TE_6_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 244 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ARSOF Training Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H92239-19-R-0002
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details regarding a federal contract opportunity for Army Special Operations Forces training support services. The past performance questionnaire is a template to be completed by a government customer evaluating a contractor's past performance on a prior contract. It requests information about the contract and the evaluator, and contains questions about the contractor's program management, technical performance, and employee retention, to which the evaluator will respond using a defined performance rating scale. The federal contract opportunity notice indicates the United States Army Special Operations Command is seeking proposals for ARSOF training support services for an 11-month base period and four one-year option periods. Services include exercise management, role players, and subject matter expertise to support training for 1st Special Warfare Training Group (Airborne). The NAICS code is 611519 with a $15 million small business size standard. The opportunity is 100% set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Proposals are due in early March 2019 and must be submitted via the Federal Business Opportunities website. An industry day will be held in March 2019 for interested parties with valid security clearances.
TE 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| H92239-19-R-0002-0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_Additional_Govt_Response_to_Industry_Questions.pdf | ||
| Amendment_4_-_H92239-19-R-0002-0004.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Updated_Pricing_Workbook.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Amendment_3_-_H92239-19-R-0002-0003.pdf | ||
| Notice_and_Order.pdf | ||
| Amendment_2_-_H92239-19-R-0002-0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1_-_H92239-19-R-0002-0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_Govt_Responses_to_Industry_Questions.pdf | ||
| Technical_Exhibit_5_-_DD254.pdf | ||
| Technical_Exhibit_9_-_Pricing_Worksheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2_-_Industry_Day_Slides.pdf | ||
| TE_4_-_Tentative_Training_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP_-_H92239-19-R-0002.pdf | ||
| TE_4_-_Tentative_Training_Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_RFP.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ARSOF TRAINING SUPPORT SERVICES
H92239-19-R-0002
NOTICE: ONCE COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE
RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
A. Contractor's Name:
i. Are you proposing as a prime under H92239-19-R-0002? Yes No , if no, who are you partnering with?_
B. Contract number for Past Performance Ref:
C. Contractor's Role in the contract identified above: Prime: Yes No
Subcontractor to Prime? If Yes, who?
D. Cage Code:
E. Contract type:
F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No G. Period of performance:
H. Initial contract cost: $_ I. Current/final contract cost: $ J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
K. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed by the respondent)
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title/role:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
(to be completed by the offeror)
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
Program Management E V S M U N/A
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program, and host multiple training events and exercises)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements and regulations
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support
Technical Performance E V S M U N/A
Perform to standards of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
Perform to standards of implementing current standard practices and specifications
Understands the technical knowledge of ARSOF training requirements
Employee Retention/Attraction E V S M U N/A
Ability to hire/apply a highly qualified workforce
Ability to retain a qualified workforce
Maintain qualifications, certifications and clearances on all Contractor personnel
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated a M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes No
Default Convenience Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Yes or No (Circle One)
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance in a separate document.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO, HQ UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND, DCSC, BLDG E2929 DESERT STORM DRIVE, FORT BRAGG, NC 28310, ATTN: CARRIE NELSON, EMAIL: carrie.nelson@socom.mil and CC gail.williams@socom.mil mailto:carrie.nelson@socom.mil mailto:jennifer.payne@socom.mil
| TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 6 |
| SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION |
| A. Contractor's Name: |
| B. Contract number for Past Performance Ref: |
| A. Customer or agency name: |
| A. Evaluator's name: |
| Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows: |
| 1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated a M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary). |
Evaluator’s Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .