Amend_0003_-_Atch_1_-_Q&A_3_Rev_2_-_Altus.pdf

HDEC03-17-R-0002

SCIP IV (Altus AFB, OK)

Questions & Answers #3 (Rev 2)

10. Note 1 on D0.01 states to remove asphalt. Is this to include subgrade removal or just the asphalt surface?

Answer: Intent was for the asphalt only. However according to the note, an onsite determination by the Contractor would indicate whether sub grade attention is needed to stabilize a new asphalt pour.

11. Note 2 D1.02 states to prepare floor in accordance with 09 05 61 Common Work Results. 09 05 61 3.4 A has led to confusion in the past. Should the proposal include moisture mitigation? Are there any existing moisture tests from the charrette?

Answer: (Note 6)-A moisture test was performed. See Addendum 1, Daily Field Report, Report No:

DFR:05461562-2/1, for Moisture Test Results.

12. Please confirm check stands are to remain. Existing appear to be installed over terrazzo that will demolish up to the check stands?

Answer: D1.02, NBS #12-All checkouts to remain-No terrazzo on the project.

13. Note 12 on D1.03 states to remove concrete base. Yet 2/A5.02 a new base is to be installed. Is the demolition only to occur to the extent of where the new lockers are terminated?

Answer: Remove existing concrete base in full-install new base per A5.02.

14. Note 18 D1.03, is this work to include matching finish flooring in Rm 55?

Answer: Yes.

15. Note 5 on D1.04 states to remove “framing system”. Please clarify if this is referencing the track, door frame, or other.

Answer: Correct, this is the frame (track) the door is associated with.

16. Note 5 on D0.01 states to remove monument sign. 2/A0.01 details a new footing and pedestal mount.

Please confirm the existing footer and pedestal are to be removed.

Answer: Existing slab/footings for the sign is to be removed.

17. A1.02 shelving between column lines 19.9 & 18 is hatched as CFCI. A1.03 has the same shelving hatched as GFGI. A1.04 indicates GFGI on the equipment schedule. Please clarify.

Answer: GF-GI is correct. Designated on sheet A1.02 incorrectly.

18. A2.02 does not depict truck restraints. Note 16 on A1.03 states restraints as part of the scope.

Specification 11 13 00 Loading Dock Equipment does not include truck restraints. Please clarify.

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002 Altus AFB, OK

Answer: Elevations may not depict everything. The plans and notes will. Per DeCA criteria and these plan notes, restraints will be installed. Specifications missed this.

19. 3/A7.04 indicates new W8x10 to bear on existing support beams. There is no detail/info on how these beams should attach to the existing steel. Please clarify how these existing beams are to attach or if they are to attach at all.

Answer: These beams will most likely just rest on the existing beams and not be fastened.

20. A8.01 indicates typical valance over frozen food on 1G12 cases. Top fed cases will have refrigeration piping visible from the east side of the sales floor. Should the valance continue along the back side of the 1g12 cases?

Answer: Piping should be hidden by the chases they run through, not visible. Valances are only made for the front side of the equipment unit.

21. A7.03 Note 3 indicates décor elements for radius décor drawings as a new architectural element.

A8.04 & 8.05 both specifically state “Radius Décor Soffit is not provided as part of décor package” yet these frames are shown fabricated from lightweight square aluminum or steel frame including 1/8” PVC foam board skin. Please confirm the décor radiuses are in fact a part of the décor package.

Answer: The radii elements are to be provided by the contractor and not provided as the décor elements are. Contractor will construct the radiused element as noted on sheet A8.04, detail 4 and all the décor pieces, which are a part of a Décor package will then be installed. Technically the radius elements are not of the décor packages but are a part of the décor assembly.

22. A9.01, are there any cores of the existing roof available for review?

Answer: Roof cores were removed during the schematic design phase of the Project. Those cores were reviewed, reset, and roof repairs accomplished. The system discovered at the lower front roofs around the skylights was: A gravel-surfaced, asphalt built-up membrane, over 1.5-inch perlite insulation, over a type B metal deck. The system discovered at cores at the balance of the Project was: A gravel-surfaced asphalt built-up membrane, over 1 inch of perlite insulation, over 3 inches of polyisocyanurate insulation, over a type B metal deck. The following photographs are representative of those cores:

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

23. DE2.01 Note 6 states to remove cash register duress alarm. If registers are to stay in place for the flooring demolition/installation, what is the intention of the conduit and alarm removal?

Answer: There is a new duress alarm system to be installed, See E3.01. Conduits may be reused if they are in the correct location. Do not remove power poles or overhead cable tray in use by other systems. Do not remove underfloor duct.

24. DR1.03 note “reuse existing refrigeration electrical gear”. Please confirm this is correct. Is there enough capacity to support new and old refrigeration equipment while old refrigeration equipment is demolished in phases?

Answer: The existing system has panels from the original construction and a previous refrigeration replacement. There should be sufficient capacity to serve the existing system and the new system components during phasing. Field verify available spaces and capacity prior to construction.

25. DP1.02 Note 10 states store sink for reinstallation. P1.02 states provide new sink. The plumbing fixture schedule does not include. Please clarify.

Answer: Modify note 10 on DP1.02 to indicate remove and dispose of sink. Provide new 4S03D, sink see spec 22 05 19 - 5 paragraph 2.9.

26. E2.01 Note 7 indicates to provide Advantor Security panel. Are any other security panels acceptable?

Will the base security accept any other manufacturers besides Advantor?

Answer: Base standard is Advantor Security System. No substitutions allowed.

27. Note 2 on P1.01, indicates to install a new drain. Finish drawings do not indicate any work to match the adjacent finishes. Is sealed concrete acceptable or will the saw cut area need to match adjacent finishes?

Answer: Match existing floor finish in the saw-cut area.

28. E2.02-2.03 indicates power to truck restraints. Drawings and specifications are not clear. Are truck restraints being provided?

Answer: Arch drawings A1.03 and A1.04 indicate new dock levelers and restraints.

29. E2.01-2.03 Note 11 indicates new gondola power. Drawings do not indicate where or how many gondolas are to receive power. Please clarify.

Answer: Gondola power outlets are existing to remain. New power outlets are provided at the ends of the new refrigerated display cases as shown on the refrigeration plans.

30. R1.02 Indicates refrigerated trailer disconnect and receptacle. Please confirm this is existing as it is not depicted on the electrical drawings.

Answer: Trailer disconnects are to be furnished by the refrigeration installer in locations indicated on the refrigeration plans.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

31. Please provide the manufacturer and model numbers of the existing gas, water, and electrical meters in order to verify compatibility with pulse outputs.

Answer: Field verify existing meter pulse output types.

32. FA1.00, has this drawing and associated specification been reviewed by the AHJ? Often times we find the base AHJ has significant differences in requirements.

Answer: AHJ was involved with initial planning/design process and provided AE direction on approach. AE provided design progress submittals to installation. AE received no comments from installation.

33. Phasing plan references relocation of gondola shelving. Demolition and architectural drawings do not indicate anything about the gondola shelving. Please clarify whose responsibility it is to relocate gondola shelving.

Answer: Contractor’s responsibility.

34. Please provide a drawing that indicates where on the roof the 750 sqft of ACM exists (Lab ID 004A, 005A, 006A)

Answer: The purple highlighted areas on the roof plan in “Figure 1 Sample Location Map” of Addendum 2, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Roof Survey, indicates the areas of asbestos abatement.

35. Please confirm there is no lead paint abatement as part of this scope.

Answer: See “Lead Paint Survey” in Addendum 2, Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Roof Survey.

36. My company would like to submit a bid on the above project. I have the Equipment List for the project.

I need the specs for the cases. For example, the number of shelves in each case. If I give you the CED No., is that something you can send me? I apologize in advance if you are not the person I should be requesting this information from.

Answer: Specs for individual types of equipment are in the Project Specifications, file name “Altus AFB Combined Solicitation Set_Specifications 08-07-2017.pdf,” dated August 7, 2017. The file is accessed by selecting “Set Specifications” under the Attachments Column at https://www.commissaries.com/our-agency/business-with-deca/contracting/construction-design-AE/contracting-solicitation.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002 Altus AFB, OK https://www.commissaries.com/our-agency/business-with-deca/contracting/construction-design-AE/contracting-solicitation https://www.commissaries.com/our-agency/business-with-deca/contracting/construction-design-AE/contracting-solicitation

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

801 S.E. 59th Street

Oklahoma City, OK 73129

Phone: (405) 632-8800

Fax: (405) 631-2180

CC:

Project:

Approved Signatory:

Date of Issue:

Date: Technician:

Daily Field Report Report No: DFR:05461562-2/1

Issue No: 1

Client:

9/2/2016

ALTUS AFB

KOMATSU ARCHITECTURE

3880 HULEN STREET, SUITE 300

FORT WORTH, TX 76107

These test results apply only to the specific locations and materials noted and may not represent any other locations or elevations. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written permission by Professional Service Industries, Inc. If a non-compliance appears on this report, to the extent that the reported non-compliance impacts the project, the resolution is outside the PSI scope of engagement.

ALTUS, OK

Eric Holm (Project Specialist)

9/2/2016 Tracy Sills, Matthew Underdown

PSI representatives reported to the above referenced site to obtain readings of the relative humidity probes inserted into the slab. The second probe was damaged and the cap was off on several probes.

Readings are as follows:

Probe Location Temp. (deg) RH, % 1 Sensor V292132 (cap off) 60 99 2 Sensor V292346 (cap off) Damaged 3 Sensor V292303 66 95 4 Sensor V292289 (cap off) 62 94 5 Sensor V292468 59 99 6 Sensor V292385 (cap off) 67 99 7 Sensor V292430 68 97 8 Sensor V292111 66 85 9 Sensor V292328 68 99 10 Sensor V292412 68 97

Site plan attached showing probe placement areas.

Page 1 of 1 © 2000-2016 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com Report No.:DFR:05461562-2/1

Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Austech Roof Consultants, Inc.

PSI Project Number: 06332834

January 31, 2017

Mr. Ken Ollinger Austech Roof Consultants, Inc.

2312 Western Trails Blvd, Suite 403 Austin, Texas 78745

Re: Asbestos and Lead-Based Paint Roof Survey

Altus Air Force Base 205 South 1st Street; DECA Commissary Altus, Oklahoma 73523

Dear Mr. Ollinger:

Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) is pleased to inform you of our findings for the above referenced project. The project encompassed the roof of DECA Commissary and included surveys for suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and suspect lead-based paint (LBP), with the site visit being conducted on January 19, 2017. PSI’s Mr. James T. Russell, an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accredited and Oklahoma licensed inspector, performed the survey.

BUILDING DESCRIPTION

The building included in this renovation survey was the DECA commissary at Altus Air Force Base. The building encompassed approximately 64,650 square feet of total area. There is approximately 61,400 square feet of built-up tar and gravel roof over insulation and metal deck and approximately 3,250 square feet of standing seam metal roof over wood decking.

ASBESTOS SURVEY

The asbestos survey was conducted to assist the client in complying with requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and the Oklahoma Department of Labor. The asbestos survey included both friable and non-friable suspect ACM. Friable ACM is defined by the EPA as any material that when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. The EPA and the Oklahoma Department of Labor define ACM as any material that contains greater than one-percent asbestos. A total of nine (9) bulk material samples were collected and analyzed by the EPA recommended Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining method. The following materials were sampled as suspect ACM at the facility:

Sample Number

Material Description

Locations in Building

Asbestos Type and Percent

Material Condition

01, 02, 03 Built up tar and gravel roofing Entire roof No Asbestos

Detected Good

04, 05, 06 Roof Tar flashing Roof HVAC framing, exhaust vents, penetrations and perimeter

4% Chrysotile Good

310 Regal Row, Suite 500

Dallas, Texas 75247 phone: 214.330.9211 fax: 214.333.2853 intertek.com/building psiusa.com

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

January 31, 2017

Sample Number

Material Description

Locations in Building

Asbestos Type and Percent

Material Condition

07, 08, 09 Brown mastic on metal roof coping cap.

Roof perimeter No Asbestos Detected

Good

A material is considered by the EPA to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample collected from an area shows asbestos present in an amount greater than one percent (1%). ACMs were identified on the roof at the subject property.

1. Roof tar flashing at penetrations, expansion joints and perimeter parapet walls.

LEAD PAINT SURVEY

The lead paint survey was conducted in general accordance with the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Developments (HUD) Publication: Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, June 1995. The paint was tested using paint chip sampling. A total of four

(4) paint chip samples were collected for analysis by the recommended Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry analytical method (SW846 Method 7420). The following painted components were sampled:

Component and Sample Location

Color/Substrate Paint Chip (%) Paint Condition

LB-01 North roof hatch Brown/Metal <0.015% Poor

LB-02 North roof ladder Brown/Metal <0.014% Poor

LB-03 Middle Roof HVAC Framing Grey/Metal <0.015% Poor

LB-04 North Roof HVAC Framing Grey/Metal <0.024% Good

Laboratory test results of 0.5% by weight or greater are considered positive under the HUD guidelines and the EPA. None of the analytical results for the paint chip samples were at or above this definition for lead-based paint.

WARRANTY

PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with the standard of care exercised within the asbestos and/or LBP testing and inspection industries. PSI recognizes that raw laboratory test data are not usually sufficient to make all abatement and management decisions.

The survey included inspection of reasonably accessible materials such as above or behind suspended ceilings or other non-permanent structures. PSI did not however inspect or sample inaccessible areas such as behind walls or within ductwork and PSI did not dismantle any part of the structure to survey inaccessible areas. Inaccessible is defined as areas of the building that could not be tested (sampled) without destruction of or damage to the structure or a portion of the structure.

The information contained in this report is based upon the data furnished by the Client and observations and test results provided by PSI. These observations and results are time dependent, are subject to changing site conditions, and revisions to Federal, state and local regulations.

PSI did not provide any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

January 31, 2017 occurrence of the amplification of the same. Client acknowledges that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture.

Client further acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI’s control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

Use by Third Parties This report was prepared pursuant to the contract PSI has with the Client. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the subject site that was unique and between PSI and its Client and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of the communication between PSI and its Client, reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than the Client, for whom it was prepared, is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to

PSI.

Reliance or use by any such third party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third party a third-party beneficiary to PSI’s contract with Austech Roof Consultants, Inc. Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third party’s risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party.

Third party reliance letters may be issued on request and upon payment of the, then current fee for such letters. All third parties relying on PSI’s reports, by such reliance, agree to be bound by the proposal and PSI’s General Conditions. No reliance by any party is permitted without such agreement, regardless of the content of the reliance letter itself.

UNIDENTIFIABLE CONDITIONS

This report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work. Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility that conditions may exist, which could not be identified within the scope of work or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. This report is also limited to information available from the client at the time it was conducted. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject site as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations.

PSI appreciates the opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions regarding our findings, please do not hesitate to give us a call.

Sincerely, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

James T. Russell Sri Krishnaprasad Project Manager Principal Consultant

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Enclosures: PLM Asbestos Analytical Results and Chain of Custody

Lead Paint Analytical Results and Chain of Custody Sample Location Drawing Photographs Inspector Certifications Laboratory Certifications

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

APPENDICES

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

PLM ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY

Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc Deca Commissary

Date Received: 1/20/2017 Date Completed: 1/23/2017

310 Regal Row Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75247 Attn: James Russell

Project ID: 06332834

Altus AFB

Date Reported: 1/24/2017

Page: 1 of 1Analyst: DA Work Order: 1701335

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

001A1-01 (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous 5% Fibrous GlassNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Gray, Insulation, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

002A1-02 (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous 5% Fibrous GlassNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Gray, Insulation, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

003A1-03 (1) Black, Roofing, Homogeneous 5% Fibrous GlassNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Gray, Insulation, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

004A2-04 (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous 10% Fibrous Glass

Chrysotile4%

005A2-05 (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous 10% Fibrous Glass

Chrysotile4%

006A2-06 (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous 10% Fibrous Glass

Chrysotile4%

007A3-07 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

008A3-08 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

009A3-09 (1) Brown, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA / 600/R-93/116 July 1993). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

Mary Cantley

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

LEAD PAINT ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY

Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Analysis of Paint for Lead Determination

Analytical Report

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc 310 Regal Row Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75247 Attn: James Russell

Date Received: 1/20/2017 Date Analyzed: 1/23/2017 Date of Issue: 1/23/2017

Project ID: 06332834 Deca Commissary Altus AFB

1 of 1Analyst: JLM Work Order: 1701333 Page:

Lab Sample # Client Sample #

Reporting Limit

% Lead by Weight % Lead by Weight

001A LB-01 0.015< 0.015

002A LB-02 0.014< 0.014

003A LB-03 0.015< 0.015

004A LB-04 0.024< 0.024

AIHA-LAP, LLC #100373; NYELAP ID #10930; CA Lab ID #2377.

Results are based on a representative subsample of the total sample submitted by the client.

Sample results are not corrected for blanks.

Reporting limit = 30µg Pb per representative subsample.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4000 Fax 412/922-4014

Melanie Smith

Analytical & Prep Method

PSI WI-506 mod. EPA SW846 7000B, Rev 2, 2007 PSI WI-502 mod. EPA SW846 3050B, Rev 2, 1996

Analysis was performed by flame AA using a PE AAnalyst 400.

All results are based on 2 significant figures. Results relate only to items tested.

This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of PSI, Inc.

Unless otherwise noted, all samples were acceptable upon receipt.

All quality control sample results are within the acceptance range, unless noted.

Client submitted data is the determining factor in the accuracy of calculated results.

The attached Chain of Custody is incorporated into and becomes a part of the final report.

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING

Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Altus AFB Commissary 205 S. 1st Street

Altus, OK PSI Project No.: 06332834

Date Drawn: 01/31/17

310 Regal Row #500 - Dallas, Texas 75247

(214) 330-9211 - FAX (972) 263-2612

L E G E N D

Figure 1 Sample Location Map

ACM Roof Flashing

01 – Sample Location POSITIVE

02 – Sample Location NEGATIVE

Amendment 0003 Attachment 1

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

PHOTOGRAPHS

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

PSI Project No.: 06332834

Photo 1: View of upper built-up roof generally looking southwest.

Photo 2: View of lower built-up roof looking southeast.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Photo 3: View of a typical built up tar and gravel roofing core sample.

Photo 4: View of typical roof tar flashing.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Photo 5: View of brown paint on roof hatch.

Photo 6: View of brown paint on roof ladder.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Photo 7: View of white paint on HVAC support frame.

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002

Solicitation HDEC03-17-R-0002