Second_Draft_Attachment_05.1_-_ACV_1._1_Integrated_Master_Plan.pdf
PDF 202 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) 1. 1 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M67854-15-R-0001
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
Second Draft Attachment 05.1 - ACV 1. 1 Integrated Master Plan
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) 1. 1 has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault
ACV-PLN-03002 - ACV 1.1 Integrated Master Plan
9-Sep-14
Program Executive Office Land Systems
ACV-PLN-03002 - ACV 1.1 Integrated Master Plan
Page 2 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Event Number Event Name Contract Number Comments ACV01 MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT DECISION (MDD) Completed
ACV02 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RELEASE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD (RFP
Release DAB) Completed
ACV03 MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed ACV04 MILESTONE C (P Vehicle Only) Completed ACV05 LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION (LRIP) Completed ACV06 FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION Completed
Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) 1.1 Integrated Master Plan (IMP) Events
Page 3 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
ACV01 01
MDD - Program Documentation Completed
Atkinson
MDD - Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM)
Atkinson REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Documents MDA decisions and direction.
ACV01 02
MDD - Program Reviews Completed
Atkinson
MDD Review - IIPT Completed MDD Review - OSD Final Document Check to Support OIPT Completed MDD Review - OSD OIPT Conducted MDD Review - OSD OIPT Report MDD Review - OSD DAB Review Meeting (DRM) Completed MDD Review - OSD DAB Read-ahead Submitted MDD Review - OSD DAB Review Completed MDD Review - Program Reviews Completed
ACV01 03 MDD Completed Atkinson
Event ACV01: MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT DECISION (MDD) Completed
Page 4 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
ACV02 01
RFP Release DAB - Technical Reviews Completed
Was
RFP Release DAB - System Requirements Review (SRR) ACV 1.1 Completed
Was A formal, system-level review conducted to ensure that system requirements have been completely and properly identified and that a mutual understanding between the government and contractors exists.
RFP Release DAB - MP SE Technical Reviews to RFP Release DAB Completed
Was ALL Technical Reviews for RFP Release DAB Complete
ACV02 02
RFP Release DAB - Program Documentation Completed
Mullins
RFP Release DAB - Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) Completed
Swanberg REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Documents MDA decisions and direction.
RFP Release DAB - Acquisition Program Baseline Draft (APB) Completed
Byus
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - for MDAPs at Milestones B and C and the FRP decision; a Regulatory requirement at all other Type/Event combinations, including the required draft5 at Development RFP Release. The draft APB for the Development RFP Release Point is approved at Milestone B. For programs responding to urgent needs, only due at the Development Milestone; preparation and staffing of APBs responding to urgent needs should not cause unnecessary delays in meeting validated warfighter capability requirements. The MDA may approve the APB for some ship programs at Milestone A.
RFP Release DAB - Acquisition Strategy (AcqStrat) Completed
Byus STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - for MDAPs at Milestone A; else Regulatory at other events and for other program types. The Acquisition Strategy will include STATUTORY and Regulatory information.
RFP Release DAB - Affordability Assessment Completed
Myers
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Prior to the Materiel Development Decision, the analysis will yield tentative cost goals and inventory goals; for Milestone A, the analysis will yield affordability goals; and for the Development RFP Release Decision Point, Milestone B, and beyond, the analysis will yield binding affordability caps.
RFP Release DAB - Analysis of Alternative (AoA) Update Completed
Swanberg
STATUTORY for MAIS programs and all AISs, including National Security Systems (NSSs), at Milestone A, and updated when required through Milestone C (or Milestone B if there is no Milestone C). STATUTORY for MDAPs at Milestone A.
Regulatory for all other marked Program Type-Event combinations. A DoD Component is responsible for conduct and approval of the AoA, as detailed in section 2 of Enclosure 9 and in paragraph 5.d.(2)(b)2 in the core instruction. The distinct assessment and approval roles of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (DCAPE) and MDA associated with the AoA and the selection of the materiel solution(s) are detailed in section 2 of Enclosure 9 of this instruction.
RFP Release DAB - Concept of Operations (ConOps) Completed
Ashinhurst
JCIDS Manual, Encl B, page B-2, para (1)(c). The CONOPS is accomplished during the Capability Based Assessment (CBA) process which provides source material for the Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). Ref: JCIDS Manaual, Encl A, page A-4, para (b)(2) If a program does not have an ICD, then the CDD and CPD must capture the intent of the ICD in terms of the capability requirements and capability gaps to be satisfied, in addition to the solution related details of the CDD and CPD.
RFP Release DAB - Core Logistics Determination/Core Logistics & Sustaining Workloads (Core) Estimates Draft (Part of LCSP)
Walker
STATUTORY. Only the CORE LOGISTICS DETERMINATION is required at Milestone A. Required at Milestone C if there was no Milestone B. Documented in the Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). For programs responding to urgent needs, only due as part of the Sustainment Approach in the Acquisition Approach at the Production Milestone. Not required for AIS programs.
Event ACV02: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RELEASE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD (RFP Release DAB) Completed
Page 5 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV02: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RELEASE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD (RFP Release DAB) Completed
RFP Release DAB - Cost Analysis Requirements Description (CARD) Completed
Smolkin
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Due any time an INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) or an ECONOMIC ANALYSIS is required. Procedures are specified in section 3 of Enclosure 10 of this instruction.
RFP Release DAB - Development RFP Cost Assessment Completed
Myers REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13.
RFP Release DAB - Failure Definition Scoring Criteria (FD/SC)
MCOTEA
RFP Release DAB - Initial Information Support Plan (ISP) Completed
Kelley
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Applicable to all IT, including NSS. A draft5 is due for Development RFP Release;
approved at Milestone B. Unless waived, updated at the Critical Design Review. The ISP of record is due prior to Milestone C; an updated ISP of record may be updated during Operations and Support. For DBS, the ISP is summarized in the Business Case. The ISP includes the Net-Centric Data Strategy.
RFP Release DAB - Item Unique Identification Implementation Plan Draft (IUIID) Completed (Part of SEP)
Walker
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Design considerations related to unique identification are included in the SEP.
RFP Release DAB - JROC Approved Capability Development Document (CDD) Completed
Kolodgie
REGULATORY SNI 5000.2e.
- A draft CDD is required at Milestone A; a validated CDD is required at the Development RFP Release Decision Point and informs Milestone B. If there are no changes, a revalidated CDD may be submitted for the Capability Production Document (CPD) required at Milestone C.
- An equivalent DoD Component-validated requirements document will satisfy this requirement for certain information systems.
- For approval authorities, JROC is Joint Requirements Oversight Council; JCB is Joint Capabilities Board.
RFP Release DAB - Life Cycle Mission Data Plan (LCMDP) Completed
Trude REGULATORY SNI 5000.2e.
RFP Release DAB - Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) Draft Complete
Walker REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for Development RFP Release; approved at Milestone B.
The LCSP is reviewed by the CAE at least every 5 years after a system’s IOC.
RFP Release DAB - Manpower Estimate Report (MER) Draft Completed
Knight STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 is due for Development RFP Release; approved at Milestone B.
RFP Release DAB - Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP) Completed (Part of CDD)
Morningstar
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. The OMS/MP is a Component approved acquisition document that is derived from and consistent with the validated/approved capability requirements document. The OMS/MP describes the operational tasks, events, durations, frequency and environment in which the materiel solution is expected to perform each mission and each phase of the mission. The OMS/MP will be provided to the MDA at specified decision events and to industry as part of the RFP.
RFP Release DAB - Performance Specification (P-Spec) Completed
Antaya
RFP Release DAB - Program Life Cycle Cost Estimate (PLCCE) Draft Completed
Myers REGULATORY SNI 5000.2e
RFP Release DAB - Program Protection Plan Draft (PPP) Completed
McGowan Includes STATUTORY and Regulatory information DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release decision and is approved at Milestone B.
RFP Release DAB - Should Cost Target Completed
Myers REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. “Should-cost” is a regulatory tool designed to proactively target cost reduction and drive productivity improvement into programs.
Page 6 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV02: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RELEASE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD (RFP Release DAB) Completed
RFP Release DAB - Small Business Innovation Research / Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIT/STTR) Completed
Harvey
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Program managers will establish goals for applying SBIR and STTR technologies in programs of record. For contracts with a value at or above $100 million, program managers will establish a goal for the transition of Phase III technologies in subcontracting plans, and report the number and dollar amount of contracts entered into for Phase III SBIR or STTR projects. At each milestone indicated, the Program Manager will provide a detailed plan for the use of SBIR and STTR technologies and associated planned funding profile (Phase I, II, and III).
RFP Release DAB - System Design Specification (SDS) Completed
Antaya
The SDS will translate Capability Development Document (CDD) performance parameters and system attributes into technical requirements that characterize the performance specifications as clearly as practical for developing the preliminary system design. An SDS Development Plan will be presented at the Gate Three review for approval. The development of the SDS will provide an in-process review of the system's design maturity, openness, and readiness to proceed toward a Milestone B decision.
RFP Release DAB - System Engineering Plan (SEP) Draft Completed
Robles
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point; approved at Milestone B. DBS programs may include systems engineering planning in applicable sections of the Business Case and Program Charter. The DASD(SE) is the approval authority for MDAPs and MAIS programs; the Component Head or as delegated will approve the SEP for all other programs.
RFP Release DAB - System Threat Assessment Report (STAR) Completed
Fitch
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. MDAP and MAIS programs require a unique, system-specific STAR. Programs on the DOT&E Oversight List require a unique, system-specific STAR, unless otherwise directed by DOT&E.
RFP Release DAB - Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Preliminary Completed
Harvey
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A preliminary assessment is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point.
The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (ASD(R&E)) will conduct an independent review and assessment of the TRA conducted by the Program Manager and other factors to determine whether the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment. The assessment will inform the 2366b CERITIFICATION MEMORANDUM at Milestone B (in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2366b (Reference (n)). The TRA at Milestone C is a Regulatory requirement when Milestone C is Program Initiation.
RFP Release DAB - Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Draft Completed
Hanneman
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point; approved at Milestone B. For DBS programs, a summary of the T&E planning for integrated developmental/operational test, jointly developed by the Program Manager, functional sponsor, and T&E community must be included in the Business Case.
DOT&E will approve the TEMP for DOT&E Oversight programs (10 U.S.C. 2399, Reference (n)); DASD (DT&E) will also approve the TEMP for DT&E Engagement programs (10 U.S.C. 139b, Reference (n)); the DoD Component equivalent will approve the plan for other programs.
RFP Release DAB - Documentation Completed
Mullins ALL Documentation activities for RFP Release DAB Complete
ACV02 04
RFP Release DAB - OSD Program Reviews Completed
Mullins
RFP Release DAB Review - Working Group IIPT Completed RFP Release DAB Review - Submittal of Final Documents to OSD Completed RFP Release DAB Review - OSD DPM Review Completed RFP Release DAB Review - OSD Final Document Check to Support OIPT Completed RFP Release DAB Review - OSD OIPT Conducted RFP Release DAB Review - OSD OIPT Report Submitted RFP Release DAB Review - OSD DRM Review Completed RFP Release DAB Review - OSD DAB Read-ahead Submitted RFP Release DAB Review - OSD DAB Review Completed
Page 7 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV02: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) RELEASE DEFENSE ACQUISITION BOARD (RFP Release DAB) Completed
ACV02 05 RFP Release DAB - Completed Mullins ALL activities for RFP Release DAB Complete
Page 8 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
ACV03 01
MS B - Program Documentation Completed
Mullins
MS B - 2366b Certification Memo Completed
Swanberg
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. for MDAPs at Milestones A and B. The MDA does not have authority to delegate this requirement. The associated procedures from 10 U.S.C. 2366a and 10 U.S.C.
2366b (Reference (n)) are re-stated in the Defense Acquisition Guidebook (Reference (l)), and must be followed. A memorandum similar to that required at Milestone B is a Regulatory requirement at Milestone C if Milestone C is program initiation.
02 MS B - ADM Completed Swanberg REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Documents MDA decisions and direction.
MS B - Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) Completed
Swanberg
STATUTORY for MDAPs at Milestones B and C and the FRP decision; a Regulatory requirement at all other Type/Event combinations, including the required draft5 at Development RFP Release. The draft5 APB for the Development RFP Release Point is approved at Milestone B. For programs responding to urgent needs, only due at the Development Milestone; preparation and staffing of APBs responding to urgent needs should not cause unnecessary delays in meeting validated warfighter capability requirements. The MDA may approve the APB for some ship programs at Milestone A.
MS B - AcqStrat Update Completed
Byus
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - for MDAPs at Milestone A; else Regulatory at other events and for other program types. The Acquisition Strategy will include STATUTORY and Regulatory information.
MS B - Affordability Analysis (AffAna) Document Completed
Myers
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Prior to the Materiel Development Decision, the analysis will yield tentative cost goals and inventory goals; for Milestone A, the analysis will yield affordability goals;
and for the Development RFP Release Decision Point, Milestone B, and beyond, the analysis will yield binding affordability caps.
MS B - CDD Update Completed
Kolodgie
REGULATORY.
- A draft CDD is required at Milestone A; a validated CDD is required at the Development RFP Release Decision Point and informs Milestone B. If there are no changes, a revalidated CDD may be submitted for the Capability Production Document (CPD) required at Milestone C.
- An equivalent DoD Component-validated requirements document will satisfy this requirement for certain information systems.
- For approval authorities, JROC is Joint Requirements Oversight Council; JCB is Joint Capabilities Board.
MS B - CIO Confirmation of CCA Compliance Document Completed
Trude STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - For all programs that acquire IT; Regulatory for other programs.
Required for programs responding to urgent needs.
MS B - Clinger-Cohen Act (CCA) Compliance Completed
Trude STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - For all programs that acquire IT; Regulatory for other programs.
Required for programs responding to urgent needs.
Event ACV03: MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed
Page 9 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV03: MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed
MS B - Core Logistics Analysis/Source of Repair ILA Comments Incorporation Completed
Walker
STATUTORY. Only the CORE LOGISTICS DETERMINATION is required at Milestone A. Required at Milestone C if there was no Milestone B. Documented in the Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). For programs responding to urgent needs, only due as part of the Sustainment Approach in the Acquisition Approach at the Production Milestone. Not required for AIS programs.
MS B - Corrosion Prevention Control Plan (CPCP) Completed
Fitch
REGULATORY. Required for ACAT ID and IC programs. Approved by the CAE. Design considerations related to corrosion control are included in the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP). Required for MAIS programs if the system includes mission critical hardware that will be operated in a corrosive environment.
MS B - CARD Update Completed
Smolkin
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Due any time an INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) or an ECONOMIC ANALYSIS is required. Procedures are specified in section 3 of Enclosure 10 of this instruction.
MS B - DoD Component Cost Estimate (CCE) Completed
Myers
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Mandatory for MAIS programs any time an ECONOMIC ANALYSIS is due. As required by the Component Acquisition Executive for MDAPs. For DBS programs, summarized in the Business Case.
MS B - DoD Component Cost Position (CCP) Competition Analysis Acquisition Strategy Completed
Myers
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Mandatory for MDAPs and MAIS programs; documented DoD Component Cost Position must be signed by the appropriate DoD Component Deputy Assistant Secretary for Cost and Economics.
MS B - Economic Analysis (EA) Completed
Myers
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 for MAIS. May be combined with the AOA at Milestone A. Also required at any review that is the equivalent of Milestone B or the FD Decision. For DBS programs, summarized in the Business Case.
MS B - Full Funding Certification Memorandum Completed
Lee
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Must be signed by the Component Acquisition Executive and the Component Chief Financial Officer.
MS B - Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) Completed
Myers
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. For MDAPs and MAIS programs. Only required for MAIS programs in advance of a report of a Critical Change pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2445c(f) (Reference (n)) when the USD(AT&L) is the MDA, or at any other time considered appropriate by DCAPE or USD(AT&L). The DCAPE will be the approval authority for ACAT ID and IAM programs; the Component will approve ACAT IC programs following review by DCAPE.
MS B - Independent Logistics Assessment (ILA) Completed
Phillips
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13 - For major weapon systems. For the FRP/FD assessment, required if the decision is more than 4 years after Milestone C. Assessments after FRP/FD will be accomplished at a minimum interval of every 5 years after Initial Operational Capability (IOC).
MS B - ISP Update Completed
Kelley
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Applicable to all IT, including NSS. A draft5 is due for Development RFP Release; approved at Milestone B. Unless waived, updated at the Critical Design Review. The ISP of record is due prior to Milestone C; an updated ISP of record may be updated during Operations and Support. For DBS, the ISP is summarized in the Business Case. The ISP includes the Net- Centric Data Strategy.
Page 10 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV03: MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed
MS B - Item Unique Identification (IUID) Implementation Plan ILA Comments Incorporation Completed
Walker
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Design considerations related to unique identification are included in the SEP.
MS B - LCSP ILA Comments Incorporation Completed
Walker
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for Development RFP Release; approved at Milestone B. The LCSP is reviewed by the CAE at least every 5 years after a system’s IOC.
MS B - MER ILA Comments Incorporation Completed
Knight STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft is due for Development RFP Release; approved at Milestone B.
MS B - Programmatic Environmental Safety & Health Evaluation (PESHE) Acquisition Strategy Completed
Dropinski
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. The Programmatic Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Evaluation (PESHE) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) / Executive Order (E.O.) 12114 Compliance Schedule is approved by the CAE. Related design considerations must be included in the SEP; related operations or sustainment considerations after Milestone C will be included in the LCSP. For programs responding to urgent needs, only due at the Production Milestone; DoD Components will develop expedited baseline processes for these programs. Not required for software programs with no hardware component.
MS B - PPP Update Completed
McGowan Includes STATUTORY and Regulatory information DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release decision and is approved at Milestone B.
MS B - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability- Cost (RAM-C) Report Completed
CD&I
MS B - Replaced System Sustainment Plan Completed
Swanberg
STATUTORY. May be submitted as early as Milestone A, but no later than Milestone B. Required when an MDAP replaces an existing system and the capability of the old system remains necessary and relevant during fielding of and transition to the new system. The plan must provide for the appropriate level of budgeting for sustainment of the old system, the schedule for developing and fielding the new system, and an analysis of the ability of the existing system to maintain mission capability against relevant threats.
MS B - Should Cost Target Update Completed
Myers REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. “Should-cost” is a regulatory tool designed to proactively target cost reduction and drive productivity improvement into programs.
MS B - SBIR/STTR Update Completed
Harvey
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Program managers will establish goals for applying SBIR and STTR technologies in programs of record. For contracts with a value at or above $100 million, program managers will establish a goal for the transition of Phase III technologies in subcontracting plans, and report the number and dollar amount of contracts entered into for Phase III SBIR or STTR projects. At each milestone indicated, the Program Manager will provide a detailed plan for the use of SBIR and STTR technologies and associated planned funding profile (Phase I, II, and III).
Page 11 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV03: MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed
MS B - Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment Completed
Trude
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. Applicable to all systems/equipment that use the electromagnetic spectrum in the United States and in other host nations. Due at milestone reviews and prior to requesting authorization to operate (for other than testing) in the United States or in host nations.
MS B - SEP Update Completed
Robles
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point; approved at Milestone B. DBS programs may include systems engineering planning in applicable sections of the Business Case and Program Charter. The DASD(SE) is the approval authority for MDAPs and MAIS programs; the Component Head or as delegated will approve the SEP for all other programs.
MS B - TRA Update Completed
Harvey
STATUTORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A preliminary assessment is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (ASD(R&E)) will conduct an independent review and assessment of the TRA conducted by the Program Manager and other factors to determine whether the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment. The assessment will inform the 2366b CERITIFICATION MEMORANDUM at Milestone B (in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2366b (Reference (n)). The TRA at Milestone C is a Regulatory requirement when Milestone C is Program Initiation.
MS B - Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Update Completed
Hanneman
REGULATORY DoDI 5000.02, 25 Nov 13. A draft5 update is due for the Development RFP Release Decision Point; approved at Milestone B. For DBS programs, a summary of the T&E planning for integrated developmental/operational test, jointly developed by the Program Manager, functional sponsor, and T&E community must be included in the Business Case. DOT&E will approve the TEMP for DOT&E Oversight programs (10 U.S.C. 2399, Reference (n)); DASD (DT&E) will also approve the TEMP for DT&E Engagement programs (10 U.S.C. 139b, Reference (n)); the DoD Component equivalent will approve the plan for other programs.
MS B - Training System Plan Preliminary Completed
Patton REGULATORY SNI 5000.2e
MS B - Documentation Completed
Mullins ALL Documentation activities for MS B Complete
ACV03 02
MS B - Program Reviews Completed
Mullins
MS B - Working Group IIPT Completed MS B - Final Documents Submitted to OSD MS B - OSD DPM Review Completed MS B - OSD Final Document Check to Support OIPT Completed MS B - OSD OIPT Conducted MS B - OSD OIPT Report Submitted MS B - OSD DRM Review Completed MS B - OSD DAB Read-ahead Submitted MS B - OSD DAB Review Completed MS B - Reviews Completed
Page 12 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
Event ACV03: MILESTONE B (P Vehicle Only) Completed
ACV03 03
MS B - Contract Activities to Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Award
Mullins
RFP Release DAB - EMD Contracts Awarded to (3?) Contractors Completed RFP Release DAB - Post Award Conference
ACV03 04
MS B - Milestone B Completed
Mullins ALL activities for Ms B Complete
Page 13 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature POC Description
ACV04 01 MS C - Technical Reviews to MS C Completed Mullins 01 MS C - Critical Design Review (CDR) ACV 1.1 Completed Was 02 MS C - Place Holder Was 03 MS C - Place Holder Was 04 MS C - Place Holder Was 05 MS C - System Verification Review (SVR) ACV 1.1 Completed Was 06 MS C - Technical Reviews to MS C Completed Was
ACV04 02 MS C - Program Documentation Completed Mullins 01 MS C - ADM Completed TBD 02 MS C - APB Update Completed TBD 03 MS C - AcqStrat Update Completed TBD 04 MS C - AffAna Update Document Completed TBD 05 MS C - AOA Update Completed TBD 06 MS C - Benefit Analysis & Determination Acquisition Document Completed TBD 07 MS C - Capability Production Document (CPD) Completed TBD 08 MS C - CARD Update Completed TBD 09 MS C - CIO Confirmation of CCA Compliance Completed TBD 10 MS C - CCA Compliance Completed TBD 11 MS C - Core (Final) Estimates (Part of LCSP) TBD 12 MS C - CPCP Update Completed TBD 13 MS C - DoD CCE Update Completed TBD 14 MS C - DoD CCP Update Completed TBD 15 MS C - Full Funding Certification Memorandum Completed TBD 16 MS C - ICE Update Completed TBD 17 MS C - ILA Update Completed TBD 18 MS C - ISP Completed TBD 19 MS C - IUID Implementation Plan Completed TBD 20 MS C - LCSP ILA Comments Incorporation Completed TBD 21 MS C - MER ILA Comments Incorporation Completed TBD 22 MS C - OMS/MP Update Completed (Part of CPD) TBD 23 MS C - PESHE Update Completed TBD 24 MS C - PPP Update Completed TBD 25 MS C - Should Cost Target Update Completed TBD 26 MS C - SBIR/STTR Update Completed TBD 27 MS C - Spectrum Supportability Risk Assessment Update Completed TBD
Event ACV04: MILESTONE C (P Vehicle Only) Completed
Page 14 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature POC Description
Event ACV04: MILESTONE C (P Vehicle Only) Completed
28 MS C - STAR Update Completed TBD 29 MS C - SEP Update Completed TBD 30 MS C - TRA Update Completed TBD 31 MS C - TEMP Update Completed TBD
33 MS B - Documentation Completed TBD ALL Documentation activities for MS B Complete
ACV04 03 MS C - Program Reviews Completed Mullins
MS C - ASN (RD&A) Program Completed MS C - Working Group IIPT Completed MS C - Submittal of Final Documents to OSD Completed MS C - OSD DPM Review Completed MS C - OSD Final Document Check to Support OIPT Completed MS C - OSD OIPT Conducted MS C - OSD OIPT Report Submitted MS C - OSD DRM Review Completed MS C - OSD DAB Read-ahead Submitted MS C - OSD DAB Review Completed
ACV04 04 MS C - DoN Gate 6 Reviews - Award/IBR/CPD/PreFRP Mullins 01 MS C - DoN Gate 6A Review - Award/IBR TBD 02 MS C - DoN Gate 6B Review - CDR TBD 03 MS C - DoN Gate 6C Review - CPD TBD 04 MS C - DoN Gate 6D Review - Pre-FRP DR TBD
ACV04 05 MS C - Industry Production Mullins 01 MS C - Activities Vendor 1 - Item Production (16 Vehicles) TBD 02 MS C - Activities Vendor 2 - Item Production (16 Vehicles) TBD 03 MS C - Vendor Activities Complete TBD 04 MS C - Vendors Delivery of 16 Sample Vehicles Each (32 Total) for Testing TBD 05 MS C - Vendors Industry Production Complete TBD 06 MS C - Industry Production Technical Reviews (IPTR) Completed TBD
ACV04 06 MS C - Test and Evaluation to Down-Select Mullins 01 MS C - Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP) Development TBD 02 MS C - Vendor Limited Operational Testing TBD 03 MS C - Vendor Vehicle Live Fire Testing TBD 04 MS C - Test Events to Down Select Complete TBD
ACV04 07 MS C - DAB Down-Select (P Vehicle Only) Mullins
Page 15 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature POC Description
Event ACV04: MILESTONE C (P Vehicle Only) Completed
01 MS C - DAB Down Select - Authority to Down-Select TBD 02 MS C - DAB Down Select - DAB Down-Select TBD 03 MS C - DAB Down Select - DAB Down-Select Complete TBD 04 MS C - AS DAB Review (P Vehicle Only) TBD
ACV04 08 MILESTONE C (P Vehicle Only) Completed Mullins
Page 16 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature POC Description
ACV05 01 LRIP Lot 1 Activities TBD 01 LRIP Lot 1 Activities - Live Fire Events (LRIP Vehicles 1-4) TBD
LRIP Lot 1 Activities - Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) Events (LRIP Vehicles 5-25)
TBD
ACV05 02 LRIP Activites Complete TBD
Event ACV05: LOW RATE INITIAL PRODUCTION (LRIP) Completed
Page 17 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Program Event (PE)
Significant Accomplishment
(SA)
Accomplishment Criteria (AC)
Accomplishment/Criteria Nomenclature
POC Description
ACV06 01 Place Holder TBD ACV06 02 Place Holder TBD
Event ACV06: FULL RATE PRODUCTION (FRP) DECISION Completed
Page 18 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Notes:
IMP Nouns Definitions Critical Design Review (CDR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The CDR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into system fabrication, demonstration, and test, and can meet the stated performance requirements within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. Generally this review assesses the system final design as captured in product specifications for each configuration item in the system (product baseline), and ensures that each p~oduct in the product baseline has been captured in the detailed design documentation. Product specifications for hardware enable the fabrication of configuration items, and may include production drawings. Product specifications for software (e.g., Software Design Documents) enable coding of a Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI). Configuration items may consist of hardware and software elements, and include items such as airframe, avionics, weapons, crew systems, engines, trainers/training, etc.
Integrated Master Plan (IMP) AFMC CPAM 63-5: 2.2.1. Integrated Master Plan. The IMP is an event-driven program/project plan that provides top-level control and progress management through establishment of key events and associated accomplishments and criteria for each accomplishment. Unlike the IMS, the IMP is contractual.
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) AFM CPAM 63-5: The IMS is an integrated, master schedule containing the networked, detailed tasks necessary to support the events, accomplishments, and criteria of the IMP. The execution IMS shall contain all of the contract IMP events, accomplishments, and criteria from contract award to completion of the contract. The IMS shall be a logical network-based schedule that is directly traceable to the contractor’s cost/schedule reporting instrument used to address variances (such as Cost Performance Report (CPR), Cost/Schedule Status Report (C/SSR), etc.).
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The PDR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into detailed design, and can meet the stated performance requirements within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. Generally this review assesses the system preliminary design as captured in performance specifications for each configuration item in the system (allocated baseline), and ensures that each function in the functional baseline has been allocated to one or more system configuration items, or System of Systems (SoS)/Family of Systems (FoS) items as appropriate.
Configuration items may consist of hardware and software elements, and include items such as airframe, avionics, weapons, crew systems, engines, trainers/training, etc.
Production Readiness Review (PRR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The PRR is an examination of a program to determine if the design is ready for production and the producer has accomplished adequate production planning without incurring unacceptable risks that will breach thresholds of schedule, performance, cost, or other established criteria. The full, productionconfigured system is evaluated to determine that it correctly and completely implements all system requirements, and whether the traceability of final system requirements to the final production system is maintained. At this review the IPT.shal1 also review the readiness of the manufacturing processes, the Quality System, and the production planning, i.e., facilities, tooling and test equipment capacity, personnel development and certification, process documentation, inventory management, supplier management, etc. A successful review is predicated on the IPT's determination that the system requirements are fully met in the final production configuration, and that production capability form a satisfactory basis for proceeding into LRIP and FRP.
Standard Glossary of ACV 1.1 Terms
Page 19 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Notes:
IMP Nouns Definitions
Standard Glossary of ACV 1.1 Terms
System Functional Review (SFR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The SFR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into preliminary design, and that all system requirements and functional performance requirements derived from the CDD (formerly ORD) are defined, aligned with the external environment (systems and infrastructure) and consistent with cost (program budget) , schedule (program schedule) , risk, and other system constraints. Generally this review assesses the system functional requirements as captured in system specifications (functional baseline), and ensures that all required system performance is fully decomposed and defined in the functional baseline. System performance may be decomposed and traced to lower level subsystem functionality that may define hardware and software requirements. SFR determines whether the systems functional definition is fully decomposed to its lower level, and that the IPT is prepared to start preliminary design.
System Requirements Review (SRR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The SRR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase, and that all system and performance requirements derived from the CDD are defined, aligned with the external environment (systems and infrastructure), and consistent with cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. Generally this review assesses the system requirements as captured in the system specification, and ensures that the system requirements are consistent with the preferred system solution as well as available technologies resulting from the Technology Development (formerly CAD) phase. Of critical importance to this review is the understanding of program technical risk inherent in the system specification and SDD phase program plan. Acceptable level of risk is key to a successful review.
System Verification Review (SVR) NAVAIRINST 4355.19C: The SVR is a multi-disciplined product and process assessment to ensure that the system under review can proceed into Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and Full Rate Production (FRP) within cost (program budget), schedule (program schedule), risk, and other system constraints. (A Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) may be conducted concurrent with SVR, if desired). Generally this review is an audit trail from the CDR, and assesses that the system final product, as evidenced in its production configuration, meets the functional requirements as derived from the Capability Production Document (CPD - formerly ORD) to the Functional, Allocated, and Product Baselines. The SVR establishes and verifies final product performance.
IMP Verbs Definitions Agreed Upon An authorized party of the Contractor enters into an agreement with the customer, the customer’s government, the U.S.
government, other companies, or with organizations within the Contractor and the agreement is documented in writing and signed by all parties.
Allocated The subject parameter has been subdivided or apportioned into parts according to the appropriate product manager.
Analyzed The subject parameter has been technically evaluated through equations, charts, and reduced data.
Approved The subject configuration item, data, or document has been submitted to the appropriate authority, which has notified the team that it is acceptable.
Available The subject configuration item, tool, or process is in place or operational.
Baselined The subject design, parameter, concept, or configuration item has been finalized, received management approval and is under configuration control.
Compiled Information, dates have been gathered, cleaned up, and put together to form a definitive document and, or analysis.
Completed The subject configuration item, data, or document has been prepared and reviewed by contractor management.
Page 20 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Notes:
IMP Nouns Definitions
Standard Glossary of ACV 1.1 Terms
Conducted The subject event or review has been held and minutes completed.
Defined The subject configuration item, data, or document has been described in an appropriate description document.
Delivered The subject configuration item, data, or document has been accepted in the form and at the location specified in the contract.
Demonstrated The subject configuration item, data, or document has been shown to be in accordance with contract requirements through measures where success or failure is determined by observation.
Developed The subject configuration item, data, or document has been produced through a sequence of activities that may include planning, design, test, and verification.
Documented The subject area has been compiled, edited, and put into a draft format for review or in final form.
Established The subject has been created and set in place in a manner consistent with its intended use (e.g., procedures, baselines established).
Evaluated A measured comparison of the subject with contract requirements has been completed.
Finalized The subject data or document is complete, has contractor management approval, and may not be changed without formal revision control.
Generated Data has been created or results have been established or information has been made available to satisfy a goal or expectation.
Identified The characteristics of a configuration item, process, or function have been made known for the first time.
Implemented The subject policy, approach, or procedure is being regularly executed.
Incorporated Information has been obtained and included, combined into subject document, data item.
Initiated The subject approach or procedure has been started.
Integrated The subject has been consolidated into an entity (e.g., data, requirement, document, configuration item) by appropriately combining all separate requirements, functional disciplines, and configuration item considerations.
Negotiated The subject item has been proposed by one party to another, exchanges between parties have taken place and the parties have arrived at an agreement which is documented in writing and sign by both parties.
Operational The intended item is capable of performing its intended function.
Performed A task or assignment has been carried out in accordance with directions, guidelines, and established processes.
Planned A description in the form of a document containing the objective, issues and questions to be addressed, the entrance and exit criteria for success, the sources of predecessor information or assumptions prior to beginning work, the artifacts to be acquired or produced, the approach to acquiring/producing the artifacts, and how the artifacts produced will be analyzed or reported.
Prepared The subject item has been created, documented, and transferred in acceptable format for review.
Provided The subject configuration item has been completed and delivered to the receiving agency.
Released The subject data or document has received all necessary Government and contractor IPT approvals.
Resolved Successful determination or solution to an issue or problem declared in writing Reviewed The subject data document has been examined critically and satisfies predefined requirements.
Revised The subject configuration item, data, or document has been updated to account for new requirements and, or facts.
Page 21 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Notes:
IMP Nouns Definitions
Standard Glossary of ACV 1.1 Terms
Submitted Provided to the customer for information or for approval when approval is required beyond that of customer participation in IPT approvals.
Supported Prime activity has been supplemented and enhanced by providing data, information, or manpower.
Updated The subject process, data, or document has been reevaluated based on later information, and adjustments have been incorporated.
Validated The subject requirement, configuration item, data, or document has been reviewed for technical compliance by the contractor, using existing approved procedures, instructions, and checklists.
Verified The subject configuration item, data, or document has been proved to be in accordance with contract requirements by analysis, inspection, demonstration, or test.
Reconciled The discrepancies between the subject items have been accounted for.
Dispositioned The final status of the subject items has been determined.
Closed The final terms and conditions of the subject items have been completed.
IMP Adjectives Definitions Initial The use of this adjective preceding a noun signifies that the item has a maturity level adequate to satisfy as the first submittal of a deliverable.
Preliminary The use of this adjective preceding a noun signifies that the item has reached a level of maturity where it is ready for limited use with caution, possibly under restricted conditions. For further definition of the preliminary state of a particular IMP item, see the definition provided in the Nouns section of this glossary for that particular item. Level of detail needed to approve initiation of preliminary design.
Reserved The use of this adjective signifies that the item is a placeholder for anticipated contract action pending definitization.
Final The use of this adjective preceding a noun signifies that the item has reached a level of maturity where it has been fully validated. For further definition of the final validated state of a particular IMP item, see the definition provided in the Nouns section of this glossary for that particular item.
Position Description Responsibility: The company/organization designated with the Owner/Leader (O) role for a given Accomplishment Criteria (AC) has lead responsibility for ensuring that said AC has been satisfied. The specific activities involved in fulfilling this responsibility may include (but are not limited to) preparing, coordinating, maintaining, updating, and (where appropriate) controlling changes to the product specified in the AC. Unless an Approver role (see below) is expressly identified for a given AC, the Owner/Leader shall also be responsible for approving the product specified in the AC. These activities, in whole or in part, may be performed by the Owner/Leader or delegated to those in a Supporter role (see below). Those activities being performed by the Owner/Leader should be clearly identifiable in the Owner/Leader's Integrated Master Schedule (IMS).
Authority: This IMP, in conjunction with associated contracts, provides the authority and obligation for the Owner/Leader to perform its responsibility.
Accountability: The Owner/Leader will be held accountable for its obligation through the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), associated subordinate schedules, and the Earned Value Management System (EVMS).
Responsibility: The company/organization designated with the Supporter (S) role for a given Accomplishment Criteria (AC) has supporting responsibility for ensuring that said AC has been satisfied. The specific activities involved in fulfilling this responsibility may include some subset of the Owner/Leader's responsibilities that have been delegated and accepted by the Supporter. Those delegated activities being performed by the Supporter should be clearly identifiable in the Supporter's Integrated Master Schedule (IMS).
Authority: This IMP, in conjunction with associated contracts, provides the authority and obligation for the Supporter to perform its responsibility.
Owner/Leader
Supporter
Page 22 of 23 As of 09/09/2014
Notes:
IMP Nouns Definitions
Standard Glossary of ACV 1.1 Terms
Accountability: The Supporter will be held accountable for its obligation through the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), associated subordinate schedules, and the Earned Value Management System (EVMS).
Responsibility: The company/organization designated with the Reviewer (R) role for a given Accomplishment Criteria (AC) has an optional (non-obligatory) responsibility for reviewing and providing feedback to the Owner/Leader toward the satisfactory completion of said AC. If the reviewer chooses to fulfill this responsibility, the specific activities involved may include reviewing appropriate work products associated with the AC, documenting relevant comments, and providing them to the Owner/Leader.
These activities may or may not be identifiable in the Reviewer's Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). If the reviewer chooses not to fulfill this responsibility, the Owner/Leader may assume that the Reviewer concurs with the satisfactory completion of the said
AC.
Authority: This IMP, in conjunction with associated contracts, provides the authority for the Reviewer to perform its responsibility.
Accountability: There is no obligation for the reviewer to perform it's responsibility, therefore no accountability is needed.
Responsibility: The company/organization designated with the Approver (A) role for a given Accomplishment Criteria (AC) has responsibility for dispositioning said AC as either satisfied or not. The specific activities involved in fulfilling this responsibility may include reviewing appropriate work product(s) associated with the AC and making a determination. If the Approver determines that said AC has been satisfied, no further action need be taken. Otherwise, the Approver is obligated to document the disposition, the rationale, as well as discrete direction as to what must be submitted to satisfy the AC, and providing the Owner/Leader with a written response in a timely manner. In the absence of a formal written response, the Owner/Leader may assume that the AC has been satisfied. The activities involved in performing this responsibility may or may not be clearly identifiable in the Approver's Integrated Master Schedule (IMS). When an approver role is not expressly specified for a given AC, it shall be assumed that the Owner/Leader is also responsible for the approval of the product specified in the AC.
Authority: This IMP, in…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .