2

2.1. Compact Program Logic (input, output, short-term outcomes, medium/long-term outcomes, ultimate impact)

2.1.1. Project-level, lower as necessary

2.1.2. Link to ERR and Beneficiary Analysis

2.1.3. Program Participants (who is being targeted and why)

2.1.4. Geographic Coverage (where is it being implemented and why)

2.1.5. Implementation Summary3

2.1.5.1. Summary of implementation:

2.1.5.1.1. Who were the implementers?

2.1.5.1.2. What were the projected and actual costs?

2.1.5.1.3. Were monitoring targets achieved? Why or why not?

2.1.5.1.3.1. Include Activity Monitoring Plan when applicable

2.1.5.1.4. How was the selection of participants/recruitment defined?

3. Literature review of the evidence

3.1. Evidence gaps that current evaluation fills

4. Evaluation Design

4.1. Evaluation type (performance, impact or mix)

4.2. Evaluation questions

4.2.1. Country-specific and international policy relevance of evaluation

4.2.2. Define key outcomes linked to program logic

4.3. Methodology

4.4. Study Sample (required sample size, sample frame, selection process, stratification, stages of sample selection, design omissions in the sample, level of representation, strategy for absent respondents)

4.5. Timeframe

4.5.1. Justification for proposed exposure period to treatment

5. Findings

5.1. Estimated impact (or potential effect for performance evaluations) on key outcomes and pathways through which effects (or lack of effects) are explained (will vary in rigor if impact or performance evaluation)

5.2. Comparison with ex-ante ERR projections and M&E Plan targets

5.3. Policy implications

6. Next Steps and/or Future Analysis

6.1. Dissemination procedures

6.2. Additional analysis and deliverables expected (journal articles, workshops, conferences, etc.)

2 Be sure to use the appropriate Project/Activity/Sub-Activity terminology.

3 This is really intended to answer – was the program implemented according to plan. The core description of the project belongs in Section 2.

7. References

Annexes

• Stakeholder Comments and Evaluator Responses

• Stakeholder Statement of Support or Difference

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .