AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03 Nov 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE H92257

MARSOC H92257

400 RR (BLDG), RIFLE RANGE ROAD, CAMP LEJEUNE ATTN G4 CONTRACT

SNEADS FERRY, NC 28460-0101

UNITED STATES

Samuel Williams, Email: samuel.williams1@socom.mil Telephone: 9104400773 Samuel Williams, Email: samuel.williams1@socom.mil Telephone: 9104400773

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

H9225726RE036

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14 Sep 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this Amendment is to provide answers to questions and update the PWS and Pricing Template. The proposal due date has been extended to 20 November 2026.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Samuel Williams

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

03 Nov 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Response Due Date 13 Nov 2026 20 Nov 2026

Contract Clauses

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

5652.216-9005, Government Down Time for Various Reasons (2005) Section I In accordance with 5616.307(l), and as prescribed in 5616.601-90, insert the following clause, From time to time Government installations may be closed in response to an unforeseen emergency or similar occurrence, or by order of the President, Secretary of Defense, or installation commander. Designated emergencies include, but are not limited to, adverse weather such as snow or flood, an act of God such as a tornado or earthquake, acts of war or terrorism, computer failures, or a base disaster such as a natural gas leak or fire.

(1) Under such designated emergencies or other ordered base closures, contractor personnel will not be allowed on the Government installation unless specifically approved by the Contracting Officer in accordance with installation policies and procedures. If an emergency requiring installation closure occurs while contractor personnel are on the installation, contractor personnel shall promptly secure all government furnished property appropriately and evacuate in an expedient but safe manner unless otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer.

(2) If the installation closure causes a delay in the work required by the contract, the Government may:

(i) grant a time extension in each task order delayed by the closure equal to the time of the closure, subject to the availability of funds.

(ii) terminate the work or a portion of the work.

(iii) reschedule the work on any day satisfactory to both parties.

(iv) permit the contractor to perform at an off-site location during the period of installation closure if meaningful work can be accomplished. Contractor shall certify to the government by letter within 5 business days of returning to work the nature and scope of the work completed off-site. There shall be no adjustment to the contract labor rates for work performed off the installation.

(v) require that the Contractor continue on-site performance during the installation closure period in accordance with installation procedures.

5652.237-9001 Key Personnel Requirements (2003) Section I As prescribed in 5637.110(b), insert the following clause, Fill-ins

(a) Certain experienced professional and/or technical personnel are essential for successful accomplishment of the work to be performed under this contract. Such personnel are defined as "Key Personnel" and are those persons whose resumes were submitted for evaluation of the proposal. The contractor agrees that such personnel shall not be removed from the contract work or replaced without compliance with the following:

(1) If one or more of the key personnel, for any reason, becomes or is expected to become unavailable for work under this contract for a continuous period exceeding 30 work days, or is expected to devote substantially less effort to the work than indicated in the proposal or initially anticipated, the contractor shall, subject to the concurrence of the Contracting Officer or an authorized representative, promptly replace personnel with personnel of equal ability and qualifications.

(2) All requests for approval of substitutions hereunder must be in writing and provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions.

The request must contain a resume for the proposed substitute, and any other information requested by the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer shall promptly notify the contractor of approval or disapproval in writing.

(b) If the Contracting Officer determines that suitable and timely replacement of Key Personnel who have been reassigned, terminated or have otherwise become unavailable for the contract work is not reasonably forthcoming or that the resultant reduction of productive effort would be so substantial as to impair successful completion of the contract, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default or for the convenience of the Government, as appropriate, or make an equitable adjustment to the contract to compensate the Government for any resultant delay, loss or damage.

(c) The following positions are identified as Key Personnel:

Program Lead;

Primary Instructor LOE 2 (medic);

Primary Lane Cadre PA/MD;

Exercise Manager;

H9225726RE0360004

Subject Matter Expert (SME) - Ultrasound; and

SME - Airway/Ventilator Support.

List of Attachments

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

1. MARSOC SOMTS PWS_3Nov2026

2. Pricing Template_3Nov2026

3. Question and Answers_3Nov2026

4. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan_3Nov2026

5. OCI Disclosure Form_3Nov2026

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

1.0 General Instructions and Administrative Information

This is a competitive, best-value tradeoff acquisition conducted in accordance with FAR Part 12 and FAR Part 13.5, Simplified Procedures for Certain Commercial Products and Commercial Services. The Government intends to award a single-award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract resulting from this solicitation. Task orders issued under this IDIQ will be Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP).

The Government reserves the right not to award a contract depending on the quality of proposals submitted and the availability of funds.

Administrative Item Details and Instructions

Primary Contracting Points of Contact

All questions and proposal submissions shall be submitted by email to SSgt Hanna Tilley, , and Samuel hanna.l.tilley.mil@socom.mil Williams, CIV, .samuel.williams1@socom.mil

Submission Method Fully completed proposals shall be submitted electronically by email to the Primary Contracting Points of Contact.

Questions No additional questions will be accepted. The Government has issued responses to timely submitted questions through solicitation amendment.

Proposal Submission Deadline

Proposals are due no later than 10:00 AM Eastern Standard Time on November 20, 2026. Late proposals may not be evaluated in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f).

Proposal Validity Period Offerors shall hold proposed prices firm for a minimum of 180 calendar days from the solicitation closing date.

H9225726RE0360004

mailto:hanna.l.tilley.mil@socom.mil mailto:samuel.williams1@socom.mil

System for Award Management

Offerors shall be actively registered in the System for Award Management at SAM.gov under North American Industry Classification System code 611699 before award.

1.1 Use of Automated Analysis Tools in Proposal Evaluation

1.1.1 Use of Automated Analysis Tools in Support of Evaluation

The Government may use approved automated analysis tools to assist Government personnel with organizing, summarizing, and reviewing proposal information. Such tools may assist in identifying solicitation-compliance issues and areas for evaluator review.

1.1.2 Inherently Governmental Functions

Notwithstanding the use of automated analysis tools to support the evaluation process, all final evaluation judgments, ratings, source-selection decisions, and award decisions will be made solely by duly appointed Government personnel. The Government retains sole responsibility for inherently governmental functions and will not delegate decision-making authority to an automated analysis tool.

1.1.3 Offeror Confidentiality and Data Protection

The Government will use approved automated analysis tools in a manner consistent with applicable requirements for safeguarding proprietary information, source-selection-sensitive information, and Controlled Unclassified Information(CUI).

2.0 Proposal Format and Page Constraints

Proposals shall be submitted electronically as four (4) separate volumes. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with the solicitation number, offeror name, volume number, and volume title. Failure to submit all four required volumes may result in the proposal being determined ineligible for award.

Vo lu m e

Title Page Limit Evaluatio n Type

Vo lu m e I

Qualifying Criteria

Maximum 5 pages, excluding completed representations and certifications, Supplier Performance Risk System documentation, SF 1449, SF 30 amendment acknowledgments, OCI Disclosure Forms and continuation sheets, and OCI mitigation plans, if applicable

Pass / Fail

Vo lu m e

II

Factor I:

Technical Maximum 15 pages, excluding required resumes Adjectival

Rating

Vo lu m e

III

Factor II:

Past Perfor mance

Maximum 5 pages Confiden ce Asses sment

Vo lu m e

IV

Factor III:

Price No page limit Price Eva luation

2.1 Email Attachment Size Limit

1.

2.

3.

4.

Individual emails, including attachments, shall not exceed 10 megabytes. It is the offeror's responsibility to request and obtain electronic receipt confirmation for proposal submissions.

2.2 Page Layout

All proposal pages shall be formatted for 8.5-inch by 11-inch paper with one-inch margins on all sides. Offerors shall use a font size of not less than 10-point type, or 11-point Calibri or Times New Roman for proportional fonts.

2.3 Page-Limit Exclusions

Coversheets, glossaries, tables of contents, and section dividers do not count toward volume page limitations.

3.0 Volume I - Qualifying Criteria and Proposal Submission Completeness

Offerors shall submit a Volume I narrative not exceeding five (5) pages, unless specifically exempted below.

Submission of all four required proposal volumes is a qualifying criterion. Offerors shall submit Volume I, Volume II, Volume III, and Volume IV as separate, complete proposal volumes. The Government will evaluate proposal-submission completeness as part of the Volume I Pass/Fail evaluation.

Volume I shall include the following:

3.1 Proposal Submission Completeness

Offerors shall submit all four required proposal volumes as separate electronic submissions:

Volume I - Qualifying Criteria;

Volume II - Factor I: Technical;

Volume III - Factor II: Past Performance; and Volume IV - Factor III: Price.

Each volume shall be clearly labeled with the solicitation number, offeror name, volume number, and volume title.

Volume IV shall include the completed Government-provided pricing template in its native Microsoft Excel format, along with any required supporting price narrative or Basis of Estimate documentation.

Failure to submit a required volume, failure to submit a volume in the required format, or submission of a materially incomplete volume may result in the proposal being assigned a No-Go rating under Volume I and being ineligible for award.

3.2 Administrative and Contact Information

Offerors shall provide the corporate name, Commercial and Government Entity code, Unique Entity Identifier, Taxpayer Identification Number, and primary point-of-contact information.

3.3 Terms and Conditions Statement

Offerors shall provide an explicit statement agreeing to all solicitation terms and conditions without exception.

3.4 Fill-In Clauses and Certifications

Offerors shall provide completed solicitation representations, certifications, and fill-in provisions. Completed representations, certifications, and fill-improvisions do not count against the Volume I page limitation.

3.5 Supplier Performance Risk System and NIST SP 800-171 Validation

Offerors shall verify that a current, active NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment is posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7019 and DFARS 252.204-7020, and that the offeror complies with DFARS 252.204-7012.

Supporting SPRS documentation does not count against the Volume I page limitation.

3.6 Controlled Unclassified Information Safeguarding Plan

Offerors shall provide a concise operational plan describing how the contractor will safeguard, store, transmit, access, retain, and dispose of CUI generated or accessed during performance, such as authorized student rosters, student performance information, training records, and tactical scenario materials.

The plan shall demonstrate compliance with applicable contract requirements, including DFARS 252.204-7012 and DoD CUI safeguarding requirements.

3.

4.

5.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

At a minimum, the plan shall address:

Access controls and need-to-know procedures;

Physical safeguarding of CUI in garrison and field-training environments;

Secure electronic storage and transmission using approved encryption methods and FIPS-validated cryptographic modules, when applicable;

Procedures for reporting suspected or confirmed loss, compromise, or unauthorized disclosure; and Retention, sanitization, and disposition of CUI in accordance with applicable contract, records-management, and safeguarding requirements.

This solicitation does not require a Facility Security Clearance or DD Form 254.Performance is limited to unclassified information, including CUI when applicable.

3.7 SF1449 and Amendment Acknowledgments

Offerors shall include a completed and signed Standard Form 1449 and a completed and signed Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, for each solicitation amendment issued by the Government, unless the amendment expressly states that acknowledgment by another method is authorized.

The SF1449 and SF 30 amendment acknowledgments shall be included in Volume I and shall not count against the Volume I page limitation.

3.8 Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form

Offerors shall submit Attachment 5, Organizational Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, with Volume I.

The OCI Disclosure Form and any continuation sheets are exempt from the Volume I page limitation.

Offerors shall submit one completed OCI Disclosure Form attachment for each USSOCOM contract or subcontract currently being performed by the offeror or its affiliates, as applicable. For each identified contract or subcontract, the offeror shall complete the form and describe whether the scope of work creates an actual or potential organizational conflict of interest related to this solicitation or any resulting contract.

If the offeror and its affiliates are not currently performing any USSOCOM contracts or subcontracts, the offeror shall submit a signed statement with Volume I affirming that no such current contracts or subcontracts exist.

If an offeror identifies an actual or potential OCI, the offeror shall submit all information necessary for Government evaluation, including a proposed mitigation plan when the offeror believes mitigation is appropriate.

4.0 Volume II - Factor I: Technical

Offerors shall provide a detailed narrative describing their technical capability to accomplish the work described in Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement.

General statements that the offeror understands the requirement or will comply with the PWS are inadequate.

Subfactor1A: Key Personnel Minimums

For CLINX00101, Prolonged Field Care Training, offerors shall submit one resume foreach of the following six evaluated key-personnel positions:

Program Lead;

Primary Instructor LOE 2, medic;

Primary Lane Cadre PA/MD;

Exercise Manager;

Subject Matter Expert, Ultrasound; and Subject Matter Expert, Airway/Ventilator Support.

Resumes shall clearly demonstrate that the proposed individual meets the minimum experience, certification, and other qualification requirements identified in PWS Table 1 for the applicable position.

Primary Instructor LOE 1, non-medic, and Assistant Lane Cadre 18D/SOIDC/SOCM are required PFC execution personnel. Resumes for those positions are not required as part of proposal evaluation. Before performance, the contractor shall provide personnel who meet the applicable PWS Table 1 qualifications for all required execution roles.

An individual may be proposed for more than one position only when the individual meets all qualification requirements for each proposed position and the offeror demonstrates that the individual's proposed assignments are compatible with PWS staffing and course-execution requirements.

Subfactor1B: Corporate Experience

Offerors shall provide a narrative describing the recent and relevant corporate experience of the prime contractor and, if applicable, proposed teaming partners and subcontractors that will perform meaningful portions of the resulting contract.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Corporate experience may be demonstrated through multiple prior or current contracts, task orders, subcontracts, or other agreements. The Government does not require one prior effort or one entity to demonstrate every capability required by this solicitation.

The experience narrative shall demonstrate the offeror's collective ability to successfully execute turnkey Special Operations Forces medical training efforts of similar size, scope, and complexity to this requirement.

Relevant experience may include, as applicable:

Medical and austere medical instruction;

Prolonged Field Care training;

Scenario-based and lane-based medical exercises;

Cadaveric or real-tissue training support;

Tactical driving or vehicle-based training;

Role-player and moulage support;

Medical simulation;

Training-facility operations;

Lodging, catering, and logistics support;

Clinical rotations; and Management of qualified medical instructional personnel.

For each referenced effort, the offeror shall identify:

The performing entity;

The customer and contract, task order, subcontract, or agreement number, if applicable;

The period of performance;

The total dollar value and the dollar value performed by the identified entity, if applicable;

A concise description of the scope of work;

The specific capability or capabilities demonstrated that are relevant to this solicitation; and For a teaming partner or subcontractor, the entity's proposed role and responsibilities under the resulting contract.

Experience of a proposed teaming partner or subcontractor will be considered only when the offeror demonstrates that the identified entity will perform a meaningful role related to the experience cited under the resulting contract.

Offerors may cite the same prior efforts under Subfactor 1B and Factor II, Past Performance, provided the offeror complies with the distinct submission requirements for each factor.

Subfactor 1C: Turnkey Operational Execution

Offerors shall provide a narrative describing their proposed approach to executing the requirements of the PWS. General statements that the offeror understands the requirement or will comply with the PWS are inadequate.

The narrative shall address, at a minimum:

The proposed approach for delivering CLIN X00101, CLIN X00102, and CLIN X00103 requirements, as applicable;

Proposed training facilities, training areas, and facility-access arrangements;

Training materials, medical equipment, supplies, simulation resources, vehicles, and other resources necessary for performance;

Staffing, instructor management, role-player support, moulage support, scenario support, and logistics management;

Lodging, meals, transportation, hygiene support, and other student-support services, as applicable by CLIN;

Protocols for safeguarding CUI, including physical safeguarding of student performance evaluations and scenario injects in garrison and field environments;

The offeror's approach to planning and executing firm-fixed-price CLIN X00103 task orders; and Other relevant elements necessary to demonstrate a feasible, realistic, and low-risk approach to PWS performance.

For CLINX00101, the offeror shall describe its approach to providing the required staffing, facilities, equipment, role-player support, scenario support, and logistics for each PFC capacity tier: up to eight students, up to sixteen students, and up to twenty-four students.

For CLINX00102, the offeror shall submit a representative detailed course schedule identifying proposed distance-learning requirements; Phase I through Phase III duration and sequencing; resident-training periods; clinical rotations; practical exercises; assessments; certification-preparation activities; the five-day refresher option; and estimated total course duration.

3.

4.

1.

2.

3.

The CLINX00102 schedule shall demonstrate how the offeror will accomplish all applicable PWS requirements.

For CLINX00102, the offeror shall also describe its proposed culmination exercise facility and training-area approach, including facility availability; exercise-area configuration; lane-management approach; role-player, vehicle, simulation, communications, and telemedicine support; safety and access-control measures; and how the proposed approach will achieve required PWS training outcomes.

5.0 Volume III - Factor II: Past Performance

5.1 Quantity and Currency

Offerors shall submit a minimum of three and a maximum of five recent and relevant contracts or agreements.

For purposes of this solicitation, recent is defined as work performed within the five years preceding the issuance date of this solicitation.

5.2 Relevance

Relevant efforts are those of similar size, scope, and magnitude to the MARSOC Special Operations Medical Training Services requirements.

5.3 Required Data Points

For each reference, offerors shall provide:

Contract, task order, subcontract, or agreement number, as applicable, and period of performance;

Total contract, task-order, subcontract, or agreement dollar value;

Point of contact name, telephone number, and email address for the Government Program Manager or Contracting Officer's Representative and, if applicable, the prime contractor; and A concise narrative explaining how the prior work directly maps to applicable PWS tasks.

6.0 Volume IV - Factor III: Price

6.1 IDIQ Ceilings and Ordering Information

This solicitation contemplates award of an IDIQ contract with a maximum overall ceiling of $4,950,000 across the base period, all option periods, and any extension exercised under FAR 52.217-8. The anticipated annual ceiling is$900,000.

The Government has not established estimated annual ordering quantities for CLINX00101 or CLIN X00102. The annual and overall ceilings are funding and ordering limitations only. They do not constitute a minimum guarantee, estimated quantity, or commitment by the Government to order a specific number of course iterations, student-seat allocations, task orders, or services.

Offerors shall propose binding unit prices in accordance with Section 6.2. The Government will evaluate proposed prices in accordance with Section 6.4.

The Government will not calculate a mathematically extended Total Evaluated Price.

6.2 Pricing Template and Unit Pricing

Offerors shall submit pricing using the Government-provided Excel pricing template.

Proposed prices for CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 shall be fully burdened firm-fixed-price unit rates. Offerors shall propose separate binding unit rates for the base period and each option period. The proposed rate applicable to an ordered requirement shall remain binding throughout the applicable ordering period.

CLINX00101 - Prolonged Field Care Training

Offerors shall propose fully burdened firm-fixed-price unit rates for each of the following CLIN X00101 PFC course-iteration capacity tiers:

PFC Course Iteration - Up to eight students;

PFC Course Iteration - Up to sixteen students; and PFC Course Iteration - Up to twenty-four students.

Each proposed unit rate shall include all contractor-provided labor, personnel, facilities, equipment, medical supplies, consumables, student support, scenario support, role-player support, moulage support, logistics, transportation, meals, lodging, administrative support, and other requirements necessary to execute the applicable PWS requirements for the ordered capacity tier.

Offerors shall separately propose fully burdened firm-fixed-price unit rates for the optional CLIN X00101 Cadaveric or Real-Tissue Training Add-On at each corresponding PFC capacity tier.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

The optional cadaveric or real-tissue training add-on price shall not be included in the standard PFC course-iteration price.

CLINX00102 - Austere Medical Training for Non-Medical Personnel

Offerors shall propose a fully burdened firm-fixed-price unit rate for one MARSOC student-seat allocation of up to five MARSOC students in one contractor-operated CLIN X00102 course iteration.

The proposed allocation rate shall include all contractor-provided CLIN X00102requirements applicable to the Government-reserved MARSOC student seats.

The proposed rate shall exclude MARSOC student lodging, meals, per diem, and other student subsistence costs unless expressly directed otherwise in the applicable task order.

CLINX00103 - Custom Medical Training

Offerors shall not propose a pre-priced course rate, labor rate, labor-rate ceiling, labor-category rate, or estimated quantity for CLIN X00103 at the IDIQ proposal level.

CLINX00103 requirements will be priced and negotiated on a firm-fixed-price basis at the task-order level.

For each CLIN X00103 task-order request, the contractor shall submit a task-order-specific firm-fixed-price proposal supported by a Basis of Estimate and price narrative.

The proposal shall demonstrate that the proposed firm-fixed price includes all resources necessary to perform the defined task-order requirement.

Option-Year Escalation for Standard Training Requirements

Offerors shall propose a fully burdened firm-fixed-price unit rate for the base period and each option period for CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102.

Offerors may apply escalation to the proposed fully burdened unit rates for Option Years1 through 4. The proposed escalation shall be reflected in the unit prices entered in the Government-provided pricing template.

Offerors are not required to identify or apply separate escalation factors to individual cost elements, including direct labor, fringe, overhead, general and administrative expense, subcontractor costs, or fee.

6.3 Basis of Estimate and Price Narrative

Offerors shall provide an aggregate Basis of Estimate and price narrative supporting proposed CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 firm-fixed-price unit rates.

The Basis of Estimate shall identify principal pricing assumptions, major cost drivers, and material resources included in the proposed unit rates.

6.3.1 CLIN X00101 - Prolonged Field Care Training

Offerors shall provide an aggregate Basis of Estimate and price narrative supporting each proposed PFC capacity-tier rate and each corresponding optional cadaveric or real-tissue training add-on rate.

The narrative shall explain the principal pricing assumptions and cost drivers associated with scaling from one training team for up to eight students, to two training teams for up to sixteen students, to three training teams for up to twenty-four students.

The narrative shall address, as applicable:

Instructor and lane-cadre staffing;

Professional role-player support;

Exercise Manager support;

Subject matter expert support;

Moulage and special effects;

Facilities;

Vehicles;

Medical supplies and equipment;

Logistics and transportation;

Meals and lodging;

Administrative support; and Optional cadaveric or real-tissue training support.

6.3.2CLIN X00102 - Austere Medical Training for Non-Medical Personnel

Offerors shall provide an aggregate Basis of Estimate and price narrative supporting the proposed firm-fixed-price unit rate for one MARSOC student-seat allocation of up to five students in a contractor-operated course iteration.

The narrative shall identify the principal cost drivers, major cost elements, and material pricing assumptions used to develop the proposed unit rate.

3.

Major cost elements may include aggregate direct labor or instructor compensation, facilities, equipment, course materials, medical supplies and consumables, clinical rotations, transportation, administrative support, subcontractor support, and other significant costs.

The Basis of Estimate shall describe the offeror's aggregate option-year escalation methodology and principal escalation assumptions supporting proposed CLINX00101 and CLIN X00102 unit rates.

Offerors are not required to disclose proprietary indirect-rate structures, indirect-cost percentages, cost-pool information, individual employee compensation, labor-category cost calculations, profit or fee calculations, or other proprietary cost-accounting data.

Offerors may provide such information voluntarily if they believe it assists the Government's understanding of the proposed price.

The Basis of Estimate shall demonstrate that each proposed firm-fixed-price unit rate includes all applicable PWS requirements and is consistent with the offeror's proposed technical approach.

6.3.3CLIN X00103 - Custom Medical Training

Offerors shall not submit a CLIN X00103 Basis of Estimate or price narrative at the IDIQ proposal stage.

For each CLIN X00103 task-order request, the contractor shall submit a task-order-specific Basis of Estimate and price narrative supporting its proposed firm-fixed-price amount. The task-order proposal shall identify the principal assumptions, major cost drivers, and resources included in the proposed price and shall demonstrate consistency with the defined task-order scope.

6.4 Price Evaluation Basis -- Unit-Rate Evaluation

The Government will evaluate proposal-level CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 prices on a unit-rate basis.

There is no mathematically extended Total Evaluated Price for this requirement. The Government will not apply estimated annual quantities to extend or compare proposed unit rates.

The Government will evaluate proposed CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 prices for completeness, reasonableness, and balance.

The Government may use price-analysis techniques, including comparison with competing proposals, historical prices, market research, and the Independent Government Cost Estimate.

6.4.1CLIN X00101

The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed firm-fixed-price unit rates foreach PFC course-iteration capacity tier:

Up to eight students;

Up to sixteen students; and Up to twenty-four students.

The Government will separately evaluate each corresponding optional Cadaveric or Real-Tissue Training Add-On rate.

The Government will assess whether proposed CLIN X00101 tiered rates are complete, reasonable, balanced, and internally consistent with the offeror's technical approach, required staffing ratios, scenario-support requirements, and optional cadaveric or real-tissue training requirements.

6.4.2 CLIN X00102

The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed firm-fixed-price unit rate for one MARSOC student-seat allocation of up to five students in one contractor-operated CLIN X00102 course iteration.

6.4.3 CLIN X00103

The Government will not evaluate pre-priced CLIN X00103 labor rates, labor-rate ceilings, labor categories, or task-order prices at the IDIQ proposal level.

CLINX00103 requirements will be priced and negotiated on a firm-fixed-price basis at the task-order level in accordance with the ordering procedures of the resulting contract.

6.4.4 FAR 52.217-8 Extension Evaluation

For evaluation of the potential six-month extension under FAR 52.217-8, the Government will evaluate applicable CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 unit rates at fifty percent of the proposed Option Year 4 unit rates.

Offerors shall not propose separate rates for the extension period.

1.

3.

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

1.0 Basis for Award

The Government will award a single-award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal is determined to represent the best value to the Government.

The Government will conduct a best-value tradeoff evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors and subfactors stated in this section.

The Government is not required to award to the offeror submitting the lowest-priced proposal. The Government may determine that a higher-priced proposal represents the best value when the proposal's evaluated technical merit, past performance, and associated performance risk justify payment of the price premium.

To be eligible for award, an offeror must receive:

A rating for Volume I - Qualifying Criteria; andGo A rating for Volume II, Factor I, Subfactor 1A - Key Personnel Minimums.Pass

A proposal receiving a No-Go rating under Volume I or a Fail rating under Subfactor 1Awill be ineligible for award.

2.0 Relative Importance of Evaluation Factors

The Government will evaluate proposals using the following factors:

Factor Evaluation Factor Relative Importance

Volume I Qualifying Criteria Pass / Fail

Volume II Factor I - Technical More important than Factor II

Volume III Factor II - Past Performance Less important than Factor I

Volume IV Factor III - Price Factors I and II, when combined, are significantly more important than Price

WithinFactor I - Technical:

Subfactor 1A - Key Personnel Minimums is a Pass/Fail gate;

Subfactor 1B - Corporate Experience and Subfactor 1C - Turnkey Operational Execution are of equal importance; and Subfactor 1B and Subfactor 1C will be evaluated only for offerors receiving a Pass rating under Subfactor 1A.

3.0 Volume I - Qualifying Criteria Evaluation

Volume I will be evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis.

The Government will evaluate whether the offeror submitted all required qualifying information and whether the submission demonstrates compliance with the applicable Volume I requirements.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

1.

2.

3.

3.1 Go Rating

A proposal will receive a Go rating when the offeror submits all four required proposal volumes as separate and materially complete volumes and satisfies each of the qualifying criteria below:

Submits Volume I - Qualifying Criteria, Volume II - Factor I: Technical, Volume III - Factor II: Past Performance, and Volume IV - Factor III: Price, in the required format and with the required content;

Provides complete administrative and contact information;

Agrees to all solicitation terms and conditions without exception;

Provides completed representations, certifications, and required fill-in provisions;

Demonstrates compliance with applicable Supplier Performance Risk System and NIST SP 800-171 assessment requirements;

Submits a CUI Safeguarding Plan that addresses the required safeguarding, access-control, transmission, incident-reporting, retention, sanitization, and disposition elements;

Submits a completed SF 1449 and all required amendment acknowledgments; and Submits the required OCI Disclosure Form documentation and, when applicable, sufficient OCI mitigation information for Government review.

3.2 No-Go Rating

A proposal will receive a No-Go rating when the offeror fails to submit a required Volume I item or when the submission materially fails to demonstrate compliance with the applicable qualifying requirement.

The Government's assessment of a disclosed actual or potential organizational conflict of interest remains subject to applicable law, regulation, and Government review.

Submission of an OCI Disclosure Form or mitigation plan does not, by itself, establish that an OCI is acceptable or capable of mitigation.

4.0 Volume II - Factor I: Technical Evaluation

The Government will evaluate the quality of the offeror's technical solution and the performance risk associated with the proposed approach.

4.1 Subfactor 1A - Key Personnel Minimums

Subfactor1A will be evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis.

The Government will evaluate the six required resumes to determine whether each proposed individual meets the applicable minimum qualification requirements in PWS Table 1.

The evaluated key-personnel positions are:

Program Lead;

Primary Instructor LOE 2, medic;

Primary Lane Cadre PA/MD;

Exercise Manager;

Subject Matter Expert, Ultrasound; and Subject Matter Expert, Airway/Ventilator Support.

To receive Pass rating under Subfactor 1A, the offeror shall submit a resume for each required position, and each resume shall clearly demonstrate compliance with the applicable PWS minimum qualification requirements.

Primary Instructor LOE 1, non-medic, and Assistant Lane Cadre 18D/SOIDC/SOCM are required PFC execution personnel but are not proposal-evaluated key-personnel positions. The contractor remains responsible for providing qualified personnel for those positions in accordance with the PWS.

4.2 Subfactor 1B - Corporate Experience

The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror's proposed performance team, including the prime contractor and proposed teaming partners or subcontractors performing meaningful portions of the resulting contract, demonstrates recent and relevant experience executing turnkey Special Operations Forces medical training efforts of similar size, scope, and complexity to this requirement.

The Government may consider experience demonstrated across multiple prior efforts and across multiple members of the proposed performance team. The Government will not require one prior effort or one entity to demonstrate every capability required by the PWS.

The Government will evaluate:

Recency of the cited experience;

Relevance of the cited experience to the PWS requirements;

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Scope, magnitude, complexity, and similarity of the cited effort;

Demonstrated experience with medically relevant and operationally realistic training;

Demonstrated experience with PFC training, austere medical training, scenario-based training, lane-based exercises, medical simulation, role-player support, moulage, facilities, logistics, clinical rotations, and other relevant capabilities;

The degree to which the cited entity performed the work being relied upon; and For proposed teaming partners and subcontractors, the extent to which the entity's proposed role under the resulting contract is meaningful and related to the experience cited.

4.3 Subfactor 1C - Turnkey Operational Execution

The Government will evaluate the feasibility, realism, completeness, and performance risk of the offeror's proposed approach to executing the PWS requirements.

The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed approach for:

Delivering CLIN X00101, CLIN X00102, and CLIN X00103 requirements, as applicable;

Providing and managing required training facilities, training areas, equipment, supplies, simulation resources, vehicles, and other contractor-provided resources;

Providing qualified personnel, instructors, SMEs, lane cadre, Exercise Managers, role players, moulage support, logistics personnel, and other required personnel;

Providing lodging, meals, transportation, hygiene support, and other student-support services, as applicable by CLIN;

Safeguarding CUI, student performance evaluations, scenario injects, and other applicable Government-provided or contractor-generated information;

Supporting the PFC training capacity tiers of up to eight, up to sixteen, and up to twenty-four students;

Providing optional cadaveric or real-tissue training support, when ordered;

Delivering the CLIN X00102 contractor-operated course model and MARSOC student-seat allocation requirements;

Providing a feasible and complete CLIN X00102 course schedule, including distance learning, resident training, Phase I through Phase III sequencing, clinical rotations, practical exercises, assessments, certification-preparation activities, the five-day refresher option, and estimated total course duration;

Providing a feasible CLIN X00102 culmination exercise facility and training-area approach, including scenario support, role-player support, vehicles, medical simulation, communications, telemedicine, safety, and access-control measures; and Planning, pricing, and executing CLIN X00103 Custom Medical Training requirements through firm-fixed-price task orders.

4.4 Technical Adjectival Ratings

The Government will assign an adjectival rating to Factor I based on the Government's evaluation of Subfactors 1B and 1C.

Rating Definition

Outstand ing

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains multiple strengths and presents a very low risk of unsuccessful performance.

Good Proposal demonstrates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains at least one strength and presents a low risk of unsuccessful performance.

Accepta ble

Proposal demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal meets requirements and presents no worse than a moderate risk of unsuccessful performance.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach or understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains one or more weaknesses that create a moderate to high risk of unsuccessful performance.

Unaccep table Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

For purposes of this evaluation:

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

A is an aspect of the proposal that increases the likelihood of successful contract performance or exceeds a requirement in a manner advantageous to strength the Government.

A is a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.weakness A is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.significant weakness A is a material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of deficiency unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

5.0 Volume III - Factor II: Past Performance Evaluation

The Government will evaluate the offeror's recent and relevant past performance to assess the Government's confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

The Government may consider past-performance information submitted by the offeror and information obtained from other sources, including Government databases, customer references, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System records, questionnaires, and other credible sources.

The Government may consider the past performance of the prime contractor and proposed teaming partners or subcontractors when the offeror demonstrates that the entity will perform a meaningful role related to the cited experience under the resulting contract.

The Government will evaluate:

Recency;

Relevance;

Quality of performance;

Scope, magnitude, and complexity;

Performance outcomes;

Record of meeting schedule, staffing, quality, safety, logistics, and customer-support requirements; and The degree to which the referenced entity's performance is relevant to its proposed role under the resulting contract.

An offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available, will receive a Neutral Confidence rating. A Neutral Confidence rating is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

5.1 Past Performance Confidence Ratings

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent and relevant performance record is available, or the offeror's past performance history is too limited for the Government to assign a confidence rating.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

3.

4.

5.

6.0 Volume IV - Factor III: Price Evaluation

6.1 Price Evaluation Approach

The Government will evaluate proposal-level CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 prices on a unit-rate basis.

There is no mathematically extended Total Evaluated Price for this requirement. The Government will not apply estimated annual quantities to extend or compare proposed unit rates.

The Government will evaluate proposed CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 prices for completeness, reasonableness, and balance.

The Government may use price-analysis techniques, including comparison with competing proposals, historical prices, market research, and the Independent Government Cost Estimate.

The Government will not perform a cost-realism analysis.

6.2 Price Completeness

The Government will verify that the offeror has:

Proposed binding firm-fixed-price unit rates for each CLIN X00101 PFC course-iteration capacity tier:

a. Up to eight students;

b. Up to sixteen students; and

c. Up to twenty-four students;

Proposed binding firm-fixed-price unit rates for each corresponding optional CLIN X00101 Cadaveric or Real-Tissue Training Add-On capacity tier:

a. Up to eight students;

b. Up to sixteen students; and

c. Up to twenty-four students;

Proposed a binding firm-fixed-price unit rate for one CLIN X00102 MARSOC student-seat allocation of up to five students in one contractor-operated course iteration;

Proposed required CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 unit rates for the base period and all option periods; and Left CLIN X00103 pricing cells blank, marked as "Unpriced," or otherwise completed as directed by the Government-provided pricing template.

The Government will not require or evaluate pre-priced CLIN X00103 labor rates, labor-rate ceilings, labor categories, labor-category rates, or task-order prices at the IDIQ proposal level.

6.3 Price Reasonableness

The Government will evaluate the proposed CLIN X00101 PFC capacity-tier rates, corresponding optional cadaveric or real-tissue training add-on rates, and CLINX00102 MARSOC student-seat allocation rate for price reasonableness.

The Government may compare proposed prices with competing proposals, historical prices, market research, the Independent Government Cost Estimate, and other relevant pricing information.

6.4 Price Balance

The Government will evaluate whether proposed CLIN X00101 and CLIN X00102 unit rates are reasonably balanced among the base period and option periods and among the applicable PFC capacity tiers and cadaveric or real-tissue training add-on tiers.

The Government may consider whether any proposed unit price is materially overstated or understated in a manner that creates an unacceptable risk to the Government.

6.5 CLIN X00103 Custom Medical Training

The Government will not evaluate pre-priced CLIN X00103 labor rates, labor-rate ceilings, labor categories, labor-category rates, or task-order prices at the IDIQ proposal level.

CLINX00103 requirements will be priced and negotiated on a firm-fixed-price basis at the task-order level in accordance with the ordering procedures of the resulting contract.

6.6 FAR52.217-8 Extension Evaluation

For evaluation of the potential six-month extension under FAR 52.217-8, the Government will evaluate…