ID04140153_Attachment_8_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
Base Integrated Environmental Support Tasks (BIEST) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
ID04140153
Issued by
General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Service Assisted Acquisition Services

About this file

Attachment 8 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Base Integrated Environmental Support Tasks (BIEST), newest first.
File Type Posted
Amend_03_ID04140153_Attachment_7_Pricing_Template_09_Feb_2015.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend_03_Questions_and_Answers_09_Feb_2015.docx DOCX document
Amend_02_Questions_and_Answers_03_Feb_2015.docx DOCX document
Amend_02_ID04140153_Purpose_of_Amend_02.docx DOCX document
Amend_02_ID04140153__UCF_PWS_V.03_03_Feb_2015_Final.docx DOCX document
Amend_01_ID04140153_Attachment_6_Minimum_Experience_ _Education_Requirements_29_Jan_2015.docx DOCX document
Amend_01_ID04140153_Questions_and_Answers_29_Jan_2015.docx DOCX document
Amend_01_ID04140153_Invasive_Species_Control_At_Robins_AFB.docx DOCX document
Amend_01_ID04140153__UCF_PWS_V.02_29_Jan_2015_Final.docx DOCX document
Amend_01_ID04140153_Attachment_7_Pricing_Template_29_Jan_2015.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend_01_WQ_Documents.zip ZIP file
Amend_01_ID04140153_Purpose_of_Amend_01.docx DOCX document
ID04140153_Attachment_6_Minimum_Experience_ _Education_Requirements.docx DOCX document
ID04140153_Attachment_9_Past_Performance_Contract_Listing.docx DOCX document
ID04140153_Attachment_1_QASP.docx DOCX document
ID04140153__UCF_PWS_16_Jan_2015_Final.docx DOCX document
ID04140153_Attachment_7_Pricing_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ID04140153_Attachment_5_Historical_Workload.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

GSA Federal Acquisition Service

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror: This questionnaire will be used in evaluating the offeror’s ability to perform the required services listed in the Performance Work Statement. The offeror shall provide their name, address and contract number to the current or former clients in order coordinate the completion of the Past Performance Questionnaire to be submitted by the client directly to the email address shown in instruction 2.

Instructions to Evaluator:

1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

a. Typed or handwritten responses to the questions and ratings in the Past Performance Questionnaire.

b. Indicate, based on the adjectival ratings below, the contractor's performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Good
Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Satisfactory
Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Marginal
Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory
Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Not Observed
This element was not observed.

c. For each question please circle or bold one rating. Select "Not Observed" if you are unable to provide a score for an area.

d. Please provide narrative explanations for your answers. Space for your remarks is provided after each question. If more space is needed, use the back of this questionnaire or attach additional sheets.

e. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, you may provide comments on other similar programs with which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

2. Please return completed questionnaire by 01/30/2015 to: rebecca.taylor@gsa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Company Information

Company Name: _______________________________________________________________________

Contract/Task Number: __________________________________________________________________

Contract/Task Information

Title of Work Performed: ________________________________________________________________

Type of Contract: Firm Fixed Price, Labor Hour, Time & Materials, Cost-Reimbursement

Date of Award: _________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance: ___________________________________________________________________

Dollar Value of Contract: ________________________________________________________________

Description of Work Performed: ___________________________________________________________

Evaluation

Note: A narrative is requested for each question below regardless of the evaluation.

1. The contractor provided effective and efficient management controls – Responsiveness, Management of Staff, and Project Management.

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

2. The contractor met schedule compliance – Milestones, Deliverables and Contract Activities) Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

3. The contractor proactively managed the contract to successfully deliver a quality service within cost and schedule constraints. This included providing proactive leadership and effective PWS integration.

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

4. The contractor provided quality customer relations and thorough contract administration. (reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer service) Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

5. How well did the contractor communicate and respond to issues at all levels.

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

6. The contractor provided experienced executives, project manager, and supervisors with the technical and administrative qualifications required, as well as responsive staffing and effective process management.

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

7. How well did the contractor comply with contract requirements, technical excellence and accuracy of reports.

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

8. How well did the contractor manage projects at geographical separated locations:

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

9. The contractor’s overall performance on this contract is/was:

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

10. The contractor’s overall performance on transitioning of the requirements:

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

11. Would you hire this company again? Yes No

Evaluator Information

Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________________________

Position/Title: _________________________________________________________________________

Organization: __________________________________________________________________________

Length of Involvement in Program/Contract: _________________________________________________

Phone Number: ________________________________________________________________________

Fax Number: __________________________________________________________________________

Email: ________________________________________________________________________________

Date Questionnaire Completed: ____________________________________________________________

ID04140153

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .