PPQ_Word_Document.docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DHS Modular Firing Ranges Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSHQDC-17-R-00052
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Revised_Attachment_B_MFR_Sample_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052-000005.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052__-_Government's_Responses_to_Vendor's_Questions.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052-000004.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052_Pre-Proposal_Conference_Slides.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052-000002.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052-000003.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052-000001.pdf | ||
| HSHQDC-17-R-00052.pdf | ||
| Attachment_B_MFR_Sample_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A
Past Performance Information Contractor Performance Customer Survey Questionnaire
Customer respondent, please complete the following questionnaire and email to Ronald Jean-Baptiste Ronald.Jean-Baptiste@hq.dhs.gov and Donald Nusbaum at Donald.Nusbaum@hq.dhs.gov, no later than return it to the attention of the individual named below, no later than the date specified in the notification letter. The “subject” line in the submission email shall clearly indicate “[MFR PPQ for HSHQDC-17-R-00052, insert Prime Offeror Name]”. THE PAGE LIMITATION IS FOUR (4) PAGES FOR EACH COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE (to exclude Rating Guidelines).
Name
Title
Address
Telephone Number/Fax Number
This survey pertains to: __________________________________________________________
Department/Component: __________________________________________________________
Solicitation Number: _____________________________________________________________
Date of Survey: _________________________________________________________________
Name of Person Completing Survey: ________________________________________________
Signature of Person Completing Survey: _____________________________________________
Your Company/Agency: __________________________________________________________
Your Role in this Contract: ________________________________________________________
Survey Period of Performance: _____________________________________________________
General description of products/services required under the contract: _______________________
RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible.
Assign each area a rating of either 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Acceptable), or 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating. Annotate with N/A if not a rating consideration or inapplicable to the contract effort.
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
1. Compliance with contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Accuracy of reports:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Capability of personnel to perform required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Overall quality of product/service:
1 2 3 4 N/A
7. Product performance:
1 2 3 4 N/A
8. Spare parts availability:
1 2 3 4 N/A
9. Ease of use:
1 2 3 4 N/A
10. Quality and timeliness of warranty work:
1 2 3 4 N/A
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Reliability:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Responsive to technical direction:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines:
1 2 3 4 N/A
BUSINESS RELATIONS:
1. Effective management, including subcontracts:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Responsive to contract requirements:
1 2 3 4 N/A
4. Notification of problems:
1 2 3 4 N/A
5. Flexibility:
1 2 3 4 N/A
6. Pro-active vs. reactive:
1 2 3 4 N/A
COST CONTROL:
1. Current, accurate and complete billings:
1 2 3 4 N/A
2. Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals:
1 2 3 4 N/A
3. Cost efficiencies:
1 2 3 4 N/A
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
1. The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Management Personnel (circle one) Yes No
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel (circle one) Yes No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Request for Proposal (RFP) HSHQDC-17-R-00052
Modular Firing Ranges Page 99R
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 4-Outstanding |
| There were no quality issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract performance requirements without commensurate additional costs to the customer. |
| There were no cost management issues, and the contractor significantly exceeded the contract requirements, achieving cost savings to the customer. |
| There were no delays, and the contractor significantly bettered the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues significantly exceeded customer expectations. |
| 3-Good |
| There were no, or minimal, quality problems, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, cost management issues, and the contractor exceeded the contract requirements. |
| There were no, or minimal, delays that affected achievement of contract requirements; however, the contractor was still able to better or meet the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues exceeded the contract requirements. |
| 2-Acceptable |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, overall compliance required some assistance from the customer. |
| The contractor met the contract requirements. However, customer provided some assistance to the contractor to manage costs. |
| The contractor met the agreed upon schedule. However, customer provided some assistance to ensure the contractor met the agreed upon schedule. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues met the contract requirements. |
| 1-Unsatisfactory |
| Non-conformances compromised the achievement of contract requirements. |
| Contractor was unable to manage costs effectively. |
| Contractor delays jeopardized achievement of contract objectives. |
| Responses to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues were not timely or effective. |
Rating Guidelines
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .