Questions for the Line of Sight - Round 2.pdf

PDF 75 KB Posted

Attached to
Chg to proposal delivery address: Amended Sections L and M
Solicitation number
FA8629-12-R-2421
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
L001 INFORMATION TO OFFERORS 29 FEB 12.pdf PDF
M001 M002 and M003 SOURCE SELECTION 29 FEB 12.pdf PDF
Atch 8 to Sect L - System Requirement Document v2.pdf PDF
Drawing Package 9579776K.pdf PDF
Data Schemas for Net-Centric Situational Awareness.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers for Line of Sight.pdf PDF
Drawing Package 9579777A.pdf PDF
DoDI 8500.2 - 20030206.pdf PDF
ppi tool.accdb —
L001 INFORMATION TO OFFERORS 10 FEB 12.pdf PDF
BAO Kit ICD 2 - Power Manager.pdf PDF
Atch 2 to Sect L - Past Performance Info.pdf PDF
Atch 6 to Sect L - Statement of Objectives.pdf PDF
BAO Kit ICD 3 - Software.pdf PDF
Atch 3 to Sect L - Past Performance questionnaire.pdf PDF
Atch 4 to Sect L - PP Quest Transmittal Letter.pdf PDF
M001 M002 and M003 SOURCE SELECTION 10 FEB 12.pdf PDF
BAO Kit ICD 1 - BRITES.pdf PDF
Atch 9 to Sect L Cost_Worksheet.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA8629-12-R-2421 10 Feb 2012.pdf PDF
Atch 8 to Sect L - System Requirement Document.pdf PDF
Atch 1 to Sect L - Cross Reference Matrix.pdf PDF
Atch 7 to Sect L - List of Clauses to be filled in.pdf PDF
Atch 5 to Sect L - PP Client Auth Letter.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Questions for the Line of Sight-Short RFP

Solicitation FA8629-12-R-2421

Round 2

1) In 3.2.11.1 it asks for both eyesafe and non-eyesafe spectrums for range finding. Does the system need both? Is eyesafe range finding preferential? Please clarify?

ANSWER: The system needs both eye safe and non-eye safe spectrums for rangefinding.

Neither spectrum is more important than the other--they are of equal importance.

2) These requirements state “Description: Under this subfactor the Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach to address the LOS-S system performance requirements. This subfactor is met when the offeror’s proposal: (a) Defines to the Government a System Specification which meets minimum threshold requirements which is complete, achievable, and consistent with the

SRD.

Subparagraph (iv) (SRD evaluation items) identifies some requirements as “Mandatory” while others are not marked.

Subparagraph (v) states “If the offer does not meet the stated SRD threshold levels, through assessment of the specification sheet and logical solution under the technical approach, the offer may receive a Red (Unacceptable) rating and may be removed from competition and the offeror debriefed upon request.”

Does the statement in subparagraph (v) only apply to those requirements identified as

“Mandatory” or does it apply to all threshold requirements included in the SRD?

ANSWER: The statement at subparagraph (v) applies to all threshold requirements included in the SRD.

3) Is it intended to have the SUSTAINMENT effort bid in a single CLIN, 0004AA, or by specific option years, CLIN 0004AA, 0004AB, 0004AC, and 0004AD in the same manner as the production CLINs.

ANSWER: SUSTAINMENT is intended to be priced across Option CLINs 0004AA, 0004AB, and 0004AC and not rolled into a single CLIN.

4) Since the proposal due date cannot be extended, can the Offeror provide a Rough Order of

Magnitude (ROM) estimate in lieu of a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP)? The ROM estimate leverages the Offeror’s “similar to” approach based on past programs (existing fielded systems) and on-going development efforts.

ANSWER: The Government desires a Firm Fixed Price proposal for those CLINs identified as such.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .