PAST_PERFORMANCE_SURVEY_V2.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8751-13-R-0014
About this file
Draft Past Performance Survey
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SABER_Specs_Addendum_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA8751-14-R-0003-01.pdf | ||
| SABER_Questions_and_Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| SABER_Questions_and_Answers.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_2_-_WRD_20120013.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_4_-_WRD_20120031.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA8751-14-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_-_Past_Performance_Survey.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_3_-_WRD_20120014.docx | DOCX document | |
| SABER_2013_Master_Specifications_130227.pdf | ||
| 13R14_Section_L.doc | DOC document | |
| 13R14_Section_M.doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY for:
Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER)
Offerors: Complete Sections 1 and 2 of this survey, and then forward the survey to references for completion and submission to the Government. Only provide surveys for those contracts defined as RELEVANT or MORE RELEVANT per the solicitation. In your proposal submission (Part I), include copies of Sections 1 or 2 that were sent to references so the Government is aware of what organizations were sent surveys.
References: You have been provided as a reference in regards to the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) source selection at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome Research Site, Rome, NY. In order for the Government to evaluate the past performance of the firm providing you as a reference, please complete Sections 3 and 4 of this survey and forward to the AFRL/RIKO Contract Specialist below to arrive no later than the proposal submission deadline:
AFRL/RIKO
Cody Owens, Contract Specialist 26 Electronic Pkwy Rome, NY 13441-4514
COM: (315) 330-2921
FAX: (315) 330-2555
DSN: 587-2921
Email: Cody.Owens@us.af.mil
SECTION 1 – CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
1. Contractor (Name, Address): _________________________________________
| 2. CAGE Code of Contractor contract was awarded to: | ________ | ||
| 3. Contract Number: | ____________________________ | ||
| 4. Contract Title: | ______________________________________________________ | ||
| 5. Contract Type (Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time and Materials (T&M), or other): | ______________ | ||
| 6. Was this a competitive contract? | Yes ____ | No____ |
7. Description, location, and relevancy of work:
(Feel free to provide a copy of the Statement of Work to help better assess the relevancy to the current acquisition)
8. Was the Contractor the Prime Contractor _____ or Subcontractor _____?
| 9. Complexity of Work (e.g. difficult, routine): | ____________________ | |
| 10. Period of Performance (Mo/Yr – Mo/Yr): | ____________________ | |
| 11. Original Contract Dollar Value: | ____________________ | |
| 12. Current/Completed Contract Dollar Value: | ____________________ |
13. If amounts from 11 and 12 differ, provide explanation: _________________________________
14. Type and Extent of Subcontracting: _________________________________________________
15. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts only:
| a. If this is a task order placed on an IDIQ contract (excluding GSA), please provide the ceiling amount of the master IDIQ contract: | ________________ | ||
| b. Please provide the current cumulative value of all orders awarded under the master IDIQ contract: | ________________ | ||
| c. Period of Performance for IDIQ contract: | ________________ | ||
| 16. Government Contracts Only: Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? No____ | Yes____ |
a. If yes, explain (e.g. Type, Reason, etc): ________________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
1. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________
2. Points of Contact, if known (Name/Title, Telephone Number, Mailing/e-mail Address):
a. Technical: ___________________________________________________________
b. Contracting Officer: ____________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR AND CONTRACT INFORMATION
1. Please provide information for primary individual(s) completing this survey:
a. Evaluator Name(s)/Title, Telephone Number, Mailing/e-mail Address:
i. Technical: ____________________________________________________
| Amount of time evaluator worked on subject contract: | _____________ | |
| ii. Contracting Officer: | _____________________________________________ |
| Amount of time evaluator worked on subject contract: | _____________ | |
| 2. Date questionnaire completed: | _______________ |
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question using the scale provided. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE | PERFORMANCE LEVEL | |
| B | BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL – Performance met/meets contractual requirements and exceeded/exceeds many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was/is accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. | |
| P | PURPLE/VERY GOOD - Performance met/meets contractual requirements and exceeded/exceeds some to the customer’s benefit. The performance of the element being assessed was/is accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. | |
| G | GREEN/SATISFACTORY - Performance met/meets contractual requirements. The performance of the element being assessed contained/contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Y | YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance did not/does not meet some contractual requirements. The performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not/did not identify corrective actions. |
| R | RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance did not/does not meet some contractual requirements. The performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s actions were ineffective. |
| N | NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score |
2. In the area titled “Additional Comments” after each evaluation area, please discuss each and every response for which you indicate B, Y, or R in response to the questions (use additional sheets, if necessary)
a. QUALITY CONTROL
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Provided Quality of Workmanship
Provided and Followed Effective Quality Control (QC) Plan
Provided Effective Inspection Procedures to Meet Contract Requirements
Stored Materials Properly
Used Materials Specified
Ordered and Used Adequate Materials
Provided Adequate Submittals
Provided Adequate As-Build Drawings
Identified/Corrected Deficient Work in a Timely Manner
Suggested Solutions and Displayed Initiative to Implement Solutions
Additional Comments:
| b. TIMELY COST EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Provided Submittals in a Timely Manner
Researched Submittals Well and Clearly Identified Proposed Items
Matched Submittals Accurately to Contract Requirement
Met Established Allotted Work Schedule
Met Established Cost Control; Performed Work Within Allotted Budget
Resolved Delays
Completed Punchlist Items Timely
Completed Punchlist Items Adequately
Completed Work Within Performance Period
Developed Realistic Progress Schedules
Additional Comments:
| c. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
General Business Practices
Provided Experience Managers and Supervisors With the Technical and Administrative Abilities Needed to Meet Contract Requirements
Hired Experienced Subcontractors
Paid Subcontractors in a Timely Manner
Provided Well Substantiated Pricing Data for Modifications
Completed All Contract Work Prior to Requesting Final Inspection. Left no Major Discrepancies
Provided Timely and Satisfactory Response to Warranty Issues After
Completion of Project
Cooperated to Resolve Problems, Attending Meetings (as Applicable), and Maintained Communication to Ensure Satisfactory Resolution
Provided Timely Resolution of Contract Discrepancies
Obtained Consent of Surety for Increases in Bonding as Work in Progress
Increased
Pricing
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Submitted Proposals That Accurately Represented the Work Required
Provided Supporting Price/Cost Information for Modifications That
Were Accurate, Complete, and Reasonable (Not Overinflated or
Underestimated)
Contractor's Overall Pricing Performance:
| Site Management/Superintendence |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Site Manager Ensure Compliance With Contract Requirements and Safety
Site Manager Acted Promptly to Resolve Proglems and Ensure
Work Quality
Delegated Sufficient Authority to Site Manager to Make Decisions or
Take Actions During Project Performance
Site Manager Consistently Present On Site When Work was Performed
Contractor's Overall Management Effectiveness:
Additional Comments:
| d. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Submitted Payrolls in a Timely Manner
Completed Payrolls Correctly
Complied with Labor Laws and Regulations with Specific Attention to the Davis-Bacon Act
Additional Comments:
| e. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS |
| B |
| P |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
| N |
Provided Adequate Safety Plan
Properly Implemented Safety Plan
Additional Comments:
| f. OTHER PAST PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS |
| Yes |
| No |
Assessment of Liquidated Damages (Frequency, Circumstances, etc)?
Based on the Contractor's Overall Performance, Would you Re-hire This
Contractor? If not, Explain in "Additional Comments"
Was the Contractor Cooperative in Negotiating Modifications so that
They Would Result in Fair and Reasonable Contract Cost Adjustments?
Did the Contractor Provide all Deliverables in a Timely/Accurate Manner?
Have There Been Any Labor Disputes or Public Law Violations?
Have There Been Any Indicators That the Contractor Has Had Any
Financial Difficulties?
Was the Contractor Ever Issued a Cure or Show Cause Notice Under the Referenced Contract? If yes, Explain in "Additional Comments"
Additional Comments:
SECTION 5: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Do you know any other contracts performed by this Contractor? If yes, please provide the following contract information, if known:
| A. Contract Number | ________________________________ | ||||
| B. Contractor Name | ________________________________ | ||||
| C. Type of Contract | ________________________________ | ||||
| D. Status: | Active _________ | Inactive | ______ | ||
| E. Date of Award | ________________________________ | ||||
| F. Contract Amount | ________________________________ | ||||
| G. Contract Completion Date | __________________________ | ||||
| H. Name/Phone of POC | ________________________________ |
Additional pages may be attached where space provided is insufficient for a complete and accurate response.
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 (WHEN COMPLETED)
SOLICITATION FA8751-13-R-0014
Attachment No. __
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .