Att_10_Sample_FACAR_5Y_8D_Form.pdf
PDF 131 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Enhanced Combat Helmet (ECH)
- Solicitation number
- M67854-16-R-1122
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
(Document Originally Uploaded 15 September 2016) Sample FACAR
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
8D - Corrective Actions Report
Status: Open Closed
Recurrent failure? Yes: NO:
Supplier: Contact: Phone number:
Address: Fax:
Affected Part Number: Part Name :
CAR number: CAR Date:
1 Problem Description Specific description of the problem:
How many parts have the problem?
When were the parts found?
Where were the parts found?
How were the parts found?
2 Problem Solution Team
Name Position Phone number E-mail address
3 Containment Actions
At Customer Facility
Action: Date : Responsible : Verification : (Date and result)
Material at Customer facility disposition:
Scrap
Vendor return No. RMA:______________
Other (explain):
Material in Transit:
At Supplier’s facility / Other locations:
Total number of parts sorted:
defective parts:
Percentage Defective:
What is the identification mark to signify
Initial Response Date:
Revision Date:
certification?
Other locations :
parts sorted:
defective parts:
Percentage Defective:
What is the identification mark to signify certification?
Containment Actions Clean Date:
4 Root Cause
5 Why’s Analysis
Why did the failure happen?
1st Cause 2nd Cause 3rd Cause
1. Why?
2. Why?
3. Why?
4. Why?
5. Why?
Why was the failure not detected?
1st Cause 2nd Cause 3rd Cause
1. Why?
2. Why?
3. Why?
4. Why?
5. Why?
Root cause verification Explain in detail what tests where taken to assure that the root cause was found:
5 Corrective Actions / Verification of the Actions
Applicable to occurrence of failure Actions Date Responsible
How was it proven that the actions taken eliminate the failure? Date Responsible
Applicable to non detection of failure Actions Date Responsible
How was it proven that the actions taken detect the failure? Date Responsible
Poke-Yokes implemented because of this failure
Yes (description of the operation) No (Why not?)
6 Standardization and Control Document Date What changed?
FMEA
Control Plan
Flow Process diagram
Visual Aid
Operation Standards
Preventive Maintenance Plans
Others
7 Verification of Effectiveness of Preventive Actions
Can the verified effective improvements from this corrective action be implemented to similar parts or processes?
Action Date Responsible i
Actions or Controls for others causes that can produce the same failure Action Date Responsible i
Describe the Methods used Date Status of Corrective Actions Produced Quantity Defects
Date Actions for failure detection Shipped Quantity Defects
8 Congratulate Team Date Team Member Team Member Congratulated / Team Member Comments file:///C:/Users/kathryn.hurd/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/bgesford.GRWTECHNOLOGIES/daten/users/MX_vee4tl/explorer_cache/OLK4B/8D's%20requisitos.doc file:///C:/Users/kathryn.hurd/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/bgesford.GRWTECHNOLOGIES/daten/users/MX_vee4tl/explorer_cache/OLK4B/8D's%20requisitos.doc
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .