06032020_FA8902-20-R-0013_BECOS_RFP_QA Set 2 of 2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Construction and Optimization Services (BECOS) Southwest Region
Solicitation number
FA8903-20-R-0013
Issued by

About this file

This document contains questions and answers related to a solicitation for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Construction and Optimization Services (BECOS) in the Southwest Region. The solicitation is for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to provide environmental remediation and monitoring services at multiple sites located at former military bases including George Air Force Base, Norton Air Force Base, and Williams Air Force Base. Services will include long-term monitoring, removal actions, corrective measures studies and implementation, and operation and maintenance of existing remediation systems. The contract holder will be responsible for tasks such as compliance sampling, soil vapor monitoring, well replacement and decommissioning, and operating remediation systems such as soil vapor extraction units. The document provides clarification on the scope of work, available documentation, and other details to support offerors in preparing proposals, which were due by June 15, 2020 following an extension. The Department of the Air Force is the contracting agency.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
20200609_Southwest TO2 Price Model_Amendment_03.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment FA890320R00130003 SF 30.pdf PDF
06042020_FA8903-20-R-0013_BECOS_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_Set 3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200603_FA890320R0013_BECOS_Southwest_Section_L_Amendment_01.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA890320R00130002 SF 30 2.pdf PDF
20200521_FA890320R0013_Southwest_BECOS_Section_M_Amendment_01.docx DOCX document
20200520_FA890320R0013_BECOS_Southwest_Section_L_Amendment_01.docx DOCX document
20200519_Southwest TO2 Price Model_Amendment_01.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA890320R0013 Southwest Amendment Changes.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA890320R00130001 SF 30.pdf PDF
05222020_v2_FA890320R0012_BECOS_Southwest_Questions and Answers set 1 of 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Southwest Solicitation Clauses Added and Removed.docx DOCX document
20200109_Southwest TO2 Price Model v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AZ20200017 31Jan20 Maricopa Heavy.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Attch 2 Southwest Acr and Def BECOS vf3.docx DOCX document
20200203_FA890320R0013_BECOS_Southwest_Section_L v6.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B004 (CMAN) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
AZ20200031 31Jan20 Maricopa Building.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B005-B006-B007 (ADMN) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A003-A012 (MGMT) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Southwest FA890320R0013 vf.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A013 (MISC CONT) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A007-A008-A009 (ENVR) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf5.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Williams Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
CA20200025 31Jan20 Riverside Building Heavy.pdf PDF
20200131_FA8903-20-R-0013_BECOS RFP Questions and Answers Template v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A001-A002-A004 (MISC) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
20200131_FA890320R0013_BECOS_Relevancy_Matrix v2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A005-A006-A011 (CMAN) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Attch 3 Southwest Del Rev Process BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A014 (DRPR) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 Norton Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
TO 2 PWS Southwest BECOS vf3.docx DOCX document
IDIQ PWS Attch 4 Southwest Perf Obj Def and Req BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
20191217_Compensation Plan Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT C001 (MGMT) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT A010 (QCIC) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 1 CDRLs Exhibit A B Southwest BECOS vf1.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B002-B003 (MGMT) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
IDIQ PWS Southwest BECOS vf4.docx DOCX document
TO 2 CDRLs Exhibit A B Southwest BECOS vf1.docx DOCX document
20200131_FA890320R0013_BECOS_Relevancy_PPQ v2.docx DOCX document
IDIQ DD1423 CDRLS EXHIBIT B001 (MISC) Southwest BECOS vf1.pdf PDF
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 George Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
20200122_Southwest FFP FBLR Tables v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO 2 PWS Attch 2 March Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2.docx DOCX document
CA20200026 31Jan20 San Bernadino Building Heavy.pdf PDF
20200203_FA890320R0013_Southwest_BECOS_Section_M v4.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 52 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

Q #Document ReferenceRFP QUESTIONSDATE RCVDDocument ReferenceGOV'T RESPONSERESPONSE DATE
151IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3Line 32 ST012 - The Admin Record included reports through 2016. Based on the comments from Agencies and responses to comments, it appears that there was a Work Plan for the EBR Pilot Study: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure Inc., 2018. Pilot Study Implementation Work Plan for Operable Unit 2 Revised Groundwater Remedy, Site ST012, Former Williams Air Force Base, Mesa, Arizona. Please provide a complete copy of this Work Plan, and all associated addenda or variances/modification memos.15-May-20ARThe pilot study work plan is available in the online Administrative Record file as documents 597626 and 571843.1 through 571843.9. The first file was revised to expand Appendix F and correct Appendix H. Two field variances memos, numbers 6 and 7, have been issued and these are posted on the Williams Google documents site.1-Jun-20
152IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3Please provide copies of O&M Manuals, SAPs, and QAPPs for all existing systems (SVE and EBR)15-May-20GeneralAll documents provided on AR and Google site that will be provided pre-award. Additional documents available upon request post award.1-Jun-20
153IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3For George AFB Site CG070, it states that the site is contaminated with PFAS. It does not appear from the Annual Monitoring Reports that groundwater samples are being analyzed for PFAS. Should the bidders assume that samples are not analyzed for PFAS and that IDW does not need to be analyzed for PFAS compounds?15-May-20Not ApplicableBidders should assume that groundwater samples are not analyzed for PFAS.
Bidders should assume characterization, handling, and disposal of IDW according to the most current applicable federal, state, local, DoD/AF guidance, and the HQ USAF/A4, Air Force Guidance Memorandum Establishing Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)-Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance, AFGM 1908-32-71, Sep 2019.20-May-20
154IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3George AFB shows Sites ST067a and ST067b. However, a search on the Administrative Record could not identify and documents related to the current status of Site ST067a. What are the specific requirement that need to be performed on TO 002 related to Site ST067a? Please clarify the SOW.15-May-20AR #s 759 and 916The removal and abandonment of the Liquid Fuels Distribution System (LFDS) portion of Site ST067a is found in the Final Report for Liquid Fuel Distribution System Removal, Underground Storage Tank Removal and Oil-Water Separator Inspection dated Janaury 1995 and prepared by Odgen Environmental Services, which is AR #s 759 and 916.20-May-20
155IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3For George AFB Site SS030, the table states that Petroleum Sites Corrective Action Plan (CAP), Part I is under RWQCB review since 24 June 2013. Is there any action that needs to be performed with the CAP on TO 002? Same question for Site OT071. Please clarify the SOW.15-May-20Not ApplicableThe Petroleum Sites Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for flightline Sites SS030, ST054, ST057 and SS084, and the Pesticide CAP for Site OT071 are NOT part of TO 02. This is will be handled on a case by case basis.20-May-20
156TO 2 PWS Attch Williams Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2Please provide a copy of the following: AMEC, 2013a. Final Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan, Site LF004, Former Williams Air Force, Base, Mesa, Arizona. 5 August 2013.15-May-20ARThe Final Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan, Site LF004 is available in the online Administrative Record file as document 1631.1-Jun-20
157TO 2 PWS Attch Williams Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf3How many PFAS analytes are required for reporting at Williams AFB, Landfill 004 Site : 18, 24 or 33 PFAS analytes?15-May-20NANo PFAS analytes are required to be reported at Williams AFB Landfill 004 under this project.1-Jun-20
114Southwest IDEQ_Schedule B_CLIN Structure and Price Model_v1_02112020.xlsxExcel file “Southwest IDEQ_Schedule B_CLIN Structure and Price Model_v1_02112020.xlsx” shows that Sites FT082 and SS083 are under severable and RAO CLIN 008. However, Excel file “20200109_Southwest TO2 Price Model v2.xlsx” shows George Sites FT082 and SS083 are under non-severable CLINs 0016 and 0017, respectively. Which is correct? Also, Excel file “20200109_Southwest TO2 Price Model v2.xlsx” shows the same CLIN being used for non-severable Site SS083 at George and base year severable CLIN involving LTM sites at March. Is this correct?27-Apr-20Southwest IDEQ_Schedule B_CLIN Structure and Price Model_v1_02112020.xlsxThe IDIQ Schedule B CLIN Structure and Price Model supporting the basic contract includes both severable and non-severable CLINs for multiple sites including George Sites FT082 (severable RA-O CLIN 0008 and non-severable CLIN 0016) and SS083 (severable RA-O CLIN 0008 and non-severable CLIN 0017). The performance objective identified in the TO 2 Attch 1 Southwest Site List (vf5) for George Sites FT082 and SS083 is RC, a non-severable activity which encompasses all tasks identified at the site under TO 2. As such, the TO 2 price model accurately captures George Sites FT082 and SS083 under non-severable CLINs 0016 and 0017, respectively.

The TO 2 Price Model has been corrected to reflect severable CLIN 0019 for LTM sites at March (revised from CLIN 0017) which aligns with the Southwest IDIQ Schedule B CLIN Structure and Price Model. Four other subsequent severable CLINs in the TO 2 Price Model (base and option year tabs) required revisions to properly align with the IDIQ Schedule B CLIN Structure and Price Model including: RA-O Sites for March (changed from CLIN 0018 to 0020), LTM Sites for Norton (changed from CLIN 0022 to 0025), LTM Sites for Williams (changed from CLIN 0025 to 0031), and RA-O Site at Williams (changed from CLIN 0026 to 0032). No changes are required to the IDIQ Schedule B CLIN Structure and Price Model.

1-Jun-20
158George FT082, SS083Attachment 1 states that the"Ongoing SVE to be completed under current PBR contract" for George sites FT082 and SS083. Who is responsible for the the monthly compliance sampling and semi-annual full site soil vapor sampling events for FT082 and SS083?15-May-20AR #s 590472 through 590472.4The awarded BECOS contractor will be responsible for the monthly compliance sampling and semi-annual full site soil vapor sampling to comply with the substantive requirements imposed by the Mojave Desert, Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) .1-Jun-20
159Norton CG097For Norton Site CG097, well decomissioning is part of this TO. In the August 2019 BCT Update for Norton on the admin record, it states that there are 26 single screened MWs and 6 multilevel MWs. Can the government furnish a list of these monitoring wells and their depths, diameters, etc for the prospective contractors to estimate the cost of decommissioning these wells?15-May-20google siteDocument will be uploaded to Google documents site.1-Jun-20
160George GeneralIn PWS Attachment 2 for George AFB, it states "Contractor is responsible for decommissioning wells that are already approved for decommissioning and are listed in Table 2-2 of the Basewide Groundwater Monitoring 2017 Annual Report, Former Norton Air Force Base, available on the reference website (refer to Table 1D, Alternative Endpoints)." Where can Table 1D be found?15-May-20GeneralThe 2017 Annual Report Table 2-2 presents our proposed sampling of three landfill wells and has nothing to do with well decommissioning and the report has no Table 1D.1-Jun-20
161Norton FT082For Norton Site FT082, the Site Supplemental Report is missing from the admin record. Can the government furnish the latest version of this report?15-May-20GeneralNorton does not have a FT082 site.1-Jun-20
162Williams ST012Can the government furnish the Williams Draft ST012 SVE System and EBR Pilot Study 2018 First and Second Quarter Performance Report and any subsequent performance reports?15-May-20AR/google siteNo perforrmance reports have yet been finalized since the initiation of the EBR pilot test in December 2018. Progress reporting is part of the monthly BRAC Cleanup Team presentations. The presentations for May 2019 through April 2020 will be uploaded to the Google documents site. December 2018 revised minutes are availabe on the online Administrative Record file as document 592367.1-Jun-20
163Williams ST012Attachment 1 states that "New monitoring wells, replacement monitoring wells and well abandonment due to rising groundwater levels is included in this TO" for Williams Site ST012. Can the government furnish or reference a document that states how many wells need to be installed, replaced, and abandoned for costing purposes?15-May-20TO 2 PWSThe requested details are not established. It is the contractors responsibility to determine the number of wells appropriate to meet the remediation and monitoring requirements.1-Jun-20
164Section L, 3.4Please confirm that Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ’s) are to be submitted to the government no later than the proposal due date and time.15-May-20Section LConfirmed.1-Jun-20
165Section L, 3.4We have received Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) from the government for our relevant projects in the past 90 days. Would it be acceptable to submit previously-completed PPQs with our proposal?15-May-20Section LNo, only the PPQ in Section J IAW Section L.1-Jun-20
44IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3Line 32 ST012 - The Admin Record included reports through 2016. Based on the comments from Agencies and responses to comments, it appears that there was a Work Plan for the EBR Pilot Study: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure Inc., 2018. Pilot Study Implementation Work Plan for Operable Unit 2 Revised Groundwater Remedy, Site ST012, Former Williams Air Force Base, Mesa, Arizona. Please provide a complete copy of this Work Plan, and all associated addenda or variances/modification memos.5/20/20ARThe pilot study work plan is available in the online Administrative Record file as documents 597626 and 571843.1 through 571843.9. The first file was revised to expand Appendix F and correct Appendix H. Two field variances memos, numbers 6 and 7, have been issued and these are posted on the Williams Google documents site.2-Jun-20
45IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3Please provide copies of O&M Manuals, SAPs, and QAPPs for all existing systems (SVE and EBR)5/20/20ARItems are uploaded on the AR.2-Jun-20
46IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3For George AFB Site CG070, it states that the site is contaminated with PFAS. It does not appear from the Annual Monitoring Reports that groundwater samples are being analyzed for PFAS. Should the bidders assume that samples are not analyzed for PFAS and that IDW does not need to be analyzed for PFAS compounds?5/20/20IDIQ PWSBidders should assume that groundwater samples are not analyzed for PFAS. Bidders should assume characterization, handling, and disposal of IDW according to the most current applicable federal, state, local, DoD/AF guidance, and the HQ USAF/A4, Air Force Guidance Memorandum Establishing Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF)-Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance, AFGM 1908-32-71, Sep 2019.2-Jun-20
47IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3George AFB shows Sites ST067a and ST067b. However, a search on the Administrative Record could not identify and documents related to the current status of Site ST067a. What are the specific requirement that need to be performed on TO 002 related to Site ST067a? Please clarify the SOW.5/20/20ARThe removal and abandonment of the Liquid Fuels Distribution System (LFDS) portion of Site ST067a is found in the Final Report for Liquid Fuel Distribution System Removal, Underground Storage Tank Removal and Oil-Water Separator Inspection dated Janaury 1995 and prepared by Odgen Environmental Services, which is AR #s 759 and 916.2-Jun-20
48IDIQ PWS Attch 1 Southwest Site List BECOS vf3For George AFB Site SS030, the table states that Petroleum Sites Corrective Action Plan (CAP), Part I is under RWQCB review since 24 June 2013. Is there any action that needs to be performed with the CAP on TO 002? Same question for Site OT071. Please clarify the SOW.5/20/20IDIQ PWSThe Petroleum Sites Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for flightline Sites SS030, ST054, ST057 and SS084, and the Pesticide CAP for Site OT071 are NOT part of TO 02.2-Jun-20
49TO 2 PWS Attch Williams Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf2Please provide a copy of the following: AMEC, 2013a. Final Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan, Site LF004, Former Williams Air Force, Base, Mesa, Arizona. 5 August 2013.5/20/20ARThe Final Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan, Site LF004 is available in the online Administrative Record file as document 1631.2-Jun-20
50TO 2 PWS Attch Williams Base Spec Req Southwest BECOS vf3How many PFAS analytes are required for reporting at Williams AFB, Landfill 004 Site : 18, 24 or 33 PFAS analytes?5/20/20TO 2No PFAS analytes are required to be reported at Williams AFB Landfill 004 under this project.2-Jun-20
166Section LAmendment 1 does not respond to all RFIs. Offerors need the RFI responses with SOW clarifications BEFORE requesting subcontractors bids. In order to allow adequate time for subcontractors to respond Offerors' bid requests and time for Offerors to process sub bids and then prepare a comprehensive cost proposal for this extensive program, we respectfully request that the proposal due date be extended to a date that is three (3) weeks after all RFI responses have been posted.5/21/20GeneralProposal deadline extended to 15 June 2020. See amendment 02.2-Jun-20
167Cost ProposalThe "6 mo ext” tab is locked and automatically calculated based on the previous option, however there is no way to add escalation to it because of this. Will the Govt consider unlocking this tab, so we can properly escalate our pricing for this task?5/22/20Section LThe 6 month tab remains as is.2-Jun-20

FA8903-20-R-0013

Southwest Region Questions and Answers &P

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .