Luke AFB Aircraft Wash Rack Services Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Wash Rack Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA488722R0014
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Site Visit Question and Answers.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA488722R00140002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Aircraft Wash Rack Services PWS 2 Aug 22.pdf | ||
| Luke AFB Environmental Guide for Contractors_July2022.pdf | ||
| F-16 Wash PWS Task List.pdf | ||
| Aircraft Wash Rack Services PWS 11 Jul 22.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA488722R00140001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| F-35 Wash PWS Task List.pdf | ||
| Question and Answers - Aircraft Wash Rack Services.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment - FA488722R00140001.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 2015-5469 Rev 18.pdf | ||
| Aircraft Wash Services PWS 21 Jun 22.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA488722R0014.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Luke AFB is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:
Aircraft Wash Rack Services
In order for Luke AFB to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and email a PDF file to: kelli.mcdonald@us.af.mil, Contract Specialist, at 56 CONS, Luke AFB. The due date for completed questionnaires is: 22 July 2022 by 1 pm EST. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records. To be considered, the Past Performance Questionnaire shall be returned to the Contract Specialist in its entirety and by the due date and time specified above.
To confirm receipt of your completed/submitted questionnaires, please contact:
Contract Specialist: Kelli McDonald by email at kelli.mcdonald@us.af.mil, Tel: 623-856-2728.
A. OFFEROR’s REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contract Name and/or Number (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Company (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Address:
POC of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone Number:
Email:
| Contractor performed as: |
| Prime Contractor__Sub-Contractor |
Attachment 3
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: Please complete
Contracting Activity/Customer:
AAF
Address:
Telephone Number: Email Address:
Point of Contract (POC) Title of POC:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please complete.
Contract Name and/or Number
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period (Base plus any options)
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value: (base plus options)
Number of FTEs
Contract Description:
| Contractor performed as: | |
| Prime Contractor: | Sub-Contractor: |
If subContractor: What percentage was performed by the evaluated Contractor
A. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and
5) that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Neutral Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the |
| Based on the |
| No recent/relevant |
| Based on the |
| Based on the |
| offeror’s |
| offeror’s |
| performance record |
| offeror’s |
| offeror’s |
| recent/relevant |
| recent/relevant |
| is available or the |
| recent/relevant |
| recent/relevant |
| performance |
| performance |
| offeror’s |
| performance |
| performance |
| record, the |
| record, the |
| performance record |
| record, the |
| record, the |
| Government has a |
| Government has a |
| is so sparse that no |
| Government has a |
| Government has no |
| high expectation |
| reasonable |
| meaningful |
| low expectation |
| expectation that the |
| that the offeror will |
| expectation that the |
| confidence |
| that the offeror will |
| offeror will be able |
| successfully |
| offeror will |
| assessment rating |
| successfully |
| to |
| perform the |
| successfully |
| can be reasonably |
| perform the |
| successfully |
| required effort. |
| perform the |
| assigned. |
| required effort. |
| perform the |
| required effort. |
| The offeror may |
required effort.
not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| THE CONTRACTOR |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| The Contractor provided properly trained, qualified personnel that provide quality service adhering to contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| The Contractor consistently accomplished all work with commonly accepted commercial practices. |
| 3 |
| The Contractor adhered to the planned schedule and performed the services within the desired times. |
| 4 |
| The Contractor corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their contract requirements. |
| 5 |
| The Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort. |
| 6 |
| The Contractor cooperated in providing flexible, proactive and effective solutions to critical contract issues. |
| 7 |
| The contractor promptly cleaned up and disposed of any residue, waste material, grease, etc. upon completion of each system. |
| 8 |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? |
Additional Remarks
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .