RFP Section M.doc
DOC document 56 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GS11P10MKC0004
About this file
RFP Section M
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
General Construction (GC) Services
HST Modernization, Phase 1B-Bid Package 3 and 4
Washington, DC
HARRY S TRUMAN (HST) MODERNIZATION
PHASE 1B-BID PACKAGE 3 AND 4
PART IV – THE SCHEDULE
SECTION M
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.1.
Basis for Award
M.1.1 General: This source selection procurement shall be awarded based on a tradeoff process in which the technical evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
M.1.2. The Government will consider any exception to any term or condition of the RFP that is not expressly authorized by the RFP to be a deficiency, as defined in FAR Part 15.
M.2.
Technical Evaluation Factors
M.2.1 Technical Evaluation Factors:
The following factors shall be used by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) to evaluate technical proposals. The maximum possible score is 1000 points.
| TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS |
| POINTS |
| Past Experience of Firm (30%) |
| 300 |
| Past Performance of Firm (20%) |
| 200 |
| Experience and Qualifications of Key Personnel (20%) |
| 200 |
| Management Approach and Capabilities (20%) |
| 200 |
| Apprenticeship Plan (10%) |
| 100 |
| Total |
| 1000 |
M.3.
Price Evaluation M.3.1 You must provide an offer for the Base Contract and Option 1 in order to be considered for award.
M.3.2 The government will evaluate the Offeror’s Total offer and the Forward Pricing for Modifications which will be based upon $500,000 in estimated changes and 10 calendar days of estimated delay..
M.3.3. Evaluated Total Cost Method
M.3.3.1. Total Price (RFP paragraph B.6.)
M.3.3.2 Forward Pricing for Modifications:
M.3.3.2.2 Field Office Extended Daily Rate:
________________X 10 calendar days of Estimated
Delay Daily Rate Offered
M.3.3.2.1 Overhead Rate (Home Office):
__________________ X $500,000 in
Contractor Mark-up (%) Estimated Changes
TOTAL EVALUATED OFFER:
(M.3.3.1 + M.3.3.2.1 +
M.3.3.2.2)
All quantities shown are estimates for evaluation purposes only.
Note: M.3.3.2.2. Execution of Estimated Changes in the amount specified above is not a guarantee of changes to be issued. Such changes shall be issued as necessary at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.
The Evaluated Total Cost Method (B.7) is an evaluation technique which measures the lowest total overall project cost to the government. The Evaluated Total Cost Method considers the Total Offer (B.6), Home Office Overhead Rate, and Field Office Extended Overhead..
M.3.4 Award of Option 1 will not obligate the government to exercise it.
M.4.
Contract Award
The contract shall be based on this RFP, and awarded after the Contracting Officer executes the Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer and Award), incorporating proposal attachments/documents including key personnel proposed, the subcontracting plan, the apprenticeship plan, and the price proposal. This RFP does not commit the Government to award a contract.
M.4.1 The selected firm must obtain the necessary DoS Security Clearance(s) (See Section H.7) prior to contract award. If the selected firm is unable to obtain the DoS Security Clearance the government may award the contract to another firm.
IV-M-1
GS-11P-10-MKC-0004
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .