M67854-14-R-6001_0003.doc
DOC document 158 KB Posted
- Attached to
- COMMON LASER RANGE FINDER INTEGRATED CAPABILITY
- Solicitation number
- M67854-14-R-6001
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
M67854-14-R-6001 0003
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
L-1 OVERVIEW
It is intended that the CLRF IC requirements identified in this solicitation be procured through the selection of a single Offer. This acquisition will utilize Best Value/Trade-Off source selection procedures and the Government intends to award one (1) Firm-Fixed Price, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract to the successful Offeror for the Production and Deployment Phase and associated data over a five-year period. The diagram below provides a visual representation of the acquisition approach to this procurement:
L-2 GENERAL
Only one (1) proposal will be accepted from a single Offeror. The Offeror’s best solution that meets the requirements of the RFP should be submitted. The Offeror shall submit documentation illustrating their approach in satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. The Offeror’s proposal must be clear, coherent, and prepared in sufficient detail for effective evaluation against the evaluation criteria. The proposal must clearly demonstrate how the Offeror intends to accomplish the project and must include convincing rationale and substantiation of all claims. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those sufficiently required to present a complete effective response to the solicitation are not desired. The Offeror may describe in their proposal, through the use of graphs, charts, diagrams, and/or narratives, in sufficient detail for the Government to understand and evaluate the nature of the Offeror’s approach. During the evaluation process, the Government will consider the degree of substantiation of the Offeror’s proposed approach in the proposal volumes and responses to any discussions, if held.
Each proposal shall sufficiently demonstrate an understanding of the ability to comply with all the requirements referenced in the CLRF IC Statement of Work (SOW) and Performance Specification (Attachment (1) – Section J). Clarity, completeness, and conciseness are essential and the quality of the proposal being indicative of the Offeror’s capability to perform the solicitation requirements. Failure to submit all of the information requested by this solicitation may be cause for unfavorable consideration or proposal being dismissed.
All correspondence in conjunction with this solicitation should be directed to Product Manager, Fire Support Systems (PdM FSS) Contract Specialist identified below:
Contract Specialist Name: Ms. Eliana York
E-mail address: eliana.york@usmc.mil Phone Number: 703.432.5739
And copied email to: lynn.frazier@usmc.mil Phone Number: 703.432.8709
L-3 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Offerors should clearly indicate which portions of their proposal are submitted in confidence and which they believe are exempt from Government disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Offerors making such assertions are encouraged to use descriptive legends citing to the FOIA exemption asserted as a cited exemption might apply to specific portions of their proposal.
L-4 PROPOSAL VOLUME REQUIREMENTS
The Offeror’s proposal shall be accompanied by a letter of transmittal prepared on the company’s letterhead stationery. The letter of transmittal shall identify all enclosures being transmitted and any exceptions taken to the specified format prescribed herein or any contingencies to the proposal and shall be used only to transmit the proposal and include no other information. If any exceptions are taken to the terms and conditions of the solicitation, they shall be clearly set forth in the letter of transmittal and they shall be explained by the Offeror with the understanding the exceptions may render the Offeror’s proposal unacceptable to the Government. The Offeror’s proposal shall also include an Executive Summary briefly describing the overall approach of that volume’s contents and any major subcontractor or teaming arrangements. The first or title page shall be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, paragraph (c)(2). The following are further descriptions of information that shall be provided with the proposal.
Table L-1. Volume Requirements.
Volume
Number & Name
| Contents |
| Total |
Page Limit
| Electronic Copy |
| Paper Copies |
| Volume 1: Technical |
| Letter of Transmittal |
| N/A |
| 1 |
(Include all volume contents on 1 CD) Original plus 5 copies of all volume contents
| Executive Summary |
| 1 |
| Technical Proposal: |
| 80* |
| · Section A: Performance |
| * |
| · Section B: Management: |
| * |
| - Safety Assessment Report (SAR) |
| 15 |
| - Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) |
| 10 |
| - Maintenance Support Plan (MSP) |
| 10 |
| · Section C: Energy |
| * |
| Volume 1 Annexes: CPSCM, CRM, and Production Schedule |
| No Limit on |
Annexes
Volume 2:
Past Performance
| Letter of Transmittal |
| N/A |
| 1 |
Original plus 3 copies of all volume contents
| Executive Summary |
| 1 |
| Past Performance |
| 15 |
Volume 3:
Business
| Letter of Transmittal |
| N/A |
| 1 |
Original plus 2 copies of all volume contents
| Executive Summary |
| 1 |
| Section A: Price |
| No Limit |
| Section B: Small Business Plan |
| No Limit |
* The Technical Proposal “Total Page Limit” includes Sections A through C, which shall not exceed 80 pages. The SAR, QAP, and MSP have separate page limits and are exclusive of the 80-page limit of the Technical Proposal.
L-4.1 Content
The Offeror’s proposal must clearly and convincingly demonstrate that the Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks, is able, willing, and competent to devote the necessary resources necessary to meet the requirements, and has valid and practical solutions for all requirements. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can, or will comply with the specifications, and statements paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without substantive evidence will not satisfy evaluation requirements.
In presenting material in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality information in more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization should be emphasized during proposal preparation. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to present enough information to allow the various work efforts, support, and management approaches, as well as price, to be meaningfully evaluated without discussions. Include any data necessary to illustrate adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems.
There is no need to repeat information in more than one volume if an overlap exists; the detailed information must be included in the most logical place and summarized and references in other areas. Price information will not be included in the technical proposal.
Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.
L–4.2 Page Limitations
The letter of transmittal, title page, table of contents, table of figures, list of tables, and glossary of abbreviations and acronyms do not count against page count limitations. Proposal contents that exceed the stated page limitations set by the solicitation, including any amendments, will not be considered in the evaluation of such a proposal.
L–4.3 Format
The printed proposal shall be single-spaced, on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper (with the exception of the Contractor Performance Specification Change Matrix (CPSCM), Cross Reference Matrix (CRM), and Production Schedule, submitted with the Technical Volume and the Section B Excel Spreadsheet submitted with the Business Volume, which can be on 11 x 17 inch white paper), with a minimum one-inch margin all around. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. A page printed on both sides shall be counted as two pages. Submission as double-sided printing/copying on recycled paper is encouraged. Print shall be of a minimum 11-point font size using "Arial" or "Times New Roman" font style. Bolding, underlining, and italics may be used to identify topic demarcations or points of emphasis. Graphic presentations, including tables, may use a reduced font style not less than 8 point and shall have spacing and text that is easily readable. The Offeror should ensure that each page provides identification of the submitting contractor in the header or footer.
Each volume in the proposal shall include a copy of the cover letter (letter of transmittal), title page, and table of contents. The table of contents shall list sections, subsections, and page numbers. Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used. Each acronym used shall be spelled out in the text the first time it appears in each proposal volume.
In addition to the paper copies identified above, the Offeror shall submit all proposal information in electronic format on a CD. The Offeror shall provide the electronic input file for each submitted IICamIP, SSCamIP, NVThermIP and NV-IPM recognition result. Text and graphics portions of the electronic copies shall be editable and compatible with Microsoft (MS) Office 2007. Data submitted in spreadsheet format shall be editable and compatible with MS Office 2007. In case of conflict between the paper copy and the electronic copy of the proposals submitted, the paper copy shall take precedence. However, if contradictory information is found in the CD, such as to discredit the claim in the paper proposal that the requirements of the Performance Specification (Attachment (1) - Section J) or SOW can be met, then the CD information may lead to a finding of technical unacceptability. Each volume, to include the "Original" and "Copies," shall be bound separately in hard side three-ring binders. Offeror(s) are responsible for ensuring printed material accurately reflects the electronic data on the CD.
Proposals shall be valid for a period of at least 240 days.
L–4.4 Submission Address
The proposal and all copies may be mailed, express mailed, or hand-carried, however, the addresses vary depending on the delivery method chosen by the Offeror. The Government’s preferred delivery method is for proposals to be MAILED OR EXPRESS MAILED (via third party couriers, i.e. FedEx, UPS, etc.).
MAILED OR EXPRESS MAILED (via third party couriers, i.e. FEDEX, UPS, etc.) proposals shall be delivered to the address and Point of Contact (POC) shown below. DO NOT HAND-CARRY PROPOSALS TO THIS ADDRESS.
Commander
Marine Corps Systems Command
Armor and Fire Support Systems (PMM-114)
ATTN: Ms. Eliana York
2200 Lester Street
Quantico, VA 22134
RFP: M67854-14-R-6001
Phone Number: 703.432.5739
Offerors are advised that proposals sent by conventional U.S. Mail service are not routed directly to the above address. Therefore, the possibility that a proposal will not comply with the stated closing date/time exists, in such case the proposal will be considered a “late submission”.
HAND-CARRIED proposals shall be delivered to the address and POC below. OFFERORS MUST CALL AHEAD AS ACCESS TO THIS BUILDING IS RESTRICTED.
Commander
Marine Corps Systems Command
Armor and Fire Support Systems (PMM-114)
ATTN: Ms. Eliana York
105 Tech Parkway, Suite 105
Stafford, VA 22555
RFP: M67854-14-R-6001
Phone Number: 703.432.5739
Alternate POC for both locations listed above is: Lynn Frazier, 703.432.8709.
L–4.5 Submission Due Dates
Responsibility falls solely on the Offerors to submit proposals on time. Offers shall be received no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation, Standard Form 33, Page 1, Block 9. Late submissions will not be accepted. The PCO will not accept e-mails and phone calls from Offerors with late submissions.
L–4.6 Communication with the Contracting Office
Solicitation information and amendments will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at www.fbo.gov. Offerors may ONLY e-mail written questions, utilizing the format in Table L-2 below, requesting clarification of the RFP to the Government via the Contract Specialist, Ms. Eliana York at: eliana.york@usmc.mil and copy lynn.frazier@usmc.mil. Written questions will be received no later than 2:00 P.M. EST, ten (10) calendar days after the “Date Issued” in the solicitation, Standard Form 33, Page 1, Block 5, unless specified otherwise. The Government will answer questions and provide responses via an amendment to the solicitation posted on the FBO website. Questions received after this date may not be answered.
Table L-2 Format for Questions
| Document/Section |
| Paragraph |
| Question/Issue/Concern |
General Issue
Solicitation
SOW
Performance Spec
Other
L-4.7 Volume 1 – Technical
The Technical Volume shall include the Performance, Management, and Energy Sections. No contract pricing information shall appear in the Technical Volume. Submitting pricing in this volume may lead to an unfavorable evaluation.
The Technical Volume shall address Evaluation Factor 1 – Technical and Evaluation Factor 5 – Energy as per solicitation Section M. The Technical Volume shall demonstrate an understanding of the Offeror’s ability to meet all of the requirements covered in the CLRF IC SOW and Performance Specification (Attachment (1) – Section J). The proposal should be sufficiently complete to demonstrate how the Offeror will comply with requirements throughout the performance period. Data previously submitted, or presumed to be known, i.e., descriptions of previous projects performed for the Government cannot be considered as a part of the proposal unless physically incorporated in the proposal.
The Government expects the following in each Offeror’s proposal: Clarity, completeness, and conciseness. The Offeror shall demonstrate the ability, resources, and experience required to meet the requirements, to include detailed procedures, plans, and methods to be used. All information shall be presented in sufficient depth for the Government to make a comprehensive evaluation of the Offeror’s understanding of the solicitation requirements and of the Offeror’s capability for successful performance. The proposal should demonstrate this understanding and capability in a concise, logical manner and should not contain superfluous material not directly related to this solicitation.
L-4.7.1 Section A - Performance This section shall include a Contractor Performance Specification Change Matrix (CPSCM) per the template provided as Attachment (2) - Section J. The completed CPSCM will be incorporated into the awarded contract. This section shall also include substantiating data material to ONLY address those Contractor's performance specifications (Attachment (2) - Section J) that are NOT met by the submitted PDMs. The Offeror shall also provide substantiating technical data on the following specifications that are verified by analysis: Nighttime Target Recognition ("Range as a Function of Probability" or "Range for Desired Probability" portion from report only), Daytime Target Recognition ("Range as a Function of Probability" or "Range for Desired Probability" portion from report only), Graceful Degradation and Mean Time Between Failure and, if provided, Azimuth Upgradeability, Self-Location Export, and Power for Wireless Adapter. The provided data shall be sufficient to allow the Government to replicate the analysis as well as substantiate the basis of the proposed parameters.
L-4.7.2 Section B - Management
This section shall address Production, Supportability, and Systems Engineering. The Technical Volume, Management Section shall include a CRM per the template provided as Attachment (3) – Section J.
· Production: A Production Schedule shall be included with this section. The Production Schedule shall be editable and compatible with Microsoft Project 2007. At a minimum, the schedule shall integrate all data items, testing, hardware deliveries, contract program events/reviews, contract milestones, technical milestones, key decision points and program events. If the Offeror’s proposed delivery for the base year is shorter than the Government's minimum requirement delineated in Section F of the RFP, the Offeror shall include that delivery schedule in their response, which will then become the required delivery schedule, if awarded a contract. The Offeror shall also include their proposed delivery schedule for the follow-on years in accordance with their proposed production capability.
This section shall also address and substantiate current plant capacity or analysis to achieve the plant capacity necessary to meet the contract requirements, long lead items, First Article Test (FAT) schedule for the fourteen (14) FAT systems, and current and projected workload on current contracts. The Offeror shall also provide a Staffing Plan to support the production effort including labor mix and hiring plan. Any areas which have proven to be schedule risks or issues on current or past contracts shall be addressed. The Offeror shall also provide evidence that they meet or will meet all of the security requirements contained in the CLRF IC Production SOW.
· Supportability and Systems Engineering: The Offeror shall discuss their approach in meeting the supportability and systems engineering requirements contained in the CLRF IC Production SOW. In particular, the Offeror shall provide their CLRF IC Quality Assurance Plan (QAP), Safety Assessment Report (SAR), and Maintenance Support Plan (MSP). The QAP shall address the Offeror's ability to maintain the quality management system to be used on the CLRF IC contract. The SAR shall be in accordance with Task 301 of MIL-STD-882E. The MSP shall identify the maintenance tasks and address maintenance functional areas for the CLRF IC and it is strongly recommended GEIA-HB-0007 be used as guidance.
L-4.7.3 Product Demonstration Models (PDMs)
Offerors shall submit two (2) Product Demonstration Models (PDM) as part of their Technical Volume. A PDM is a functional unit that will be used to substantiate and validate performance claims contained in the Technical Volume of the proposal. The PDMs shall have the labels required by 21 CFR 1010.2 and 1010.3 permanently affixed to the device housing. These labels shall be such that they do not affect the performance or evaluation of the design. Submitted PDMs shall be returned to respective Offerors after contract award. The Government shall not be held liable or responsible for the condition in which the PDMs are returned. The Government reserves the right to validate or demonstrate any of the requirements listed in Section 4 of the Performance Specification (Attachment (1) - Section J). The Offeror shall submit the FDA Compliance Checklist provided as Attachment (4) - Section J 10 days prior to the proposal due date in order to identify any variations from the performance requirements of 21 CFR 1040.10 and the labeling requirements of 21 CFR 1010.2 and 1010.3, complete with justification for each deviation.
L-4.7.4 Section C - Energy
In this section, the Offeror shall provide substantiating technical data on the Battery Component specifications per paragraph 3.15 of the Performance Specification (Attachment (1) – Section J).
L-4.8 Volume 2 – Past Performance
The Past Performance Volume shall include the Offeror’s Past Performance data. The Past Performance Volume shall address Evaluation Factor 3 – Past Performance, as per solicitation Section M. No production or pricing information shall be contained in the Past Performance Volume.
Offerors are advised that the Government may use and evaluate independently obtained past performance data such as Past Performance Retrieval System (PPIRS) data and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment (8) – Section J), as well as recent and relevant past performance data provided by the Offeror. Therefore, the Government requests that Offerors provide past performance information that adequately supports its stated capabilities to accomplish the work defined in this solicitation. Since the Government may not necessarily interview all of the sources provided by the Offeror, it is incumbent upon the Offeror to explain the relevance of any past performance data provided. Furthermore, the Government does not assume the duty to search for data to explain or remedy any inconsistencies it finds in the information provided by the Offeror. All past performance information required is applicable to all proposed key subcontractors with whom the Offeror is teaming, as well as the Offeror. The Offeror shall submit with its proposal its key subcontractors’ letter(s) of consent allowing the Government to disclose the subcontractors’ past performance to the Offeror if necessary. Key subcontractors are those which perform 25% or more of the proposed cost of this effort and/or whose performance on the award contract is such that if it fails, could significantly impact program success.
At a minimum, proposals shall include the following information for work similar in size, scope, and/or complexity to the CLRF IC: technical relevance of the referenced effort to this procurement, demonstrated technical and schedule performance, general responsiveness to contract requirements, management aspects of the effort to include problem resolution, quality of the products and services, and overall customer satisfaction with products and services. For any contracts which did not/do not meet the original requirements with regard to original cost, schedule, or technical performance, the Offeror shall provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for such shortcomings and any demonstrated corrective actions taken to avoid recurrence. Provide a copy of any cure notices or show cause letters received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action taken.
Offeror shall submit past performance citations within the past three (3) years that are relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. PLEASE SUBMIT NO MORE THAN THREE (3) CITATIONS PER OFFEROR AND TWO (2) PER KEY SUBCONTRACTOR. Pages are limited to no more than three (3) pages per citation. In addition, any and all contracts terminated in whole or in part during the past five (5) years, to include those currently in the process of such termination are considered relevant and the Offeror shall provide past performance information for those contracts.
Offerors shall complete Part I of the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment (8) – Section J) and send it to the assessors (Government or Commercial personnel that had experience with the Offeror on a previous, relevant contract). Offerors shall request the assessors complete Part II of the questionnaire and ask they email it by the closing date of the solicitation, directly to eliana.york@usmc.mil with copy to lynn.frazier@usmc.mil. Offerors shall also identify to whom Past Performance Questionnaires were submitted for completion by providing, via email to eliana.york@usmc.mil with copy to lynn.frazier@usmc.mil, the Name of the Government Agency or Commercial Organization, Address, Contract Number, and Evaluator’s Name/Contact Info (Phone Number and Email Address). Any Offeror that is unable to provide three (3) relevant contracts for past performance evaluation may submit a lesser number.
L–4.9 Volume 3 – Business
The Business Volume shall address Evaluation Factor 2 – Price and Evaluation Factor – 4 Small Business Plan, as per solicitation Section M. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 240 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers. After proposal submission, the Government reserves the right to request more detailed price information, as necessary.
L-4.9.1 Section A - Price
This volume shall include the price proposal that includes a Firm-Fixed Price or Labor Rate for the Time and Material CLINs, for each separately priced Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) in Section B of the RFP. Offerors shall propose a step-ladder pricing structure for quantities based on price breaks for all step-ladder CLINs, but a maximum of six (6) step-ladder ranges applies. The minimum quantity for the first range shall be one (1) and the maximum quantity for the last range shall be the maximum quantity specified for each CLIN. The Offeror shall submit prices for each period of performance. If the Offeror does not propose prices for all step-ladder quantities in each year of the period of performance, they may be considered non-responsive and rejected. All dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar.
For the Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Time and Material (T&M) CLINs, the Offeror shall propose only one (1) labor rate for the CLS T&M CLINs. Materials shall be non-fee bearing with a not to exceed amount of $150,000.00 for each period of performance and will be calculated using the $150,000.00 not to exceed amount only.
For the Government Directed Engineering Studies (GDES) T&M CLINs, the Offeror shall propose only one (1) labor rate for the GDES T&M CLINs. Materials shall be non-fee bearing with a not to exceed amount of $300,000.00 for each period of performance and will be calculated using the $300,000.00 not to exceed amount only.
It is expected that this contract will be awarded based upon determination that there is adequate price competition; therefore, the Offeror is not required to submit or certify cost or pricing data with its proposal. If, after receipt of the proposals, the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition does not exist, the Offeror shall provide certified cost or pricing data as requested by the Contracting Officer.
The Business Volume shall consist of the following, separated by tabs:
a. This volume shall include a master table of contents of the entire proposal (Note: include the master table of contents in Volume 3 only).
b. Including its subcontractors, the Offeror shall provide the company/division address, identifying codes, and applicable designations, company/division's street address, county and facility code, CAGE Code, Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) code, size of business (large or small), and labor surplus area designation. The Offeror shall also provide the mailing address, e-mail address, telephone numbers, fax numbers, and facility codes for the cognizant Contract Administration Office, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), and Government paying office including the name, e-mail address, telephone number, and fax number for the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Offeror shall provide a single point of contact and one alternate for all matters dealing with its proposal; including name, position title, address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address.
c. Signed Standard Form 33, titled Solicitation, Offer and Award with blocks 12 through 17 shall be completed by the Offeror.
d. Signed Standard Form 30, titled Amendment of Solicitation/ Modification of Contract.
e. Completed Attachment (7) “Section B - Description of Supplies/Services” located in Section J, to reflect total price for CLRF IC. Offerors are encouraged to submit their proposals based on the most favorable terms provided to reflect their best offer. See instructions in Attachment (7) for how to complete the Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet.
f. Completed Section K “Contractor’s Representations and Certifications”.
g. Certification: Offerors shall also execute and include the following Certification in Volume 3 - Business:
“I hereby certify our offer dated (INSERT DATE) in response to solicitation M67854-14-R-6001 does not include any ground rules, assumptions, or any other verbiage which conditions or otherwise limits our offer dated (INSERT DATE) in response to solicitation M67854-14-R-6001 unless otherwise noted in our Letter of Transmittal.”
Company: (INSERT COMPANY NAME)
Authorized Signature/Title/Date: (SIGN/INSERT TITLE/INSERT DATE)”
h. The following provides additional information on how to complete each of the columns in DFARS 252.227-7017, Identification and Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions. This volume shall also include any technical data and computer software which the Contractor intends to provide with limited rights or restricted rights at the time of delivery IAW DFARS 252.227-7017, Identification and Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions for the table titled, List of Technical Data Computer Software to be furnished with Restrictions.
Column 1. Technical Data or Computer Software to be furnished with Restrictions
(Note. Identify the deliverable technical data and the Item, Component, or Process (ICP) to which it pertains.)
Column 2. Basis for Assertion
(Note. Specify whether “development” of the ICP or software was EXCLUSIVELY or PARTIALLY at private expense. Provide evidence of private expense, such as IR&D account numbers. “Developed” is defined at 252.227-7013(a)(6) for technical data and 252.227-7014(a)(6) for software. Indicate whether the ICP or the software will be further developed with Government funding. If so, indicate whether the new development can be segregated from the original.)
Column 3. Asserted Rights Category
(Note. Identify the expiration date for Government Purpose Rights and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Data Rights. Commercial technical data and software should be listed separate from the noncommercial items. See 252.227-7015(b) for the Government’s license rights in commercial technical data. Commercial software licenses must comply with DFARS 227.7202-1; attach a copy of the license.)
Column 4. Name of Persons Asserting Restrictions
Column 5. 252.227-7028 – Similar Item Delivered to the Government
(Note. Identify if the same or similar technical data or software has been produced for, delivered to, or is subject to delivery to the Government under any contract or subcontract. Identify the contract number, organization, and any limitations on the Government’s rights to use and disclose [to include applicable expiration date].)
Date
Printed Name and Title
Signature
L-4.9.2 Section B - Small Business Plan
The Offeror shall describe the extent to which it proposes to utilize Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) in the performance of the contract in accordance with FAR 52.219-9. Where possible, describe firms to include NAICS Code qualifications germane to this effort, the type to be used, along with the complexity and variety of work. Indicate the dollar amount of the proposed effort and give its relative impact with respect to total price of the proposal. Detail how the Offeror will meet DOD’s goal of a minimum of 5% SDB subcontracting utilization or provide a detailed explanation as to why the goal cannot be achieved. The subcontracting plan shall be provided in Volume 3 as a separate section.
(End of Summary of Changes)
_1470210333.ppt
Company A
Company B
Company C
Company D
Company E
Proposals Submitted by Industry
One (1) proposal for the CLRF IC consisting of:
Volume 1 – Technical, Volume 2 – Past Performance, and Volume 3 – Business
2. Evaluation of Proposals
Evaluation of Technical Proposal (Volume 1)
Factor 1: Technical
Sub-factor 1: Performance
Sub-factor 2: Management
Factor 5: Energy
Evaluation of Past Performance Proposal (Volume 2)
Factor 3: Past Performance
Evaluation of Business Proposal (Volume 3)
Factor 2: Price
Factor 4: Small Business Plan
3. Establish the Competitive Range and Hold
Discussions, if Needed
4. Best Value Determination and Award of One (1) Contract
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .