RFP Section J Attachments 1 and 2 Performance Questionnaires.DOC

ATTACHMENT 1: FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and send by facsimile [(202) 708-4964] or electronic mail [Chrischanda.Smith@gsa.gov ]to:

Chrischanda Smith, Contract Specialist, GSA, NCR

7th and D Streets, SW; Room 2021

Washington, DC 20407

Desired Response Date:

02/16/10

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR’S FIRM for THE HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PROJECT

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE (REFERENCE)

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please circle the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor.

EX = Excellent VG = Very Good

G = Good F = Fair

I = Inadequate N/O = Not Observed

A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the Contractor’s conformance to the terms and conditions of the contract..

EX

VG

G F I N/O

Comments:

B. Overall Performance – Assess whether the Contractor was capable, efficient, and effective.

G F I

C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule.

G F I

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.

G F I

E. Cost Control – Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.

G F I

F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Contractor’s ability to employ successful and cost-effective solutions to routine matters.

G F I N/O

G. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the Contractor’s ability to employ successful and cost-effective solutions to unexpected difficulties..

G F I

H. Repeat Business -- Assess the likelihood that you would want this contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.

EX

VG

G F I N/O Comments:

I. Coordination – How well did the Contractor coordinate construction?

EX

VG

G F I N/O

Comments:

J. Cooperation – Assess whether the Offeror was reasonable and cooperative during construction.

EX

VG

G F I N/O

K. Additional Comments on Regarding Overall Strengths/Weaknesses (if any)

ATTACHMENT 2: individual PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and send by facsimile [(202) 708-4964] or electronic mail [Chrischanda.Smith@gsa.gov] to:

Chrischanda Smith, Contract Specialist, GSA, NCR

7th and D Streets, SW; Room 2021

Washington, DC 20407

Desired Response Date:

02/16/10

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

TO BE COMPLETED BY PROSPECTIVE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT OFFEROR FOR THE HARRY S TRUMAN MODERNIZATION PROJECT

5. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

6. COMPLETION DATE:

2. OWNER’S NAME AND ADDRESS

7. CONTRACT VALUE $

8. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

3. PROJECT NAME:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE (REFERENCE)

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

1. How long was this individual involved with this project?

2. What were his/her duties on this project?

3. Describe this person’s management style. For instance, are they proactive or reactive; responsive; helpful; combative; etc.

4. Describe this person’s technical knowledge of the contract requirements.

5. Describe the person’s proficiency in business controls such as contracting, operations, accounting, and quality.

6. Describe the degree of difficulty or complicated aspects of the project (i.e. secure working areas, publicity and media coverage, etc.) and the person’s ability to effectively manage these aspects.

7. Were there any notable problems with this person’s performance?

8. Describe why you would or would not like to work with this person again.