FA852316R0001_0005(8).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

JSU

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

FA8523-16-R-0001-0005

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

FD20601430523

5. PROJECT NO (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

EW/AVIONICS, AFLCMC/WNYKA

235 BYRON ST STE 19A

BLDG 301 CML PHN 478 926 7212

ROBINS AFB GA 31098-1670

BUYER: Chutney W. Guyton/WNYKA chutney.guyton@us.af.mil Phone: (478) 926- 7000 No Collect Calls

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODEFA8523

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA852316R0001

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-NOV-2015

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods. ( a ) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; ( b ) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or ( c ) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

ROUTINE

This is a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Set Aside.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY ________________________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY ____________________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

FACILITY CODE

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

X

X

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Amendment/Modification FA8523-16-R-0001-0005

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1) Incorporate Performance Work Statement (PWS) revision, dated 31 August 2016, as shown in Section J of the solicitation. This PWS revision shall supersede all other PWS versions.

2) Change CLIN X003 title as follows:

FROM: General Work Requirements TO: Maintenance Concept

3) Change CLIN X007 (Travel) to ‘To Be Determined’ as it will not be included in the evaluation of proposal costs. See Section B below.

4) Change CLIN X008 title as follows:

FROM: Information Assurance TO: Cybersecurity

5) Change CLIN X009 (Over and Above) to 'To Be Determined' as it will not be included in the evaluation of proposal costs. See Section B below.

6) Change CLIN X011 title as follows:

FROM: Block Upgrade/Tech Refresh Requirements TO: Block Cycle Upgrade/Tech Refresh Work Requirements

8) Revise Section M, Evaluation Basis for Award, as follows:

FROM: The Travel CLINs (0007, 1007, 2007, 3007, and 4007) will be excluded in the TEP.

TO: CLIN X007 (Travel) and CLIN X009 (Over and Above) will be excluded in the TEP.

9) Add Clause 52.204-2, Security Requirements, per FAR 4.404.

10) All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Amendment/Modification FA8523-16-R-0001-0005

Request for Proposal FA8523-16-R-0001-0005

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

SECTION B

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

In accordance with the OSD AT&L memorandum dated 10 November 2011, any incurred proposal preparation expenses are to be treated as indirect costs and direct charge billings against the resultant task/delivery order are unallowable.

MINIMUM/MAXIMUM VALUE: The contractor shall furnish to the Government, if and when ordered, the items of supplies or services specified in this Schedule up to and including the “Maximum”amount of $XXXXXX.XX for all orders issued hereunder. The Government shall order at least the “Minimum” amount of 2,000,000.00 in conjunction with award of the basic contract. The quantities of supplies or services specified in this Schedule are estimates only and are not purchased by this contract. Except as this contract may otherwise provide, if the Government’s requirements do not result in orders in the quantities described as “estimated” or “maximum” in the schedule, that fact shall not constitute the basis for an equitable price adjustment equitable price adjustment.

BASIC CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: Date of Award through 12 Months

Note: An option is considered to have been exercised at the time the Government deposits written notification to the Contractor via mail or other electronic means of notification.

PAA: Packaging IAW attached AFMC 158

Program Management

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 RE

Program Management Program Management IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.2 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Program Management

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Government Furnished Property

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Consumable/Expendable, Contractor Repair, and MILSTRIP Repair GFE IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.3 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Class I ODS Substance Application/Use Quantity None none Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Maintenance Concept

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 RE

Maintenance Concept Maintenance Concept IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.4 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Help Desk Support

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 Help Desk Support Help Desk Support IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.5 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Help Desk Support

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Scheduled Maintenance

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 Scheduled Maintenance Scheduled Maintenance IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.7 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Unscheduled Maintenance

Item No.

Cost Plus Fixed Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Fixed Fee Amount

Unscheduled Maintenance

12 MO

R408 Unscheduled Maintenance Unscheduled Maintenance IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.6 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Travel

Item No.

Cost Reimbursement - No Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Total Estimated Cost 1 LO To be Determined To be Determined

TRAV

TRAVEL AS APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY CONTRACTING OFFICER

TRAVEL IN SUPPORT OF CLINs 0005 and 0006. TRAVEL REIMBURSED IAW FAR 31.2 Priority: R ROUTINE

Cybersecurity

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

R408 RE

Cybersecurity Cybersecurity IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, paragraphs 6.1 thru 6.4 Priority: R ROUTINE

Cybersecurity

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Over and Above

Item No.

Cost Plus Fixed Fee Quantity U/I Estimated Cost Fixed Fee Est Total Cost 1 LO To be Determined To be Determined

R408 Over and Above Over and Above IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.6.2 Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Origin Acceptance: Origin Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of

Over and Above

IAW PWS 1 LO

DATA

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Quantity Amount 1 LO Not Separately Priced Not Separately Priced

DATA

DATA

Data IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016. See attached DD1423s.

ELIN Title: Data Acq Doc No:

A003 Status Reports DI-MGMT-80368A A004 Accident/Incident Report DI-SAFT-81563/T A006 Engineering Change Proposal DI-CMAN-80639D A007 Software Version Description DI-IPSC-81442A A009 Interface Control Document DI-CMAN-81248B A010 Parts Approval Request DI-MISC-80071E A011 Gov't Industry Data Exchange Program DI-QCIC-80125B

(GIDEP)

A012 Gov't Industry Data Exchange Program DI-QCIC-80126B

(GIDEP) Alert Response A013 Logistics Product Data DI-SESS-81757/T A017 Report, Record of Meeting Minutes DI-ADMN-81505 A018 Product Drawings/Models and DI-SESS-81000E/T

Associated Lists A019 Software Development Plan (SDP) DI-IPSC-81427A A022 Software Design Description DI-ISPC-81435A A023 Interface Design Descriptions DI-IPSC-81436A A026 Software Requirements Specifications DI-IPSC-81433A

(SRS)

A027 Interface Requirements Specification DI-IPSC-81434A

(IRS)

A030 Specification Change Notice (SCN) DI-CMAN-80643D A031 System Subsystem Design Description DI-IPSC-81432A

(SSDD)

A032 Source Data for Forecasting Dim. DI-SESS-81656

Mfg Sources & Material Shorts A033 Technical Manual Contract Reqs TM-86-01P

(TMCR)

Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Exhibit: A Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

+ IAW1423 1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

+ IAW1423 1 LO

Block Cycle Upgrade/Tech Refresh Work Requirements

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

1 LO

R408 RE

Block Cycle Upgrade/Tech Refresh Work Requirements Block Cycle Upgrade/Tech Refresh Work Requirements IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 8.1.

Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of

IAW PWS 1 LO *12 Months

Block Cycle Upgrade/Tech Refresh Work Requirements

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO

Training (1 Week Course)

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

1 LO

R408 RE

Training (1 Week Course) Training (1 Week Course) IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 9.0.

Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO

Engineering Support

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

12 MO

Engineering Support Configuration Management, Technical Data, Provisioning, and Engineering Change Proposal Engineering Support IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para 7.1.3.

Engineering Support

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

IUID Required: Yes Physical Item Markings:

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 12 MO

Repair

Item No.

Cost Plus Fixed Fee Quantity U/I Unit Price Fixed Fee Amount

1 EA

R408 Repair Repair IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, paras. 4.17.1, 4.17.2, and Appendix E of the PWS Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of

+ TBD 1 EA *12 Months

Repair

Proposed Period of Performance

+ TBD 1 EA

GFE Replenishment

Item No.

Cost Reimbursement - No Fee Quantity U/I Est Unit Cost Total Estimated Cost

1 LO

R408 GFE Replenishment IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, para. 4.3.1.

Priority: R ROUTINE

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO

Software

Item No.

Firm Fixed Price Quantity U/I Unit Price Amount

1 LO

R408 RE

Software Software IAW PWS dated 31 Aug 2016, paragraphs 10.1 thru 10.4.2.

Limitations of Liability: Other Than High Value Item

Software

Inspection: Destination Acceptance: Destination Inspection/Acceptance Report: Receiving Report Required Quality Assurance: Higher Level Contract Quality Requirements The Contractor shall comply with the standard(s) listed below. (if more than one, check the appropriate standard.)

Title Number Date Tailoring

ISO 9001-2008 2008

Class I ODS Substance Application/Use Quantity None none Place of Perf Quantity (U/I) *ARO Contract _ Req No / Pri

Required Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO *12 Months

Proposed Period of Performance

IAW PWS 1 LO

SHIP TO / PLACE OF PERFORMANCE

TYPE/CODE: + IAW1423

MARK FOR: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION NUMBER: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION PRIORITY: (See Individual Line Item)

AWARD NUMBER:

TYPE/CODE: + TBD

MARK FOR: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION NUMBER: (See Individual Line Item) REQUISITION PRIORITY: (See Individual Line Item)

AWARD NUMBER:

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

SECTION I

CONTRACT CLAUSES

52.204-2 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS (AUG 1996)

(IAW FAR 4.404(a))

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS OR RESPONDENTS

L-900. INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

A. The following instructions cover the preparation and submittal of the offeror’s proposal for this solicitation. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are cautioned that any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP may cause their proposal to be determined unacceptable and therefore not considered eligible for award. If a joint venture arrangement exists for this acquisition, the offeror shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement that is signed and dated by all joint venture members as part of the proposal submission. Proposals shall be submitted to the Government in two (2) separate volumes as set forth below:

VOLUME PAGE LIMITS NUMBER OF COPIES DESCRIPTION

I N/A 2 paper/ 1 electronic* Completed RFP and Clauses II 30 4 paper/ 1 electronic* Written Technical Proposal

*All proposal information shall be submitted in written form (2 copies) and CD-R or DVD-R (write once/read only copy) that is “closed” so thspat no further writes can be made to the media. CD-R/W or DVD-R/W media types are not acceptable. Media must be virus scanned by the offeror prior to submitting to the Government.

In addition to the page limitations set forth, proposals should comply with the following format:

(1) The sealed package used to submit the proposal package must show the time and date specified for receipt. Each volume shall be marked with the RFP number and the offeror’s name and address, and the number of the Volume, i.e. I, II, etc. Proposals shall be in the English language and all monies shall be proposed in United States dollars.

(2) Print shall be no smaller than a font size of 12 and should be on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper, excluding any charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, or spreadsheets, etc. Charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, spreadsheets, etc. shall not be greater than 11” x 17”. Each volume within the proposal shall be separately tabbed and identified. Margins shall be no smaller than 1 inch and each page within a volume shall be numbered consecutively. Elaborate formats, bindings, or color presentations are not desired or required.

(3) The page limitation for Volume II, Written Technical Proposal, is 30 pages. The page limitation includes any charts, graphs, drawings, diagrams, supporting illustrations, spreadsheets, etc., but excludes any cover page, table of contents or list of acronyms (if utilized). Offerors are cautioned that any pages that exceed the page limitations shall not be read but shall be removed and either retained in the contract file without being considered in the evaluation, or, sent back to the offeror.

(4) Page limitations may be placed on Evaluation Notices (ENs), if issued. The specified limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors or on the EN form itself.

(5) Each page containing proprietary information should be so marked.

(6) Each page should contain the following legend at the bottom of each sheet:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION--SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

(7) Submission of the initial proposal packages via electronic mail will not be accepted. Initial proposal packages shall either be mailed or hand-delivered.

Offerors are cautioned that Warner Robins Air Logistics Complex has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. Some delay should be anticipated when hand-delivering proposal packages. Offerors should allow for sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the specified office PRIOR to the time specified for receipt of proposals.

Communications:

Exchanges of source selection information between Government and offerors will be controlled by the Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist. Email may be used to transmit such information, only if the email can be sent encrypted, and must include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104” in the subject line of the email.

Otherwise, source selection information will be transmitted via direct mailing or facsimile.

In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of encrypted emails, offerors must use MS Outlook email configured to support encryption or a different email product that is S/MIME compatible and configured to support encryption. If you intend to submit your source selection information via encrypted email, you will need to contact the Buyer/Contracting Officer indicated on the face page of the solicitation prior to that first submittal in order to exchange certificates used for encryption. To ensure the process is working correctly, send a test encrypted message first (without including any source selection information).

When submitting source selection information via email, file suppression utilities, to include but not limited to zip files, will not be accepted.

B. Volume I, Completed RFP and Clauses will consist of the completed and signed RFP with a cover letter delineating any exceptions taken to the RFP terms and conditions with accompanying rationale. However, offerors are cautioned that any noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the RFP may cause their proposal to be determined unacceptable and therefore not considered eligible for award. Offerors shall ensure that all clauses and provisions that require “fill-in” information are appropriately completed, including the proposed prices associated with the contract line items in the Schedule of the RFP. All CLINs not directly designated as Not Separately Priced (NSP) or To Be Negotiated (TBN) shall be completed with a price.

The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary. Any discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306. Proposals received are subject to the requirements specified in FAR 52.215-1, unless otherwise tailored in the Addendum to the solicitation. Proposals must be received by ALFCMC/WNYKA, 235 Byron Street, Suite 19A, Robins AFB, GA Attention: Brandi Moody, by the date and time specified in Block 8 on the face page of the

RFP.

The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

2. Volume II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 30 pages.

Submit original plus three (3) copies.

1. The written technical proposal shall be clear, concise, and include all the information required by this provision in sufficient detail for effective evaluation. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their capabilities, work processes, facilities, and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s technical proposal.

2. The following information shall be provided in the technical proposal and will be evaluated to assess technical acceptability (which includes the consideration of technical risk) in accordance with Section M-900, Evaluation Basis for Award. The technical proposal addresses each of the following subfactors to describe the offeror’s proposed approach to performing the requirements set forth in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). For each subfactor, the offeror shall identify risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror’s proposal, it indicates the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach.

Subfactor One: Technical Requirements The proposal shall provide a detailed narrative and supporting documentation that illustrates the offeror's understanding of, approach to, and current and planned capability for the following:

14. How will you meet the technical requirements as defined in the following PWS paragraphs?

a) 4.2.2 Level of Repair - what steps will you take to repair Pocket-J LRUs?

b) 4.2.5 Configuration Management (CM) - how will you implement Pocket-J CM?

c) 4.13 Technical Data - how are you postured to write Technical Orders

d) 4.13 Technical Data - how are you postured to complete Engineering Drawings?

e) 4.14 Provisioning - describe how you plan to accomplish provisioning

f) 5.2 Clearances – how will you ensure personnel meet the required security clearances

Subfactor Two: Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Management The proposal shall provide a detailed narrative and supporting documentation that illustrates the offeror's understanding of, approach to, and current and planned capability for the following:

13. How will you manage the GFE as defined in the following PWS paragraphs?

a) 4.3 GFE management – what methods will you use to account for and maintain inventory stock levels?

Subfactor Three: Repair and Maintenance Requirements The proposal shall provide a detailed narrative and supporting documentation that illustrates the offeror's understanding of, approach to, and current and planned capability for the following:

How will you manage the repair and maintenance requirement in the following PWS paragraphs?

a) 4.5 Help Desk - state your plan for providing help desk services

b) 4.6 Unscheduled Maintenance - describe how you are going to meet the requirements of unscheduled maintenance for all Pocket J sites.

c) 4.7 Scheduled Maintenance - detail how you plan to accomplish scheduled maintenance

d) 4.12 Travel - describe how you plan to comply with the requirements in 4.12.

e) 4.17 Hardware, Inspections and Repair – how will you oversee your subcontractor’s performance?

Subfactor Four: Information Assurance Requirements The proposal shall provide a detailed narrative and supporting documentation that illustrates the offeror's understanding of, approach to, and current and planned capability for the following:

How will you manage Information Assurance (IA) requirement in the following PWS paragraphs?

a) 6.1 IATO/ATO - describe how you plan to obtain ATO or ATC.

b) 6.1 IATO/ATO – how do you plan to maintain IATO/ATO with Risk Management Framework (RMF)?

c) 6.2 Contractor Responsibilities – how do you plan to provide input and updates to the System Security Plan (SSP)?

d) 6.3 IA Scans – how do you plan to assist the IAM with Security Content Automation Protocol Compliance Checker (SCC) scans?

e) 6.4 Urgently Required IA Fixes - detail your plan to comply with all the requirements in paragraph 6.4 of the PWS.

Subfactor Five: Block Cycle Upgrade Requirements The proposal shall provide a detailed narrative and supporting documentation that illustrates the offeror's understanding of, approach to, and current and planned capability for the following:

How will you meet the block cycle upgrade requirement as defined in the following PWS paragraphs?

a) 8.1 Block Upgrade Requirements - describe your plan to comply with all the requirements in paragraph 8.1 of the PWS.

b) 8.1.1 Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) – how do you plan to accomplish ECPs.

c) 8.1.3 Acceptance Criteria – describe your plan to meet all the requirements in paragraph 8.1.3 of the PWS.

d) 8.1.6 Test Environment Support - describe your plan to meet all the requirements in paragraph 8.1.6 of the PWS.

e) 8.1.8 Software Maintenance and Update – how do you plan to accomplish software maintenance and updates in accordance with 8.1.8 of the PWS?

f) 8.1.9 Documentation/Trouble Reports - describe your plan to meet all the requirements in paragraph 8.1.9 of the PWS.

M-900. EVALUATION BASIS FOR AWARD

1. Basis for Contract Award A. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, 04 March 2011 and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 04 May 2011. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. A decision on the technical acceptability of each offeror’s proposal will be made. Among those offerors who are determined to be technically acceptable, award will be made to the offeror having the lowest total evaluated price. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal is technically acceptable, conforms to all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, technical requirements, and also provides the best value to the Government based on the results of the evaluation described in paragraph 2 below. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

B. The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary. Any discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.306. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer, with the concurrence of the Source Selection Authority, may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors Each offeror’s written technical proposal shall be evaluated, based on the subfactors below, to determine if the offeror provides a sound, compliant approach that meets the requirements of the PWS, and demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of those requirements and their associated risks. The technical proposal addresses each of the following subfactors in sufficient detail. For each subfactor, the offeror identifies risks, if any, associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror’s proposal, it indicates the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach.

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor 1: Technical Requirements Subfactor 2: Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Management Subfactor 3: Repair and Maintenance Requirements

Subfactor 4: Information Assurance Requirements Subfactor 5: Block Cycle Upgrade Requirements

Factor 2: Cost/Price

a. Technical Factor The technical rating reflects the evaluation of the acceptability of the offeror’s technical approach for meeting the Government’s requirement. The technical risk associated with the offeror’s proposed technical approach will also be considered as part of the technical acceptability decision. Technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weaknesses, assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach for the requirements of the solicitation may cause disruption of schedule, increased costs, degraded performance, the need for increased government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. The evaluation shall address the Government’s identification of any weakness as well as the offeror’s identified risks and proposed mitigation (if applicable) and document why that is or is not acceptable. The Government may independently identify risks not identified by the offeror and assess its impact to the successful performance of the contract. Should the Government determine that any risks identified by either the offeror or the Government poses too great a risk to the program and does not address a suitable mitigation, the Government may consider the proposal technically unacceptable. The offeror’s proposal shall be evaluated to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined in the table below. One technical rating will be assigned to each technical subfactor. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every subfactor.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Technical Requirements

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror’s ability to meet technical requirements for Pocket J.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal specifies means/ methods to meet work requirements set forth in 4.2.2, 4.2.5, 4.13, 4.14, 5.2 of PWS, with a low to moderate risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Subfactor 2: Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Management

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror’s ability to provide management of and secure storage space for GFE that will be provided under this contract.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal specifies means/ methods to meet work requirements set forth in 4.3-4.3.3 of PWS, with a low to moderate risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Subfactor 3: Repair and Maintenance Requirements

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror’s ability to repair and maintain Pocket J sites.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal specifies means/ methods to meet work requirements set forth in 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.12, and 4.17of PWS, with a low to moderate risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Subfactor 4: Information Assurance Requirements

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror’s ability to manage IA requirements for Pocket J.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal specifies means/ methods to meet work requirements set forth in 6.1-6.4 of PWS, with a low to moderate risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Subfactor 5: Block Cycle Upgrade Requirements

Description: This subfactor evaluates offeror’s ability to meet block cycle upgrade requirements to sustain Pocket J.

Measure of Merit: This requirement is met when the offeror’s proposal specifies means/ methods to meet work requirements set forth in 8.1, 8.1.1, 8.1.3, 8.1.6, 8.1.8, and 8.1.9of PWS, with a low to moderate risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

b. Cost/Price Factor. The Government will evaluate each offeror's proposed prices submitted in Volume I, Completed RFP, for reasonableness and balance as discussed in the following paragraphs (1) and (2). Offerors are reminded that in order to maintain reasonable/balanced pricing, the Government will not accept “Not Separately Priced (NSP)”, No Charge (NC), $0, etc. on any line items other than those already designated as “NSP” or “TBN” in the Schedule. Offerors are advised to review all data items and ensure that they are proposing to the specific data requirements and level of effort involved. For data items, where the quantity of (1) one lot is specified, the quantity of (1) one shall be used. The Government will calculate a Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for each offeror’s proposed prices in accordance with paragraph (iii) below.

(i) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of reasonableness. Price analysis techniques may be used to validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not obtained and/or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

(ii) Balance: Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items including the Basic and Options, is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of proposal analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether there are unbalanced separately priced line items or sub-line items. Prices submitted will be compared and evaluated to assure that a logical progression exists as related to price and quantity changes within each offeror’s response to the pricing structure in the Schedule. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(iii) Total Evaluated Price (TEP): The Government will utilize the following methodology to determine the TEP of each proposal. The TEP will be calculated for evaluation purposes. Offerors are reminded that the evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the options. The TEP will be calculated as follows:

The Government will multiply the identified quantity by the proposed unit price to obtain an extended price for each CLIN (and Sub-CLIN). The sum of all the CLINs (and Sub-CLINs) will represent the evaluated price for that contract period. The TEP will be determined by adding the price of the Basic Contract Period to the price of each Option Period.

CLIN X007 (Travel) and CLIN X009 (Over and Above) will be excluded in the

TEP.