Attch_3_PP_Survey.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
Japan ATGHS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
HTC711-18-R-C001
Issued by
Department of Defense United States Transportation Command

About this file

Past Performance Survey

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Japan ATGHS, newest first.
File Type Posted
2018.03.22_PWS_Fukuoka.doc DOC document
Amend_002.pdf PDF
Japan_Preproposal_Conference.pptx PPTX presentation
2018.03.26_Q&A_Master_Log.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
2018.03.22_PWS_Misawa.doc DOC document
Japan_meeting_minutes.pdf PDF
Amend_001.pdf PDF
HTC711-18-R-C001_Released.pdf PDF
Attch_2_Misawa_PWS.pdf PDF
Attch_4_Contract_Information_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attch_5_DD254.pdf PDF
RFP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
HTC711-18-R-C001.pdf PDF
Attch_3_PP_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attch_1_Fukuoka_PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY

When Filled In This Document is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

REQUEST INFORMATION BE TYPED TO ENSURE READABILITY

A. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PRESENT OR PAST PERFORMANCE EFFORT BEING

SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION: (To be completed by Offeror)

Offeror’s Company Name: ________________________________________________________________

Address:__________________________________ Telephone Number:____________________________

Offeror Point of Contact/Email Address:_____________________________________________________

Project Title:___________________________________________________________________________

Contract Number:_______________________________________________________________________

Annual Dollar Amount: $________________________________________________________________

Total Dollar Amount of Overall Effort (to include all options) $__________________________________

Place of Performance:___________________________________________________________________

Contract Start Date:_____________Contract End Date (to include all options) ______________________

Did the offeror perform services as the ____ Prime Contractor or as a ____ Sub-Contractor on the above referenced effort?

If performed as a Sub-Contractor, please provide a description of the tasks performed:

Annual Dollar Amount of Sub-Contracted tasks performed: $____________________________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To be completed by Respondent)

Note: If any of the information in Section A is incorrect, please make necessary changes.

Detailed Description of Services provided: (Must be completed by Respondent – not the Offeror):

Also, please provide a copy of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or portion of the PWS you believe to be relevant to this acquisition:

Name of Respondent:______________________________________ Title:_______________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number:___________________________________________________________________________________

Fax Number:__________________________ Email Address:_________________________________________________

C. FAX OR E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Meggan DeBrobander – meggan.a.debrobander.civ@mail.mil & Wanda Huber – wanda.l.huber.civ@mail.mil

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

NOTE: PPIRS may be reviewed. Although you may have filed a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARS) for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this survey because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: (Please circle response. Do not “highlight”)

The contractor:

1. Worked with established sequence of events checklist to facilitate on-time aircraft departures and tracked delays to determine the root cause. YES NO N/A

2. Provided processing and handling for:

a. Passengers(If yes, provide # of passengers per year ____________)YESNON/A
b. Baggage(If yes, provide # of bags per year __________________)YESNON/A
c. Cargo and Mail(If yes, provide # of tons per year __________________)YESNON/A
d. Hazardous shipmentsYESNON/A

3. Load/unload cargo and passenger aircraft. (If yes, provide # of aircraft per year _______) YES NO N/A

4. Maintained “customer furnished” materials, vehicles, equipment and facilities. YES NO N/A

5. Maintained an adequate and effective safety and security program. YES NO N/A

6. Worked with secure data processing systems to manifest and track cargo, mail and passengers. YES NO N/A

7. Completed reports and maintained records, both in terms of timeliness and accuracy. YES NO N/A

8. Followed written directives, instructions, and manuals in performance of the contract. YES NO N/A

9. Provided quality control and/or inspection procedures to ensure performance requirements were consistently met. YES NO N/A

10. Transitioned equipment, resources and personnel to ensure prompt implementation and performance. YES NO N/A

11. Hired, maintained, and replaced, if necessary qualified personnel during the contract period, ensuring attrition did not result in a degradation of services. YES NO N/A

12. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. YES NO N/A

13. Reacted to and overcame stressful situations caused by unforeseen events. YES NO N/A

14. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. YES NO N/A

15. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain outcome below. YES NO

16. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain below. YES NO

UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contract al requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the customer’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of performance or the record is inconclusive.

USING THE ABOVE DEFINITIONS, PLEASE RATE THE FOLLOWING:

1. Contractor’s quality of service: _______________________________________________________

2. Contractor’s adherence to schedule: ____________________________________________________

3. Contractor’s business relations: _______________________________________________________

4. Contractor’s management of key personnel:______________________________________________

REMARKS:

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION SUPPORTING YOUR ABOVE RATINGS AND AN EXPLANATION OF ANY RATING OF MARGINAL OR UNSATISFACTORY. ADDITIONALY, PROVIDE YOUR RATIONALE FOR WHY YOU WOULD OR WOULD NOT AWARD A FUTURE CONTRACT TO THEM.

Evaluator’s Signature/Date

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE!

ATTACHMENT 3

SOLICITATION HTC711-18-R-C001

File details come from the government source that posted it.