4_-_Contracting_Brief _6_June_2016.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED 1

UNCLASSIFIED

UNITED IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION

Test, Evaluation, Certification (TEC) Services

Pre-Solicitation Conference

Christopher Enriquez Contracting Officer

June 6, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 2

UNITED IN SERVICE TO OUR NATION

Disclaimers

• All materials viewed today are in draft form and are considered to be used for planning purposes only

• Nothing said or discussed during this conference may be construed or interpreted as a commitment by the Government

• Any statements made by the Government during this conference are subject to changes made in the final solicitation or by questions & answers incorporated therein

UNCLASSIFIED 3

Agenda

• Acquisition Roles

DISA/JITC

Industry

• Acquisition Goals

• Contract Type

• Solicitation

• One-on-One Expectations

• Way Ahead

UNCLASSIFIED 4

Acquisition Roles

• Joint Interoperability Command (JITC) Requirement owner

• DISA/DITCO

Administrative authority of existing T&E MSS contract Procuring authority for TEC Industry focal point

• Industry Provide input on efficient ways of procuring services Advise on applicable best practices

UNCLASSIFIED 5

Acquisition Goals

• Provide JITC and the warfighter with an affordable solution that meets, or exceeds, their mission requirements

• Put in place a flexible contract vehicle that adapts to mission requirements

• Control costs throughout the lifecycle of the vehicle

• Maximize small business participation

• Incentivize productivity and innovation

• Promote effective competition

UNCLASSIFIED 6

Contract Type

• FAR Part 15 acquisition

• Indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract (IDIQ)

Anticipated single award

• Fixed-Price

• Cost-Reimbursement

UNCLASSIFIED 7

TEC Draft RFP

• Posted on FedBizOpps on June 2, 2016

HC1028-16-R-0007

• Response Date:

Jun 17, 2016 12:00 p.m. Central

• Evaluation Factors for Award Factor 1: Technical/Management Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Cost/Price

UNCLASSIFIED 8

Factor 1 – Technical/Management (Pass/Fail)

• Phase 1 Subfactor 1: Support of Interoperability Certification Subfactor 2: Support of Standards Compliance and Conformance Verification Subfactor 3: Support of Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) Subfactor 4: Information Technology Service Management Framework (ITSM) Subfactor 5: ISO 9001 Certification Subfactor 6: Integrated Architecture Traceability Matrix (IATM) Development

UNCLASSIFIED 9

Factor 1 – Technical/Management (Tradeoff)

• Phase 2 Subfactor 1: Science Based Test Design (SBTD), Automation, and

Instrumentation Support Subfactor 2: Special Operations DNA Analysis Solutions (SODAS) Test and

Evaluation Sample Task Order Subfactor 3: Department of Defense (DoD) Enterprise Unified Capabilities (UC)

Product TEC Services and Facility Support Task Order Subfactor 4: Defense Joint Finance and Accounting System (DJFAS) Test and

Evaluation (T&E) Support Sample Task Order Subfactor 5: Program Management

UNCLASSIFIED 10

Past Performance Assessment

TABLE M5- PAST PERFORMANCE ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATING METHOD

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

UNCLASSIFIED 11

Factor 2 – Past Performance

• M.2.3 Past Performance Factor Recency:

• Effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three

(3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation, or for ongoing efforts, must have been in place at least nine months prior to the proposal due date.

Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

Relevancy:

• Related to Test and Evaluation (T&E) of information technology system(s) with a value of performance not less than $500K annually

• Related to providing interoperability, cybersecurity, or operationally focused

T&E support;

• Related to developing T&E strategies based on the use of architectural artifacts, science based test design approaches, or other systematic methods to ensure T&E rigor; and

• Related to the firm’s experience applying instrumentation and automation to support test data collection, management, and analysis.

Performance Quality Assessment:

• How well the contractor performed on the contracts

UNCLASSIFIED 12

Cost/Price Evaluation

• The offeror’s price proposal will be evaluated based on the total evaluated price for Task Order 0001 (FFP), CPFF Pricing Scenario, and FFP Pricing Scenario. The Cost/Price team will calculate a total proposed price for:

Task Order 0001 (FFP) CPFF Pricing Scenario FFP Pricing Scenario

• Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) Pricing Scenario / Task Orders

• Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Pricing Scenario / Task Orders

• Travel/Other Direct Costs (ODC)

UNCLASSIFIED 13

Small Business

• The Government will review the offeror’s Small Business Subcontracting Plan/Small Business Participation Proposal, and it will be evaluated, on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, by the Contracting Officer, the Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization Specialist, and Small Business Administration for compliance with FAR Part 19.704, DFARS 215.304, and DISA subcontracting goals.

UNCLASSIFIED 14

Organizational and Consultant Conflict of Interest (OCCI) Mitigation Plan

• The Government’s review of the offeror’s OCCI Mitigation plan will consider:

the degree to which the offeror addressed OCI concerns, the offeror’s approach for mitigating OCI issues, the adequacy of its OCI training and oversight programs, the adequacy of its procedures, and whether or not the offeror’s OCI plan and/or mitigation strategy complies with all regulatory and statutory requirements, including FAR Subpart 9.5.

• The above elements and the OCI plan will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. An acceptable plan is one that addresses items a-e above

UNCLASSIFIED 15

Way Ahead

Item Timeline*

Draft RFP Release 2nd Quarter CY 2016

Final RFP 3rd Quarter CY 2016

Proposals Due ~2 months after posting

Award 2nd Quarter CY 2017 *All timelines are tentative and are subject to change.

UNCLASSIFIED 16