Attch 33 - Seed Project Building 909-Study - Cost Removed.pdf

Design Analysis Package

Expansion Study of AFRL 1590 Building 909 Kirtland AFB New Mexico September 2010

2 February 2012 1 of 31 Attachment 33

Solicitation FA9401-12-R-0002

Section 1: Executive Summary

Section 2: Existing Site and Facility Observations

Section 3: New Laboratory Expansion Concepts

Section 4: Structural Considerations

Section 5: Electrical Considerations

Section 6: Mechanical and Fire Protection Concepts

Section 7: Cost Estimates (REMOVED)

Section 8: Appendix

Questionnaire Pre-definition Meeting Minutes Meeting Minutes- user group 1 Meeting Minutes- 50% review Meeting Minutes- 95% review

2 February 2012 2 of 31

Executive Summary

Existing Conditions The proposed Laboratory addition will be an expansion of building 909A at the south east quadrant of the facility. Building 909 is 50 years old and meets NRHP requirements for Criterion A. It was one of the first Air Defense Command Centers built for early Cold War air defense.

Building 909 consists of two main structures, building 909 built in 1950 (~ 9412 sf.)

and 909A built in 1966 (~ 8323 sf.). Two additions were added to building 909A, one in 1967 (~ 1608 sf.) and one in 1970 (~ 1213 sf.).

The proposed addition of 6480 SF does not require any additional parking.

Since most of the expansion is focused on an external addition to Building 909A, a detailed analysis of the existing conditions in Building 909A was not done.

The current facility does not have an operable overhead crane, or the ability to easily add one. This constrains the users ability to move large pieces of equipment to the use of forklifts, which cannot always reach and place equipment where desired.

The proposed modification would allow consolidation of research presently conducted in rented space at Sandia National Laboratory, and ease the present crowding in the 322 hi-bay.

Current authorized personnel in the facility are at 6. The lab area could see an increase in personnel of 100% (12-15 people total) in the next 2-3 years.

New Addition Concepts Two concepts were proposed for the addition to building 909. Both were single story structures varying mainly in building height. Both concepts utilize a building foot print of 72’X100’. The first concept, Option A, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the west by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 30 feet. The second concept, Option B, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the west by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 40 feet.

Based on the 50% review it was decided to pursue with option B. It was also decided that the use of a prefab metal building did not fit with the Architectural Compatibility Plan (ACP). Option B was also modified to decrease in size to approximately 6,480 square feet with an overall building size of 72’X90’. Due to the existing tension only bracing, current code requirements for additions and UFC criteria for upgrading or retrofitting existing buildings it is our recommendation that the new addition be structurally separated from building 909.

The final concept for the exterior building material is integrally colored, split face CMU blocks to meet the ACP guidelines.

The building will also have a 10 ton bridge crane that spans the 70foot dimension of the building and traverses the 90 foot long dimension. There will be a 2 foot deep containment trench around the interior of the building capable of holding 15,000 gallons and an additional Anechoic Chamber pit approximately 30’X30’X6 feet deep.

2 February 2012 3 of 31

Site/Civil Observation

Site/Civil Observations:

Existing Site The proposed Laboratory addition will be an expansion of building 909A at the south east quadrant of the facility. Major roads abutting the site are Aberdeen Drive on the north, Truman Avenue on the west and San Mateo Blvd on the east.

Building 909 and 909A are fenced-in facilities. Access for pedestrian and vehicular service entry is from the south of the facility.

Drainage The existing topography could be described, flat to gentle sloping and the landscaping as sparse.

The land generally slopes to the south into drainage features and eventually into storm water ponds.

Site drainage appeared to have been handled almost exclusively by grading to utilize natural topography for surface runoff towards lower unpaved areas.

Building roof collected storm water is almost exclusively handled via a sheet metal gutter and downspout system which outlets at the base of the buildings with a drain boot. Many downspout outlet locations in unpaved areas do not have splash blocks which leads to surface erosion and possible moisture problems in the building exterior wall due to ground saturation and surface splash-back. Some other locations have splash blocks with sediment accumulation which decreases the splash block effectiveness.

Parking The majority of parking in the study area appeared to be asphalt-gravel mix on a compacted sub-base and was in overall good condition. The surface is relatively flat.

Current staff and visitor vehicle parking is primarily concentrated on the west side of

Building 909. Overall there are approximately 87 staff parking spaces and is adequate given the occupied square footage for Building 909 and 909A at a ratio for general business B1 occupancy, parking of 1 space per each 300 SF. The proposed addition of 6480 SF does not require any additional parking.

Parking pavement striping and signage was somewhat lacking in areas and it appeared that in some cases even more parking spaces and vehicular space efficiency could be achieved with a full traffic parking study and revised striping and signage if additional parking spaces are required in the future.

ADA parking is sufficient with five handicap parking spaces.

Additionally there are 7 two wheeler parking.

Utilities Electrical Transformer is located on the east side of Building 909A.

Natural gas is available on the South and North side of Building 909A.

Water connection is from the North side.

Refer Existing Site Analysis Illustration (location, parking and utility connections)

2 February 2012 4 of 31

HANDICAPPED PARKING

AND LOADING ZONES

-all parking are limited to outside the secure fenced area

FIRE ACCESS ROAD

- may need to be relocated

TRANSFORMER LOCATION

-existing and proposed

PROPOSED FIRE ACCESS

ATURAL GAS CONNECTION

909 ROPOSED ADDITION

- 90' x 72' split-face integral colored CMU building expansion to meet ACP guidelines

TEMPORARY STRUCTURES

-trailer location can be relocated

TOTAL PARKING COUNT= 87

- no new parking is required for this expansion

SITE DRAINAGE

- if this project moves into the construction phase, it will be subject to section 438 of the ESA and must comply with KAFB Municipal Seperate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit conditions.

Study Expansion of AFRL 1590 Lab, Bldg 909 Kirtland, AFB, NM

EXISTING SITE ANAYLSIS- LOCATION, PARKING AND UTILITIY CONNECTIONS

100% final study submittal -=c::r- SITE PLAN

N NOT TO SCALE

2 February 2012 5 of 31

Section 2: Existing Site and Facility Observations

Existing Facility Observation

Architecture/Interior Observations:

The existing Laboratory, offices and support functions occupy approximately 20,000

SF.

Since most of the expansion is focused on an external addition to Building 909A, a detailed analysis of the existing conditions in Building 909A was not done.

Building 909 consists of two main structures, building 909 built in 1950 (~ 9412 sf.)

and 909A built in 1966 (~ 8323 sf.). Two additions were added to building 909A, one in 1967 (~ 1608 sf.) and one in 1970 (~ 1213 sf.). All of the structures are connected with no apparent separation joints. The original 909 building is a two story cast in place (CIP) concrete structure with CMU shear walls. The balance of the 909 buildings is high-bay single story structures. Gravity framing consists of steel columns supporting steel beams and open web steel joists. Lateral resistance is provided by tension only (rod) “X” bracing. Roof diaphragm is bare metal deck with rigid insulation.

Existing facility deficiencies

The current facility does not have an operable overhead crane, or the ability to easily add one. This constrains the users ability to move large pieces of equipment to the use of forklifts, which cannot always reach and place equipment where desired.

The proposed modification would allow consolidation of research presently conducted in rented space at Sandia National Laboratory, and ease the present crowding in the 322 hi-bay.

Building Code compliance:

The Existing Laboratory was built in the late 50’s. Many of the Building Codes have changed and the facility may not be in compliance with the updated building codes.

As of July 1, 2008, the state of New Mexico is under the following Building Codes.

a) 2009 New Mexico Commercial Building Code (NMCBC)

b) 2009 New Mexico Existing Building Code (NMEBC)

c) 2009 New Mexico Mechanical Code (NMMC)

d) 2009 New Mexico Plumbing Code (NMPC)

e) 2008 New Mexico Electrical Code (NMEC)

f) 2009 New Mexico Electrical Safety Code (NMESC)

g) 2009 New Mexico Energy Conservation Code (NMECC)

h) 2009 International Fire Code (IFC)

The State of New Mexico Building Codes adopts and amends the following Codes:

a) 2009 International Building Code (IBC)

b) 2009 International Existing Building Code (IEBC)

c) 2009 Uniform Mechanical Code ( UMC)

d) 2009 Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC)

e) 2008 National Electrical Code (NEC)

All applicable UFC requirements will be complied (refer individual disciplines/ sections for specific UFC code applications).

Refer Existing Building Analysis Illustration (age and year of renovation) Refer Existing Building Photos

Expansion study of 1590 Lab Space, Building 909 2-2 Design Analysis Package (DAP) / 100% Submittal

2 February 2012 6 of 31 r.

Building 909 I!

9,412 SF

1) Building 909: 1950

a) Renovations to rooms in 1955

b) Automatic fire detection system was added in 1957

c) Renovation and alteration to the Armament Lab in 1960

d) Installation of Dark tunnel in 1962

e) Alteration to the Armament Lab in 1967

2) Building 909A: 1966

Also referred to as, Systems Environmental Tests (SET) facility

3) East addition to Building 909A: 1967

4) South addition to Building 909A: 1970

5) Building re-roof: 1970

6) Modification to air-conditioning: 1973

7) Repair and maintenance of air-conditioning: 1976

8) Bridge crane extension: 1981

9) Fire alarm replacement: 1983

10) Repair air-conditioning: 1985

11) Expand energy monitoring and control system: 1987

12) Insulate exterior of building 909 and 909A: 1988

13) HVAC upgrades: 1997

14) Lighting and Power upgrades: 1999

EXISTING BUILDING ANAYLSIS- AGE AND YEAR OF RENOVATION

100% final study submittal -=c::I- SITE PLAN

2 February 2012 7 of 31 cade ext-03 south facade ext-04 south facade

100% final study submittal

2 February 2012 8 of 31

Historical Significance

Building 909 is 50 years old and meets NRHP requirements for Criterion A. It was one of the first Air Defense Command Centers built for early Cold War air defense.

The original building, now the western portion, served as the headquarters for the 34th Air Division (Defense) which directed air defense radar alert and interception for New Mexico, Arizona, most of Colorado and Utah, and west Texas. This was part of a national Cold War effort by the USAF to protect American skies from invasion. As such, it is recommended as eligible to the National Register. Therefore when this task is ready for design documents we have to submit plans (elevations) and why it is necessary to do this addition to the SHPO for the addition.

Personnel/Occupancy load

Current authorized personnel in the facility are at 6. The lab area could see an increase in personnel of 100% (12-15 people total) in the next 2-3 years.

This laboratory houses government researchers and laboratory technician support personnel. No office or administrative functions are performed in this area.

Mission

Developing high power microwave devices, and the supporting technology of repetitive pulsed power which requires the use of large amount of electrical power, insulating materials (including oil and insulating gases) and electrical and mechanical machinery.

Expansion concepts and requirements

Two concepts were proposed for the addition to building 909. Both were single story structures varying mainly in building height. Both concepts utilize a building foot print of 72’X100’. The first concept, Option A, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the west by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 30 feet. The second concept, Option B, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the west by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 40 feet.

Based on the 50% review it was decided to pursue with option B. It was also decided that the use of a prefab metal building did not fit with the Architectural Compatibility Plan (ACP). Option B was also modified to decrease in size to approximately 6,480 square feet with an overall building size of 72’X90’. Due to the existing tension only bracing, current code requirements for additions and UFC criteria for upgrading or retrofitting existing buildings it is our recommendation that the new addition be structurally separated from building 909.

The proposed addition will have a stucco exterior finish to meet the requirements of the Architectural Compatibility Plan. This addition does not have any exterior window;

however the user has requested the need to provide 3 skylights above the doors.

This addition is just for the laboratory and no support spaces like restrooms or offices are being planned.

2 February 2012 9 of 31

Since the addition is over 5,000 SF, the design will incorporate EISA section 438 requirements for storm water management. Some techniques or options that should be explored during the design are permeable pavement and rain water harvesting cisterns.

The building will also have a 10 ton bridge crane that spans the 70foot dimension of the building and traverses the 90 foot long dimension. There will be a 2 foot deep containment trench around the interior of the building capable of holding 15,000 gallons and an additional Anechoic Chamber pit approximately 30’X30’X6 feet deep.

AFH 32-1084 will be used as a baseline for facility space requirements

This facility houses high voltage equipment, devices that produce RF energy, and diagnostic equipment for laboratory experiments. An anechoic chamber is required for radiating the pulse from a HPM source. This facility will require an overhead bridge crane for moving large equipment and ionizing radiation shielding. This facility will need to be compliant with liquid containment requirements (i.e., trench) to prevent discharge into the environment in the event of a spill.

The ideal space for the user’s mission would provide sufficient prime power in anticipation of future directed energy work, along with the ability to demonstrate using this pulsed energy. The facility would also provide sufficient safety and environmental devices to satisfy local regulation and probable changes during the lifetime of the facility. An overhead crane that spans the entire lab area would also expedite movement of devices materials.

.Access to the lab area is restricted so the general office populace is not in the vicinity of the laboratory. The separation of the administrative area is essential because of the safety requirements for non-ionizing radiation workers.

Existing facility demolition and phasing requirements

The existing south wall separating the expansion and the existing storage / workroom is being demolished. The existing storage / workroom has a floor area of approximately 2,885 square feet. The demolition of the southern exterior wall, to expand the area to be part of the new expansion, will be done under a phased construction plan. The phased construction plan will provide full function of the existing building while construction is in progress with the expansion. After construction of the expansion is completed, the demising wall (the southern exterior wall of the existing storage / workroom) will be demolished. Fire sprinkler coverage will be expanded from the expansion area into the existing workroom. The fire protection system design shall incorporate the future coverage of this area.

Refer Illustration for New Building Expansion options Refer Illustration for Anechoic Chamber- details for ideal conditions

2 February 2012 10 of 31 mo on area -----------+-- The demolition of the existing south-ern exterior wall as shown in the il-lustration, will be done under a phased construction plan.

Anechoic Chamber/pit

a) Shape -Square

b) Size- 30' x30'

H c) Location- 10' clearance

Existing storage ---- -++------------oil------ Both the overhead door and the personnel door are to be removed, ing way for an open layout and er circulation between the exist-ing and new addition

I N N

Overhead bridge crane rails 10 Ton capacity .

H

EXISTING BLDG 909A

Secondary Containment Trench 15,000 Gallaon Capacity 4'-0 wide and 2'-0" deep

ANECHOIC CHAMBER PIT _ /

30'-0"

LABORATORY

ADDITOI N

po9-LA§

Equipment that are to be used in this Lab space (Refer Electrical narrative for power consumption)

a) High Voltage equipment

b) Devices that produce RF energy

c) Diagnostic equipment for Lab experiments nterior finishing materials

a) Floor- Epoxy concrete

b) Wall - CMU and stucco exterior

c) Ceiling- Open (add skylights)

Building Area addition of 6,480 SF Building height= 40' b I

"N N n' -o"

15'-0"

LAB EXPANSION- FINAL OPTION

-c:r- SITE PLAN

2 February 2012 11 of 31

5" thick x-ray shield wall anechoic chamber containment trench !33' antenna test area/ p1an v1ew antenna test area/ staging area perspective

This illustration is for reference only.

The dimensions, adjacencies and materials were the starting point for the current design.

The proposed addition was modified from this illustration to meet budget constraints

ANECHOIC CHAMBER -DETAfts r IDEAL CONDITIONS _

2 February 2012 12 of 31

Structural Considerations

Code Analysis:

A. IBC 2009.

B. Applicable Local Codes and Ordinances C. UFC Criteria as applicable

Standards

Code Prescribed Standards:

1). Loads: ASCE 7-05 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures including Supplement No. 1 and excluding Chapter 14 and Appendix 11A.

2) Seismic: AISC 327-05 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings.

3) Steel: AISC 360-05 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings.

4) Concrete: ACI 318-08 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete.

5) Masonry: ACI 530-08 Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures.

6) Wood: NDS-05 National Design Specification for Wood Construction with 2005 supplement.

Criteria

A. Occupancy:

Occupancy Category: I (Table 1604.5) B. Fire Rating:

1) General Rating of Structure - One Hour Floor Rating Assembly.

C. Geotechnical Conditions:

1) Geotechnical Investigation: TBD o Recommended Foundation System: Spread and Continuous footings.

(Based on existing building construction)

2) Net Bearing Capacities: TBD

Design Loads

1) Live Loads:

o a. Roof (minimum): 20 psf

2) Dead Load:

o a. Roof:

1. Ceiling: 5 psf

2. Mech/Elec/Plumbing: 6 psf

3. Roofing/Insulation: 9 psf

Wind In accordance with UFC 3-31-01 the wind speed for the base is 125 mph (201 k/hr) on the south sector of the base and 100 mph (161 k/hr) on the balance of the base. This facility is not located in the south sector of the base.

Building Main Frame:

o Basic Wind Speed (w): 100 mph o Surface Roughness: C o Exposure Category: C o Importance Factor (I): 1.0 o External Pressure Coeff. (Cp): 0.8

2 February 2012 13 of 31

Earthquake (Seismic) In accordance with UFC 3-31-01 the response spectral accelerations parameters are as follows:

a. Building Main Frame:

Spectral Acceleration for Short Period (Ss): 0.56 Spectral Acceleration for 1-Second Period (S1): 0.17 Site Class: D (Assumed) Site Coefficient (Fa): 1.35 Site Coefficient (Fv): 1.86 Spectral Response Coeff. for Short Period (SDS): 0.505g Spectral Response Coeff. for 1-Second Period (SD1): 0.240g Seismic Design Category: D Seismic Force-Resisting System: Ordinary Brace Frame Response Modification Factor (R): 3.25 System over-strength factor Omega: 2.0 Deflection Amplification Factor (Cd): 3.25 Using the USGS ground motion parameter calculator with a latitude and longitude of

35.040275 and -106.609188, Sds and Sd1 values of .512g and .243g were obtained.

Snow In accordance with UFC 3-31-01 the ground snow load pg is 10 psf with a frost penetration depth of 18”.

Construction Materials:

A. Structure Steel: A992 Grade 50

B. Steel joist – LH series meeting SJI standards

C. Metal Deck: B – 1 1/2” x 18 GA

D. Concrete Strength and reinforcing

1) Foundations: 4,000 psi

2) Slab-on-grade: 4,000 psi

Existing building:

Building 909 consists of two main structures, building 909 built in 1950 (~ 9412 sf.) and 909A built in 1966 (~ 8323 sf.). Two additions were added to building 909A, one in 1967 (~ 1608 sf.) and one in 1970 (~ 1213 sf.). All of the structures are connected with no apparent separation joints. The original 909 building is a two story cast in place (CIP) concrete structure with CMU shear walls. The balance of the 909 buildings is high-bay single story structures. Gravity framing consists of steel columns supporting steel beams and open web steel joists.

Lateral resistance is provided by tension only (rod) “X” bracing. Roof diaphragm is bare metal deck with rigid insulation. Foundations for the 909 building are conventional spread and continuous footings on ground.

2 February 2012 14 of 31

Two concepts (option A & option B) are proposed for the addition to building 909.

Both are single story structures varying mainly in building height. Both concepts utilize a building foot print of 72’X100’. The first concept, Option A, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the east by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 30 feet. The second concept, Option B, proposes an approximately 7200 square foot addition bounded on the north by the 1967 addition and bounded on the east by the 1966 building 909A with a structure height of approximately 40 feet.

The structural concept for option “A” or “B” is the same. Due to the existing tension only bracing, current code requirements for additions and UFC criteria for upgrading or retrofitting existing buildings it is our recommendation that the new addition be structurally separated from building 909. The new structure is expected to use a metal deck diaphragm at the roof level supported by a combination of wide flange beams and open web steel joists supported by steel columns on conventional spread footings. A column spacing of 24 feet in the N- S direction will be utilized on the East and West ends of the building with steel girders spanning the 24 foot dimension and 40” deep open web steel joist spanning 70 feet clear to the steel girders. The lateral system is expected to be a steel brace frame. As the owner has requested a metal exterior, the building is an ideal candidate for a pre-manufactured steel building and this option should be further investigated.

Based on the 50% review the decision to proceed with option B was exercised. It was also decided that the use of a prefab metal building did not fit with the proposed direction of the project. Option B was also modified to decrease in size to approximately 6,200 square feet with an overall building size of 72’X90’. Due to the existing tension only bracing, current code requirements for additions and UFC criteria for upgrading or retrofitting existing buildings it is our recommendation that the new addition be structurally separated from building 909.

Two potential structural systems are viable for the new building. The first is expected to use a metal deck diaphragm at the roof level supported by a combination of wide flange beams and open web steel joists supported by steel columns on conventional spread footings. A column spacing of 22.5 feet in the N-S direction will be utilized on the East and West ends of the building with steel girders spanning the 22.5 foot dimension and 40” deep open web steel joist spanning 70 feet clear to the steel girders and spaced at approximately six feet on center. Two intermediate HSS sections located about 13 feet on center vertically and spanning between columns will be utilized to brace the exterior metal wall system. The lateral system is expected to be a steel brace frame with grade beams under the brace frame locations.

The second structural system would use a metal deck diaphragm at the roof level supported by a combination of wide flange beams and open web steel joists supported by CMU masonry pilasters integrated into a CMU wall on conventional continuous footings and widened at the pilaster locations. A pilaster spacing of

22.5 feet in the N-S direction will be utilized on the East and West ends of the building with steel girders spanning the 22.5 foot dimension and 40” deep “LH type” open web steel joist spanning 70 feet clear to the steel girders and spaced at approximately six feet on center. The exterior wall system would be 12” CMU

2 February 2012 15 of 31 solid grout. The CMU wall would also serve as the lateral system in the form of a CMU shear wall. This system could be left exposed on the exterior or have a stucco exterior applied.

The building will also have a 10 ton bridge crane that spans the 70foot dimension of the building and traverses the 90 foot long dimension. There will be a 2 foot deep containment trench around the interior of the building capable of holding 15,000 gallons and an additional Anechoic Chamber pit approximately 30’X30’X6 feet deep.

Additional issues to consider are the existing foundations. As the new building is bounded on both the North and East sides the existing spread footings (that vary in size from 3’ to 4’ square) will require special attention to either avoid or incorporate into the design. Two potential solutions would be to offset the existing building far enough to miss the existing foundation system, which is probably the most cost effective. The other is to integrate the new and existing foundation systems. It may also be possible to offset column locations from existing columns and create a hybrid of the two options mentioned above.

2 February 2012 16 of 31

Electrical Considerations

The mission of the building is to develop high power microwave devices, and the supporting technology of repetitive pulsed power which requires the use of large amount of electrical power, insulating materials, electrical and mechanical machinery. The final concept for the building is a 72’ x 90’ addition at 40’ tall.

1. Applicable Standards

It is anticipated that the building would be designed in accordance with the 2009 New Mexico Electrical Code (NMEC) an adaption and amended version of 2008 NEC, 2009 New Mexico Electrical Safety Code (NMESC), 2009 New Mexico Energy Conservation Code (NMECC) and any applicable UFC requirements.

2. Building Power Distribution

Function The function of the building power distribution is to provide electrical power to the lab equipment and other miscellaneous loads.

3. System Description

Existing System.

The existing electrical service to Building 909 is 480V, 3Ph. It is not expected to utilize or extend this power to new building addition due to anticipated high demand of the new building. Additionally, this new building expansion will be structurally separated from the existing building 909 as indicated by the structural engineer on the Structural Narrative.

New Building Addition/Expansion.

The client anticipates 2MW power requirement in the near future. The new electrical service will be sized to accommodate this future power requirement. The contractor will provide a new service entrance switchboard and pad mounted transformer to serve a 3000 amp main.

Both transformer and the SES will be located at the North East side of the new building.

A Surge Protection Device (SPD) will be provided to protect sensitive

Lab equipment, electronics and computer systems from electrical transients and high frequency noise. SPD protection will be located as determined by system load configuration.

Major Lab equipment, 10 ton bridge crane, lighting, mechanical, and distribution panels will be 480Y/277 volt. One lighting panel will serve the

2 February 2012 17 of 31

NEW SERVICE ENTRANCE SECTION "SES"

3PH, 4W, 277/480V

TOTAL AREA 6500 SQ. FT.

AREA(sf) LOAD

(VA)

LIGHTING @ 2VA/SF X 125% (high side to account high ceiling) 6500 8125

RECEPTACLES @ 2.0VA/SF X (6500) 100% 6500 13000

LAB POWER (per client equipment list, assume 80% loading)

662000

HVAC @ 50VA/SF X 100% (high side to account high volume/heat)

325000

TELECOMS, LAN @ 30VA X 150 SF X 100% 150 4500

MISCELLANEOUS @ 2.0VA/SF X 100% 6500 13000

SPARE @ 15VA/SF X (20% OF CURRENT SF) 130 1950

TOTAL

1027575 whole area. 208Y/120 volt branch panels will serve plug loads and other lab equipment. Dry type transformers will step the voltage down for branch panels.

The following power outlets and quantity of equipments are presently used in the existing Area IV facility. As a minimum, these high voltage switches, breakers will be provided for this new building.

(4) 480VAC / 100Amp / 3Phase

(10) 480VAC / 20Amp / 3Phase

(2) 208VAC / 100Amp / 3Phase

(15) 208VAC / 30Amp / 3Phase

(15) 208VAC / 30Amp / 1Phase

(30) 120VAC / 15Amp / 1Phase

KIRTLAND AIRFORCE BASE B909

"6500SF" ESTIMATED ELECTRICAL LOAD (DAY ONE)

AMPS @ 277/480V, 3PH 1237.4

Redundancy.

There is no redundancy in the building distribution.

Future Capacity/Expansion.

The 2MW is the total projected requirement, therefore there is no additional power capacity planed to be added to the new distribution.

4. Emergency Generator

System Description There is currently no generator power requirement for the building.

Back up power requirement for code required life safety equipment and devices, can be satisfied using UL listed emergency battery up system.

2 February 2012 18 of 31

5. Uninterrupted Power Source (UPS)

• System Description There is currently no UPS power requirement for the building. A UPS system currently is not in the program.

6. Building Grounding and Lightning Protection

• Function The function of the grounding system is to provide an alternate path to ground and to provide a low impedance reference source to all systems with in the building.

• System Description Grounding system and devices to match existing high voltage application and to satisfy latest facility standard and applicable code requirement. As a minimum, a driven electrode grounding system in counterpoise will be provided. The system will be designed to limit the grounding system resistance to less than 5 ohms.

Lighting protection system will be provided in accordance with UL-96 and NFPA 780 and bear the UL Master C label.

A question was raised on the lightning protection system requirement during the 95% design review and below is an excerpt from the Lighting protection institute.

o The National Electrical Code is NFPA Document #70, as the Lightning Protection Standard is NFPA #780. These are separate documents available for adoption by the ""local authority having jurisdiction"" for construction projects in their locale. In many locations NFPA 70 (NEC) is adopted, but #780 is not - it is an option. The NEC does not require lightning protection, although it does reference 780 in several sections. Coordination generally exists between the Committees charged with keeping the documents updated. NEC references the fact that an electric service shall have a ground and lightning protection systems shall have separate grounds. NEC references the fact that when there is a 780 lightning protection system the grounds shall be interconnected with the electrical ground. NEC addresses surge suppression as an option, but wording is to be added to clarify that when a 780 lightning protection system is installed, the surge is required by that Standard. Items such as ground terminal devices are coordinated between documents, so that the same products are used in similar soil types. We would presume that since lightning risk assessment is determined through Annex L of the #780 document, and there are locations without much lightning activity, it would be difficult to require lightning protection everywhere or even on specific structures everywhere in a document like NEC. This would make the NEC document not as useful in certain areas.

o Our recommendation is to include it in the design, as it is appropriate for the type and use of this facility expansion.

2 February 2012 19 of 31

7. Lighting Systems

This lighting system provides adequate, safe, comfortable, and reliable indoor illumination levels. Lighting will be provided to the levels as recommended by the IES design guide.

All lighting systems will be provided to meet 2007 ASHRAE 90.1 as a minimum.

Lab Areas and Support. Fluorescent high bay fixtures suitable for laboratory function should be used. HID or LED high bay lighting can also be considered as an alternative to Fluorescent. Fluorescent fixtures should also be used for support areas.

Egress lighting. The new building egress lighting should have integral battery backed up ballasts. Emergency egress lighting in the lab area should provide adequate illumination for safe egress during a loss of the normal lighting system.

There is no redundancy in lighting systems.

The system has no additional capacity requirement.

8. Lighting Control System Description

Basic Control Sequences.

The lighting will have local wall switches.

9. Special Systems

Fire Alarm.

A fire alarm system will be provided as an extension of the existing building. Fire alarm system and devices to match existing and to satisfy facility standard and adapted code requirement. Conventional smoke detectors will be used in the Lab space. The duct smoke detectors will be located in the supply duct of the air handler and in the return plenum as required by code. Visual and Audible devices will be located in the lab space. A manual station will be located within the egress path

Voice/Data.

Voice and data work is minimal and will be limited to adding a voice and data drops. It is assumed that the existing building voice/data system infrastructure is adequate to support this addition. Phones will be provided in the lab space.

Client indicated that it is not required to have internet/comm. in the high bay.

Data ports will only be provided as needed/required for the lab equipment.

Security.

Client indicated that Cipher Locks is preferred over card reader access for the

Lab spaces/room. Integrate with the existing security system. Provide door

2 February 2012 20 of 31 interlock as required to prevent the lab room and building doors from both being open at the same time.

PA.

Provide PA system as required. Extend existing system for this addition. Speaker and other devices to match existing and to satisfy latest facility standard and requirement.

Performance Criteria

There is no redundancy.

The system has no additional capacity requirement.

Energy Monitoring An energy monitoring will be provided as an extension of the existing building, devices to match existing and to satisfy facility standard and requirement. The project energy monitoring systems will be controlled and monitored from the existing centralized control station. The existing system will perform all data trending and data storage. The system will be Ethernet-based native BACNET compliant distributed digital control system (DDC), compatible with the existing control system.

2 February 2012 21 of 31

Mechanical and Fire Protection Considerations

• New Addition Concepts:

• Two concepts were proposed for the addition to Building 909. The two concepts differ only on the height of the building. This height difference will have a minimal effect mechanical system requirement.

• After the 50% design review, it was decided to pursue the building expansion with 40’ high bay. The existing building will be in operation during construction of the building expansion. This design concept for the building expansion will be done with a phased construction methodology to provide for minimal interruption to ongoing building operations. Where interruption to existing building services or areas is necessary during the performance construction, all shutdowns and interferences are to be performed at times that will have the least impact the building occupants.

• Applicable Standards

• It is anticipated that the building would be designed in accordance with the following codes.

• International Codes o Building Code - 2009 o Fire Code - 2009 o Mechanical Code - 2009 o Plumbing Code – 2009 o Fuel Gas Code - 2009

• Uniform Codes o Fire Code – 2009

• ASHRAE Standards o 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions For Human Occupancy o 62, Ventilation For Acceptable Indoor Air Quality o 90.1, Energy Standard For Buildings

• NFPA Standards o 13, Standard For Automatic Sprinkler Systems o 90A, Installation Of Air Conditioning, Heating, And Ventilation Systems

• Energy Codes and Standards o UFC 3-400-01 o Executive Order 13423 (Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management) o EPACT 2005 along with mandatory provisions of ASHRAE 90.1 o KAFB Instruction 23-301

• DESIGN CRITERIA

o Site Design Criteria

Site Location Elevation 5,300 ft, 12.22 Psia Latitude 35.04° N Longitude -106.6° W

2 February 2012 22 of 31 o Climatic Design Data (Albuquerque International Airport as Basis, WMO# 723650)

Basis 2009 ASHRAE F, 0.4% Summer 95.2°Fdb, 60.3°Fwb Dehumidification 67.7°Fdb, 63.4°FDP Winter 17.7°Fdb Cooling Degree Days 1348 Cdd65 Heating Degree Days 4069 Hdd65

• Seismic Zone o As defined in IBC

• Building Environment Design Criteria o Space Vibration Criteria No specific criteria defined

• Acoustic Criteria o Laboratories NC 45 o Utility areas NC 55 – NC 60

• Space Temperature (Min / Max (Deg. F)) o Laboratories 68 Deg F / 74 ± 2 Deg F

Per KAFB Instruction 23-301, paragraph10.3 (Heating) and paragraph 11 (cooling) (or as required for equipment) o Utility areas 55 Deg F / 78 +/- 2 Deg F

Per KAFB Instruction 23-301, paragraph10.2 (Heating) and paragraph 11 (cooling) (or as required for equipment)

• Space Humidity o Laboratories

Minimum Not Controlled Maximum 50% RH

• System/Component Sizing Criteria – HVAC o Infiltration Rate

Laboratories Assume zero Other Areas Assume zero o Space Pressurization Laboratories +0.04 Inches Water Column Utility areas Negative with respect to other areas o Minimum Outside Air Ventilation Rates (per ASHRAE 62)

Occupancy Load based consistent with ASHRAE 62 recommendations o Space Heat Load Criteria

Electrical rooms 20 W/sf (or as required for equipment) Laboratory / Instrument areas As required for instrument loads o Space Heat Load Criteria (Other) Lighting 2 W/sf People 200 BTUh/person (sensible)

250 BTUh/person (latent) o Zoning

2 February 2012 23 of 31

Laboratories one zone/lab Open spaces 900 sf (maximum) Closed spaces 4 spaces/zone (maximum)

Perimeter spaces one zone for spaces with 2 external walls

Maximum flow 1,600 cfm/zone o Maxi mum Air Velocities – Ducting

Makeup Air

2,000 fpm Cold Air 2,000 fpm Return Air (main ducts) 2,000 fpm Supply Air 1,500 fpm Return Air (branch ducts) 1,500 fpm Exhaust Air 500 To 3,000 fpm o Maximum Air Velocities – Air Grilles/ Outside Air 300 - 500 fpm (Free Area) Supply Air 500 fpm Return Air 300 - 500 fpm AHU Coils 450 to 500 fpm AHU Filter Banks 500 fpm Exhaust Stacks 3,000 fpm (minimum) o Ductwork Design Criteria From fan to VAV box 4” w.g. positive Downstream of VAV box 1” w.g. positive Return air 1” w.g. positive or negative General exhaust: 2” w.g. negative For P<-4” w.g. or >+ 10” w.g SMACNA Ductwork Seal Class A for all systems o Ductwork / Insulation Design Criteria

Flame-spread rating 25 (max) Smoke developed rating 50 (max)

• System / Component Sizing Criteria – Mechanical

• Pipe Velocities (Maximum)

½ To 1 Inch 5 fps 1-1/2 To 3 Inch 6 fps 4 To 12 Inch 7 fps 14 To16 inches 9 fps 18 to 24 inches 10 fps o Maximum Pressure Drop 5 ft/100 ft

• System / Component Sizing Criteria – Plumbing o Existing facilities are anticipated to provide for base occupancy requirements. No additional base facility plumbing services are anticipated. Primary and overflow rainwater drains will be provided to direct water from the building roof to discharge to the storm water system. Potable water hose connections will be provided around the building perimeter. Natural Gas piping will be provided to distribute natural gas to gas fired heaters located in the high bay area and at the Air Handling Units.

o Rainfall

2 inches / hour as required by IPC 2009

2 February 2012 24 of 31 o Wall Hydrants and Hose Bibbs Located at the ground level building perimeter at 100 ft intervals.

Located within mechanical equipment rooms.

Located at the roof level as determined necessary for equipment maintenance and cleaning.

o Piping Domestic cold water:

• Type L copper, silver soldered, insulated hot water piping.

Non-potable cold water:

• Type L copper, silver soldered, insulated hot water piping.

Cooling coil condensate:

• Type L copper, silver soldered Sanitary Waste (for condensate and equipment area drains):

• Service weight cast iron, no hub with 4 stainless steel bands per fitting, or hub and spigot.

Storm Water / Rain Leaders:

• Service weight cast iron, no hub with 4 stainless steel bands per fitting, or hub and spigot.

Natural Gas :

• Black Steel, Welded or threaded as necessary for operating pressure as required by the International Fuel Gas Code.

• Existing Equipment o An existing small York air handler, which sits on grade at the south-east corner of the building, will need to be relocated to expand the building.

The air handler will be relocated towards the south-west of the building expansion, and it will be reconnected to the system which it serves.

• HVAC SYSTEMS

• Function o An HVAC system will be provide to provide heating and cooling to meet the required thermal conditions of the project building. The thermal conditions will be as required for specific instruments, and as required by KAFB Instruction 23-301 for energy management.

o Major Equipment

Air Handling Units Two units will be provided in to meet building load requirements and facility redundancy requirements.

o System Description The air handler serving the project area will be provided with sound attenuators at return and supply plenums (if required to achieve sound criteria compliance) return / exhaust fans, full economizers, outside air inlet plenum, filtration sections, evaporative cooling section, natural gas heating section, direct expansion cooling section and supply air fans. The units will be capable of providing up to 100% outdoor air to the project building through the economizer section during times when outdoor conditions permit. The units will be capable of high end humidity control, to allow the unit to remove excess moisture from the air stream during periods of high humidity.

2 February 2012 25 of 31

The system will be a constant volume, variable temperature with bypass VAV terminal unit configuration, distributed to serve and offset loads throughout the building.

CO2 sensors within the return ductwork will provide feedback to the air handler controls. Outdoor air introduced to the building through the air handlers will be reduced, when not in economizer mode, or increased as necessary to maintain building CO2 levels below acceptable limits.

o Performance Criteria Partial redundancy in the form of shared excess capacity will be provided for the AHU’s. Two units, each sized for 2/3 peak load will be provided.

• EXHAUST SYSTEMS

o A general exhaust system will be provided for the building.

• Major Equipment o Two Exhaust Fans will be provided in to meet building exhaust requirements and facility redundancy requirements.

• System Description o Duct material will be galvanized metal. Exhaust ductwork from within the building will join at one location to rise up through the roof

• Performance Criteria o Partial redundancy in the form of shared excess capacity will be provided for the exhaust system. Two exhaust fans will be provided, each with 2/3 peak exhaust demand capacity.

• HEATING

o Indirect heating will be provided by natural gas heating in the buildings

Air Handling Units, and direct heating by natural gas fired unit heaters in mechanical spaces and in high bay areas.

• Major Equipment o Unit heaters o See Air Handling Units for indirect gas heating sections at AHU’s

• System Description Gas fired unit heaters will be provided to meet heating requirements in the high bay areas.

• Performance Criteria o Heating equipment will be provided to meet design heating load requirements. No additional requirement for the heating systems is anticipated.

• PROCESS SYSTEMS

o Process system requirements have not yet been determined.

• BUILDING AUTOMATION AND CONTROLS

o The project automation systems will be controlled and monitored from the existing centralized control station. The existing system will perform all data trending and data storage. The system will be Ethernet-based native BACNET compliant distributed digital control system (DDC), compatible with the existing control system.

2 February 2012 26 of 31

• ADDITIONAL SUSTAINABLE FEATURES TO BE CONSIDERED

o Sustainable features to be determined during sustainability charrette meetings during design.

o Energy performance in accordance with Executive Order 13423.

Fire Protection Concepts

FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS

• Purpose

• This fire protection design narrative is intended to summarize code requirements, hazard and design criteria, water supply, fire pump and standpipe requirements associated with the fire protection systems for the project. The fire protection design narrative is typically used for space planning, cost estimating and design coordination, and is a companion document to the fire protection design specifications that will be provided during design.

• Applicable Codes

• This design narrative is based on review and application of the following codes and standards as adopted by the State Fire Marshal’s office:

• Uniform Fire Code

• NFPA 13, 2010 edition – Installation of Sprinkler Systems

• NFPA 14, 2010 edition – Installation of Standpipe, Private Hydrants and Hose

Systems

• NFPA 20, 2010 edition – Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection

• NFPA 24, 2010 edition – Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and their

Appurtenances

• Hazard and Fire Sprinkler Design Criteria

• The building expansion is required to be provided with automatic fire sprinklers, and will be designed in accordance with NFPA 13. While the expansion is required to have sprinklers, because the expansion cost is below 50% of the Plant Replacement Value (PRV) of the existing building, the addition of fire sprinklers into the existing building is not required.

• The wall separating the expansion and the existing storage / workroom is being demolished. The existing storage / workroom has a floor area of approximately 2,885 square feet. The demolition of the southern exterior wall, to expand the area to be part of the new expansion, will be done under a phased construction plan. The phased construction plan will provide full function of the existing building while construction is in progress with the expansion. After construction of the expansion is completed, the demising wall (the southern exterior wall of the existing storage / workroom) will be demolished. Fire sprinkler coverage will be expanded from the

2 February 2012 27 of 31 expansion area into the existing workroom. The fire protection system design shall incorporate the future coverage of this area.

• Based on the project design, occupancy, and associated fire hazards, the overall fire protection design will include wet-pipe systems throughout the project expansion area. The following design criteria is provided as a baseline for the project, and will be validated and updated during design.

o Electrical Switchgear Rooms – Light Hazard o Lab Spaces – Ordinary Hazard Group I

• WATER SUPPLY

• Fire protection water supply will be provided via connection to the water main(s). Fire mains that are used to supply the fire protection systems will be a minimum of six (6) inch. During design it will be determined if a fire water booster pump will be required.

If required, the pump will be connected to the source water main.

• Since the facility and utilities for the campus are established, it is not anticipated that any modification to site hydrant locations will be required. Water flow test data is not yet available.

2 February 2012 28 of 31

Unit Interview Questionnaire Building 322- Expansion feasibility study Kirtland

AFB, NM

Facility Number(s): Bldg 322 Group/Squadron/Flight: Flight-Level Facility “Owner” Organization AFRL/RDHP Commander Name: Section: Capt Jason Webb, Branch: Wesley Tucker Commander Tel/Email: Section: 846-6747 Branch: 846-9913 Facility Manager Name: Randy Robinson Facility Manager Tel/Email: 846-2739 Form Prepared By: Capt Jason Webb Tel/Email: 846-6747 Total Current Personnel: 40 Total Authorized Personnel: 40+ Forecasted Auth Personnel: 40 Date Form Completed: 4 June 2010

Questions:

Mission & Demographic Profile:

1. Please provide a brief narrative that describes your organization’s mission activities:

RDHP serves as the pulsed power arm of the AFRL/RD high powered microwave division. RDHP engages in varied industrial experiments in support of DOE, DTRA & DARPA customers. These experiments consist of the use of the SHIVA star capacitor bank and side experiments all housed in the 322 facility.

2. Identify any planned authorized and contractor personnel increases and/or decreases:

There are no known personnel increases at this time. Any increase would be incremental and unexpected prior to the new FY.

3. Identify any planned new and/or additional equipment, etc:

There is currently no new equipment purchases planned. We can expect to have more Pulsed Power projects requiring more…