Past Performance Questionnaire Rev 1.docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Medical Administrative Technicians IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HT940823R0001
- Issued by
- Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract solicitation for advanced medical administrative technicians. The Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity, Southern Markets Contracting Division is seeking to award a single IDIQ contract to provide various medical administrative technician services at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas. The services include medical administration technician, clinical pastoral education administrative assistant, radiology central scheduling administrative support, medical logistics administrative assistant, administrative technicians in medical clinic settings, and other related roles. The anticipated ordering period is five years with a $45 million ceiling. Responses to the past performance questionnaire are due by November 28th, 2022 and will be used for tradeoff evaluation and award of the 8(a) competitive set-aside contract to one firm fixed price IDIQ.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The Defense Health Agency, Southern Markets Contracting Division has issued an 8(a) competitive Request for Proposal (RFP). The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation Number HT940823R0001
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance, and return via email no later than 2:00pm CST 28 November 2022 to andrew.k.page1.civ@health.mil and meagan.e.askew.civ@health.mil.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contractor Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
Telephone Number:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Number:
Task Order Number:
Type of Contract:
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services:
MAGNITUDE
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
COMPLEXITY
Number of FTEs:
Facility Type (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
Contractor performed on this contract as (include an X in the appropriate cell):
| Prime |
| Subcontractor |
| Teaming Partner |
| Joint Venture |
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified Medical Administrative Technician IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified Medical Administrative Technician remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed and retained qualified Medical Administrative Technician with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provide qualified Medical Administrative Technician on time IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each Medical Administrative Technician IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate credentialing/privileging packages within established time frames IAW the Terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified Medical Administrative Technician without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .