Attachment_(8)_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_16_Jun_2014.docx

ATTACHMENT (8)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

M67854-14-R-6001

PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS

The company who has provided you with this form is proposing on Department of Navy/United States Marine Corps (USMC) solicitation, M67854-14-R-6001, to provide a Common Laser Range Finder Integrated Capability (CLRF IC) that will meet the mission needs of the Marine Corps. Past Performance is an important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition. Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Offeror named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s). Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to the following Contract Specialist: eliana.york@usmc.mil with copy to PCO: lynn.frazier@usmc.mil.

Commander Marine Corps Systems Command Attn: Ms Eliana York, Contract Specialist Code: PMM-114 CT 2.6 2200 Lester Street Quantico, VA 22134 Phone: 703-432-5739 Email: eliana.york@usmc.mil Copy to: lynn.frazier@usmc.mil

When Complete, the information on this form is Source Selection Sensitive (41 USC 423); SAFEGUARD.

COMMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THIS DATA TO BE UTILIZED

Contract Award Date:

Completion Date:

Contract Value:

Type of Contract:

Evaluator Name/Title/Phone:

Description of Contract Requirements:

PART TWO: EVALUATION

1) Recency (Is the contract within the past 36 months) Yes_______ No_______

2) Relevancy (Check the block that describes the contract)

Explain._________________________________________________________

A. Product Performance A1. The contractor demonstrated the development of system/subsystems that met the required system performance specifications.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

A2. The contractor demonstrated that all systems/subsystems were fully qualified and ready for intended use prior to delivery to the Government.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

A3. The contractor demonstrated that warranty or contractor logistics support repairs were timely.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

A4. The contractor substantiated reduction of occurrences of engineering changes, rework activity, requests for waivers/deviations, and material review board actions.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

B. Integration Performance B1. The contractor demonstrated the ability to work effectively as the prime contractor and/or integration team member. This experience should include working with other prime contractors, subcontractors, program management activities (PMAs)/System Program Offices (SPOs).

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

_____________________________________________________________________________________B2. The contractor demonstrated the ability to successfully integrate systems/subsystems.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

C. Program Management and Control C1. The contractor demonstrated the ability to control cost.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory C2. The contractor demonstrated the ability to deliver product or deliverables on schedule.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory C3. The contractor demonstrated the ability to meet small business subcontracting goals.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory D1. Overall Satisfaction.

|_| N/A Comments:

|_| Outstanding |_| Exceeded Expectation |_| Met Expectations |_| Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

Has the information provided been shared with the Contractor?

|_| YES

|_| NO

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.

SIGNATURE OF EVALUATOR

TITLE OF EVALUATOR DATE