SECTION_J.8,_ATT._(8)_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM_-_Amd_04_-_OASIS_SB_8(a)_SubPool.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OASIS SB 8(a) SubPool On-Ramping
- Solicitation number
- GSOOQ-13-DR-0002-8(a)
About this file
This document contains a past performance rating form and information on a federal contract opportunity solicitation. The solicitation is for the OASIS Small Business 8(a) SubPool On-Ramping to conduct open season competition for OASIS SB 8(a) SubPools 1, 2, 3, 4, 5B and 6. The General Services Administration intends to make multiple awards from 74 to 158 total contracts across the six SubPools. Services will cover a full range of integrated professional services including program management, engineering, scientific, logistics, and financial disciplines. The period of performance is from date of award through December 19, 2024, with task order periods up to 5 years post-OASIS term. The primary NAICS codes listed cover scientific research and development services, facilities support services, and other professional services. The final solicitation will be available on February 8, 2019 on FBO, with proposal due dates to be determined.
SECTION J.8, ATT. (8) PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM - Amd 04 - OASIS SB 8(a) SubPool
View the file
Other files
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION
8(a) SubPool On-Ramping RFP SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002-8(a) Amendment 04
SECTION J.8, ATTACHMENT (8)
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
INSTRUCTIONS
If applicable in accordance with Section L.5.4. of the solicitation, the Offeror must provide this Past Performance Rating Form to the Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative or Program Manager of the awarding agency responsible for the project. No other format is allowable. The awarding agency must provide the form back to the Offeror in .pdf format for the Offeror to be able to fill out their Self Scoring Worksheet and to submit the form with their proposal. The awarding agency may at their discretion provide the OASIS Program Management Office a copy by e-mailing it to OASISSB@gsa.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
| CONTRACTOR NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PROJECT TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS |
| Click here to enter text. |
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
| NAME: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| TITLE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| AGENCY or CUSTOMER: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| PHONE: |
| Click here to enter text. |
| Click here to enter text. |
For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
| RATING |
| Adjectival Rating |
| Definition |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .