S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_Updated_11_7_2019.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USMC Professional Support Services For The Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory Futures Division (MCWL/FD)
- Solicitation number
- M00264-19-R-0014
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal solicitation seeking professional support services. The solicitation number is M00264-19-R-0014 and is seeking a contractor to provide engineering, analytical, technical, and business services to support the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory Futures Division in developing new operational concepts, tactics, techniques, procedures and technologies. The period of performance is unspecified. The questionnaire is to be completed by both the offeror and an assessor with past experience working with the offeror on a relevant prior contract. It requests ratings and rationale for the offeror's performance in areas such as customer satisfaction, timeliness, technical success, quality, and cost control. The completed questionnaire must be submitted to the contracting office by November 20, 2019 to be considered as part of the evaluation.
S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE_Updated_11_7_2019.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_2-DD254_Fillable_version..pdf | ||
| M00264-19-R-0004_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| M00264-19-R-0014_Amendment_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1-_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q_&_A_from_Industry_Day__Conference.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2-_DD_Form_254.pdf | ||
| M00264-19-R-0014.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1-_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Final_MCWL_Brief_Master_9_5_2019.pdf | ||
| Industry_Day_Corporate_Interest.pdf | ||
| S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3-_GFP_Checklist.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_Attachment_3-_GFP_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_Attachment_1-_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_Attachment_2-_DD254.pdf | ||
| DRAFT_EBOSS_RFP_M00264-19-R-0014.pdf | ||
| Attachment_A_Final_EBOSS_II_PWS_DRAFT_for_FBO_posting.pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EBOSS II Solicitation M00264-19-R-0004
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Instructions:
· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation on 20 November 2019.
· Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: joy.hughes@usmc.mil. Questionnaries must be received from the references and not the offeror.
I. Solicitation Data (EBOSS II)
| Solicitation Number |
| M00264-19-R-0014 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Experiementation Business Operations Support Services (EBOSS II) |
| Customer/Agency |
| Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL)/ |
Futures Directorate (FD)
| Project/Requirement Description |
| This requirement is to provide a full range of engineering, analytical, technical, and business services. The application of talent and experience through skillful resourcing will support the development of new or existing operational concepts, tactics, techniques, procedures and technologies to prepare Marines for combat. This effort is critical as MCWL/FD feeds the combat development process. The methodology by which the combat development process is accomplished is iterative, non-linear and continuously cyclical. As MCWL/FD responds to growing requirements for experimentation and analysis of existing or emerging science and technologies, applying streamlined acquisition techniques and the support of experts and industry partners to achieve operational goals is vital and challenging. MCWL/FD requires a solution that is comprehensive yet flexible based upon depth of knowledge and experience. Such solutions must consider an integrated technical and management approach demonstrating vision, depth of capabilities and flexibility in responding to a changing environment. Performance of tasks within this PWS will require individualized dedicated support to respective subordinate divisions and across one or more elements of the command. Tasks encompass the spectrum of business operations, research, engineering, experimentation, technical analysis, and program management. While the core services required under the scope of this contract are known, incidental task requirements may develop during the course of contract performance. |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final (Or Current) |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description/Agency
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Customer Satisfaction
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Customer Satisfaction
Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.
2. Timeliness
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones
Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please explain your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
3. Technical Success
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Success
b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.
| Technical Success |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Technical Execution—(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)
MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
4. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Performance
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Conformance to Specifications
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
5. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| COST CONTROL |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
FORECASTING/ MANAGEMENT/ COST CONTROL
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
VII. General Comments:
| _______________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .