Attachment_8_Offerors_Questions_in_Response_to_Soliciation_Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M00264-19-R-0013
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains questions and responses related to a solicitation for language, culture, and research support services. The solicitation seeks proposals for seven main categories of services: language and regional expertise training; operational and expeditionary cultural support; scientific research; institutionalization and process improvement support; assessment; graphic design; and integration services. Responses provide clarification on requirements for aggregating federal spending data, access constraints, overriding mandatory tasks, order numbering, concurrent modifications, and tracing procurement line items to contract awards. The intent is to utilize commercial products to the maximum extent possible while fully meeting requirements through multiple approved implementation methods.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_4_Sample_Task_Order_0002_Version_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_DD_Form_254.pdf | ||
| M00264-19-R-0013_Questions_and_Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| M00264-19-R-0013_Amendment_0001_CAOCL_RFP.docx.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_Past_and_Present_Performance_Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_7_Deliverables_Unit_Pricing_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M00264-19-R-0013.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_Sample_Task_Order_0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_6_CAOCL_SOP_Signed_11_Dec_2018_(1).pdf | ||
| Attachment_9_PRS-CAOCL-Services.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3_Initial_Task_Order_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_Sample_Task_Order_0002.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CRM
| New CRM No.5 | Source Document | Page Number | Section/Para No. | Question/Comment | Response | DASN AP Comments |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | Suggest revision. Intent is to allow consume information from USA Spending to aggregate reporting (i.e., allowing reporting on additional data elements captured by external activities that are captured within USA Spending). There is no requirement at this time to export information directly to USA Spending. | |||||
| 3 | Do not concur. SMR-84 constrains access that is not specifically granted by SMR-89/136. | |||||
| 4 | Intent is to allow for urgent and compelling need. For example, a mandatory task may be overridden given that the appropriate level or approval has been received and it is captured as part of the workflow history. | |||||
| 5 | Do not concur. The DON still requires the need to identify order ranges. The new PIID rules would mean this would be more granular (i.e., a range per PIID), but would allow existing business procedures to continue. | |||||
| 6 | Reserve is intended to mean that it can be used by that user only. | |||||
| 7 | Based on inference, the intent is a Multiple Award Contract (MAC). | |||||
| 8 | Correct. A line item may be deleted only if it has not been executed at any point (i.e., has been created in error on a draft document). | |||||
| 9 | Concur. Recommend revision requirements to address a) informing users that a concurrent modification exist (both outstanding concurrent modifications and the newly created), b) disallowing multiple concurrent modifications for the same line item and c) updating concurrent modifications upon execution (signature) of one. | |||||
| 10 | Recommend removing this requirement. Primary business need is to allow a single PR line item to trace to multiple Award line items; and, multiple PR line items to trace to a single Award line item. | |||||
| 11 | Correct. Recommend revision to clarify statement. | |||||
| 12 | Question unclear. Not all attachments apply to full-and-open competition rules. | |||||
| 13 | ||||||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | ||||||
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | Under consideration. | |||||
| 20 | ||||||
| 21 | ||||||
| 22 | ||||||
| 23 | ||||||
| 24 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 26 | Intent is to maximize OOTB capabilities and remain on the COTS product line (i.e., preserving all inherited maintenance activities) while meeting 100% of the requirement. There are multiple implementation methods to meet this criteria. | |||||
| 27 | ||||||
| 28 | ||||||
| 29 | ||||||
| 30 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .