Attachment_3_Solicitation.docx

M0026418R0006

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

MIN AND MAX

As referred to in Paragraph (b) of the “Indefinite Quantity” clause of this contract, the contract minimum and maximum quantities are as follows:

a. Minimum guarantee per contract: $2,500.00. The minimum applies to each contract award.

b. Maximum: $48,000,000.00. The maximum applies to the cumulative total of orders issued under all contracts awarded as a result of the solicitation. Success of each contractor competing for individual task orders will vary.

INFORMATION WARFARE INTEGRATION (IWI)

FFP

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.1 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 72 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

PSC Code: R408

FOB: Destination

MAX

NET AMT

FIRES AND MANEUVERS INTEGRATION (FMI)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.2 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 36 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

FORCE PROTECTION INTEGRATION (FPI)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.3 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 72 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION (II)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.4 I Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 72 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

LOGISTICS INTEGRATION (LI)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.5 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 72 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

MAGTF INTEGRATION (MI)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.6 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 72 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

ATF&P

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.7 ADVOCACY, TRANSITION, FISCAL AND PERSONNEL/OPERATIONS (ATF&P) Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 36 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

SEABASING INTEGRATION

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.8 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 36 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

EXPEDITIONARY ENERGY (E2)

Support Services IAW PWS Section 3.9 Overall effort anticipated during the life of this contract is approximately equivalent to 36 months of Support for the MID CBA Task order (Attachment #5) in RFP

MAX

UNDEFINED

CDRL

CDRLs; NSP CDRLS will be identified at the task order level on FORM 1423

MAX

Travel

COST

Travel

MAX COST

UNDEFINED

FFP

Option to Extend Services up to an Additional Six (6) Months

MAX

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

DELIVERY INFORMATION

17-JUL-2023

3300 RUSSELL RD

QUANTICO VA 22134

SHAWN WADE

703-784-3429

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

M30700

17-JUL-2023

3300 RUSSELL RD

QUANTICO VA 22134

SHAWN WADE

703-784-3429

M30700

17-JAN-2024

M30700

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

DEPUTY COMMANDANT, COMBAT DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF

CAPABILITIES DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE,

TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES

Performance Work Statement in Support of Capabilities Development Directorate for Technical Support Services

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The scope of this effort includes provisions for technical, analytical, engineering, and capability portfolio management support to the Director, Capabilities Development Directorate (CDD), Deputy Commandant Combat Development and Integration (DC CD&I). CDD has a requirement for technical, analytical, and engineering, and capability portfolio management (CPM) support. Critical capabilities within this effort include the development of comprehensive Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) documents and analysis of existing capabilities to define capability gaps, capability needs, and approaches to provide those capabilities within a specified functional or operational area. Note this effort does not include the development of Operational Architectures, which will be provided by the Operational Architecture Branch, Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Integration Division (MID). The Marine Corps Capabilities Based Assessment (MC CBA) process is conducted in accordance with MCO 3900.20, Marine Corps Capabilities Based Assessment (MC CBA). This effort will support both recurring and ad hoc requirements to provide JCIDS/MC CBA assessment components (Capability Analysis, Gap Analysis, Solutions Analysis, and Risk Analysis) and conduct assessments of training and education standards development. Performance areas include both overarching and Division-centric support areas that will be delineated by individual task orders.

1.1 CDD MISSION

CDD supports the DC, CD&I by developing and integrating war fighting capabilities solutions enabling an effective Marine Corps capability to respond to strategic challenges and opportunities. CDD provides subject matter experts in the areas of: Command and Control/Cyber and Electronic Warfare, Fires and Maneuver, Force Protection, Intelligence, Logistics, (MAGTF) Integration, Small Wars and Irregular Warfare, Total Force Structure, Seabasing, and Expeditionary Energy. In consideration of overarching national strategic and service guidance and concepts development, the Directorate will conduct analysis across the complete spectrum of Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P). The identification of Enterprise-wide capabilities, gaps, capability excesses, solutions, and risk areas is incorporated into the development of the Marine Corps Enterprise Integration Plan (MCEIP) and other capabilities development documents (i.e. (Joint Capability Integration Development System (JCIDS)), and the management of Universal Needs Statements (UNS) requiring vigilant and dedicated coordination by respective subject matter experts supported by a business infrastructure with which to further capability development from concept to acquisition and fielding.

2.0 SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS

Requirements for task orders under the resulting contract will specify performance criteria based upon individual customer needs, timelines, and system-specific objectives. The following is a list of general requirements that will be common to all task orders irrespective of the technical priorities:

2.1 WORK LOCATION. Principal performance will occur at Contractor spaces within the National Capital Region (NCR) and, more specifically, the MCB Quantico, VA. Some work will occur on-site at CDD, but not as a full-time place of performance. The Contractor is required to possess all facilities, equipment, applications, and related infrastructure required to support their technical and management operations. However, if space is available and both the Government and Contractor are agreeable, full-time on-site place of performance is possible.

2.2 TRAVEL REQUIREMENTS. Occasional travel for coordination of support efforts in the local area is anticipated. Government directed CONUS or OCONUS travel may be required at the task order level. Only Government directed travel outside of the local Northern Virginia area will be acomplished via the travel CLIN. Local travel will not be reimbursed.

2.2.1 MEETING SUPPORT. The Contractor shall provide support for off-site meetings and working groups as necessary to facilitate task execution. Such support shall include the following and be made readily available given a 2-week advance notice by the Government with authorization from the CDD Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR):

· Teleconference, Video Teleconference (VTC) and Secured-VTC capabilities

· Up to 100 seat capacity

· Multiple display projection capabilities

· Smaller break-out rooms with 10-30 seat capacity

2.3 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT. The Contractor shall provide the necessary resources and infrastructure to manage and administer all resulting task orders. The selection of teaming partners, subcontractors, facilities, and other business considerations is discretionary on the part of the Contractor, so long as they conform to the labor categories, pricing, and performance terms and conditions that bind the prime. The Contractor shall establish processes and assign appropriate management and support resources to administer the resulting Indefinite Quantity, Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) and to interface with the Government's COR. This shall include management of task orders, staffing actions, subcontractor management, finance, and Government interface with CDD and RCO staff. At all times, the prime Contractor shall be responsible for the actions of its teaming partners and subcontractors.

2.4 GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES AND INTERFACE. CDD's designated COR will have technical cognizance over all tasks issued under this IDIQ. The COR will execute responsibilities related to quality compliance and performance oversight; deliverables acceptance; invoice certification; and coordination of follow-on work efforts. Only the contracting officer will interface with the prime Contractor's representative for payment and administrative issues.

2.5 TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE QUALITY. Site Lead for the contractor team can either be the Prime or a Subcontractor, however, technical cognizance over performance remains with the prime Contractor at all times. The prime Contractor is responsible for all assigned resources, performance quality (e.g., QASP compliance), and deliverables associated with each task order.

2.6 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS. The Contractor shall be responsible for staffing, competency training, guidance, and supervision of personnel performing any resulting task orders. The Contractor shall accomplish the assigned work by employing and utilizing qualified personnel possessing an appropriate combination of education, training, and experience required to respond to the PWS criteria. Staff initially assigned shall provide the benchmark for replacement staff qualifications and no dilution of such qualifications, or reduction in performance shall be incurred by the Government as a result of staff reassignment/departure.

2.7 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. ALTHOUGH THE MAJORITY OF THE WORK WILL REQUIRE ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AT THE SECRET LEVEL, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO POSSESS A TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTALIZED INFORMATION (TS/SCI) IN ORDER TO PERFORM CERTAIN TASK ORDERS. ALL CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL REQUIRING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ASSIGNED TO THIS PROGRAM SHALL POSSESS A MINIMUM SECRET CLEARANCE. At the task order level, the Contractor may be required to possess a TOP SECRET/SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTALIZED INFORMATION (TS/SCI) clearance. The Prime Contractor and all Sub-contractors (though the Prime Contractor) shall certify in writing to the Government that personnel supporting this contract are "Qualified United States (U.S.) Contractors" per Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5220.22-M Chapter 2 Section 2. Qualified U.S. Contractors are restricted to U.S. citizens, persons admitted lawfully into the United States for permanent residence, and are located in the United States. All personnel identified on the certification and/or supporting this contract shall be in compliance with DoD, Department of the Navy (DON), and Marine Corps Information and Personnel Security Policy to include completed background investigations (as required) prior to classified performance. This contract shall include a DoD Contract Security Classification Specification (DD-254) as an attachment. The Contractor shall ensure they, and any subcontractors, have completed all DD-254 requirements prior to commencing any work under this task order. Specifically, the Contractor shall have completed the information in Block 6 (a/b/c) of the DD-254 form along with Block 13 (Facility Security Officer) contact and provide the form back to the Government for final approval.

The Contractor is required to have an active Top Secret Facility Clearance with access to Communications Security (COMSEC) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) without any special limitations that restrict access to perform certain task orders. The Government shall assist the Contractor in gaining access to Government agencies and installations related to the systems in question. The Contractor shall take all necessary steps to assure that contractor and any subcontractor personnel performing under this contract are persons of professional and personal integrity and trust and meet all other requirements stipulated in this Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Contractor shall ensure that the employees are on the approved Government access list prior to entering any access controlled area. The Contractor shall notify the Government by written notice within twenty-four hours of Contractor personnel are to be added or removed from the access control list.

The Contractor may be required to store, access and handle unclassified and classified (up to the TS/SCI level) for specific work designated at the task order level via access to Joint World-wide Intel Communication System (JWICS) terminals within Marine Corps Intelligence Agency (MCIA) workspace in building 3300. Overarching security requirements and Contractor access to classified information shall be specified in the task order level DD-254 form. Security management, inclusive of retention of clearances and document handling/storage, are to be considered as part of the Contractor’s indirect base. The Government will not be responsible for getting subcontract companies cleared through any security measures. The Government will sponsor the Contractor’s access to other Government facilities as required. Additional Contractor badging requirements will be delineated on task order DD-254(s). The Government will also provide the Contractor access to NATO and Secured Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) at the Government facility located at Raymond G. Davis Building, 3300 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134 as required at the task order level. The Contractor shall safeguard all Government property and information provided in performance of this contract. Contractor employees shall be subject to all MCIA security procedures and any other applicable installation access and security regulations.

As required for TS/SCI work, the Contractor is responsible for ensuring all contract personnel possess an in-scope, favorable Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI) adjudicated for SCI eligibility with no conditions, exceptions or waivers at the time of award and prior to performance under a task order. The Contractor shall utilize the Government Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) located in Suite 124 of Building 3300 Russell Road for all TS/SCI work. Before any subcontracting can take place, approval from the government representative and DD-254 is required.

2.8 PHYSICAL RESOURCES. The Contractor shall have all necessary equipment, models, tools, software applications, infrastructure (inclusive of cell phones, PDAs, laptops) and other resources necessary to execute performance of task orders. No additional charges will be made to the Government to purchase equipment, software, or other tools necessary to perform task orders following their award.

3.0 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. CDD is responsible for identifying and coordinating customer requirements based upon considerations of program complexity, acquisition phase, and operational levels of interface. While the variety of services required under the CDD support program are generally known, specific tasks to be ordered, by the contracting officer, and accomplished throughout the performance period are based upon requests from Capability Integration Officers (CIOs) in support of the JCIDS/MC CBA, or in response to requests from Program Managers (PMs) in support of their acquisition documents. Collectively, such requirements can be categorized into the following Tasks:

3.1 CLIN 0001 INFORMATION WARFARE INTEGRATION (IWI): Serves as CDD's integration and execution authority for all Marine Corps warfighting development activities associated with C2, Communication, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Information Warfare. IWI integrates future and evolving C2, Communication, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Information Warfare concepts, with fiscally informed capabilities, requirements, analysis and supporting programs, to synchronize Marine Corps initiatives and shape Naval and Joint initiatives in support of the war fighter within approved DoD processes. IWI coordinates with the operating forces, supporting establishment, and mission partners in order to identify, prioritize, and integrate expeditionary C2, Communications, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Information Warfare capability solutions across the pillars of DOTMLPF-P, battle space functions, and joint requirements.

3.1.1 Task 1: Technical Support to CDD Divisions and CPMs defined as analysis of requirements, resolution of issues, documentation and recommendations; systems engineering expertise; assessment of tools and methodologies that improve the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) modeling process; establish and maintain data libraries, establish and maintain a high-confidence data integrity model with exportable content and open-systems structure; conduct DOTMLPF-P assessments of candidate solutions and expert recommendations of impacts; support of Command Element Advocate and Warfighting Investment Program Evaluation Board (WIPEB) functions.

3.1.2 Task 2: JCIDS & MC CBA Process Support defined as JCIDS and MC CBA definition, development and maintenance as well as documentation consistent with program phases and system complexity; research, writing, and coordination with multiple service and joint service organizations to support development of operating concepts and doctrine, revision of doctrinal publications; JCA-specific development and analysis; review documents and conduct research or communicate with external partners at the SCI-level across the spectrum of topics and functional areas of intelligence, cyberspace operations and MAGTF EW; SME support and participation in JCIDS process and document development; observation and assessment of developmental and operational testing and identification of candidate issues for further analysis, support of combat developer inputs for operational testing as part of test Data Assessment Group (DAG) and similar Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) in support of platform Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP); conduct of studies and analysis required to underpin attributes for JCIDS documents in compliance with Portfolio Management development and management of Requirements Management Plans and Analysis Plan (RMAP) or similar capability planning documents; systems engineering-based studies and analysis to support the analytical underpinning of attributes considered for JCIDS documents, including the platform Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP), support of Capability Document to Purchase Description (PD)/Performance Specification (P-SPEC) cross walks, Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Program Manager sponsored baseline reviews; SME input development to process related Joint and Marine Corps specific documents based upon Operational Architectures; support and participation in the execution of the annual MC CBA process, capture of accurate capabilities sets and metrics evolved through the JCIDS process, and conduct analysis of existing CPM (across all Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)) capabilities and gaps, contained in the Marine Corps Capabilities List (MCCL) and Marine Corps Gap List (MCGL) that have been developed during previous Capability Based Assessments (CBA), and determine traceability to applicable Marine Corps Task List (MCTL), Mission Essential Task (MET), and Mission Essential Task List (METL) areas, provide reports detailing the CPM support along with recommendations to consolidate and align the MCCL and MCGL information to the applicable MCTL, MET, and/or METL, develop methodologies that will support gathering, analyzing, and documenting data captured during the MCGL and MCCL phases of the CBA process for the CPM; provide; survivability engineering expertise to support Live Fire Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) combat developer inputs as well as inputs to Live Fire scoring assessments.

3.1.3 Task 3: Program Operations, Management & External Communications defined as expertise aligned with CDD work priorities and task order objectives, interface on behalf of CDD stakeholders at Joint planning and technical forums to represent findings and leadership positions, development and maintenance of a corresponding Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and reporting protocol consistent with task order objectives, interface and maintenance of active communications with stakeholder groups and other parties at OSD, Joint, and Service levels, inter-Divisional support and communications for parallel working efforts across CDD operating Divisions, coordination of expertise to ensure cohesion in the execution of immediate and ancillary task efforts, program coordination, quality execution, and all facets of management aligned with CDD work priorities and task order complexities; attend SCI-level meetings and conferences at MCIA and external partners and agencies at the associated caveats in order to discuss and collect additional information for inclusion in capability gap analysis; Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS) support to include tracking of and input to Table of Organization and Equipment Change Request (TOECRs), update of Approved Acquisition Objectives (AAOs) and Table of Authorized Material Control Numbers (TAMCNs), review of force re-set processes, and support of Analysis of Alternatives, DOTMLPF assessments, DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) reviews, and Front End Assessments that feed TFSMS process; development and maintenance of an environment (e.g., modeling & simulation) capable of supporting sustained analytical efforts using verified and validated architecture data; review and analysis of Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data prior capabilities management decisions as they relate to funding, submission of POM campaign planning recommendations and baseline reviews mandated by the MCFDS and Deputy Commandant Programs and Resources (DC P&R), and submission of technical briefing materials to support POM Program Review Working Group meetings and CDD Capability Portfolio Management processes, recommendations of strategies for utilizing analysis data to support capability development decisions, support of development and maintenance of Defense Program Strategy Guidance considering such variables as risk based funding, total asset visibility and funding profiles for procurements, Operations and Maintenance (O&M), and Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts throughout the FYDP, review, analysis, and recommendation of input to Marine Corps or Joint POMs through successful submission to Congress; organization/coordination/participation in meetings, working group sessions and the like, submission of briefings, drafted agenda for events, and drafted meeting minutes, observation, analysis, and review of data from events to provide recommendations for potential inclusion in the MCFDS process based upon event outcomes; expertise in the areas of data architectures/information exchange requirements (IER), Information Assurance, concept development in order to draft documents supporting Joint Staff mandated convergence efforts, as well as review and provide recommendations on Joint products pertaining to convergence efforts.

3.2 CLIN 0002 FIRES AND MANEUVERS INTEGRATION (FMI): Integrates future and evolving Fires and Maneuver concepts, with identified capabilities, requirements, and supporting programs to synchronize Marine Corps initiatives and shape Naval and Joint initiatives within the JCIDS process with an emphasis on combat and tactical vehicles, armored combat platforms, riverine and amphibious craft and vehicles, combat engineering (manned and unmanned) platforms and equipment, manned and unmanned air and ground platforms, direct and indirect lethal and nonlethal weapon systems, individual and crew-served weapons and optics, and protection, mobility, and load bearing capabilities for dismounted Marines. Responsible for the development and maintenance of doctrine publications, as assigned in MCBUL 5603, in partnership with doctrinal proponents and the MID.

3.2.1 Task 1: Technical Support to CDD Divisions and CPMs defined as analysis of requirements, resolution of issues, documentation and recommendations; systems engineering expertise; assessment of tools and methodologies that improve the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) modeling process; establish and maintain data libraries, establish and maintain a high-confidence data integrity model with exportable content and open-systems structure; conduct DOTMLPF-P assessments of candidate solutions and expert recommendations of impacts; support of Command Element Advocate and Warfighting Investment Program Evaluation Board (WIPEB) functions.

3.2.2 Task 2: JCIDS & MC CBA Process Support defined as JCIDS and MC CBA definition, development and maintenance as well as documentation consistent with program phases and system complexity; research, writing, and coordination with multiple service and joint service organizations to support development of operating concepts and doctrine, revision of doctrinal publications; JCA-specific development and analysis; review documents and conduct research or communicate with external partners at the SCI-level across the spectrum of topics and functional areas of intelligence, cyberspace operations and MAGTF EW; SME support and participation in JCIDS process and document development; observation and assessment of developmental and operational testing and identification of candidate issues for further analysis, support of combat developer inputs for operational testing as part of test Data Assessment Group (DAG) and similar Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) in support of platform Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP); conduct of studies and analysis required to underpin attributes for JCIDS documents in compliance with Portfolio Management development and management of Requirements Management Plans and Analysis Plan (RMAP) or similar capability planning documents; systems engineering-based studies and analysis to support the analytical underpinning of attributes considered for JCIDS documents, including the platform Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP), support of Capability Document to Purchase Description (PD)/Performance Specification (P-SPEC) cross walks, Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Program Manager sponsored baseline reviews; SME input development to process related Joint and Marine Corps specific documents based upon Operational Architectures; support and participation in the execution of the annual MC CBA process, capture of accurate capabilities sets and metrics evolved through the JCIDS process, and conduct analysis of existing CPM (across all Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)) capabilities and gaps, contained in the Marine Corps Capabilities List (MCCL) and Marine Corps Gap List (MCGL) that have been developed during previous Capability Based Assessments (CBA), and determine traceability to applicable Marine Corps Task List (MCTL), Mission Essential Task (MET), and Mission Essential Task List (METL) areas, provide reports detailing the CPM support along with recommendations to consolidate and align the MCCL and MCGL information to the applicable MCTL, MET, and/or METL, develop methodologies that will support gathering, analyzing, and documenting data captured during the MCGL and MCCL phases of the CBA process for the CPM; provide; survivability engineering expertise to support Live Fire Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) combat developer inputs as well as inputs to Live Fire scoring assessments.

3.2.3 Task 3: Program Operations, Management & External Communications defined as expertise aligned with CDD work priorities and task order objectives, interface on behalf of CDD stakeholders at Joint planning and technical forums to represent findings and leadership positions, development and maintenance of a corresponding Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and reporting protocol consistent with task order objectives, interface and maintenance of active communications with stakeholder groups and other parties at OSD, Joint, and Service levels, inter-Divisional support and communications for parallel working efforts across CDD operating Divisions, coordination of expertise to ensure cohesion in the execution of immediate and ancillary task efforts, program coordination, quality execution, and all facets of management aligned with CDD work priorities and task order complexities; attend SCI-level meetings and conferences at MCIA and external partners and agencies at the associated caveats in order to discuss and collect additional information for inclusion in capability gap analysis; Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS) support to include tracking of and input to Table of Organization and Equipment Change Request (TOECRs), update of Approved Acquisition Objectives (AAOs) and Table of Authorized Material Control Numbers (TAMCNs), review of force re-set processes, and support of Analysis of Alternatives, DOTMLPF assessments, DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) reviews, and Front End Assessments that feed TFSMS process; development and maintenance of an environment (e.g., modeling & simulation) capable of supporting sustained analytical efforts using verified and validated architecture data; review and analysis of Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data prior capabilities management decisions as they relate to funding, submission of POM campaign planning recommendations and baseline reviews mandated by the MCFDS and Deputy Commandant Programs and Resources (DC P&R), and submission of technical briefing materials to support POM Program Review Working Group meetings and CDD Capability Portfolio Management processes, recommendations of strategies for utilizing analysis data to support capability development decisions, support of development and maintenance of Defense Program Strategy Guidance considering such variables as risk based funding, total asset visibility and funding profiles for procurements, Operations and Maintenance (O&M), and Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts throughout the FYDP, review, analysis, and recommendation of input to Marine Corps or Joint POMs through successful submission to Congress; organization/coordination/participation in meetings, working group sessions and the like, submission of briefings, drafted agenda for events, and drafted meeting minutes, observation, analysis, and review of data from events to provide recommendations for potential inclusion in the MCFDS process based upon event outcomes; expertise in the areas of data architectures/information exchange requirements (IER), Information Assurance, concept development in order to draft documents supporting Joint Staff mandated convergence efforts, as well as review and provide recommendations on Joint products pertaining to convergence efforts.

3.3 CLIN 0003 FORCE PROTECTION INTEGRATION (FPI): Identifies, develops, coordinates and integrates with the operating forces, supporting establishment commands and internal integration divisions for future MAGTF Force Protection operating concepts, capabilities, requirements and related material and non-material solutions that optimally support engagement in both conventional and irregular warfare. Specific areas of effort requiring SME support include Counter Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED); Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD); Science and Technology (S&T)/Sea Shield; Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN); Law Enforcement; Identity Operations (IdOps) capabilities of biometrics and forensics; and Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD)) Air Defense irregular warfare with an emphasis on integrated air missile defense; counter-unmanned air systems, counter-improvised explosive devises; explosive ordnance disposal; chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear; law enforcement; and non-lethal weapon systems. Responsible for the development and maintenance of doctrine publications, as assigned in MCBUL 5603, in partnership with doctrinal proponents and the MID.

3.3.1 Task 1: Technical Support to CDD Divisions and CPMs defined as analysis of requirements, resolution of issues, documentation and recommendations; systems engineering expertise; assessment of tools and methodologies that improve the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) modeling process; establish and maintain data libraries, establish and maintain a high-confidence data integrity model with exportable content and open-systems structure; conduct DOTMLPF-P assessments of candidate solutions and expert recommendations of impacts; support of Command Element Advocate and Warfighting Investment Program Evaluation Board (WIPEB) functions.

3.3.2 Task 2: JCIDS & MC CBA Process Support defined as JCIDS and MC CBA definition, development and maintenance as well as documentation consistent with program phases and system complexity; research, writing, and coordination with multiple service and joint service organizations to support development of operating concepts and doctrine, revision of doctrinal publications; JCA-specific development and analysis; review documents and conduct research or communicate with external partners at the SCI-level across the spectrum of topics and functional areas of intelligence, cyberspace operations and MAGTF EW; SME support and participation in JCIDS process and document development; observation and assessment of developmental and operational testing and identification of candidate issues for further analysis, support of combat developer inputs for operational testing as part of test Data Assessment Group (DAG) and similar Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) in support of platform Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP); conduct of studies and analysis required to underpin attributes for JCIDS documents in compliance with Portfolio Management development and management of Requirements Management Plans and Analysis Plan (RMAP) or similar capability planning documents; systems engineering-based studies and analysis to support the analytical underpinning of attributes considered for JCIDS documents, including the platform Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP), support of Capability Document to Purchase Description (PD)/Performance Specification (P-SPEC) cross walks, Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Program Manager sponsored baseline reviews; SME input development to process related Joint and Marine Corps specific documents based upon Operational Architectures; support and participation in the execution of the annual MC CBA process, capture of accurate capabilities sets and metrics evolved through the JCIDS process, and conduct analysis of existing CPM (across all Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)) capabilities and gaps, contained in the Marine Corps Capabilities List (MCCL) and Marine Corps Gap List (MCGL) that have been developed during previous Capability Based Assessments (CBA), and determine traceability to applicable Marine Corps Task List (MCTL), Mission Essential Task (MET), and Mission Essential Task List (METL) areas, provide reports detailing the CPM support along with recommendations to consolidate and align the MCCL and MCGL information to the applicable MCTL, MET, and/or METL, develop methodologies that will support gathering, analyzing, and documenting data captured during the MCGL and MCCL phases of the CBA process for the CPM; provide; survivability engineering expertise to support Live Fire Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) combat developer inputs as well as inputs to Live Fire scoring assessments.

3.3.3 Task 3: Program Operations, Management & External Communications defined as expertise aligned with CDD work priorities and task order objectives, interface on behalf of CDD stakeholders at Joint planning and technical forums to represent findings and leadership positions, development and maintenance of a corresponding Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and reporting protocol consistent with task order objectives, interface and maintenance of active communications with stakeholder groups and other parties at OSD, Joint, and Service levels, inter-Divisional support and communications for parallel working efforts across CDD operating Divisions, coordination of expertise to ensure cohesion in the execution of immediate and ancillary task efforts, program coordination, quality execution, and all facets of management aligned with CDD work priorities and task order complexities; attend SCI-level meetings and conferences at MCIA and external partners and agencies at the associated caveats in order to discuss and collect additional information for inclusion in capability gap analysis; Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS) support to include tracking of and input to Table of Organization and Equipment Change Request (TOECRs), update of Approved Acquisition Objectives (AAOs) and Table of Authorized Material Control Numbers (TAMCNs), review of force re-set processes, and support of Analysis of Alternatives, DOTMLPF assessments, DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) reviews, and Front End Assessments that feed TFSMS process; development and maintenance of an environment (e.g., modeling & simulation) capable of supporting sustained analytical efforts using verified and validated architecture data; review and analysis of Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data prior capabilities management decisions as they relate to funding, submission of POM campaign planning recommendations and baseline reviews mandated by the MCFDS and Deputy Commandant Programs and Resources (DC P&R), and submission of technical briefing materials to support POM Program Review Working Group meetings and CDD Capability Portfolio Management processes, recommendations of strategies for utilizing analysis data to support capability development decisions, support of development and maintenance of Defense Program Strategy Guidance considering such variables as risk based funding, total asset visibility and funding profiles for procurements, Operations and Maintenance (O&M), and Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts throughout the FYDP, review, analysis, and recommendation of input to Marine Corps or Joint POMs through successful submission to Congress; organization/coordination/participation in meetings, working group sessions and the like, submission of briefings, drafted agenda for events, and drafted meeting minutes, observation, analysis, and review of data from events to provide recommendations for potential inclusion in the MCFDS process based upon event outcomes; expertise in the areas of data architectures/information exchange requirements (IER), Information Assurance, concept development in order to draft documents supporting Joint Staff mandated convergence efforts, as well as review and provide recommendations on Joint products pertaining to convergence efforts.

3.4 CLIN 0004 INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION (II): Integrates, across battle space functional areas of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) near, mid, and far-term requirements for the support of MAGTF, Joint, and Combined operations and ensures DOTMLPF-P solutions represent a thorough analysis of non-materiel and materiel capabilities needed to provide timely, relevant, and tailored combat information and intelligence to commanders and staff. Represents the USMC intelligence community in USMC, other service, and joint forums. II has four (4) main discipline areas: Human Intelligence (HUMINT), Signals Intelligence (SIGINT), Imagery Intelligence (IMINT), and Intelligence Systems.

3.4.1 Task 1: Technical Support to CDD Divisions and CPMs defined as analysis of requirements, resolution of issues, documentation and recommendations; systems engineering expertise; assessment of tools and methodologies that improve the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) modeling process; establish and maintain data libraries, establish and maintain a high-confidence data integrity model with exportable content and open-systems structure; conduct DOTMLPF-P assessments of candidate solutions and expert recommendations of impacts; support of Command Element Advocate and Warfighting Investment Program Evaluation Board (WIPEB) functions.

3.4.2 Task 2: JCIDS & MC CBA Process Support defined as JCIDS and MC CBA definition, development and maintenance as well as documentation consistent with program phases and system complexity; research, writing, and coordination with multiple service and joint service organizations to support development of operating concepts and doctrine, revision of doctrinal publications; JCA-specific development and analysis; review documents and conduct research or communicate with external partners at the SCI-level across the spectrum of topics and functional areas of intelligence, cyberspace operations and MAGTF EW; SME support and participation in JCIDS process and document development; observation and assessment of developmental and operational testing and identification of candidate issues for further analysis, support of combat developer inputs for operational testing as part of test Data Assessment Group (DAG) and similar Integrated Product Teams (IPTs) in support of platform Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP); conduct of studies and analysis required to underpin attributes for JCIDS documents in compliance with Portfolio Management development and management of Requirements Management Plans and Analysis Plan (RMAP) or similar capability planning documents; systems engineering-based studies and analysis to support the analytical underpinning of attributes considered for JCIDS documents, including the platform Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP), support of Capability Document to Purchase Description (PD)/Performance Specification (P-SPEC) cross walks, Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Program Manager sponsored baseline reviews; SME input development to process related Joint and Marine Corps specific documents based upon Operational Architectures; support and participation in the execution of the annual MC CBA process, capture of accurate capabilities sets and metrics evolved through the JCIDS process, and conduct analysis of existing CPM (across all Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)) capabilities and gaps, contained in the Marine Corps Capabilities List (MCCL) and Marine Corps Gap List (MCGL) that have been developed during previous Capability Based Assessments (CBA), and determine traceability to applicable Marine Corps Task List (MCTL), Mission Essential Task (MET), and Mission Essential Task List (METL) areas, provide reports detailing the CPM support along with recommendations to consolidate and align the MCCL and MCGL information to the applicable MCTL, MET, and/or METL, develop methodologies that will support gathering, analyzing, and documenting data captured during the MCGL and MCCL phases of the CBA process for the CPM; provide; survivability engineering expertise to support Live Fire Integrated Product Team (IPT) and Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) combat developer inputs as well as inputs to Live Fire scoring assessments.

3.4.3 Task 3: Program Operations, Management & External Communications defined as expertise aligned with CDD work priorities and task order objectives, interface on behalf of CDD stakeholders at Joint planning and technical forums to represent findings and leadership positions, development and maintenance of a corresponding Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and reporting protocol consistent with task order objectives, interface and maintenance of active communications with stakeholder groups and other parties at OSD, Joint, and Service levels, inter-Divisional support and communications for parallel working efforts across CDD operating Divisions, coordination of expertise to ensure cohesion in the execution of immediate and ancillary task efforts, program coordination, quality execution, and all facets of management aligned with CDD work priorities and task order complexities; attend SCI-level meetings and conferences at MCIA and external partners and agencies at the associated caveats in order to discuss and collect additional information for inclusion in capability gap analysis; Total Force Structure Management System (TFSMS) support to include tracking of and input to Table of Organization and Equipment Change Request (TOECRs), update of Approved Acquisition Objectives (AAOs) and Table of Authorized Material Control Numbers (TAMCNs), review of force re-set processes, and support of Analysis of Alternatives, DOTMLPF assessments, DOTMLPF Change Recommendation (DCR) reviews, and Front End Assessments that feed TFSMS process; development and maintenance of an environment (e.g., modeling & simulation) capable of supporting sustained analytical efforts using verified and validated architecture data; review and analysis of Program Objective Memorandum (POM) data prior capabilities management decisions as they relate to funding, submission of POM campaign planning recommendations and baseline reviews mandated by the MCFDS and Deputy Commandant Programs and Resources (DC P&R), and submission of technical briefing materials to support POM Program Review Working Group meetings and CDD Capability Portfolio Management processes, recommendations of strategies for utilizing analysis data to support capability development decisions, support of development and maintenance of Defense Program Strategy Guidance considering such variables as risk based funding, total asset visibility and funding profiles for procurements, Operations and Maintenance (O&M), and Research, Development, Testing and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts throughout the FYDP, review, analysis, and recommendation of input to Marine Corps or Joint POMs through successful submission to Congress; organization/coordination/participation in meetings, working group sessions and the like, submission of briefings, drafted agenda for events, and drafted meeting minutes, observation, analysis, and review of data from events to provide recommendations for potential inclusion in the MCFDS process based upon event outcomes; expertise in the areas of data architectures/information exchange requirements (IER), Information Assurance, concept development in order to draft documents supporting Joint Staff mandated convergence efforts, as well as review and provide recommendations on Joint products pertaining to convergence efforts.

3.5 CLIN 0005 LOGISTICS INTEGRATION (LI): Integrates future and evolving logistics concepts in Engineering, Material Readiness, Motor Transport, Naval Support, and Ground Ammunition across the Marine Corps while representing USMC interests to other services and in the joint environment. Also identifies capabilities, requirements, and supporting programs to synchronize Marine Corps initiatives and shape naval and joint initiatives within the JCIDS and DoD processes.