S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
USMC Professional Support Services For The Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory Futures Division (MCWL/FD)
Solicitation number
M00264-19-R-0014
Issued by

About this file

This past performance questionnaire requests performance assessments from government personnel who administered a previous contract with an offeror bidding on a new solicitation. The solicitation seeks professional support services for the Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory Futures Division, including a full range of engineering, analytical, technical, and business services to support combat development processes. Services include research, experimentation, technical analysis, and program management across subordinate divisions. Assessors are asked to evaluate the offeror's performance on areas such as customer satisfaction, timeliness, technical success, quality, and cost control on a previous relevant contract. Ratings are requested for overall performance as well as sub-elements within each category. The completed questionnaire must be received from the reference, not the offeror, by November 18, 2019.

S-1_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EBOSS II Solicitation M00264-19-R-0004

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Instructions:

· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation on 18 November 2019.

· Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: joy.hughes@usmc.mil. Questionnaries must be received from the references and not the offeror.

I. Solicitation Data (EBOSS II)

Solicitation Number
M00264-19-R-0014
Project/Requirement
Experiementation Business Operations Support Services (EBOSS II)
Customer/Agency
Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory (MCWL)/

Futures Directorate (FD)

Project/Requirement Description
This requirement is to provide a full range of engineering, analytical, technical, and business services. The application of talent and experience through skillful resourcing will support the development of new or existing operational concepts, tactics, techniques, procedures and technologies to prepare Marines for combat. This effort is critical as MCWL/FD feeds the combat development process. The methodology by which the combat development process is accomplished is iterative, non-linear and continuously cyclical. As MCWL/FD responds to growing requirements for experimentation and analysis of existing or emerging science and technologies, applying streamlined acquisition techniques and the support of experts and industry partners to achieve operational goals is vital and challenging. MCWL/FD requires a solution that is comprehensive yet flexible based upon depth of knowledge and experience. Such solutions must consider an integrated technical and management approach demonstrating vision, depth of capabilities and flexibility in responding to a changing environment. Performance of tasks within this PWS will require individualized dedicated support to respective subordinate divisions and across one or more elements of the command. Tasks encompass the spectrum of business operations, research, engineering, experimentation, technical analysis, and program management. While the core services required under the scope of this contract are known, incidental task requirements may develop during the course of contract performance.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Initial
Final (Or Current)

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description/Agency

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
|_| PRIME
|_| SUBCONTRACTOR
Termination History
|_| Convenience
|_| Default
|_| N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Customer Satisfaction

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Customer Satisfaction

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

2. Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Timeliness in Meeting Milestones

Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please explain your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Technical Success

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Technical Success

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.

Technical Success
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Technical Execution—(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

5. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/ MANAGEMENT/ COST CONTROL

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

___________________________________________________
Assessor’s SignatureDate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .