SECTION_J.5,_ATT._(5)_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET_(SAMPLE_ONLY)_-_OASIS_SB_8(a)_SubPool.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OASIS SB 8(a) SubPool On-Ramping
- Solicitation number
- GSOOQ-13-DR-0002-8(a)
About this file
This document contains a self-scoring worksheet sample and related federal contract opportunity notice. The self-scoring worksheet appears to be a template for offerors to evaluate their own proposals for an OASIS SB 8(a) subpool on-ramping solicitation. It includes criteria across primary and secondary experience, past performance, and systems/certifications.
The federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for OASIS SB 8(a) subpool 1, 2, 3, 4, 5B and 6. The General Services Administration seeks to award multiple IDIQ contracts for integrated professional services across areas like communication, defense, and transportation. The estimated period of performance is from 2019 to 2024. Offerors must be SAM registered and the solicitation involves 8(a) set asides. Anticipated awards by subpool range from 8 to 30 contracts. The final solicitation will be available in February 2019 on FBO, covering services under NAICS codes 541330, 541219, 541715, and associated size standards.
SECTION J.5, ATT. (5) SELF SCORING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE ONLY) - OASIS SB 8(a) SubPool
View the file
Other files
Show all 50
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SELF-SCORING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE)
| OASIS SMALL BUSINESS SOLICITATION |
| 8(a) SubPool On-Ramping RFP |
| SOLICITATION NO. GS00Q-13-DR-0002-8(a) |
| SECTION J.5, ATTACHMENT (5) |
SELF SCORING WORKSHEET (SAMPLE ONLY)
| OFFEROR NAME: ACME CORPORATION | |||||
| Section | Scored Evaluation Criteria | Point Value | Enter YES or NO for each question as applicable | Score | These notes are for sample purposes only. The Offeror must not add notes to their Section J.5.1. Att. (5A) |
| L.5.3. | VOLUME 3 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE | ||||
| L.5.3.2.1. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Project under an OASIS SB NAICS or PSC Code | ||||
| Is EACH Project reported under any NAICS code or PSC Code identified in Section L.5.3.2.1? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 150 | YES | 150 | Project 1 was reported under an OASIS SB NAICS Code | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 150 | YES | 150 | Project 2 was reported under an OASIS SB PSC Code | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 150 | YES | 150 | Project 3 was reported under an OASIS SB NAICS Code | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 150 | NO | 0 | Project 4 was not reported under an OASIS SB NAICS/PSC Code | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 150 | NO | 0 | Project 5 was not reported under an OASIS SB NAICS/PSC Code | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.1. ONLY: | 450 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.2. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Project Value | ||||
| Is EACH Project $750K OR MORE on an annual basis but, LESS THAN $2M on an annual basis, including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 25 | YES | 25 | Project 1 was valued at $750K/yr. | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 25 | NO | 0 | Project 2 was valued at $3M/yr. | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 25 | NO | 0 | Project 3 was valued at $4M/yr. | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 25 | NO | 0 | Project 4 was valued at $5M/yr. | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 25 | NO | 0 | Project 5 was valued at $6M/yr. | |
| Is EACH Project $2M OR MORE on an annual basis but, LESS THAN $4M on an annual basis, including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 1 was valued at $750K/yr. | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 2 was valued at $3M/yr. | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 3 was valued at $4M/yr. | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 4 was valued at $5M/yr. | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 5 was valued at $6M/yr. | |
| Is EACH Project $4M OR MORE on an annual basis but, LESS THAN $6M on an annual basis, including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 1 was valued at $750K/yr. | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 2 was valued at $3M/yr. | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 75 | YES | 75 | Project 3 was valued at $4M/yr. | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 75 | YES | 75 | Project 4 was valued at $5M/yr. | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 5 was valued at $6M/yr. | |
| Is EACH Project $6M OR MORE on an annual basis, including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 1 was valued at $750K/yr. | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 2 was valued at $3M/yr. | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 3 was valued at $4M/yr. | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 4 was valued at $5M/yr. | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 was valued at $6M/yr. | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.2. ONLY: | 325 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.3. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with Performance/Integration of Additional Core Disciplines | ||||
| Does EACH Project Integrate AT LEAST 4 out of 6 Core Disciplines BUT NO MORE THAN 4 out of 6 Core Disciplines? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 1 integrated 3 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 2 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 3 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 4 integrated 5 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 5 integrated 6 Core Disciplines | |
| Does EACH Project Integrate AT LEAST 5 out of 6 Core Disciplines BUT NO MORE THAN 5 out of 6 Core Disciplines? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 1 integrated 3 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 2 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 3 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 75 | YES | 75 | Project 4 integrated 5 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 75 | NO | 0 | Project 5 integrated 6 Core Disciplines | |
| Does EACH Project Integrate ALL 6 out of 6 Core Disciplines? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 1 integrated 3 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 2 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 3 integrated 4 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 4 integrated 5 Core Disciplines | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 integrated 6 Core Disciplines | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.3. ONLY: | 275 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.4. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with Multiple Locations | ||||
| Does EACH Project have performance in AT LEAST 2 but NO MORE THAN 4 different locations? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 1 was performed in one location | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 2 was performed in one location | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 3 was performed in one location | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 4 was performed in three locations | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 5 was performed in five locations | |
| Does EACH Project have performance in 5 OR MORE different locations? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 1 was performed in one location | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 2 was performed in one location | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 3 was performed in one location | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 4 was performed in three locations | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 was performed in five locations | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.4. ONLY: | 150 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.5. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with Subcontracting/Teaming | ||||
| Does EACH Project have Subcontracting/Teaming with AT LEAST 3 separate subcontractors? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 1 included no subcontracting | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 2 included one subcontractor | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 100 | NO | 0 | Project 3 included no subcontracting | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 4 included three subcontractors | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 included four subcontractors | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.5. ONLY: | 200 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.6. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with Ancillary Support Services and Products | ||||
| Does EACH Project have Ancillary Support SERVICES? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 1 included Ancillary Support Services | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 2 included Ancillary Support Services | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 3 included no Ancillary Support Services | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 4 included no Ancillary Support Services | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 5 included Ancillary Support Services | |
| Does EACH Project have Ancillary Support PRODUCTS? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 1 included Ancillary Support Products | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 2 included Ancillary Support Products | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 3 included no Ancillary Support Products | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 50 | NO | 0 | Project 4 included no Ancillary Support Products | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 50 | YES | 50 | Project 5 included Ancillary Support Products | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.6. ONLY: | 300 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.7. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with Cost-Reimbursement (any type) | ||||
| Are any projects PREDOMINATELY Cost-Reimbursement? SCORING CREDIT IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO PROJECTS ONLY. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 was the ony project that was predominately cost-remiburseable. | |
| Project N/A | 100 | NO | 0 | N/A | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.7. ONLY: | 100 | ||||
| L.5.3.2.8. | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with OCONUS Locations | ||||
| Do any projects involve work in an OCONUS Location? SCORING CREDIT IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF TWO PROJECTS ONLY. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 100 | YES | 100 | Project 5 was the ony project that included OCONUS work | |
| Project N/A | 100 | NO | 0 | N/A | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.2.8. ONLY: | 100 | ||||
| L.5.3.3.1. | Relevant Experience (Secondary) Projects with Mission Spaces | ||||
| Has the Offeror been awarded projects in AT LEAST 2 different Mission Spaces but, NO MORE THAN 2 different Mission Spaces? Type the word Yes or No in Column D | 50 | NO | 0 | The Offeror provided support to 4 different Mission Spaces | |
| Has the Offeror been awarded projects in AT LEAST 3 different Mission Spaces but, NO MORE THAN 3 different Mission Spaces? Type the word Yes or No in Column D | 100 | NO | 0 | ||
| Has the Offeror been awarded projects in AT LEAST 4 different Mission Spaces but, NO MORE THAN 4 different Mission Spaces? Type the word Yes or No in Column D. | 150 | YES | 150 | ||
| Has the Offeror been awarded projects in AT LEAST 5 different Mission Spaces? Type the word Yes or No in Column D. | 200 | NO | 0 | ||
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.3.1. ONLY: | 150 | ||||
| L.5.3.3.2. | Relevant Experience (Secondary) Projects with Multiple Award Contracts/BPAs and Task Orders | ||||
| Has the Offeror has been awarded AT LEAST 2 Multiple Award Contracts but, NO MORE THAN 5 Multiple Award Contracts, with AT LEAST 4 total Task Order Awards combined? Additionally, have AT LEAST 2 Task Orders been awarded under EACH of the Multiple Award Contracts? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | 50 | NO | 0 | The Offeror had been awarded 6 MACS with 28 Task Orders. All MACs had at least two Task Orders each | |
| Has the Offeror has been awarded AT LEAST 5 Multiple Award Contracts but, NO MORE THAN 10 Multiple Award Contracts, with AT LEAST 10 total Task Order Awards combined? Additionally, have AT LEAST 2 Task Orders been awarded under EACH of the Multiple Award Contracts? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | 100 | YES | 100 | ||
| Has the Offeror been awarded AT LEAST 10 Multiple Award Contracts with AT LEAST 20 total Task Order Awards combined? Additionally, have AT LEAST 2 Task Orders must have been awarded under EACH of the Multiple Award Contracts? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | 150 | NO | 0 | ||
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.3.3.2. ONLY: | 100 | ||||
| L.5.4. | VOLUME 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE | ||||
| L.5.4.1. through L.5.4.3 | Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects (Past Performance) | ||||
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 3.50 and 3.74? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 350 | NO | 0 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 350 | NO | 0 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 350 | NO | 0 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 350 | NO | 0 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 350 | NO | 0 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 3.75 and 3.99? Type the word "Yes" or "No" in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 450 | YES | 450 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 450 | NO | 0 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 450 | NO | 0 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 450 | NO | 0 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 450 | NO | 0 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.00 and 4.24? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 550 | NO | 0 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 550 | YES | 550 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 550 | NO | 0 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 550 | NO | 0 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 550 | NO | 0 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.25 and 4.49? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 600 | NO | 0 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 600 | NO | 0 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 600 | YES | 600 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 600 | NO | 0 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 600 | NO | 0 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.50 and 4.74? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 700 | NO | 0 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 700 | NO | 0 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 700 | NO | 0 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 700 | YES | 700 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 700 | NO | 0 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.75 and 5.00? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | |||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 800 | NO | 0 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 3.81 | |
| Project 2: Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 800 | NO | 0 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.16 | |
| Project 3: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 800 | NO | 0 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.36 | |
| Project 4: Contract No. DEFGHI-13-C-0012 | 800 | NO | 0 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 4.62 | |
| Project 5: Task Order No. QRSTUV-0012 | 800 | YES | 800 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.90 | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.5.4.1 through L.5.4.3. ONLY: | 3100 | ||||
| L.5.5. | VOLUME 5 – SYSTEMS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND CLEARANCES | ||||
| L.5.5.1. through L.5.5.10. | Systems, Certifications, and Clearances | ||||
| Does the Offeror have each of the following? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH System, Certification, or Clearance. | |||||
| Approved Purchasing System | 500 | YES | 500 | The Offeror has an Approved Purchasing System | |
| Current FPRA, FPRR, and/or Approved Billing Rates | 200 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have Current FPRA, FPRR, and/or Approved Billing Rates | |
| EVMS ANSI/EIA Standard-748 | 200 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have EVMS ANSI/EIA Standard-748 | |
| Acceptable Estimating System | 200 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have an Acceptable Estimating System | |
| CMMI Maturity Level 2 (If taking credit for Level 3 or higher, answer No to Level 2) | 100 | NO | 0 | The Offeror has CMMI Maturity Level 4 | |
| CMMI Maturity Level 3 or higher | 200 | YES | 200 | The Offeror has CMMI Maturity Level 4 | |
| ISO 9001 | 200 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have ISO 9001 | |
| IS0 17025 | 100 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have IS0 17025 | |
| ISO 14001 | 100 | YES | 100 | The Offeror has ISO 14001 | |
| AS9100 | 100 | NO | 0 | The Offeror does not have AS9100 | |
| Secret FCL (If taking credit for Top Secret, answer No to Secret) | 100 | NO | 0 | The Offeror has a Top Secret FCL | |
| Top Secret FCL | 200 | YES | 200 | The Offeror has a Top Secret FCL | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTIONS L.5.5.1. through L.5.5.10 ONLY: | 1000 | ||||
| TOTAL POINTS SCORED: | 6,250 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .