Attachment 3 - Addendum 4.pdf

PDF 17 KB Posted

Attached to
USSOCOM - Language, Regional Expertise and Cultural Training
Solicitation number
H92222-11-R-0009
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 3 - QASP Addendum 4

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
H92222-11-R-0009-U0004.pdf PDF
Q A - 7 July 2011.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Amended Price Evaluation Table.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Amended QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Amended CLIN 0001 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H92222-11-R-0009-U0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Amended Price Evaluation Table.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - Amended CLIN 0001 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FINAL Q A List 01 Jul 2011.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - CDRLs.pdf PDF
Sample Section B.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Amended QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Amended Sample Tasks.pdf PDF
Q A List - 27 June.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - LREC Sample Class Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
H92222-11-R-0009-U0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Amended CLIN 0001 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - Amended Sample Tasks.pdf PDF
FINAL H92222-11-R-0009-U0001.pdf PDF
QA list —
Attachment 7 - Amended Price Evaluation Table.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Amended Addendum 3.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Amended QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - CLIN 0001 Pricing Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7 - Price Evaluation Table.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - CDRLs.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Past Performace Info.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Addendum 5.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - DD254.pdf PDF
H92222-11-R-0009.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Addendum 1b.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - QASP.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Addendum 2.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 6 - Proposal Tasks.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Addendum 3.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Addendum 1a.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 36

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE PLAN ADDENDUM 4 – SURVEILLANCE GUIDE

QUALITY OF COMPLETED WORK

1. Purpose: To provide surveillance of Contract Line Numbers (CLIN). To ensure instruction meets ILR standards identified in the task order.

2. Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) - The AQL will be 80% of students at course completion attaining course ILR standard.

3. Sample Size. 100% of students completing courses.

4. Sampling Procedure. The COR or Technical Inspector will review the DLAB and DLPT scores for each course of instruction completed. The COR will record the number of courses inspected and the number of students found below course standard. The COR will record these inspections and will summarize the results on a monthly basis or as required.

5. Inspection Procedure. Quality of work is satisfactory and no score deduction will be taken when the AQL is met. Quality of work is unsatisfactory when (1) course’s average DLPT is below the ILR standard set for the course.

6. Performance Criteria. Quality of work is satisfactory and no deduction will be taken if the AQL is met.

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST

ITEM SURVEILLED Points Awarded

ACCURATE INVOICES SUBMITTED ____________

PROVIDES QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES ____________

PROFESSIONAL ATTITUDE/ PRACTICE ____________

MANAGE AND ENFORCE CONTRACT PROVISIONS ____________

TOTAL ____________

Points Outstanding - Exceeds all contract requirements 10 Excellent - Exceeds requirements in some areas 8 Satisfactory - Fully meets contract requirements 6 Marginal - Meets some contract requirements but needs improvement 4 Unacceptable - Contractor fails to meet contract requirements 2

Note: Any area not meeting or exceeding contract requirements must be documented.

PERFORMANCE PLAN ADDENDUM 4 – SURVEILLANCE GUIDE - Continued

INSTRUCTOR SUPERVISION

1. Purpose. To ensure adequate supervision of Instructors.

2. Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) - The AQL of 80% of inspected areas or less are found to meet the standard for quality of required service. Quality of work will be judged on attributes. An attribute is a characteristic of work which is required by the specifications.

3. Lot Size. All instructors who are assigned.

4. Sample Size. Random Sampling

5. Sampling Procedure. Observation of the instructor supervisors.

6. Inspection Procedure. Checklist.

INSTRUCTOR SUPERVISOR CHECK LIST

ITEM SURVEILLED YES NO

DAILY ATTENDANCE REPORT ( 6 ) ( 2 )

MONITOR TRAINING SCHEDULE FOR COMPLIANCE ( 6 ) ( 2 )

MONITOR COURSE MATERIALS UTILIZATION ( 6 ) ( 2 )

FOR COMPLIANCE

MONITOR INSTRUCTOR WORK SCHEDULE ( 6 ) ( 2 )

PROVIDE TIMELY INFORMATION OF ANY ( 6 ) ( 2 )

ISSUES, PROBLEMS RELATED TO OR

IMPACTING TRAINING

PERFORM DUTIES USING PROFESSIONAL ( 6 ) ( 2 )

ATTITUDE

ENSUSRES CONTRACT PERFORMANCE IN ( 6 ) ( 2 )

COMPLIANCE WITH TERMS AND CONDITIONS

ENSURES ACCURACY OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED ( 6 ) ( 2 )

TOTAL ____________

Performance Criteria. Quality of work is satisfactory no score deduction will be taken. For each instructor who does not meet the training objectives a score deduction will be made for the Government training time.

Note: Any area not meeting or exceeding contract requirements must be documented.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .