SCARS_RFP_Attachment_L2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment L-2: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 6

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 6

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD – During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered.

Contractor took timely corrective action.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive customer oversight and involvement was required.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 6

The Contractor: B P G Y R N/A

1. Demonstrated the ability to setup ACA’s/subcontract/teaming arrangements to obtain access to data.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Demonstrated the ability to overcome proprietary data issues on existing systems, through either obtaining the necessary ACA’s with the OEM or identifying another acceptable approach to meet requirements.

5. Met or exceeded small business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

6. Met contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones.

7. Demonstrated the ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution, and response to

Government changes.

8. Security Environments – Demonstrated the ability to operate within the required DoD security environment(s) needed to meet contract requirements.

Please specify the applicable security environment(s) under supporting information below.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 6

The Contractor: B P G Y R N/A

9. Simulators – Demonstrated the ability to effectively manage, maintain, and/or operate simulator systems as required to meet contract requirements.

10. Simulators - Demonstrated the ability to support varying levels of training devices from Part Task Trainer up to a Full Mission Trainer.

11. Cybersecurity – Provided effective and sufficient cybersecurity services needed to meet contract requirements.

12. Cybersecurity – Effectively met ATO requirements and JSIG and/or RMF data submittal schedules.

13. Enterprise IT Management – Demonstrated the ability to effectively provide

IT services to meet contract requirements.

14. Enterprise IT Management – Met availability requirements for the network or

IT services.

15. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 6

The Contractor: B P G Y R N/A

16. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

17. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

NARRATIVE QUESTIONS:

1. Simulators – How many training systems were supported as a part of this effort?

2. Simulators – Please describe the variety and complexity of simulator(s) baseline(s) on this effort (i.e., Desktop trainer, Mission Training Center, etc.).

3. Cybersecurity – Which phases of the JSIG and/or RMF process were executed by the vendor?

4. Cybersecurity – How effectively did the contractor respond to meet urgent cybersecurity threat mitigation needs?

5. Enterprise IT Management – Did the contractor-provided network or IT services serve an external (outside of the contractor’s own network) customer?

6. What were the Contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

7. What were the Contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 6

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

McKenna E. Moore

Contracting Officer mckenna.moore@us.af.mil

937-656-8153