ITT_-_completed_Q20_(July-Sept_2014)_(2015_01_09)_final.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 147 KB Posted Oct 4, 2016

Attached to: Independent Evaluation Services - Namibia Tourism Activities Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: MCC-16-RFQ-0204
Issued by: Millennium Challenge Corporation

About this file

From the source

Indicator Tracking Table

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Independent Evaluation Services - Namibia Tourism Activities, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0004_(Signed).pdf	PDF	Oct 7, 2016
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0003.pdf	PDF	Oct 4, 2016
M E_Plan_-_version_of_7-1-14_(approved)_(final).pdf	PDF	Oct 4, 2016
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0002.pdf	PDF	Sep 6, 2016
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_0001.pdf	PDF	Aug 30, 2016
Annex_I_-_Data_Collection_Plan.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_N_-_Medical_Accomodation_Procedures.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
FBO_Synopsis_-_MCC-16-RFQ-0204_-_Independent_Evaluation_Services_-_Namibia_Tourism.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_H_-_MCC_Evaluation_Management_and_Review_Process_DRAFT.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_Q_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_J_-__MCC_Informed_Consent_Statement_Draft.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_G_-_Evaluation_Design_Report_Outline_Template.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_O_-_Travel_Form_-_DS-4086.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_E_-_Project_Evaluability_Assessment_draft.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_D_-_Economic_Model_for_Tourism_Marketing_Activity.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_F_-_Evaluation_Services_Travel_SOW_Template.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_A_-_Toursim_Project_Description.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
MCC-16-RFQ-0204_-_Independent_Evaluation_Services_(Namibia_Tourism).pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_M_-_Evaluator_Progress_Report_ _Work_Plan.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_C_-_Economic_Model_for_ENP_Activity.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_K_-_Evaluation_Final_Report_Template_outline.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_L_-_MCC_Data_Documentation_and_Anonymization_Requirements.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_B_-_Tourism_Program_Logic.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016
Annex_P_-_Travel_Form_-_DS-4086A.pdf	PDF	Aug 5, 2016

Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ITT - Requrements TBD

Displayed on Every Tab

Compact/Project

Annual Targets

Goal/Objective

Quarter N

Cumulative Quarters 1-N

Quarterly Targets

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

End of Compact

Indicator

Unit

Baseline

Actual

Target

Percentatge

Actual

Target

Percentage

Q N+1

Q N+2

Q N+3

Q N+4

Q1 - Q4

Q5 - Q8

Q9 - Q12

Q13 - Q16

Q17 - Q20

Cumulative Year 1 - 5

Pre-populated field

Text

Numeric

Numeric*

Numeric

Numeric percentage value

Numeric

DD-MM-YYYY

Business Rules:

The quarterly targets section diaplays the 4 quarters of the respective fiscal year.

Compact-Wide Goal Indicators

Indicator Tracking Table (ITT)

Country:

Namibia

Project:

All Projects and Activities

Submission Date: December 1, 2014

Compact Year 1

Compact Year 2

Compact Year 3

Compact Year 4

Compact Year 5

Progress to Date

Notes

MCC Comments

MCA Follow-Up

(Oct-2009 to Sept-2010)

(Oct-2010 to Sept-2011)

(Oct-2011 to Sept-2012)

(Oct-2012 to Sept-2013)

(Oct-2013 to Sept-2014)

Yearly Target

% Complete

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q10

Q11

Q12

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q13

Q14

Q15

Q16

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q17

Q18

Q19

Q20

Yearly Target

% Complete

Common Indicator

Indicator Level

Indicator

Classification

Unit

Baseline

Oct 2009 - Dec 2009

Jan 2010 - Mar 2010

Apr 2010 - Jun 2010

Jul 2010 - Sep 2010

Oct 2010 - Dec 2010

Jan 2011 - Mar 2011

Apr 2011 - Jun 2011

Jul 2011 - Sep 2011

Oct 2011 - Dec 2011

Jan 2012 - Mar 2012

Apr 2012 - Jun 2012

Jul 2012 - Sep 2012

Oct 2012 - Dec 2012

Jan 2013 - Mar 2013

Apr 2013 - Jun 2013

Jul 2013 - Sep 2013

Oct 2013 - Dec 2013

Jan 2014 - Mar 2014

Apr 2014 - Jun 2014

Jul 2014 - Sep 2014

Actual to Date

End of Compact Target

% Complete To Date

N	Goal	Poverty Rate	Level	Percentage	27.60		20.00			20.00
N	Goal	Unemployment Rate	Level	Percentage	51.20	29.60	33.60	122.73%	29.60	33.60	122.73%	The change in rate should be cautiously interpreted, given data quality issues with the baseline (whose true value likely lies around 33%) and changes in the data collection methodology in CY5 versus the baseline year.

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

	N	Goal	Median household Income	Level	Namibian Dollars
(2003/2004)	43,520					55,269	55,269

Education

Indicator Tracking Table (ITT)

Country:

Namibia

Project:

Education

Submission date:

9-Jan-15

Compact Year 1

Compact Year 2

Compact Year 3

Compact Year 4

Compact Year 5

Progress to Date

Notes

(Oct-2009 to Sept-2010)

(Oct-2010 to Sept-2011)

(Oct-2011 to Sept-2012)

(Oct-2012 to Sept-2013)

(Oct-2013 to Sept-2014)

Yearly Target

% Complete

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q10

Q11

Q12

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q13

Q14

Q15

Q16

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q17

Q18

Q19

Q20

Yearly Target

% Complete

Common Indicator

Indicator Level

Indicator

Classification

Unit

Baseline

Oct 2009 - Dec 2009

Jan 2010 - Mar 2010

Apr 2010 - Jun 2010

Jul 2010 - Sep 2010

Oct 2010 - Dec 2010

Jan 2011 - Mar 2011

Apr 2011 - Jun 2011

Jul 2011 - Sep 2011

Oct 2011 - Dec 2011

Jan 2012 - Mar 2012

Apr 2012 - Jun 2012

Jul 2012 - Sep 2012

Oct 2012 - Dec 2012

Jan 2013 - Mar 2013

Apr 2013 - Jun 2013

Jul 2013 - Sep 2013

Oct 2013 - Dec 2013

Jan 2014 - Mar 2014

Apr 2014 - Jun 2014

Jul 2014 - Sep 2014

Actual to Date

End of Compact Target

% Complete To Date

E-1	Process	Value of signed educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts	Cumulative	US Dollars	0																82,707,051	72,993,740	113%	89,980,756	89,980,756	89,980,756	89,980,756	89,382,730	101%	94,399,435	94,744,889	94,744,889	96,290,298.39	90,382,730	107%	96,290,298	90,382,730	107%
E-2	Process	Percent disbursed of educational facility construction, rehabilitation, and equipping contracts	Level	Percentage	0																37	66	56%	36	50	58	70	83	85%	79	86	91	99	100	99%	99	100	99%
E-4	Output	Educational facilities constructed or rehabilitated	Cumulative	Number	0																23	23	100%	23	23	23	29	55	53%	43	44	59	60	57	105%	60	57	105%	As of end of Q20: 48 schools, 8 COSDECs, 3 RSRCs, 1 Arts and Craft Center.
	Activity 1: Improving the Quality of General Education
	Sub Activity: Improving the Quality of General Education (47 Schools)
	Process	Value of signed contracts for design/supervisory services for 47 schools	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,930,000	100%	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,928,450	7,930,000	99.98%	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,930,000	100%	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,950,242	7,930,000	100%	9,285,751	9,285,751	9,285,751	10,126,500	7,930,000	128%	10,126,500	7,930,000	128%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Value disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for 47 schools	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	317,138	713,560	1,268,552	1,982,112	2,450,000	81%	2,695,673	2,774,957	3,488,518	4,054,587	4,130,000	98.17%	4,292,441	4,768,148	4,847,432	5,096,000	5,940,000	86%	5,175,285	5,571,707	5,730,276	5,809,560	7,360,000	79%	7,144,559	8,191,114	8,339,866	10,126,500	7,930,000	128%	10,126,500	7,930,000	128%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Percent disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for 47 schools	Level	Percentage	0	4	9	17	27	31	88%	34	35	44	51	52.08	98.19%	54	60	61	64	75	86%	65	70	72	73	93	79%	77	88	90	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
	Process	Value of signed contracts for construction, rehabilitation and equipment for 47 schools	Cumulative	US Dollars	0					12,910,000	0%	16,881,856	16,881,856	16,881,856	31,718,794	45,670,000	69%	31,718,794	41,613,197	41,613,197	53,547,602	55,493,740	96%	59,379,010	59,379,010	59,379,010	59,379,010	57,675,768	103%	63,756,258	64,058,855	64,058,855	66,395,934	58,675,768	113%	66,395,934	58,675,768	113%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC

Costs were higher than expected on Packages 3 and 4 due to increases in scope (relevant contract amentments were entered into).

Penalties resulted in the final contract price reduction for 47 schools howerever there were some additional infrastracture added which were not part of the initial contracts hence there is a net increase.

Process	Value disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for 47 schools	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	1,030,000	0%		2,033,242	4,044,197	8,220,030	20,710,000	40%	11,368,818.38	13,925,914	16,633,612	26,394,043	35,540,023	74%	26,842,394	32,926,265	36,019,723	43,118,007	51,010,164	85%	50,821,991	55,822,884	59,819,524	66,072,388	58,675,768	113%	66,072,388	58,675,768	113%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
Process	Percent disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for 47 schools	Level	Percentage	0	8	0%		12.04	23.96	25.92	45	57%	36	33.47	40	49	64	77%	45	55	61	73	88	83%	80	87	93	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
Output	Educational facilities constructed, rehabilitated, equipped in the 47 schools sub-activity	Cumulative	Number	0	0						13	0%		13	13	23	23	100%	23	23	23	29	45	64%	35	35	48	48	47	102%	48	47	102%	In total 48 Schools were assisted as opposed to the target of 45. (48 = 47 schools + 1 that split)
Output	Percent of schools with positions filled to teach Information, Communication and Technology (ICT) Literacy	Level	Percentage																			88	100	88%	88			71	100	71%	71	100	71%
Output	Learners (any level) participating in the 47 schools sub-activity	Level	Number	26,857	26,857		26,415				27,861	-44%

Author: Author:

This is the same issue as in S20 therefore the formula for a baseline of zero is used (divided the actual by the target) (MCA-N)

Per your note, S36 is fine. Since the end of Compact target differs from the baseline, the other formula should be used for calculating AQ36. (MCC) 27,618 28,393 50% 27,274 28,947 20% 27,795 28,947 45% 27,795 28,947 45% MCA tracked down historical data and sought sector staff input to help explain decreased enrollments. The splitting of schools explains some of it. To ensure we're comparing apples and apples over time, the June 2013 revision of the M&E Plan adjusted this indicator's definition (to account for schools that split and are co-located with the rehabbed school), but following the DQR team visit in November 2013 the baseline figure and subsequent years' data were revised to account for schools that split (and omit schools that would not be helped). Targets were revised downward slightly in the July 2014 version of the M&E Plan to accommodate the lower baseline.

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

Output	Learners (any level) participating in the 47 schools sub-activity (female)	Level	Number	0										13,994			13,994
Output	Learners (any level) participating in the 47 schools sub-activity (male)	Level	Number	0										13,801			13,801
Outcome	Teacher qualification - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	85	85.0	85.0	0%	93.4	86.7	494%	87	88	55%	90	90	104%	90	90	104%	The decrease (between Y3 and Y4) might be explained by the splitting of schools, which created additional elementary schools and, generally, elementary school teachers are less qualified than secondary school teachers. This hypothesis is supported by tables provided with the ITT in March 2014. There also appears to be some natural variation over time.

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

Outcome	Percentage of learners attaining "Basic Achievement" or higher on the Grade 5 NSAT - English - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	30.0	50.2	35.0	404%				48	40	179%	48	40	179%
Outcome	Percentage of learners attaining "Basic Achievement" or higher on the Grade 5 NSAT - mathematics - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	44.0	45.8	49.0	36%				58	54	135%	58	54	135%
Outcome	Pass rate of JSC learners (grade 10) - math - 47 Schools	Level	Percentage	34.1				48.08	49.1	93%	51.30	58.9	69%	51.30	58.9	69%	Context from MCC Education: At the beginning of the program it was assumed that infrastructure and technical equipment provision would improve quality. However, teacher training (subject matter expertise or pedagogical upgrading) and extensive instructional leadership, both since proven to be a catalyst for improvements in average test scores (sustained improvement), were not provided as part of the Compact. Instructional leadership was provided at the end of the Compact only. This could partly explain the results.

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

	Outcome	Pass rate of JSC learners (grade 10) - science - 47 Schools	Level	Percentage	38.6																51.03				55.5	73%	57.60				66.6	68%	57.60	66.6	68%	See comment above.
	Outcome	Pass rate of JSC learners (grade 10) - English - 47 Schools	Level	Percentage	39.3																33.22				56.6	-35%	34.30				67.9	-17%	34.30	67.9	-17%	See comment above.
	Outcome	Pass rate of NSSC learners (grade 12) - math - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	29.8																33.56				42.9	29%	33.56				51.4	17%	33.56	51.4	17%	See comment above.
	Outcome	Pass rate of NSSC learners (grade 12) - science - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	31.6																42.66				45.5	79%	42.66				54.7	48%	42.66	54.7	48%	See comment above.
	Outcome	Pass rate of NSSC learners (grade 12) - English - 47 schools	Level	Percentage	50.8																53.23				73.1	11%	53.22				87.8	7%	53.22	87.8	7%	See comment above.
	Sub-Activity: Policy, Operational, and Administrative Support
	Process	Textbook procurement process reformed	Date	Date																								Mar-14			Jan-14	Complete	Mar-14	Jan-14	Complete
	Output	People trained in facilities maintenance management	Cumulative	Number	0																			0	200	0%	0	0	105	105	200	53%	105	200	53%	According to MCA, because of competing priorities for MoE staff at the time the training took place, the turn out was lower than expected.
	Output	People trained in facilities maintenance management (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																			0			0	0	26	26			26
	Output	People trained in facilities maintenance management (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																			0			0	0	79	79			79
	Output	Regional continuous professional development (CPD) coordinating committees	Cumulative	Number	0											13	13	13	100%		13	13	13	13	13	100%	13	13	13	13	13	100%	13	13	100%
	Output	Regions where Master Trainers have been trained	Cumulative	Number	0																			0	3	0%	0	5	13	13	13	100%	13	13	100%
	Output	Educators trained in instructional leadership	Cumulative	Number	0																								65	65	50	130%	65	50	130%
	Sub -Activity: Equipment for the Colleges of Education (CoEs)
	Process	Value of science teaching equipment delivered	Cumulative	US Dollars	0				53,948	53,948	53,948			53,948	53,948	53,948	53,948				53,948	53,948	53,948	153,748	164,200	94%	153,748	153,748	153,748	466,340	275,223	169%	466,340	275,223	169%
	Activity 2: Vocational Training
	Sub-Activity: Multiple Vocational and Skills Training Sub-Activities
E-6	Outcome	Students participating in MCC-supported education activities	Cumulative	Number	0													599	0%		356	927	947	1,049	1,638	64%	1,049	1,500	1,500	1,500	8,638	17%	1,500	8,638	17%
E-6.1	Outcome	Students participating in MCC-supported education activities (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																	573	582	614			614
E-6.2	Outcome	Students participating in MCC-supported education activities (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																	354	365	435			435
	Sub-Activity: Establishment of NTF
	Process	NTF Levy collection system operational	Date	Date																					Apr-13	Pending			1-Apr-14			Complete	1-Apr-14	1-Apr-13	Complete
	Output	Percent of NTF Levy funds collected that are awarded for skills training and related improvement of training facilities and equipment	Cumulative	Percentage	0																										80			80	0%	MCC requested a report on the status of this indicator but did not receive one before the closure period ended. It will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted from the NTF levy	Cumulative	Number	0																										7,000			7,000	0%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted from the NTF levy (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																															Same as above.
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted from the NTF levy (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																															Same as above.
	Outcome	Compliance rate for NTF levy	Level	Percentage	0																										80			80	0%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
	Sub-Activity: Competitive Grants for High Priority Vocational Skills Training
	Process	Value of vocational training grants awarded through the MCA-N grant facility	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	450,000	0%	644,929	644,929	730,644	730,644	900,000	81%	730,644	1,070,081	1,837,405	7,190,796	1,710,000	421%		7,190,796	7,190,796	7,320,655	7,320,655	4,680,000	156%	8,284,823	8,284,823	8,284,823	8,284,823	4,680,000	177%	8,284,823	4,680,000	177%	Includes funding for training and grants for equipment, etc.
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted through the MCA-N Vocational Training Grant Fund	Cumulative	Number	0	563	0%	60	90	90	110	1,125	10%	110	150	150	150	599	25%		346	927	947	1,135	1,638	69%	1,135	1,500	1,500	1,500	1,638	92%	1,500	1,638	92%
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted through the MCA-N Vocational Training Grant Fund (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																		582													Unable to get disaggregated gender data despite several requests.
	Output	Vocational trainees assisted through the MCA-N Vocational Training Grant Fund (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																		365													Unable to get disaggregated gender data despite several requests.
E-7	Outcome	Graduates from MCC-supported education activities	Cumulative	Number	0						29			29	70	70	72	77	94%	%	72	72	118	138	509	27%	138	138	450	541	1,392	39%	541	1,392	39%	Includes 91 Wolwedans supported trainees graduated. Please note that the Q19 figure verified by the DQR includes NATH but not Wolwedans.
E-7.1	Outcome	Graduates from MCC-supported education activities (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																31	31	54													Unable to get disaggregated gender data despite several requests.
E-7.2	Outcome	Graduates from MCC-supported education activities (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																41	41	64													Unable to get disaggregated gender data despite several requests.
	Outcome	NQA-accredited and/or NTA-registered vocational training providers	Cumulative	Number	25																45			39	59	41%		64	64	64	60	111%	64	60	111%	Despite being an annual indicator, quarterly reports were reported when provided by NTA.

There was a decrease from Q13 as some training providers allowed their NTA registrations to lapse; a more appropriate classification for this indicator would have been level rather than cumulative.

[Training Providers] appear to eventually re-register, but there might be a brief lapse where they don't do so on time. We're not sure what the effect of training grants will be but with the new VETMIS system that's rolling out and the fact that they won't be able to access the system if not registered (and they need to access the system as pat of administering the training), that should keep registrations active -- with the caveat that some TPs may not have steady connections to the system and some work may be done offline; also that the extent to which the NTA will provide adequate training on the system and build other capacity to ensure its appropriate use is unclear.

Given the error in the report flagged during review of the DQR firm's Q19 report, it is possible that earlier reports were also erroneous.

E-8	Outcome	Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities	Cumulative	Number	0																						1,044	0%					1,044			1,044	0%	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
E-8.1	Outcome	Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																																	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
E-8.2	Outcome	Employed graduates of MCC-supported education activities (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																																	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Percentage of trainees who secure employment	Level	Percentage	0																						75	0%					75			75	0%	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Percentage of trainees who secure employment (female)	Level	Percentage	0																																	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Percentage of trainees who secure employment (male)	Level	Percentage	0																																	Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Average gross monthly income of VTGF-supported trainees	Level	Namibian Dollars	1,866																												2,862			2,862		Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Average gross monthly income of VTGF-supported trainees (female)	Level	Namibian Dollars																																		Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Outcome	Average gross monthly income of VTGF-supported trainees (male)	Level	Namibian Dollars																																		Will be reported post-Compact by MCC-contracted evaluator after endline data collection is complete.
	Sub-Activity: Construction and Upgrading of 9 Community Skills and Development Centres
	Process	Value of signed contracts for design/supervisory services for COSDECs	Cumulative	US Dollars	0				2,020,000	0%		1,427,429	1,427,429	1,427,429	2,020,000	71%	1,427,429	1,427,429	1,572,636	1,572,636	1,600,000	98%	1,572,636	1,572,636	1,572,636	1,572,636	1,600,000	98%	1,572,636	1,572,636	1,752,635	1,752,635	1,600,000	110%	1,752,635	1,600,000	110%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Value disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for COSDECs	Cumulative	US Dollars	0				670,000	0%					920,000	0%				1,122,863	1,000,000	112%	1,165,682	1,179,960	1,194,234	1,359,960	1,500,000	91%	1,374,234	1,374,234	1,651,962	1,752,635	1,600,000	110%	1,752,635	1,600,000	110%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Percent disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for COSDECs	Level	Percentage	0				33	0%					46	0%				71	63	113%	74	75	76	86	94	92%	87	87	94	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
	Process	Value of signed contracts for construction, rehabilitation and equipment for COSDECs	Cumulative	US Dollars	0										7,150,000	0%				10,875,455			12,317,753	12,317,753	12,317,753	12,317,753	14,206,962	87%	12,359,184	12,402,041	12,402,041	12,411,056	14,206,962	87%	12,411,056	14,206,962	87%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Value disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for COSDECs	Cumulative	US Dollars	0																		347,194	2,490,446	5,178,652	7,935,437	6,028,481	132%	9,983,870	10,378,343	10,443,110	12,004,881	14,206,962	84%	12,004,881	14,206,962	84%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC
	Process	Percent disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for COSDECs	Level	Percentage	0																		3	20	42	64	42	153%	81	84	84	97	100	97%	97	100	97%
	Output	COSDECS completed	Cumulative	Number	0																					7	8	88%	8	8	8	8	8	100%	8	8	100%	Last COSDEC (Opuwo) was completed during Q17.
	Output	Arts and Crafts Centres completed	Cumulative	Number	0																											1	1	100%	1	1	100%	Official handover was held in Nov 2014.
	Sub-Activity: COSDECs Management Training
	Output	COSDEC staff trained in management	Cumulative	Number	0															15	15	100%	15	15	15	15	15	100%	15	15	15	15	15	100%	15	15	100%	Management training is defined as any training provided under the COSDEC Management Training consultancy and, if someone participates in more than one management course, they are only counted once. Also, only targeted COSDEC management staff are counted, not others who might happen to attend (e.g., volunteers).
	Output	COSDEC staff trained in management (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																					9			9	9	9	9			9
	Output	COSDEC staff trained in management (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																					6			6	6	6	6			6
	Activity 3: Improving Access to and Management of Textbooks
	Sub-Activity: Procurement of Priority Textbooks and Procurement of General Textbooks
	Process	Textbook storage plan complete	Date	Date		12-Nov-09			31-Oct-09	Complete						Complete						Complete													12-Nov-09	31-Oct-09	Complete
	Process	Textbook baseline study completed	Date	Date			31-May-10		31-Mar-10	Complete						Complete						Complete													31-May-10	31-Mar-10	Complete
	Output	Textbooks delivered	Cumulative	Number	0		669,751	669,751	695,164	96%	669,751	669,751	669,751	669,751	695,164	96%	669,751	669,751	669,751	669,751	695,164	96%	669,751	763,930	763,930	763,930	695,164	110%	763,930	1,672,557	1,715,763	1,715,763	1,300,000	132%	1,715,763	1,300,000	132%	In 2010, 669,751 books were delivered to schools and 25,413 were delivered to other institutions e.g. resource centers. If we're strict about the definition, then the number delivered to schools is what should be reported. As such, Q3 number includes only books that were delivered to schools not to resource centers.
	Sub-Activity: Textbook Management Training
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook management trainers	Cumulative	Number	0																					96	100	96%	96	96	96	96	100	96%	96	100	96%
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook management trainers (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																					45			45	45	45	45			45
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook management trainers (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																					51			51	51	51	51			51
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook utilization trainers	Cumulative	Number	0																					75	100	75%	75	136	136	136	100	136%	136	100	136%
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook utilization trainers (female)	Cumulative	Number	0																					29			29	54	54	54			54
	Output	Educators trained to be textbook utilization trainers (male)	Cumulative	Number	0																					46			46	82	82	82			82
	Activity 4: Investment in Regional Study and Resource Centers
	Process	Value of signed contracts for design/supervisory services for RSRCs	Cumulative	US Dollars	0		2,106,536	2,106,536	2,040,000	103%	2,106,536	2,106,536	2,106,536	2,106,536	2,040,000	103%	2,042,678	2,042,678	2,276,470	2,212,613	2,040,000	108%	2,212,613	2,212,613	2,212,613	2,212,613	2,040,000	108%	2,212,613	2,652,043	2,652,043	2,654,100	2,040,000	130%	2,654,100	2,040,000	130%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC.

Increased scope led to increased contract value.

Process	Value disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for RSRCs	Cumulative	US Dollars	102,134	265,548	600,000	44%	592,377	857,925	1,103,046	1,266,461	1,160,000	109%	1,348,168	1,368,594	1,368,594	1,389,021	1,310,000	106%	1,542,032	1,542,032	1,565,857	1,626,845	1,640,000	99%	1,626,845	1,626,845	2,275,559	2,654,100	2,040,000	130%	2,654,100	2,040,000	130%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC.
Process	Percent disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for RSRCs	Level	Percentage	6.90	26.80	29.4	91%	28.12	40.73	52.36	60.12	57	105%	66.00	67	60	63	64	98%	70	70	71	74	80	92%	74	61	86	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
Process	Value of signed contracts for construction, rehabilitation and equipment for RSRCs	Cumulative	US Dollars			4,580,000	0%				11,501,321	9,220,000	125%	11,501,321	11,501,321	18,283,994	18,283,994	17,500,000	104%	18,283,994	18,283,994	18,283,994	18,283,994	17,500,000	104%	18,283,994	18,283,994	18,283,994	17,483,309	17,500,000	100%	17,483,309	17,500,000	100%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC.

Money was de-obligated from the contract between Q19 and Q20.

Process	Value disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for RSRCs	Cumulative	US Dollars		793,227	2,070,000	38%	889,626	1,078,505	1,294,018	4,192,368	12,500,000	34%	4,817,679	9,324,135	10,558,915	12,338,766	17,000,000	73%	13,802,083	15,441,371	15,849,376	17,483,309	17,500,000	100%	17,483,309	17,500,000	100%	Figures calculated using an exchange rate of US$ 1 to N$ 7.00 as suggested by MCC.
Process	Percent disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for RSRCs	Level	Percentage	0	6.90	22	31%	7.73	9.38	7	23	71	32%	26	51	58	67	97	70%	75	84	87	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
Output	RSRCs completed	Cumulative	Number														0	2	0%	1	1	3	3	3	100%	3	3	100%	All 3 RSRC are handed over.
Output	Percent of positions at RSRCs staffed	Level	Percentage															60	0%		49	53	58	100	58%	58	100	58%	Helao Nafidi RSRC 66% staff positions hired while Oshakati has 56% and Gobabis has 53% staff required recruited.

All RSRC have the same number of positions, 32 for each RSRC, so indicator calculated the straight average across centers.

Output

RSRCs opened to visitors

Cumulative

Number

100%

Oshakati RSRC officially opened on September 17, 2014. Helao Nafidi RSRC officially opened on September 18, 2014. Gobabis was officially handed over November 25, 2014.

Outcome

Visits to MCA-N assisted RSRCs

Level

Number

240,000

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

Outcome

Library loans of books and learning and study materials from MCA-N assisted RSRCs

Level

Number

32,000

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

Outcome

Library loans of books and learning and study materials from MCA-N assisted mobile units

Level

Number

1,980

2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

Activity 5: Expanding and Improving Access to Tertiary Finance

Sub Activity: Developing a Financially and Equitable Scholarship and Loan System

Process

Namibia Student Financial Assistance Fund policy in place

Date

22-Nov-12

1-Nov-12

Complete

22-Nov-12

1-Nov-12

Complete

Process

Modified NSFAF MIS completed

Date

1-Jun-13

Pending

1-Jun-13

Pending

The scope of MCA-N's intervention was changed to just complete the user specifications and now it it up to NSFAF to commission the building of the actual MIS.

MCC requested infromation abotu the agreement with NSFAF and what was actually completed but we did not receive a response.

Activity 6: Cross-Project Support
Sub Activity: HIV/AIDS Management Strengthening to HAMU
Output	Educators trained to be HIV/AIDS awareness trainers	Cumulative	Number	0	159	159	159	159	41	388%	159	41	388%	Initially, training was meant for 13 RACE Coordinators, 3 Hamu Staff, 13 CPD staff, 13 School Counsellors and that is how the target was set, but later it was decided that the training should include Deputy Directors, School Inspectors as well as Education Planners, thus the over-achievement.

Tourism

Indicator Tracking Table (ITT)

Country:

Namibia

Project:

Tourism

Submission date:

19-Dec-14

Compact Year 1

Compact Year 2

Compact Year 3

Compact Year 4

Compact Year 5

Progress to Date

Notes

(Oct-2009 to Sept-2010)

(Oct-2010 to Sept-2011)

(Oct-2011 to Sept-2012)

(Oct-2012 to Sept-2013)

(Oct-2013 to Sept-2014)

Yearly Target

% Complete

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q10

Q11

Q12

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q13

Q14

Q15

Q16

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q17

Q18

Q19

Q20

Yearly Target

% Complete

Common Indicator

Indicator Level

Indicator

Classification

Unit

Baseline

Oct 2009 - Dec 2009

Jan 2010 - Mar 2010

Apr 2010 - Jun 2010

Jul 2010 - Sep 2010

Oct 2010 - Dec 2010

Jan 2011 - Mar 2011

Apr 2011 - Jun 2011

Jul 2011 - Sep 2011

Oct 2011 - Dec 2011

Jan 2012 - Mar 2012

Apr 2012 - Jun 2012

Jul 2012 - Sep 2012

Oct 2012 - Dec 2012

Jan 2013 - Mar 2013

Apr 2013 - Jun 2013

Jul 2013 - Sep 2013

Oct 2013 - Dec 2013

Jan 2014 - Mar 2014

Apr 2014 - Jun 2014

Jul 2014 - Sep 2014

Actual to Date

End of Compact Target

% Complete To Date

Outcome	Leisure tourist arrivals	Level	Number	416,991	442,576									423,290						429,189				442,633		422,157				453,699	14%	422,157	453,699	14%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
Outcome	Tourist arrivals	Level	Number	984,099										1,027,229						1,078,937				1,106,782		1,176,042				1,155,480	112%	1,176,042	1,155,480	112%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
Outcome	Jobs in tourism	Level	Number	21,500	22,000													22,000	0%				23,100	22,836	120%					23,841		23,100	23,841	68%	Data are not available yet; NTB is yet to finalise the calculations and it seems the figures will not be available until 2015..
Activity 1: Improving Management and Infrastructure in Etosha National Park
Sub-Activity: ENP Management Reform and Investment Promotion
Process	Galton Gate plan completed	Date	Date		21-Sep-10	30-Sep-10	Complete						Complete						Complete						Complete							21-Sep-10	30-Sep-10	Complete
Process	Galton Gate plan implemented	Cumulative	Percentage	0%	12			18	24	36	36	25	145%	36	47	56	56	70	80%	59	27	48	61	79	77%	61	81	81	100	100	100%	100	100	100%	Reporting is now (post-Q13) against the revised Galton Gate Plan (approved in December 2012), thus the fluctuation in the figures. Targets for Year 4 and Year 5 were updated in the June 2013 M&E Plan revision.

Process	Percent of Conditions Precedents and performance targets met for Etosha National Park activity	Cumulative	Percentage	0%	20.0	38	50	75%	50	50	50	81	100	81%	94	97	97	100	100	100%	100	100	100	100	100	100%	100	100	100	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
Process	Opening of Galton Gate for general tourist use	Date	Date																						31-Jan-13			28-Feb-14				Complete	28-Feb-14	31-Jan-13	Complete
Outcome	Entries and exits through Galton Gate	Level	Number	1,582								2,161			2,193	3,323	5,722	8,731			1,913	3,417	5,920	8,334	10,000	80%	2,387	4,005	8,288	13,313	15,000	87%	13,313	15,000	87%
Outcome	Tourists to Etosha National Park	Level	Number	179,365											44,793	78,698	118,591	184,802	242,000	9%	69,338	96,440	138,594	201,425	265,134	26%	60,700	99,325	129,088	207,450	276,800	29%	207,450	276,800	29%
Outcome	Etosha National Park gross revenue from gate receipts	Level	Namibian Dollars	19,648,166													4,228,999	18,437,444	19,500,000	817%	5,751,960	8,659,700	13,164,520	21,164,768	26,513,418	22%	6,078,262	9,233,502	15,006,362	23,316,100	27,680,008	46%	23,316,100	27,680,008	46%
Outcome	Etosha National Park gross revenue from conservancy-sourced concession fees	Level	Namibian Dollars	0																	0	0	0	0			0	0	0	0	330,000	0%	0	330,000	0%	No payments can or could be made by all three concessionaires (3) ENP awarded traversing concessions i.e. Sheya, Roadsite and Hai//Om. The reasons for the non-payments is business ventures are yet to come into operation as the lodges is currently under construction particularly with reference to Roadsite Lodge (Ehirovipuka traversing concession) and the Sheya Traversing Concession) and there is yet to be an operator appointed for the Hai//Om concession which may lead to any lodge development in future.

As per discussion with MCC, yes this could happen post compact.

Sub-Activity: ENP Management Centres and Staff Housing
Process	Value of signed contracts for design/supervisory services for ENP housing units/management structures	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	4,350,000	0%	2,521,893	2,521,893	2,521,893	3,057,093	3,057,093	100%	3,338,093	3,338,093	3,338,093	3,338,093	3,057,093	109%	3,338,093	3,338,093	3,968,565	3,886,550	3,057,093	127%	3,886,550	3,057,093	127%	Contract value decreased because of de-commitments.
Process	Value disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for ENP housing units/management structures	Cumulative	US Dollars	0	700,000	0%		126,094	315,236	642,179	1,800,000	36%	697,079	1,934,466	2,203,866	2,673,360	2,200,000	122%	2,969,264	2,994,567	3,446,244	3,855,026	3,025,570	127%	3,855,026	3,025,570	127%
Process	Percent disbursed against design/supervisory contracts for ENP housing units/management structures	Level	Percentage	0	16	0%		5	12	21	59	36%	21	58	66	80	72	111%	89	90	87	99	99	100%	99	99	100%
Process	Value of signed contracts for construction, rehabilitation and equipment for ENP housing units/management structures	Cumulative	US Dollars	0											31,000,000	31,000,000	30,865,708	100%	44,051,920	44,051,920	44,051,920	44,023,348	30,865,708	143%	44,023,348	30,865,708	143%	Contract value decreased because of de-commitments.
Process	Value disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for ENP housing units/management structures	Cumulative	US Dollars	0												3,439,491	18,000,000	19%	5,609,452	12,809,085	23,671,956	44,023,348	30,865,708	143%	44,023,348	30,865,708	143%	This indicator was previously lagging due to the delay in the start of contracting caused by the delay in meeting of the CPs by the IP.
Process	Percent disbursed against construction, rehabilitation and equipment contracts for ENP housing units/management structures	Level	Percentage	0												11	58	19%	13	29	54	100	100	100%	100	100	100%	This indicator was previously lagging due to the delay in the start of contracting caused by the delay in meeting of the CPs by the IP.
Process	Galton Gate Construction: Schedule Performance Index (SPI)	Level	Number	0												0.21	1	21%	0.70	0.70	0.93	1.00	1	100%	1.00	1	100%	This is measured against Contractor's recovery program.

This value became somewhat misleading once construction missed the targeted completion date.

Process	Galton Gate Construction: Cost Performance Index (CPI)	Level	Number	0																					0.97	1	97%	0.94	0.94	0.93	0.96	1	96%	0.96	1	96%
Process	Ombika Gate Construction: Schedule Performance Index (SPI)	Level	Number	0																					1.15	1	115%	0.80	0.80	0.81	1.00	1	100%	1.00	1	100%	This value became somewhat misleading once construction missed the targeted completion date.
Process	Ombika Gate Construction: Cost Performance Index (CPI)	Level	Number	0																					0.92	1	92%	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.96	1	96%	0.96	1	96%
Output	Percentage of housing structures completed	Cumulative	Percentage	0																										35	100	100	100%	100	100	100%
Output	Occupancy rate of new housing units completed	Cumulative	Percentage	0																											70	100	70%	70	100	70%	Note that there is an open question as to whether occupancy rates abide by the ENP housing policy. For example, unrelated staff may be assigned to live with one another against policy.
Activity 2: Marketing Namibia in Tourism
Sub-Activity: Destination Marketing North America
Output	North American tourism businesses that offer Namibian tours or tour packages	Level	Number	106													116	118	118	121	80%	120	120	121	127	126	105%	127	127	158		131	208%	158	131	208%	Like with some other indicators implementers pushed hard in the last leg of the Compact
Output	Namibian travel trade business persons trained	Level	Number	0																					615	485	127%	615	615	822		800	103%	822	800	103%	Like with some other indicators implementers pushed hard in the last leg of the Compact
Outcome	Leisure tourist arrivals from the North American market	Level	Number	17,246												14,883						17,217				15,258	-99%	23,306				15,715	-396%	23,306	15,715	-396%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
Outcome	Tourist arrivals from the North American market	Level	Number	22,793												22,791						24,243				23,136	323%	26,116				23,483	482%	26,116	23,483	482%	2014 data for this indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.
Sub-Activity: Regional and Communal Tourism Products
Output	Domestic and regional tourist routes developed and marketed to the public	Cumulative	Number	0										2	0%														3	3	3	3	100%	3	3	100%
Sub-Activity: Interactive Website (includes NTB Website and Online Marketing)
Process	Releases of NTB website completed	Cumulative	Number	0			1	1	100%	1	1	1	1	2	50%	1	1	1	1	2	50%	1	1	1	2	2	100%	2	2	2	2	2	100%	2	2	100%
Output	Unique visits on NTB website	Level	Number	125,685	27,617	54,628	89,695			19,856	56,961	90,272	128,914			38,996	83,272	123,234	145,874			85,698	139,106	188,224	239,463	248,684	93%	34,570	86,082	121,654	160,186	282,605	22%	160,186	282,605	22%
Output	Unique visits on NTB website from the North American market	Level	Number	29,793												14,540	25,902	33,740	37,381			12,792	28,974	40,825	51,054	38,714	238%	6,973	19,933	28,087	35,460	40,649	52%	35,460	40,649	52%
Outcome	Average time spent on the NTB website	Level	Seconds	249												228	234	227	204			144	166	174	176			191	212	206	203			203
Outcome	Registered users of the NTB website	Level	Number							260	294	372	499			485	763	889	928	560	166%	1,131	1,251	1,367		1,739	85%					1,976	0%		1,976		From mid-2013, the reported figures were no longer in line with the indicator definition (due to changes in the website set-up); therefore, from that point, the cells are shaded -- see also the DQR team's Q19 report.
Activity 3: Ecotourism Development for Communal Conservancies
Sub-Activity: Conservancy Support - Needs Assessment
Process	Conservancy needs assessment completed	Date	Date		31-Mar-10				Complete						Complete					31-May-10	Complete													31-Mar-10	31-May-10	Complete
Sub-Activity: Conservancy Support - Ecotourism Development Packages
Process	Value of grants issued by the Conservancy Development Support Grant Fund	Cumulative	Namibian Dollars	0									7,851,777			7,851,777	22,801,613	31,972,469	31,972,469	10,037,706	319%	41,212,261	52,649,101	59,991,576	62,250,009	36,017,651	173%	62,250,009	62,250,009	90,561,529	93,708,470	59,045,329	159%	93,708,470	59,045,329	159%
Output	Game translocated to conservancies with MCA-N support	Cumulative	Number	0		82	294			294	294	294	578	445	130%	578	578	578	2,212	1,305	170%	2,212	2,213	2,213	2,758	2,135	129%	2,758	2,758	2,758	2,758	2,135	129%	2,758	2,135	129%	See related database (sent with request for Q15 funds) for specific species previously translocated. Additional 252 Eland, 49 kudu and 244 waterbuck translocated in Q16.
Output	Rare game translocated to conservancies with MCA-N support	Cumulative	Number	0		82	294			294	294	294	294	161	183%	294	294	294	488	471	104%	488	488	488	732	651	112%	732	732	732	732	651	112%	732	651	112%	Additional 244 Waterbuck translocated in Q16.
Outcome	Amount of new private sector investment secured by MCA-N assisted conservancies	Cumulative	Namibian Dollars	0									3,667,000			3,667,000	3,667,000	3,667,000	8,072,996	20,000,000	40%	8,072,996	8,072,996	8,072,996	66,846,644	33,000,000	203%	66,846,644	66,846,644	66,846,644	136,371,696	40,000,000	341%	136,371,696	40,000,000	341%
Outcome	New joint venture lodges or tented camps	Cumulative	Number	0									0			2	2	2	7	5	140%	7	7	7	10	8	125%	10	10	10	15	12	125%	15	12	125%	Definition revised to lower the minimum contribution required for JVs. Final 5 JVs reported in Q20 correspond to Y5 overall (this is an annual indicator, so quarterly reports are misleading).
Outcome	New small tourism and natural resources enterprises within conservancies	Level	Number	0															10	7	143%	10	10	10	12	7	171%				16	10	160%	16	10	160%
Outcome	New jobs in tourism created in conservancies	Level	Number	0															78	60	130%	78	78	78	137	120	114%				224	120	187%	224	120	187%
Outcome	Annual general meetings (AGMs) with financial reports submitted & benefit distribution plans discussed	Level	Number	0												12	12	12	17	14	121%				25	18	139%				26	25	104%	26	25	104%
Outcome	MCA-N grants aimed at mitigating human wildlife conflicts	Cumulative	Number	0															6	4	150%	6	6	6	7	6	117%	7	7	7	9	8	113%	9	8	113%
Outcome	Annual gross revenue to conservancies receiving MCA assistance	Level	Namibian Dollars	30,833,276									31,674,994	28,495,913	-36%				33,315,560	31,758,274	268%				39,296,204	32,683,273	457%				51,759,310	33,608,271	754%	51,759,310	33,608,271	754%
Outcome	Share of conservancy revenue paid out in dividends and/or spent on community services	Level	Percentage	21									9						43	22	2200%				32	23	550%				32	24	367%	32	24	367%	Re fluctuations, per the CDSS 2012 annual report there was a conservancy which paid out above normal benefits.
Outcome	Median household income in conservancies receiving MCA assistance	Level	Namibian Dollars	5,450																											8,010	TBD		8,010	TBD		To be reviewed and updated after preparing CS/INP Summary of Findings: NORC's End of Project Data Collection Report indicates that the baseline value was NAD5,200. The report does not clarify whether this is simply the weighted median calculated in 2011 NAD. The following context from NORC's final evaluation report is key: "Despite the increases in employment...both the qualitative and quantitative analysis acknowledge that the average household did not see much increase in income through conservancy activities. Quantitative analysis finds no positive or statistically significant relationship between conservancy outcomes (such as benefits or employment) and household income or expenditure."

Agriculture

Indicator Tracking Table (ITT)

Country:

Namibia

Project:

Agriculture

Submission Date:

9-Jan-14

Compact Year 1

Compact Year 2

Compact Year 3

Compact Year 4

Compact Year 5

Progress to Date

Notes

(Oct-2009 to Sept-2010)

(Oct-2010 to Sept-2011)

(Oct-2011 to Sept-2012)

(Oct-2012 to Sept-2013)

(Oct-2013 to Sept-2014)

Yearly Target

% Complete

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q10

Q11

Q12

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q13

Q14

Q15

Q16

Yearly Target

% Complete

Q17

Q18

Q19

Q20

Yearly Target

% Complete

Common Indicator

Indicator Level

Indicator

Classification

Unit

Baseline

Oct 2009 - Dec 2009

Jan 2010 - Mar 2010

Apr 2010 - Jun 2010

Jul 2010 - Sep 2010

Oct 2010 - Dec 2010

Jan 2011 - Mar 2011

Apr 2011 - Jun 2011

Jul 2011 - Sep 2011

Oct 2011 - Dec 2011

Jan 2012 - Mar 2012

Apr 2012 - Jun 2012

Jul 2012 - Sep 2012

Oct 2012 - Dec 2012

Jan 2013 - Mar 2013

Apr 2013 - Jun 2013

Jul 2013 - Sep 2013

Oct 2013 - Dec 2013

Jan 2014 - Mar 2014

Apr 2014 - Jun 2014

Jul 2014 - Sep 2014

Actual to Date

End of Compact Target

% Complete To Date

Activity 1: Land Access and Management

Sub-Activity: Communal Land Support

Process

Registration strategy and implementation plan submitted

Date

20-Dec-10

Complete

30-Nov-11

Complete

20-Dec-10

30-Nov-11

Complete

Process

Procedures, operations, and systems Report submitted

Date

30-Sep-11

Pending

29-Feb-12

Complete

29-Feb-12

30-Sep-11

Complete

Process

Approved procedure in place for securing/registering rural land management areas

Date

Pending

30-Sep-13

Pending

30-Sep-13

Pending

Should still happen post-Compact but it depends on Government action.

This indicator will be included in an abbreviated list of indicators the post-Compact M&E counterpart will report on in April 2015.

	Output	Group rights secured/registered	Cumulative	Number	0																		0	0	0	3	0%	0	3	0%	Should still happen post-Compact but it depends on Government action.
L-1	Output	Legal and regulatory reforms adopted	Cumulative	Number	0														16	2	800%	20	19	19	19	9	211%	19	9	211%	The target was set conservatively, because the CLS team felt that it is not in their power to make sure that Govt adopt the regulations they can only recommend; therefore, more was achieved that initially thought to be possible.
	Output	Outreach events held	Cumulative	Number	0	11	37			45	57	97	97	87	111%	131	143	156	348	196	178%	402	501	552	552	331	167%	552	331	167%	Outreach events were done more on needs bases
L-3	Output	Stakeholders trained	Cumulative	Number	0	346	479	500	96%	479	734	906	906	600	151%	1,076	1,426	1,426	1,549	1,776	87%	1,761	1,858	2,524	2,524	1,936	130%	2,524	1,936	130%	Contract amendment was done to allow for more training based on the identified need. The final figures here will reflect the DQR team's verification, so double-counting and other problematic issues should not feature.
L-3.1	Output	Stakeholders trained (female)	Cumulative	Number	0	102	157			157	225	269	269			334	465	465	502			479	504	749	749			749
L-3.2	Output	Stakeholders trained (male)	Cumulative	Number	0								637			742	961	961	1,047			1,282	1,354	1,775	1,775			1,775
L-5	Output	Parcels corrected or incorporated in land system	Cumulative	Number	0		117			167	303	738	4,082			5,390	5,498	5,556	6,576	7,307	90%	6,902	7,394	8,869	8,869	10,807	82%	8,869	10,807	82%
L-6	Output	Household land rights formalized	Cumulative	Number	0													2,087	2,574	1,500	172%	3,186	3,964	4,356	4,356	5,080	86%	4,356	5,080	86%
	Sub-Activity: Community Based Rangeland and Livestock Management

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.