Japan_Preproposal_Conference.pptx

PPTX presentation 387 KB Posted

Attached to
Japan ATGHS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC711-18-R-C001
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

Attch 1 PowerPoint Slides

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Japan ATGHS, newest first.
File Type Posted
2018.03.22_PWS_Fukuoka.doc DOC document
Amend_002.pdf PDF
2018.03.22_PWS_Misawa.doc DOC document
Japan_meeting_minutes.pdf PDF
2018.03.26_Q&A_Master_Log.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend_001.pdf PDF
HTC711-18-R-C001_Released.pdf PDF
Attch_2_Misawa_PWS.pdf PDF
Attch_4_Contract_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attch_3_PP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attch_1_Fukuoka_PWS.pdf PDF
Attch_3_PP_Survey.docx DOCX document
Attch_5_DD254.pdf PDF
RFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
HTC711-18-R-C001.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

JAPAN AIR TERMINAL AND GROUND HANDLING SERVICES

Preproposal Conference 14 March 2018

TCAQ-C

UNCLASSIFIED

Together, we deliver.

Introductions Proposal Submission Evaluation of Proposals Requirements Overview

Agenda

UNCLASSIFIED

TCAQ-C

AMC Program Management Office USTRANSCOM Acquisition Team Other Government Attendees Introductions

Business Proposal All documents requiring signature/completion. Authorized official shall sign the offer and all certifications requiring original signature SF 1449 Solicitation/Contract Form. Complete blocks 17a, and 30 a, b, c. Signature on SF 1449 constitutes an offer, which the Govt may accept Block 17b. If remittance address is different, such address must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database Acknowledgement of Solicitation Amendments Company/division’s street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; DUNS code; and size of business (large or small) List of individuals authorized to negotiate/sign on behalf of the company with email addresses Fill out Reps and Certs IAW the directions listed in the RFP (page 47)

Proposal Preparation

Business Proposal rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable -An Acceptable proposal complies with all terms and conditions of the solicitation

Technical Proposal Subfactor A – Staffing and Management Plan to recruit, hire, and retain workforce If submitted, organizational chart and the names of specific individuals will be removed prior to evaluation if they are submitted.

Subfactor B – Implementation Approach to deploy a workforce of personnel that has been medically screened, trained, and equipped IAW the PWS.

The Technical Proposal can be no more than 10 pages

Technical Proposal rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable To be rated Acceptable, each subfactor must be rated as Acceptable Subfactor is Acceptable if the proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable does not clearly meet the requirements of the solicitation An Unacceptable rating on any subfactor results in the overall rating of Unacceptable.

Pricing Proposal Rank all technically acceptable offers by price, including any option prices.

The Government will first multiply the quantities identified in the Schedule by the proposed unit price for each CLIN or SLIN to confirm the extended amount for each.

The sum of these extended prices for the base period, all options, and the 6-month extension will constitute the Total Evaluated Price.

The Government will then evaluate the price to determine its completeness and if it is fair and reasonable.

Proposal Preparation Past Performance Proposal References No more than 3 Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) for the offeror for similar services A Contract Information Sheet must be submitted with your proposal for EACH PPQ Offeror’s responsibility to send PPQs and ensure POC info is correct Recent: within 3 years of proposal submission The Government will give greater consideration to information on contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in the RFP.

Proposal must include relevant PWS excerpts.

PPQ

Contract Information Sheet

Past Performance assigned an Overall confidence assessment rating Using PPQs Using other information independently obtained form Gov or commercial sources Determine recency and relevancy of each effort Assign a confidence assessment rating Offerors with no recent/relevant past performance given Unknown Confidence (Neutral) Treated neither favorably nor unfavorably

Best Value Source Selection Performance Price Trade Off Past Performance evaluated significantly more important than price Award Criteria Responsible IAW FAR Part 9 Acceptable Business Proposal, Technical Proposal Represents best value to the Gov considering past performance and price

Source Selection

Milestones

EventDate
Pre-proposal Conference14 Mar 18
Fukuoka Site Visit16 Mar 18
Award Date1 Jul 18

Review of the Air Terminal and Ground Handling Services on behalf of Air Mobility Command at Misawa AB and Fukuoka IAP, Japan, PWS performance requirements.

Requirements Overview

This concludes the Pre-proposal Site Visit.

Questions image7.png image8.png image1.jpeg image2.gif image3.gif image4.gif image5.jpeg image6.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it.