Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_5_L-2_PPQ.pdf
PDF 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Joint Directed Energy Transition Office (DE-JTO) Professional Technical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9451-18-R-0002
About this file
This document contains a past/present performance questionnaire for federal contractors. The questionnaire requests performance ratings and commentary for a previous government contract across several factors including technical performance, program management, cost performance, and small business participation. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on a scale of blue (exceptional) to red (unsatisfactory) for questions tailored to the acquisition factors. Comments must be provided for any ratings of blue, yellow, or red. Additional narrative feedback is soliciated on willingness to use the contractor for future work. Completed questionnaires should be returned to three specified contracting personnel at the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Research Laboratory by the stated deadline.
Draft Section L Attachment 2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_AFRL_RESPONSE.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft_RFP_FA9451-18-R-0002.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_1_JTO_PTSS_PWS.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_5_JTO_PTSS_Section_L_ITO.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_2_Draft_Task_Order_0001.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_8_Cross_Reference_Matrix.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_6_JTO_PTSS_Section_M_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_3_-__Task_Order_0001_PWS.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_4_Solicitation_DD_254.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Letter_DE-JTO_PTSS.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_7_DE-JTO_PTSS_RFP_TEP_Calculation.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Atch_5_L-1_Subcontractor_Consent_Letter.pdf | ||
| Draft_RFP_Section_J_Exhibit_A_Draft_CDRLs.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:
C. Contract number:
D. Contract type:
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Period of performance:
G. Initial contract cost: $
H. Current/final contract cost: $
I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.
Technical Performance B P G Y R N
T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control
T6 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control
T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
Program Management B P G Y R N
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
Program Management B P G Y R N
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/phase-in B P G Y R N
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Employee Retention/Attraction B P G Y R N
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation B P G Y R N
S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan
S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.
Cost Performance B P G Y R N
C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes No
Default Convenience Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire via email to the following addresses:
Chris Keyes, Contracting Officer: christopher.keyes.2@us.af.mil
Rachel Lyden, Contract Specialist: rachel.lyden@us.af.mil
Britney Chavez, Contract Specialist: britney.chavez@us.af.mil mailto:christopher.keyes.2@us.af.mil mailto:rachel.lyden@us.af.mil mailto:britney.chavez@us.af.mil
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .